Skip to content

CONSISTENT 1: Metabolic and Safety Outcomes of Hylenex Recombinant (Hyaluronidase Human Injection) Preadministered at CSII Infusion Site in Participants With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM)

CONtinuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion STudy ENrolling Type 1 (CONSISTENT 1): Evaluation of Metabolic Outcomes and Safety of Hylenex Recombinant (Hyaluronidase Human Injection) Used as a Preadministration Infusion Site Treatment in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes (T1DM) Using Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01848990
Enrollment
456
Registered
2013-05-08
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2018-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, Sub Cutaneous Insulin Infusion, Rapid Acting Analog Insulin, Hylenex, Halozyme, Phase 4

Brief summary

The primary objectives of this study are to compare the difference in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to Month 6 using Hylenex recombinant preadministration in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus standard CSII and to evaluate the safety of Hylenex recombinant preadministration, including local tolerability, adverse events, and hypo- and hyperglycemia rates.

Detailed description

This Phase 4 study is designed to demonstrate noninferiority of pretreatment with Hylenex recombinant in the CSII setting to rapid-acting analog insulin alone with respect to glycemic control as assessed by changes in HbA1c in participants with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Total duration of study treatment is 24 months. However, according to the study design, the primary outcome measure is to be assessed at 6 months and an interim analysis is to be completed at 6 months for the secondary outcome measures and adverse events. Therefore, data reported in this clinical trials record is for the 6-month interim analysis.

Interventions

DRUGCommercial Hylenex® recombinant (hyaluronidase human injection)
DRUGPrecommercial Hylenex recombinant (hyaluronidase human injection)
DRUGInsulin lispro
DRUGInsulin aspart
DRUGInsulin glulisine

Sponsors

Halozyme Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female of age 18 years or older with a history of T1DM for at least 12 months 2. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 6.5% to 9.5% (inclusive) based on central laboratory results 3. Fasting C-peptide \<0.6 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) 4. Current use of an insulin pump compatible with available tubing for Hylenex recombinant infusion and use of an infusion set compatible with the tubing available or willingness to switch to an infusion set compatible with tubing available for infusion of Hylenex recombinant 5. Current treatment at the time of screening with insulin \<300 units per day (U/day) 6. Participants who routinely use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) (defined as average CGM use 5 or more days per week over the preceding 3 months) and those who do not routinely used CGM are both eligible for inclusion in the study. Intermittent use of CGM is also acceptable but will not be a criterion use for stratified randomization. 7. Participants should be in good general health based on medical history and physical examination, without medical conditions that might prevent the completion of study drug infusions and assessments required in this protocol.

Exclusion criteria

1. Type 2 diabetes 2. Known or suspected allergy to any component of any of the study drugs in this study 3. Severe proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy, and/or gastroparesis, and/or severe neuropathy, in particular autonomic neuropathy, of such severity as to impede the participant's ability to comply with protocol procedures, as judged by the Investigator 4. History of transmural myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure and uncontrolled hypertension (diastolic blood pressure \[BP\] consistently \>100 millimeters of mercury \[mmHg\]) are exclusionary 5. As judged by the Investigator, clinically significant active disease of the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular (including history of stroke, history of arrhythmia, or conduction delays on electrocardiogram \[ECG\]), hepatic, neurological, renal, genitourinary, pulmonary, or hematological systems of such severity as to impede the participant's ability to comply with protocol procedures 6. History of any illness or disease that in the opinion of the Investigator might confound the results of the study or pose additional risk in administering the study drugs to the participant 7. As judged by the Investigator, clinically significant findings in routine laboratory data at screening 8. Use of drugs that may interfere with the interpretation of study results or are known to cause clinically relevant interference with hyaluronidase action, insulin action, glucose utilization, or recovery from hypoglycemia (including systemic pharmacologic corticosteroid). Use of pramlintide or a glucagon-like peptide \[GLP\]-1 receptor agonist is not exclusionary but participants using these agents will be subjected to stratified randomization. Use of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid \[ASA\]) up to 325 milligrams (mg)/day is not exclusionary but should be noted for analysis. 9. Hypoglycemic unawareness of such severity as to impede the participant's ability to comply with protocol procedures, as judged by the Investigator. 10. Current addiction to alcohol or substance abuse as determined by the Investigator. 11. Pregnancy, breast-feeding, the intention of becoming pregnant, or not using adequate contraceptive measures (adequate contraceptive measures consist of sterilization, intra-uterine device \[IUD\], oral or injectable contraceptives, and/or barrier methods). Abstinence alone is not considered an adequate contraceptive measure for the purposes of this study. 12. Mental incapacity, unwillingness, or language barriers precluding adequate understanding or cooperation in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)Baseline; 6 MonthsChange from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline to 12 Months in HbA1cBaseline; 12 MonthsChange from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rates of HEs to Month 12After Month 1 up to Month 12Overall rates of hypoglycemia (defined as blood glucose ≤70 milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\] and \<56 mg/dL) were based on measurements after 1 month up to 12 months. A severe HE was classified as an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. A nocturnal HE was classified as an event with a blood glucose of ≤70 mg/dL with start time between 2300 and 0600, inclusive. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.
Rates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 6After Month 1 up to Month 6Overall rates of hyperglycemia (defined as blood glucose \>240 mg/dL and \>300 mg/dL) were based on measurements after 1 month up to 6 months. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.
Rates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 12After Month 1 up to Month 12Overall rates of hyperglycemia (defined as blood glucose \>240 mg/dL and \>300 mg/dL) were based on measurements after 1 month up to 12 months. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.
Mean Glucose Excursions at 6 MonthsAfter Month 1 up to Month 6A 4-hour postprandial glucose excursion was measured for 3 meals after 1 month up to 6 months. For each of the 3 meals, the mealtime (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) excursions were calculated as the post-meal glucose value minus the pre-meal (for measurements taken within 15 minutes before a meal). The average of all excursions is presented. Least Squares (LS) means were calculated from ANOVA with treatment (Hylenex, standard rapid-acting insulin CSII) as a fixed effect. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.
Mean Glucose Excursions at 12 MonthsAfter Month 1 up to Month 12A 4-hour postprandial glucose excursion was measured for 3 meals after 1 month up to 12 months. For each of the 3 meals, the mealtime (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) excursions were calculated as the post-meal glucose value minus the pre-meal (for measurements taken within 15 minutes before a meal). The average of all excursions is presented. LS means were calculated from ANOVA with treatment (Hylenex, standard rapid-acting insulin CSII) as a fixed effect. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.
Standard Deviation of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Values at 6 MonthsAfter Month 1 up to Month 6Standard deviation of self-monitoring blood glucose values was calculated based on measurements taken within 15 minutes before a meal, 1 month and up to 6 months after study drug administration. LS means were calculated from ANOVA with treatment (Hylenex, standard rapid-acting insulin CSII) as a fixed effect. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.
Standard Deviation of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Values at 12 MonthsAfter Month 1 up to Month 12Standard deviation of self-monitoring blood glucose values was calculated based on measurements taken within 15 minutes before a meal, 1 month and up to 12 months after study drug administration. LS means were calculated from ANOVA with treatment (Hylenex, standard rapid-acting insulin CSII) as a fixed effect. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.
Number of Participants Achieving HbA1c <7.0% and HbA1c ≤6.5% at Month 12Month 12The number of participants achieving HbA1c goals of \<7% and ≤6.5% was calculated.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Baseline; Week 2; Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to randomization.
Average of Daily Insulin Doses (Bolus, Basal, and Total)from Randomization up to Month 12The daily bolus insulin dose is calculated as the daily prandial (occurring before a meal) insulin dose plus the daily corrective insulin dose. Cumulative basal dosage is to generally be within 40% to 60% of the total daily dose.
Average Carbohydrate Factor (CarbF) ValuesMonth 1 to Month 12CarbF is calculated as 2.6 \* weight (pounds) / total daily dose of insulin (grams per unit).
Time Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLRandomization to Month 12For each participant, the following CGM parameters were calculated using CGM values recorded after Randomization up to Month 12: time per day spent in the pre-defined glucose classes.
Average of Bolus Times Relative to Meal TimesMonth 1 to Month 12The average meal bolus timing relative to meal time is defined as the minutes between the start time of a meal bolus and the start time of a meal.
Average Glucose, Median Glucose, and Average Daily Standard DeviationRandomization to Month 12For each participant, the following continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) parameters were calculated using CGM values recorded after Randomization up to Month 12: average glucose, median glucose, and average daily standard deviation.
Area Per Day <56 mg/dL, ≤70 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLRandomization to Month 12For each participant, the following continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) parameters were calculated using CGM values recorded after Randomization up to Month 12: area per day spent in the pre-defined glucose classes. The area per day for a specific glucose concentration range (e.g., \<56 mg/dL) is the sum of the area under the curve with glucose concentration falling in the specific glucose concentration range (e.g., \<56 mg/dL). For example, if the glucose stays constant at 50 mg/dL for the whole day (1,440 minutes), the area per day for glucose \< 56 mg/dL equals: 50\*1440 = 72,000 mg\*minutes/dL.
Change From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Baseline; Month 12The Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQoL) is a validated, diabetes-specific questionnaire to evaluate the participant's assessment of quality of life (QoL). Participants rated the impact of diabetes on 19 applicable domains on a scale from -3 (maximum negative impact) to +3 (maximum positive impact) and then rated the importance of those domains for their QoL on a scale from 3 (very important) to 0 (not at all important). Impact ratings were multiplied by the corresponding importance ratings to provide a weighted-impact score for each domain from -9 (maximum negative impact) to +9 (maximum positive impact).
Change From Baseline in Average Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Baseline; Month 12The ADDQoL is a validated, diabetes-specific questionnaire to evaluate the participant's assessment of QoL. Participants rated the impact of diabetes on 19 applicable domains on a scale from -3 (maximum negative impact) to +3 (maximum positive impact) and then rated the importance of those domains for their QoL on a scale from 3 (very important) to 0 (not at all important). Impact ratings were multiplied by the corresponding importance ratings to provide a weighted-impact score for each domain from -9 (maximum negative impact) to +9 (maximum positive impact). Weighted impact scores were summed and divided by the number of applicable domains to give an overall Average Weighted Impact (AWI) score (higher values represent more positive impact). If there were less than 13 non-missing weighted-impact values, AWI was not to be calculated. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to randomization.
Change From Baseline in DTSQs and DTSQc at Month 12Baseline; Month 12The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-status version (DTSQs) and DTSQ-change version (DTSQc) are validated tools to assess treatment satisfaction and change in treatment satisfaction after therapy changes have occurred. The scale total was computed by adding the 6 items (1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) to produce the Treatment Satisfaction scale total, which has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 36 on the DTSQs and a minimum of -18 and a maximum of 18 on the DTSQc. Higher scores represent greater satisfaction. If any of the 6 item scores were missing and the numbers of missing scores were less than the number of non-missing scores, the Treatment Satisfaction scale score was to be computed by taking the average of the existing scores and multiplying the average by 6. If there were less than 4 non-missing item scores, the Treatment Satisfaction scale score was not to be calculated. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to randomization.
Mean Time to Change Infusion SiteMonth 12Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program.
Mean Additional Time for Hylenex Pre-administrationMonth 12Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Question Regarding the Difficulty of Infusion Site ChangeMonth 12Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsMonth 12Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program. Question 1: Achieve excellent post meal glucose control; Question 2: Insulin responds quickly when basal rate is changed; Question 3: Insulin responds quickly when correction bolus is given.
Mean Times Per Week Participants Said They Were Eating to Avoid Going Low Due to Late Insulin ActionMonth 12Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program.
Average Correction Factor (CorrF) ValuesMonth 1 to Month 12CorrF is calculated as 1960 / total daily dose of insulin (milligrams/\[deciliter\*unit\]).
Rates of Hypoglycemia Events (HE) to Month 6After Month 1 up to Month 6Overall rates of hypoglycemia (defined as blood glucose ≤70 milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\] and \<56 mg/dL) were based on measurements after 1 month up to 6 months. A severe HE was classified as an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. A nocturnal HE was classified as an event with a blood glucose of ≤70 mg/dL with start time between 2300 and 0600, inclusive. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Commercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 1)
Hylenex Formulation 1: For 12 months, participants received their regular treatment of rapid-acting continuous CSII (for example, insulin lispro, insulin aspart, and insulin glulisine). Additionally, during this 12-month treatment period, the participants received a pretreatment dose of the commercial form of Hylenex recombinant, delivered at 150 U through their insulin infusion cannula each time they changed infusion sets (every 2 to 3 days).
227
Precommercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 2)
Hylenex Formulation 2: For 12 months, participants received their regular treatment of rapid-acting CSII (for example, insulin lispro, insulin aspart, and insulin glulisine). Additionally, during this 12-month treatment period, the participants received a pretreatment dose of the precommercial form of Hylenex recombinant, delivered at 150 U through their insulin infusion cannula each time they changed infusion sets (every 2 to 3 days).
115
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSII
Participants received their regular treatment of rapid-acting CSII (for example, insulin lispro, insulin aspart, and insulin glulisine) for 12 months.
113
Total455

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event620
Overall StudyDeath101
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up622
Overall StudyNon Compliance100
Overall StudyOther142
Overall StudyPhysician Decision110
Overall StudyProtocol Violation110
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject291011

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCommercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 1)Precommercial Hylenex Recombinant (Formulation 2)Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIITotal
Age, Continuous47.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
45.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.14
49.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.73
47.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.47
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants7 Participants5 Participants22 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
217 Participants108 Participants108 Participants433 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 participants0 participants2 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian Indian
0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
8 participants3 participants2 participants13 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
216 participants112 participants107 participants435 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
227 participants115 participants113 participants455 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
122 Participants53 Participants64 Participants239 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
105 Participants62 Participants49 Participants216 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
174 / 22784 / 11576 / 113
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 22710 / 11513 / 113

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to 12 Months in HbA1c

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline; 12 Months

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all randomized participants (par.). Comparisons were made by pooling all rHuPH20 pretreatment par. (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis. Only par. with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline to 12 Months in HbA1c-0.13 percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.59
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline to 12 Months in HbA1c-0.26 percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.718
Comparison: Sample size calculated based on approximately 400 Pt being enrolled. No more than 10% dropout rate at 6 months allowed at least 270 Hylenex and 90 standard CSII Pt to reach primary metabolic endpoint evaluation. Assuming HbA1c standard deviation of 0.7% and population difference of 0% between treatments, Pt reaching primary efficacy endpoint would provide \>90% power to demonstrate HbA1c noninferiority at margin of 0.4% using confidence bound from 2-tailed 95% confidence interval.p-value: 0.071195% CI: [-0.01, 0.28]ANOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline to 6 Months in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline; 6 Months

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of study drug and had evaluable HbA1c data. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline to 6 Months in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)-0.14 percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.521
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline to 6 Months in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)-0.18 percentage of HbA1cStandard Deviation 0.687
Comparison: Sample size calculated based on approximately 400 participants (Pt) being enrolled. No more than 10% dropout rate at 6 months allowed at least 270 Hylenex and 90 standard CSII Pt to reach primary metabolic endpoint evaluation. Assuming HbA1c standard deviation of 0.7% and population difference of 0% between treatments, Pt reaching primary efficacy endpoint would provide \>90% power to demonstrate HbA1c noninferiority at margin of 0.4% using confidence bound from 2-tailed 95% confidence interval.p-value: 0.451695% CI: [-0.08, 0.18]ANOVA
Secondary

Area Per Day <56 mg/dL, ≤70 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dL

For each participant, the following continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) parameters were calculated using CGM values recorded after Randomization up to Month 12: area per day spent in the pre-defined glucose classes. The area per day for a specific glucose concentration range (e.g., \<56 mg/dL) is the sum of the area under the curve with glucose concentration falling in the specific glucose concentration range (e.g., \<56 mg/dL). For example, if the glucose stays constant at 50 mg/dL for the whole day (1,440 minutes), the area per day for glucose \< 56 mg/dL equals: 50\*1440 = 72,000 mg\*minutes/dL.

Time frame: Randomization to Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantArea Per Day <56 mg/dL, ≤70 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLArea per day ≤70 mg/dL687.0 mg*minutes/deciliterStandard Error 77.58
Hylenex RecombinantArea Per Day <56 mg/dL, ≤70 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLArea per day outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL20033.8 mg*minutes/deciliterStandard Error 1232.6
Hylenex RecombinantArea Per Day <56 mg/dL, ≤70 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLArea per day ≥140 mg/dL42660.2 mg*minutes/deciliterStandard Error 1874.62
Hylenex RecombinantArea Per Day <56 mg/dL, ≤70 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLArea per day outside of 71 to 139 mg/dL43347.2 mg*minutes/deciliterStandard Error 1857.54
Hylenex RecombinantArea Per Day <56 mg/dL, ≤70 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLArea per day <56 mg/dL129.7 mg*minutes/deciliterStandard Error 21.71
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIArea Per Day <56 mg/dL, ≤70 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLArea per day outside of 71 to 139 mg/dL43089.0 mg*minutes/deciliterStandard Error 3033.35
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIArea Per Day <56 mg/dL, ≤70 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLArea per day <56 mg/dL163.2 mg*minutes/deciliterStandard Error 35.45
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIArea Per Day <56 mg/dL, ≤70 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLArea per day ≤70 mg/dL771.7 mg*minutes/deciliterStandard Error 126.69
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIArea Per Day <56 mg/dL, ≤70 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLArea per day ≥140 mg/dL42317.2 mg*minutes/deciliterStandard Error 3061.24
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIArea Per Day <56 mg/dL, ≤70 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLArea per day outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL20411.2 mg*minutes/deciliterStandard Error 2012.83
p-value: 0.421695% CI: [-115.9, 48.9]ANOVA
p-value: 0.569795% CI: [-379.2, 209.8]ANOVA
p-value: 0.924195% CI: [-6772.3, 7458.2]ANOVA
p-value: 0.923295% CI: [-54.2, 59.8]ANOVA
p-value: 0.942395% CI: [-6792.2, 7308.7]ANOVA
Secondary

Average Carbohydrate Factor (CarbF) Values

CarbF is calculated as 2.6 \* weight (pounds) / total daily dose of insulin (grams per unit).

Time frame: Month 1 to Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantAverage Carbohydrate Factor (CarbF) Values11.1 grams per unitStandard Error 0.26
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIAverage Carbohydrate Factor (CarbF) Values11.0 grams per unitStandard Error 0.46
p-value: 0.877895% CI: [-1, 1.1]ANOVA
Secondary

Average Correction Factor (CorrF) Values

CorrF is calculated as 1960 / total daily dose of insulin (milligrams/\[deciliter\*unit\]).

Time frame: Month 1 to Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantAverage Correction Factor (CorrF) Values43.2 milligrams/(deciliter*unit)Standard Error 1.06
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIAverage Correction Factor (CorrF) Values45.3 milligrams/(deciliter*unit)Standard Error 1.83
p-value: 0.323395% CI: [-6.3, 2.1]ANOVA
Secondary

Average Glucose, Median Glucose, and Average Daily Standard Deviation

For each participant, the following continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) parameters were calculated using CGM values recorded after Randomization up to Month 12: average glucose, median glucose, and average daily standard deviation.

Time frame: Randomization to Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantAverage Glucose, Median Glucose, and Average Daily Standard DeviationAverage glucose152.9 milliliters per deciliterStandard Error 1.79
Hylenex RecombinantAverage Glucose, Median Glucose, and Average Daily Standard DeviationMedian glucose145.2 milliliters per deciliterStandard Error 1.8
Hylenex RecombinantAverage Glucose, Median Glucose, and Average Daily Standard DeviationAverage daily standard deviation48.9 milliliters per deciliterStandard Error 0.85
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIAverage Glucose, Median Glucose, and Average Daily Standard DeviationAverage glucose151.9 milliliters per deciliterStandard Error 2.93
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIAverage Glucose, Median Glucose, and Average Daily Standard DeviationMedian glucose143.4 milliliters per deciliterStandard Error 2.94
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIAverage Glucose, Median Glucose, and Average Daily Standard DeviationAverage daily standard deviation49.7 milliliters per deciliterStandard Error 1.39
p-value: 0.770895% CI: [-5.8, 7.8]ANOVA
p-value: 0.605895% CI: [-5, 8.6]ANOVA
p-value: 0.657195% CI: [-4, 2.5]ANOVA
Secondary

Average of Bolus Times Relative to Meal Times

The average meal bolus timing relative to meal time is defined as the minutes between the start time of a meal bolus and the start time of a meal.

Time frame: Month 1 to Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantAverage of Bolus Times Relative to Meal TimesBreakfast-2.3 minutesStandard Deviation 8.17
Hylenex RecombinantAverage of Bolus Times Relative to Meal TimesLunch-1.8 minutesStandard Deviation 6.75
Hylenex RecombinantAverage of Bolus Times Relative to Meal TimesDinner-1.7 minutesStandard Deviation 7.48
Hylenex RecombinantAverage of Bolus Times Relative to Meal TimesOverall-1.9 minutesStandard Deviation 6.51
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIAverage of Bolus Times Relative to Meal TimesOverall-2.4 minutesStandard Deviation 7.86
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIAverage of Bolus Times Relative to Meal TimesBreakfast-3.9 minutesStandard Deviation 7.83
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIAverage of Bolus Times Relative to Meal TimesDinner-1.7 minutesStandard Deviation 9.19
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIAverage of Bolus Times Relative to Meal TimesLunch-1.6 minutesStandard Deviation 8.61
Secondary

Average of Daily Insulin Doses (Bolus, Basal, and Total)

The daily bolus insulin dose is calculated as the daily prandial (occurring before a meal) insulin dose plus the daily corrective insulin dose. Cumulative basal dosage is to generally be within 40% to 60% of the total daily dose.

Time frame: from Randomization up to Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantAverage of Daily Insulin Doses (Bolus, Basal, and Total)Daily bolus dose21.9 International unitsStandard Error 0.78
Hylenex RecombinantAverage of Daily Insulin Doses (Bolus, Basal, and Total)Daily basal dose28.0 International unitsStandard Error 0.73
Hylenex RecombinantAverage of Daily Insulin Doses (Bolus, Basal, and Total)Daily total dose49.9 International unitsStandard Error 1.32
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIAverage of Daily Insulin Doses (Bolus, Basal, and Total)Daily bolus dose22.9 International unitsStandard Error 1.33
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIAverage of Daily Insulin Doses (Bolus, Basal, and Total)Daily basal dose25.7 International unitsStandard Error 1.26
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIAverage of Daily Insulin Doses (Bolus, Basal, and Total)Daily total dose48.5 International unitsStandard Error 2.27
p-value: 0.494895% CI: [-4.1, 2]ANOVA
p-value: 0.109995% CI: [-0.5, 5.2]ANOVA
p-value: 0.58395% CI: [-3.7, 6.6]ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Average Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12

The ADDQoL is a validated, diabetes-specific questionnaire to evaluate the participant's assessment of QoL. Participants rated the impact of diabetes on 19 applicable domains on a scale from -3 (maximum negative impact) to +3 (maximum positive impact) and then rated the importance of those domains for their QoL on a scale from 3 (very important) to 0 (not at all important). Impact ratings were multiplied by the corresponding importance ratings to provide a weighted-impact score for each domain from -9 (maximum negative impact) to +9 (maximum positive impact). Weighted impact scores were summed and divided by the number of applicable domains to give an overall Average Weighted Impact (AWI) score (higher values represent more positive impact). If there were less than 13 non-missing weighted-impact values, AWI was not to be calculated. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to randomization.

Time frame: Baseline; Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Average Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 120.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Average Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 120.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
p-value: 0.990195% CI: [-0.3, 0.3]ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12

Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to randomization.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 2; Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Week 2-0.10 kilogramsStandard Deviation 1.272
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Month 1-0.11 kilogramsStandard Deviation 1.583
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Month 2-0.03 kilogramsStandard Deviation 2.002
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Month 30.16 kilogramsStandard Deviation 2.562
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Month 40.04 kilogramsStandard Deviation 2.68
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Month 60.60 kilogramsStandard Deviation 3.035
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Month 90.91 kilogramsStandard Deviation 3.355
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Month 120.61 kilogramsStandard Deviation 3.796
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Month 120.48 kilogramsStandard Deviation 4.078
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Week 20.19 kilogramsStandard Deviation 1.257
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Month 40.37 kilogramsStandard Deviation 2.23
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Month 10.20 kilogramsStandard Deviation 1.696
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Month 90.92 kilogramsStandard Deviation 3.033
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Month 20.48 kilogramsStandard Deviation 1.672
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Month 60.83 kilogramsStandard Deviation 2.287
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Body Weight to Month 12Month 30.37 kilogramsStandard Deviation 1.858
p-value: 0.773595% CI: [-0.76, 1.03]ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in DTSQs and DTSQc at Month 12

The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-status version (DTSQs) and DTSQ-change version (DTSQc) are validated tools to assess treatment satisfaction and change in treatment satisfaction after therapy changes have occurred. The scale total was computed by adding the 6 items (1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) to produce the Treatment Satisfaction scale total, which has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 36 on the DTSQs and a minimum of -18 and a maximum of 18 on the DTSQc. Higher scores represent greater satisfaction. If any of the 6 item scores were missing and the numbers of missing scores were less than the number of non-missing scores, the Treatment Satisfaction scale score was to be computed by taking the average of the existing scores and multiplying the average by 6. If there were less than 4 non-missing item scores, the Treatment Satisfaction scale score was not to be calculated. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to randomization.

Time frame: Baseline; Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in DTSQs and DTSQc at Month 12DTSQs0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in DTSQs and DTSQc at Month 12DTSQc9.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in DTSQs and DTSQc at Month 12DTSQs0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.53
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in DTSQs and DTSQc at Month 12DTSQc9.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.68
p-value: 0.908195% CI: [-1.1, 1.3]ANOVA
p-value: 0.98495% CI: [-1.5, 1.6]ANOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12

The Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality of Life (ADDQoL) is a validated, diabetes-specific questionnaire to evaluate the participant's assessment of quality of life (QoL). Participants rated the impact of diabetes on 19 applicable domains on a scale from -3 (maximum negative impact) to +3 (maximum positive impact) and then rated the importance of those domains for their QoL on a scale from 3 (very important) to 0 (not at all important). Impact ratings were multiplied by the corresponding importance ratings to provide a weighted-impact score for each domain from -9 (maximum negative impact) to +9 (maximum positive impact).

Time frame: Baseline; Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Family life0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Self-confidence0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Vacations0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Motivation0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Friendships and social life0.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12The way people in general react0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Local or long distance travel-0.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Feelings about the future-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Close personal relationship0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Financial situation0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Do physically-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Living situation and conditions0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Sex life0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Depend on others-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Work life-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Freedom to eat0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.15
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Physical appearance0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.11
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Freedom to drink-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Hylenex RecombinantChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Leisure activities-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Freedom to drink-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Leisure activities0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Work life0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Local or long distance travel-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Vacations0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Do physically-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Family life0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Friendships and social life0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Close personal relationship0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.27
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Sex life-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Physical appearance-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.19
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Self-confidence-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Motivation0.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.24
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12The way people in general react-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Feelings about the future0.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Financial situation0.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Living situation and conditions-0.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.22
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Depend on others0.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIChange From Baseline in Weighted Impact ADDQoL Values at Month 12Freedom to eat-0.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.25
p-value: 0.524695% CI: [-0.7, 0.4]ANOVA
p-value: 0.63895% CI: [-0.8, 0.5]ANOVA
p-value: 0.571995% CI: [-0.7, 0.4]ANOVA
p-value: 0.405295% CI: [-0.8, 0.3]ANOVA
p-value: 0.72495% CI: [-0.4, 0.6]ANOVA
p-value: 0.687695% CI: [-0.4, 0.6]ANOVA
p-value: 0.647895% CI: [-0.4, 0.6]ANOVA
p-value: 0.974495% CI: [-0.6, 0.6]ANOVA
p-value: 0.317795% CI: [-0.3, 0.8]ANOVA
p-value: 0.208795% CI: [-0.2, 0.7]ANOVA
p-value: 0.790795% CI: [-0.4, 0.5]ANOVA
p-value: 0.344495% CI: [-0.8, 0.3]ANOVA
p-value: 0.217595% CI: [-0.1, 0.6]ANOVA
p-value: 0.206295% CI: [-1, 0.2]ANOVA
p-value: 0.876295% CI: [-0.5, 0.6]ANOVA
p-value: 0.8995% CI: [-0.5, 0.5]ANOVA
p-value: 0.136795% CI: [-1.1, 0.2]ANOVA
p-value: 0.314495% CI: [-0.3, 0.9]ANOVA
p-value: 0.686995% CI: [-0.4, 0.6]ANOVA
Secondary

Mean Additional Time for Hylenex Pre-administration

Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantMean Additional Time for Hylenex Pre-administration2.9 minutesStandard Deviation 3.96
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIMean Additional Time for Hylenex Pre-administration3.8 minutesStandard Deviation 2.84
Secondary

Mean Glucose Excursions at 12 Months

A 4-hour postprandial glucose excursion was measured for 3 meals after 1 month up to 12 months. For each of the 3 meals, the mealtime (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) excursions were calculated as the post-meal glucose value minus the pre-meal (for measurements taken within 15 minutes before a meal). The average of all excursions is presented. LS means were calculated from ANOVA with treatment (Hylenex, standard rapid-acting insulin CSII) as a fixed effect. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Time frame: After Month 1 up to Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantMean Glucose Excursions at 12 MonthsBreakfast20.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.36
Hylenex RecombinantMean Glucose Excursions at 12 MonthsLunch22.4 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.17
Hylenex RecombinantMean Glucose Excursions at 12 MonthsDinner12.7 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.08
Hylenex RecombinantMean Glucose Excursions at 12 MonthsOverall17.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 1.49
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIMean Glucose Excursions at 12 MonthsOverall19.7 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.65
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIMean Glucose Excursions at 12 MonthsBreakfast24.9 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 4.21
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIMean Glucose Excursions at 12 MonthsDinner13.8 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.69
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIMean Glucose Excursions at 12 MonthsLunch21.0 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 3.89
p-value: 0.323995% CI: [-14.3, 4.7]ANOVA
p-value: 0.75495% CI: [-7.4, 10.2]ANOVA
p-value: 0.790495% CI: [-9.5, 7.2]ANOVA
p-value: 0.401695% CI: [-8.5, 3.4]ANOVA
Secondary

Mean Glucose Excursions at 6 Months

A 4-hour postprandial glucose excursion was measured for 3 meals after 1 month up to 6 months. For each of the 3 meals, the mealtime (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) excursions were calculated as the post-meal glucose value minus the pre-meal (for measurements taken within 15 minutes before a meal). The average of all excursions is presented. Least Squares (LS) means were calculated from ANOVA with treatment (Hylenex, standard rapid-acting insulin CSII) as a fixed effect. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Time frame: After Month 1 up to Month 6

Population: Primary SMBG Analysis Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantMean Glucose Excursions at 6 MonthsBreakfast17.3 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.77
Hylenex RecombinantMean Glucose Excursions at 6 MonthsLunch22.2 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.67
Hylenex RecombinantMean Glucose Excursions at 6 MonthsDinner12.6 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.45
Hylenex RecombinantMean Glucose Excursions at 6 MonthsOverall17.1 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 1.7
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIMean Glucose Excursions at 6 MonthsOverall16.9 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 2.91
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIMean Glucose Excursions at 6 MonthsBreakfast20.7 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 4.76
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIMean Glucose Excursions at 6 MonthsDinner12.5 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 4.18
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIMean Glucose Excursions at 6 MonthsLunch17.9 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)Standard Error 4.58
p-value: 0.539495% CI: [-14.2, 7.5]ANOVA
p-value: 0.415195% CI: [-6.1, 14.8]ANOVA
p-value: 0.99395% CI: [-9.5, 9.6]ANOVA
p-value: 0.94195% CI: [-6.4, 6.9]ANOVA
Secondary

Mean Times Per Week Participants Said They Were Eating to Avoid Going Low Due to Late Insulin Action

Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantMean Times Per Week Participants Said They Were Eating to Avoid Going Low Due to Late Insulin Action2.1 occurrences per weekStandard Deviation 2.19
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIMean Times Per Week Participants Said They Were Eating to Avoid Going Low Due to Late Insulin Action2.5 occurrences per weekStandard Deviation 2.37
Secondary

Mean Time to Change Infusion Site

Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantMean Time to Change Infusion Site5.7 minutesStandard Deviation 4.45
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIMean Time to Change Infusion Site4.7 minutesStandard Deviation 3.68
Secondary

Number of Participants Achieving HbA1c <7.0% and HbA1c ≤6.5% at Month 12

The number of participants achieving HbA1c goals of \<7% and ≤6.5% was calculated.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants Achieving HbA1c <7.0% and HbA1c ≤6.5% at Month 12HbA1c <7.0%61 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants Achieving HbA1c <7.0% and HbA1c ≤6.5% at Month 12HbA1c ≤6.5%18 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants Achieving HbA1c <7.0% and HbA1c ≤6.5% at Month 12HbA1c <7.0%21 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants Achieving HbA1c <7.0% and HbA1c ≤6.5% at Month 12HbA1c ≤6.5%6 Participants
p-value: 0.8955Chi-squared
p-value: 0.8926Chi-squared
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling Questions

Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program. Question 1: Achieve excellent post meal glucose control; Question 2: Insulin responds quickly when basal rate is changed; Question 3: Insulin responds quickly when correction bolus is given.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 1Completely disagree5 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 2Disagree25 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 1Agree110 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 2Completely disagree3 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 2Completely agree31 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 3Completely agree36 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 1Disagree59 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 3Agree165 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 2Agree146 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 3Neither agree or disagree34 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 1Neither agree or disagree97 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 3Disagree38 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 2Neither agree or disagree71 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 3Completely disagree3 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 1Completely agree5 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 3Completely disagree2 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 1Completely agree0 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 1Agree28 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 1Neither agree or disagree44 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 1Disagree22 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 1Completely disagree3 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 2Completely agree8 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 2Agree48 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 2Neither agree or disagree28 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 2Disagree12 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 2Completely disagree1 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 3Completely agree14 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 3Agree39 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 3Neither agree or disagree22 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Device Handling QuestionsQuestion 3Disagree20 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Question Regarding the Difficulty of Infusion Site Change

Participants were asked device handling questions to provide information about the impact of the Hylenex administration procedure on everyday life and to investigate perceptions of the overall efficacy and responsiveness of their insulin program.

Time frame: Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Question Regarding the Difficulty of Infusion Site ChangeVery easy143 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Question Regarding the Difficulty of Infusion Site ChangeEasy130 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Question Regarding the Difficulty of Infusion Site ChangeDifficult3 Participants
Hylenex RecombinantNumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Question Regarding the Difficulty of Infusion Site ChangeVery difficult0 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Question Regarding the Difficulty of Infusion Site ChangeVery difficult1 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Question Regarding the Difficulty of Infusion Site ChangeVery easy49 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Question Regarding the Difficulty of Infusion Site ChangeDifficult1 Participants
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIINumber of Participants With the Indicated Responses to the Question Regarding the Difficulty of Infusion Site ChangeEasy46 Participants
Secondary

Rates of HEs to Month 12

Overall rates of hypoglycemia (defined as blood glucose ≤70 milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\] and \<56 mg/dL) were based on measurements after 1 month up to 12 months. A severe HE was classified as an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. A nocturnal HE was classified as an event with a blood glucose of ≤70 mg/dL with start time between 2300 and 0600, inclusive. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Time frame: After Month 1 up to Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. The Number Analyzed reflects the number of participants with at least one event.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hylenex RecombinantRates of HEs to Month 12<56 mg/dL2.6792 events per participant per month
Hylenex RecombinantRates of HEs to Month 12≤70 mg/dL11.3803 events per participant per month
Hylenex RecombinantRates of HEs to Month 12Nocturnal HEs1.6754 events per participant per month
Hylenex RecombinantRates of HEs to Month 12Severe HEs0.0091 events per participant per month
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIRates of HEs to Month 12Severe HEs0.0085 events per participant per month
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIRates of HEs to Month 12<56 mg/dL3.3022 events per participant per month
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIRates of HEs to Month 12Nocturnal HEs1.9203 events per participant per month
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIRates of HEs to Month 12≤70 mg/dL12.3591 events per participant per month
p-value: 0.0456negative binomial model
p-value: 0.2322negative binomial model
p-value: 0.1365negative binomial model
p-value: 0.8909negative binomial model
Secondary

Rates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 12

Overall rates of hyperglycemia (defined as blood glucose \>240 mg/dL and \>300 mg/dL) were based on measurements after 1 month up to 12 months. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Time frame: After Month 1 up to Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. The Number Analyzed reflects the number of participants with at least one event.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hylenex RecombinantRates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 12>240 mg/dL18.9784 events per participant per month
Hylenex RecombinantRates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 12>300 mg/dL7.1138 events per participant per month
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIRates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 12>240 mg/dL18.2785 events per participant per month
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIRates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 12>300 mg/dL6.8900 events per participant per month
p-value: 0.5414negative binomial model
p-value: 0.711negative binomial model
Secondary

Rates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 6

Overall rates of hyperglycemia (defined as blood glucose \>240 mg/dL and \>300 mg/dL) were based on measurements after 1 month up to 6 months. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Time frame: After Month 1 up to Month 6

Population: Primary SMBG Analysis Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. The Number Analyzed reflects the number of participants with at least one event.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hylenex RecombinantRates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 6>240 mg/dL18.0422 events per participant per month
Hylenex RecombinantRates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 6>300 mg/dL6.4768 events per participant per month
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIRates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 6>240 mg/dL18.4696 events per participant per month
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIRates of Hyperglycemia Events to Month 6>300 mg/dL6.8155 events per participant per month
p-value: 0.7292negative binomial model
p-value: 0.5895negative binomial model
Secondary

Rates of Hypoglycemia Events (HE) to Month 6

Overall rates of hypoglycemia (defined as blood glucose ≤70 milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\] and \<56 mg/dL) were based on measurements after 1 month up to 6 months. A severe HE was classified as an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. A nocturnal HE was classified as an event with a blood glucose of ≤70 mg/dL with start time between 2300 and 0600, inclusive. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Time frame: After Month 1 up to Month 6

Population: Primary Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Analysis Population: all randomized participants who received study treatment and had SMBG data up to Month 6. Only participants with available data were analyzed. The Number Analyzed reflects the number of participants with at least one event.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Hylenex RecombinantRates of Hypoglycemia Events (HE) to Month 6<56 mg/dL2.9103 events per participant per month
Hylenex RecombinantRates of Hypoglycemia Events (HE) to Month 6≤70 mg/dL11.6219 events per participant per month
Hylenex RecombinantRates of Hypoglycemia Events (HE) to Month 6Nocturnal HEs1.6224 events per participant per month
Hylenex RecombinantRates of Hypoglycemia Events (HE) to Month 6Severe HEs0.0055 events per participant per month
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIRates of Hypoglycemia Events (HE) to Month 6Severe HEs0.0160 events per participant per month
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIRates of Hypoglycemia Events (HE) to Month 6<56 mg/dL4.1970 events per participant per month
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIRates of Hypoglycemia Events (HE) to Month 6Nocturnal HEs2.0727 events per participant per month
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIRates of Hypoglycemia Events (HE) to Month 6≤70 mg/dL14.7112 events per participant per month
p-value: 0.0105negative binomial model
p-value: 0.013negative binomial model
p-value: 0.0511negative binomial model
p-value: 0.1176negative binomial model
Secondary

Standard Deviation of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Values at 12 Months

Standard deviation of self-monitoring blood glucose values was calculated based on measurements taken within 15 minutes before a meal, 1 month and up to 12 months after study drug administration. LS means were calculated from ANOVA with treatment (Hylenex, standard rapid-acting insulin CSII) as a fixed effect. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Time frame: After Month 1 up to Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantStandard Deviation of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Values at 12 Months72.9 mg/dLStandard Error 1.04
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIStandard Deviation of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Values at 12 Months72.4 mg/dLStandard Error 1.85
p-value: 0.804995% CI: [-3.7, 4.7]ANOVA
Secondary

Standard Deviation of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Values at 6 Months

Standard deviation of self-monitoring blood glucose values was calculated based on measurements taken within 15 minutes before a meal, 1 month and up to 6 months after study drug administration. LS means were calculated from ANOVA with treatment (Hylenex, standard rapid-acting insulin CSII) as a fixed effect. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

Time frame: After Month 1 up to Month 6

Population: Primary SMBG Analysis Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantStandard Deviation of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Values at 6 Months70.9 mg/dLStandard Error 1.09
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIIStandard Deviation of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose Values at 6 Months72.2 mg/dLStandard Error 1.86
p-value: 0.52695% CI: [-5.6, 2.9]ANOVA
Secondary

Time Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dL

For each participant, the following CGM parameters were calculated using CGM values recorded after Randomization up to Month 12: time per day spent in the pre-defined glucose classes.

Time frame: Randomization to Month 12

Population: ITT Population. Only participants with available data were analyzed. Comparisons were made by pooling all of the rHuPH20 pretreatment participants (including both Formulations 1 and 2) and comparing against the standard CSII treatment arm. Formulation 1 versus Formulation 2 was compared as a supportive analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Hylenex RecombinantTime Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLTime per day >70 mg/dL1358.8 minutesStandard Error 5.62
Hylenex RecombinantTime Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLTime per day ≥140 mg/dL756.4 minutesStandard Error 17.02
Hylenex RecombinantTime Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLTime per day ≤70 mg/dL63.0 minutesStandard Error 5.37
Hylenex RecombinantTime Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLTime per day outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL464.4 minutesStandard Error 15.02
Hylenex RecombinantTime Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLTime per day <140 mg/dL660.3 minutesStandard Error 16.99
Hylenex RecombinantTime Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLTime per day outside of 71 to139 mg/dL819.4 minutesStandard Error 14.74
Hylenex RecombinantTime Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLTime per day <56 mg/dL18.1 minutesStandard Error 2.4
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIITime Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLTime per day outside of 71 to139 mg/dL801.0 minutesStandard Error 24.07
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIITime Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLTime per day <56 mg/dL20.3 minutesStandard Error 3.91
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIITime Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLTime per day ≤70 mg/dL68.5 minutesStandard Error 8.77
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIITime Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLTime per day >70 mg/dL1351.9 minutesStandard Error 9.18
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIITime Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLTime per day <140 mg/dL683.7 minutesStandard Error 27.74
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIITime Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLTime per day ≥140 mg/dL732.5 minutesStandard Error 27.8
Standard Rapid-Acting Insulin CSIITime Per Day <56 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL), ≤70 mg/dL, >70 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, ≥140 mg/dL, Outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL, and Outside of 71 to 139 mg/dLTime per day outside of 71 to 180 mg/dL461.7 minutesStandard Error 24.54
p-value: 0.625295% CI: [-11.3, 6.9]ANOVA
p-value: 0.592995% CI: [-25.9, 14.9]ANOVA
p-value: 0.520795% CI: [-14.4, 28.3]ANOVA
p-value: 0.475495% CI: [-87.8, 41.2]ANOVA
p-value: 0.464495% CI: [-40.7, 88.6]ANOVA
p-value: 0.923295% CI: [-54.2, 59.8]ANOVA
p-value: 0.515195% CI: [-37.5, 74.4]ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026