Skip to content

Analysis of a New Mask for Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) Device Users

Analysis of a New CPAP Mask for Patients With Sleep-disordered Breathing and Treated With Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) Thearapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01847846
Enrollment
23
Registered
2013-05-07
Start date
2014-07-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2021-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Keywords

CPAP, mask, microorganisms

Brief summary

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is an effective therapy to treat sleep apnea. Sleep apnea is a condition where the airways collapse when the patient is asleep. CPAP treats sleep apnea by delivering an air pressure to the airways, splinting the airways open. CPAP is a device that sits besides the bed and is applied to the patient using a face mask. The development of new CPAP masks is an on-going focus at ResMed Ltd in a bid to improve comfort and user compliance. ResMed are developing a new mask and investigations are required to evaluate mask performance over time. ResMed Ltd design and manufacturer CPAP masks. The revision and development of masks is an on-going focus of the company in a bid to improve usability and patient compliance while maintaining optimum treatment. ResMed is developing a new mask. Investigations are therefore required to determine how much matter is built-up on the mask over time and to evaluate mask performance (including comfort and seal) and efficacy. AIMS The aims of the study are: 1. To measure and compare the change in the abundance of microbes on the new mask over a period of 8 weeks 2. To measure and compare the change in comfort, seal, stability, efficacy, leak and user compliance of this new mask over a period of 8 weeks 3. To measure and compare the change in comfort, seal, stability, efficacy, leak and user compliance of this new mask versus an available mask It is hypothesised that: 1. The new mask acquires microbes from the user but there is no difference in the abundance of microorganisms between 2 and 8 weeks. 2. The new mask maintains the same degree of comfort, seal, stability, efficacy, leak and compliance between 2 and 8 weeks. 3. Compared to the existing mask, the new mask provides a higher degree of comfort, seal and stability and improves user compliance. The new mask also maintains efficacy, and maintains or reduces leak compared to the current masks.

Interventions

DEVICECPAP mask - prototype

prototype mask, wore for all sleeps for 4 and 8 weeks (as randomly selected). Mask to be used in conjunction with participant's usual prescribed CPAP settings.

Sponsors

ResMed
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* At least 18 yrs old * Diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnoea * Been using CPAP therapy for at least 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* Has a lung disease/condition * Using bilevel therapy * Is unable to participate for the duration of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To measure and compare the prevalence of microorganisms within the new mask over a period of 8 weeksup to 8 weeks of useThe mask is for single user use only. The participants will be instructed not to wash or clean the material for the duration of the study. The mask will be returned in a sealed bag and sent off for testing within 24 hrs after the trial.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measure and compare mask efficacy over a period of 8 weeksAfter 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks of useThe efficacy variables that will be measured and compared at each time point are: Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI; the number of apneas and hypopneas per hour), mask leak, number of hours of use per night, and user compliance will be measured

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measure and compare mask performance over a period of 8 weeksafter 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks of useMask performance will be subjectively assessed by the user over a period of 8 weeks. Varibles which will be measured are: 1. Comfort 2. Mask seal 3. Mask stability 4. The occurence of red marks

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026