Complication
Conditions
Keywords
rate of positive detection
Brief summary
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to compare the two ways (tras-rectal and trans-perineal) to perform prostate biopsy from the rate of Positive detection, complications, pain level, operation time and costs et al.
Interventions
PROCEDUREtrans-rectal to perform the prostate biopsy
the puncture points are at the rectal
PROCEDUREtrans-perineal to perform the prostate biopsy
the puncture points are at the perineal
Sponsors
Shanghai 10th People's Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
No minimum to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* prostate-specific antigen \> 4ng/ml * Palpation is positive
Exclusion criteria
* older than 80y * prostate-specific antigen \> 100 ng/ml
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| the rate of positive detections | 1year |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| the incidence rate of each complication | 1 year |
Other
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| pain level assessed by visual analogue scale | 1 year |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary Contactguo lehang, phd
Outcome results
None listed