Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of RVL-1201 in Acquired Blepharoptosis

A Randomized, Double-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1/2a Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Dosing Regimens of RVL-1201 in the Treatment of Acquired Blepharoptosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01848041
Enrollment
46
Registered
2013-05-07
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2021-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Blepharoptosis

Keywords

Blepharoptosis, Ptosis

Brief summary

This is an exploratory, proof of concept study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RVL-1201 dosed once or twice daily for 14 days compared to a placebo (vehicle) control in patients with ptosis.

Detailed description

This is an exploratory, proof-of-concept study. The objectives include establishing the efficacy and duration of effect of once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) administration of RVL-1201 and the safety profile following 14 days of treatment in 72 subjects (24 per arm) with acquired blepharoptosis. Efficacy will be assessed at each treatment visit by the Humphrey Visual Field 36-point ptosis protocol test, photographic measurement of marginal reflex distance, palpebral fissure distance and contrast sensitivity in the study eye only and Visual Acuity assessment in both eyes. Safety assessments will include slit lamp examination/corneal fluorescein staining, pupil size measurement, ophthalmoscopy/ fundus examination, tonometry, visual acuity; urine pregnancy test (for women of childbearing potential only), vital signs (Heart Rate/Blood Pressure); and collection of adverse events. Subject rating of study medication comfort and assessment of ongoing tolerability will also be obtained. Primary efficacy endpoint is the mean increase from baseline in points seen on the HVF 36-point ptosis protocol test at various timepoints according to a hierarchical analysis. Analysis of exploratory endpoints will provide characterization of the efficacy and duration of effect of RVL-1201 with a variety of efficacy measures, as well as the potential additional effect of BID over QD dosing and safety profile of BID administration of RVL-1201. Exploratory endpoints will be analyzed by each regimen against placebo and between regimens and will include: * The change from baseline in HVF, MRD, PFD, VA, and CS. * The change from baseline in BP/HR

Interventions

RVL-1201 0.1% Ophthalmic Solution

RVL-1201 Vehicle Placebo

Sponsors

RVL Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adult male or female subjects 18 years of age and older. 2. Presence of all of the following at Screening: 1. Loss on HVF 36-point ptosis protocol test of ≥ 8 points in points not seen at or above 10° from fixation in the superior visual field; AND 2. Marginal reflex distance (MRD), the distance from the central pupillary light reflex to the upper lid margin, of ≤ 2.5 mm in the same eye as Inclusion Criterion #2a; AND 3. Corrected Snellen visual acuity (VA) of 20/40 or better (refraction must be within 6 months of Visit 1) in the same eye as Inclusion Criteria #2a and #2b. 3. No contraindications for treatment of both eyes as specified in

Exclusion criteria

#1-14. 4. Female subjects must be 1-year postmenopausal, surgically sterilized, or women of childbearing potential with a negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1. Women of childbearing potential must use an acceptable form of contraception throughout the study. 5. Provide informed consent prior to undergoing any study-related procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Humphrey Visual FieldBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0), Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2) and Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)The mean change from baseline (Day 0, Hour 0) in number of points seen on the HVF 36-point ptosis protocol test according to a pre-planned hierarchical analysis as follows: 1. Hour 6 on Visit 4 (Day 13) for the BID regimen versus vehicle 2. Hour 6 on Visit 4 (Day 13) for the QD regimen versus vehicle 3. Hour 2 on Visit 4 (Day 13) for the BID regimen versus vehicle 4. Hour 2 on Visit 4 (Day 13) for the QD regimen versus vehicle Testing was performed using a Humphrey perimeter at a grid of 36 points confined to the superior hemifield extending 55° to either side of fixation and 45° superior to fixation. Testing was accomplished in the standard fashion using a varying 4-mm2 or 5-mm2 stimulus to determine the visual sensitivity for each grid point in the field (Riemann et al, 2000). A 4-mm2 stimulus was acceptable, but a 5-mm2 stimulus was preferred, if available.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Marginal Reflex DistanceBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0), Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2) and Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)Change from baseline in MRD by regimen against placebo and between regimen. The distance from the pupillary light reflex to the central margin of the upper eyelid is the MRD. The MRD will be measured from the external photograph using calipers and the millimeter ruler as the legend.
Palpebral Fissure Distance MeasurementBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0), Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2) and Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)Change from baseline in PFD by regimen against placebo and between regimen. The PFD is the distance from the upper lid margin to the lower lid margin measured through the central visual axis. It will be measured from the external photograph using handheld calipers and the millimeter ruler as the legend.
Contrast SensitivityBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0), Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2) and Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)Change from baseline in CS by regimen against placebo and between regimen. The Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart will be used at a distance of 1 meter. The subject was instructed to begin reading the letters at the top of the chart and to continue reading across and down the chart. Testing was discontinued when 2 of 3 letters were named incorrectly. The test was scored using the letter-by-letter method where a value of 0.05 log CS is given per correct letter (Haymes et al, 2006).
Corrected Snellen Visual AcuityBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0), Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2) and Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)Change from baseline in VA by regimen against placebo and between regimen. Corrected Snellen VA measurement was performed with the Snellen eye chart using subjects current corrective lens prescription at a distance equivalent to 20 feet (6 meters).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RVL-1201 QD
RVL-1201 0.1% ophthalmic solution dosed one full drop per eye in the morning; one full drop of vehicle (placebo) per eye approximately 8 hours after the morning dose RVL-1201: RVL-1201 0.1% Ophthalmic Solution
15
RVL-1201 BID
RVL-1201 0.1% ophthalmic solution dosed one full drop per eye BID; approximately 8 hours between the morning dose and the afternoon dose RVL-1201: RVL-1201 0.1% Ophthalmic Solution
16
RVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo) BID
RVL 1201 ophthalmic solution vehicle (placebo) dosed one full drop per eye BID; approximately 8 hours between the morning dose and the afternoon dose RVL-1201 Vehicle Placebo: RVL-1201 Vehicle Placebo
15
Total46

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRVL-1201 QDRVL-1201 BIDRVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo) BIDTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants3 Participants5 Participants15 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants13 Participants10 Participants31 Participants
Age, Continuous64.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.33
58.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.47
58.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.23
60.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Age, Customized63 years60 years60 years61.5 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants9 Participants9 Participants29 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants7 Participants6 Participants17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Iris Color OD/OS
Iris Color OD
Blue
4 Participants4 Participants1 Participants9 Participants
Iris Color OD/OS
Iris Color OD
Brown
10 Participants11 Participants13 Participants34 Participants
Iris Color OD/OS
Iris Color OD
Green
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Iris Color OD/OS
Iris Color OD
Grey
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Iris Color OD/OS
Iris Color OD
Hazel
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Iris Color OD/OS
Iris Color OD
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Iris Color OD/OS
Iris Color OS
Blue
4 Participants4 Participants1 Participants9 Participants
Iris Color OD/OS
Iris Color OS
Brown
10 Participants11 Participants13 Participants34 Participants
Iris Color OD/OS
Iris Color OS
Green
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Iris Color OD/OS
Iris Color OS
Grey
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Iris Color OD/OS
Iris Color OS
Hazel
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Iris Color OD/OS
Iris Color OS
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Lens Status OD/OS
Lens Status OD
Aphakic, a person with a natural lens was extracted and no intraocular lens was implanted.
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Lens Status OD/OS
Lens Status OD
Phakic, a person with an intact natural lens
9 Participants11 Participants11 Participants31 Participants
Lens Status OD/OS
Lens Status OD
Pseudophakic, a person who has had a lens extracted and an intraocular lens placed
6 Participants5 Participants4 Participants15 Participants
Lens Status OD/OS
Lens Status OS
Aphakic, a person with a natural lens was extracted and no intraocular lens was implanted.
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Lens Status OD/OS
Lens Status OS
Phakic, a person with an intact natural lens
9 Participants12 Participants11 Participants32 Participants
Lens Status OD/OS
Lens Status OS
Pseudophakic, a person who has had a lens extracted and an intraocular lens placed
6 Participants4 Participants4 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants14 Participants12 Participants41 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 Participants16 Participants15 Participants46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants10 Participants11 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 160 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 155 / 161 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 160 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Humphrey Visual Field

The mean change from baseline (Day 0, Hour 0) in number of points seen on the HVF 36-point ptosis protocol test according to a pre-planned hierarchical analysis as follows: 1. Hour 6 on Visit 4 (Day 13) for the BID regimen versus vehicle 2. Hour 6 on Visit 4 (Day 13) for the QD regimen versus vehicle 3. Hour 2 on Visit 4 (Day 13) for the BID regimen versus vehicle 4. Hour 2 on Visit 4 (Day 13) for the QD regimen versus vehicle Testing was performed using a Humphrey perimeter at a grid of 36 points confined to the superior hemifield extending 55° to either side of fixation and 45° superior to fixation. Testing was accomplished in the standard fashion using a varying 4-mm2 or 5-mm2 stimulus to determine the visual sensitivity for each grid point in the field (Riemann et al, 2000). A 4-mm2 stimulus was acceptable, but a 5-mm2 stimulus was preferred, if available.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0, Hour 0), Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2) and Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RVL-1201 Once DailyHumphrey Visual FieldVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2)16.1 Points seenStandard Deviation 5.35
RVL-1201 Once DailyHumphrey Visual FieldBase Line (Day 0, Hour 0)9.8 Points seenStandard Deviation 5.07
RVL-1201 Once DailyHumphrey Visual FieldVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)15.9 Points seenStandard Deviation 5.29
RVL-1201 Twice DailyHumphrey Visual FieldVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2)15.7 Points seenStandard Deviation 4.63
RVL-1201 Twice DailyHumphrey Visual FieldBase Line (Day 0, Hour 0)12.1 Points seenStandard Deviation 4.64
RVL-1201 Twice DailyHumphrey Visual FieldVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)17.0 Points seenStandard Deviation 4.51
RVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo)Humphrey Visual FieldBase Line (Day 0, Hour 0)11.1 Points seenStandard Deviation 4.74
RVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo)Humphrey Visual FieldVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)17.1 Points seenStandard Deviation 5.02
RVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo)Humphrey Visual FieldVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2)15.7 Points seenStandard Deviation 5.64
Secondary

Contrast Sensitivity

Change from baseline in CS by regimen against placebo and between regimen. The Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart will be used at a distance of 1 meter. The subject was instructed to begin reading the letters at the top of the chart and to continue reading across and down the chart. Testing was discontinued when 2 of 3 letters were named incorrectly. The test was scored using the letter-by-letter method where a value of 0.05 log CS is given per correct letter (Haymes et al, 2006).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0, Hour 0), Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2) and Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RVL-1201 Once DailyContrast SensitivityVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2)34.7 Letters ReadStandard Deviation 4.45
RVL-1201 Once DailyContrast SensitivityBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0)33.1 Letters ReadStandard Deviation 4.05
RVL-1201 Once DailyContrast SensitivityVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)35.5 Letters ReadStandard Deviation 3.81
RVL-1201 Twice DailyContrast SensitivityVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2)35.8 Letters ReadStandard Deviation 4.28
RVL-1201 Twice DailyContrast SensitivityBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0)34.7 Letters ReadStandard Deviation 6.14
RVL-1201 Twice DailyContrast SensitivityVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)36.8 Letters ReadStandard Deviation 3.29
RVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo)Contrast SensitivityBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0)33.3 Letters ReadStandard Deviation 5.81
RVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo)Contrast SensitivityVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)35.1 Letters ReadStandard Deviation 4.18
RVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo)Contrast SensitivityVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2)35.3 Letters ReadStandard Deviation 4.79
Secondary

Corrected Snellen Visual Acuity

Change from baseline in VA by regimen against placebo and between regimen. Corrected Snellen VA measurement was performed with the Snellen eye chart using subjects current corrective lens prescription at a distance equivalent to 20 feet (6 meters).

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0, Hour 0), Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2) and Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RVL-1201 Once DailyCorrected Snellen Visual AcuityVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)0.026 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.0891
RVL-1201 Once DailyCorrected Snellen Visual AcuityVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2)0.055 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.0739
RVL-1201 Once DailyCorrected Snellen Visual AcuityBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0)0.071 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.0859
RVL-1201 Twice DailyCorrected Snellen Visual AcuityVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2)0.024 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.1043
RVL-1201 Twice DailyCorrected Snellen Visual AcuityBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0)0.086 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.0988
RVL-1201 Twice DailyCorrected Snellen Visual AcuityVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)0.023 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.0949
RVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo)Corrected Snellen Visual AcuityBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0)0.081 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.077
RVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo)Corrected Snellen Visual AcuityVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)0.053 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.1018
RVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo)Corrected Snellen Visual AcuityVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2)0.059 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.119
Secondary

Marginal Reflex Distance

Change from baseline in MRD by regimen against placebo and between regimen. The distance from the pupillary light reflex to the central margin of the upper eyelid is the MRD. The MRD will be measured from the external photograph using calipers and the millimeter ruler as the legend.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0, Hour 0), Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2) and Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RVL-1201 Once DailyMarginal Reflex DistanceVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2)2.4 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 0.99
RVL-1201 Once DailyMarginal Reflex DistanceBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0)1.6 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 0.77
RVL-1201 Once DailyMarginal Reflex DistanceVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)2.4 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 1
RVL-1201 Twice DailyMarginal Reflex DistanceVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2)2.3 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 1.19
RVL-1201 Twice DailyMarginal Reflex DistanceBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0)1.6 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 0.84
RVL-1201 Twice DailyMarginal Reflex DistanceVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)2.5 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 1.13
RVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo)Marginal Reflex DistanceBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0)1.6 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 0.63
RVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo)Marginal Reflex DistanceVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)2.2 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 1.07
RVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo)Marginal Reflex DistanceVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2)2.0 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 0.95
Secondary

Palpebral Fissure Distance Measurement

Change from baseline in PFD by regimen against placebo and between regimen. The PFD is the distance from the upper lid margin to the lower lid margin measured through the central visual axis. It will be measured from the external photograph using handheld calipers and the millimeter ruler as the legend.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0, Hour 0), Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2) and Visit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)

Population: Intent to Treat Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RVL-1201 Once DailyPalpebral Fissure Distance MeasurementVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2)6.9 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 1.35
RVL-1201 Once DailyPalpebral Fissure Distance MeasurementBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0)6.2 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 1.16
RVL-1201 Once DailyPalpebral Fissure Distance MeasurementVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)7.0 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 1.51
RVL-1201 Twice DailyPalpebral Fissure Distance MeasurementVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2)7.1 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 1.72
RVL-1201 Twice DailyPalpebral Fissure Distance MeasurementBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0)6.5 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 1.1
RVL-1201 Twice DailyPalpebral Fissure Distance MeasurementVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)7.5 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 1.45
RVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo)Palpebral Fissure Distance MeasurementBaseline (Day 0, Hour 0)6.5 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 1.55
RVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo)Palpebral Fissure Distance MeasurementVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 6)6.8 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 1.35
RVL-1201 Vehicle (Placebo)Palpebral Fissure Distance MeasurementVisit 4 (Day 13, Hour 2)6.6 Millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 1.67

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026