Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury)
Conditions
Keywords
amputation, prosthesis, stump, socket, pressure, gait, posture
Brief summary
This study aims at evaluating the relation between quality of the interface between the stump and the prosthesis, and the quality of gait in above-knee amputees. The hypothesis is that an adapted prosthesis allowing an efficient gait in above-knee amputees corresponds to an homogeneous pressure distribution pattern onto the stump.
Detailed description
Forty amputee patients will be evaluated for satisfaction with the prosthesis, pressure repartition pattern and functional capabilities. Pressure at the stump-socket interface will be recorded using a set of 14 single cells sensors placed in predefined positions onto the stump. Pattern of pressure will be measured in four tasks: sitting posture, standing posture, gait initiation, and gait at preferred velocity. Reproducibility of the pressure repartition pattern will be analyzed by repeating gait and standing posture task in the first 15 patients included. In patients whom prosthesis has been modified on the basis on the first pressure measurement (pressure peak and bad functional capacities), a new pressure measurement will be repeated 2-8 weeks apart. Postural and gait abilities will be also assessed in 40 age/gender matched non-amputated subjects to serve as control data.
Interventions
DEVICEClinical and instrumented measurements
Clinical examination will include stump pain, wound, scar and unusual shape. Questionnaire will include satisfaction scale (SatPro), comfort scale (SCE), and functional scale (PPA-LCI) After installing the sensors on the stump, the patient will put his prosthesis on and will perform the following tasks: gait, sitting and standing posture and gait initiation. Pressure repartition at the stump-socket interface will be assessed with the 14 flat sensors. Gait parameters will be assessed with the OptoGait device. Standing posture and gait initiation parameters will be assessed with a force-plate.
Sponsors
TIMC-IMAG
University Hospital, Grenoble
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Amputee patients: Inclusion Criteria: * unilateral transfemoral amputation * use of a prosthesis with a contact socket
Exclusion criteria
* neurological or muscular disorder likely to impair walking capabilities * Mini Mental State Examination below 24/30 2. Healthy subjects :
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Two minute Walking Test | At inclusion (baseline) for all patients | Maximal distance(m)walked during 2 minutes (one trial) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Variation coefficient of maximal pressures during gait | At inclusion (Baseline) for all patients | Calculated on the basis of 10 walking trials of 10 meters. The maximal pressure will be measured at each step for each sensor. The mean maximal pressure is calculated for each of the 14 sensors. The variation coefficient is calculated between these 14 values (variation coefficient = standard deviation/mean) A low variation coefficient of pressure is supposed to represent an homogeneous repartition of the pressure in the prosthesis. |
| Change in two minutes walk tests between Baseline and 5 Weeks | Five weeks (W5) in average after inclusion in patients in whom the prosthesis will be modified | If a modification of the prosthesis is required and performed on the basis of the first assessment (at inclusion), a new assessment with the modified prosthesis is performed 5 weeks later (from 2 to 8 weeks). Change in walking capabilities is assessed by calculating the difference between results of the two minute walk test at inclusion and at 5 weeks. |
| Change in the variation coefficients of maximal pressures between Baseline and 5 Weeks | 5 Weeks in average (2 and 8 weeks) after the inclusion in patients in whom the prosthesis will be modified | If a modification of the prosthesis is required and performed on the basis of the first assessment (at inclusion), a new assessment with the modified prosthesis is performed 5 weeks later (from 2 to 8 weeks). Change of repartition pattern will be assessed by calculating the difference between the variation coefficient before and after the prosthesis modification. |
| Variation coefficient of maximal pressure during standing posture | At inclusion for all patients | Calculated based on 4 standing trial of 30 seconds. The calculation is the same as for gait, but the mean pressure during the postural trial will be used instead of the maximal pressure during the step. |
| Reproducibility of the Variation Coefficients of maximal pressures | At baseline | At inclusion (baseline), the measurements of pressure repartition pattern in gait and standing posture tasks will be repeated twice, in order to test inter- and intra-evaluator reproducibility. |
| Gait spatial and temporal parameters | At inclusion for all patients | Calculated based on 10 walking trial of 10 meters. Speed, step length of the prosthetic and non-amputated leg and standing time on the prosthetic and non-amputated leg |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Occurrence of pain, dyscomfort, or skin wound due to the measurement system | at baseline | By structured interview, visual analogic pain scale, and clinical examination at the end of the baseline assessment. |
Countries
France
Outcome results
None listed