Skip to content

Robotic Versus Abdominal Surgery for Endometrial Cancer

Randomized Trial Comparing Robotic and Abdominal Surgery for High Risk Endometrial Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01847703
Acronym
RASHEC
Enrollment
120
Registered
2013-05-07
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2017-07-31
Last updated
2018-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometrial Neoplasms

Brief summary

This study is intended to explore differences in oncologic and surgical safety between robotic assisted laparoscopy and conventional abdominal surgery for high risk endometrial cancer.

Detailed description

Hypothesis: Robotic assisted laparoscopy (RAL)is equal in terms of oncologic and surgical safety as conventional abdominal surgery (AS) for high risk endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: Women with high risk EC (defined as high grade endometrial, clear cell or serous) are randomized to either RAL or AS. Both groups will undergo complete surgical staging (hysterectomy, bilateral salpingoophorectomy, pelvic and paraaortal lymphadenectomy) Primary endpoint: Number of harvested lymph nodes per station Secondary endpoints: Recurrences up to 3 year after surgery. Lymphatic side-effects, quality of life, cost, surgical morbidity.

Interventions

PROCEDURERobotic surgery

Minimal invasive surgery performed with daVinci robotic system

PROCEDUREAbdominal surgery

Current gold standard

Sponsors

Karolinska Institutet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18-75 years of age * High risk endometrial cancer

Exclusion criteria

* WHO performance\>1 * Severe comorbidity, ASA\>3 * Unable to understand information

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of harvested lymph nodes2 yearsExtracted lymphatic tissue from 3 stations (above inferior mesenteric artery, below inferior mesenteric artery, pelvic) is analysed by a pathologist and the number of nodes for each station recorded and compared between the two groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence of cancer3 yearsCancer recurrences will be recorded up to 3 years after surgery and categorized according to anatomical site
Lymphatic side-effects2 yearsLymphatic side-effects will be monitored by repeated computed tomography (CT) 3 months and 12 months after surgery. Enrolled women will be asked specific, validated questions at follow-up
Quality of life2 yearsAll included participants will be asked to fill out a questionnaire (EORTC) to assess quality of life before and 1 year after surgery
Healthcare cost2 yearsAll costs related to each procedure including complications, re-admissions, rehabilitation, medication, radiology will be compared after 1 year.

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026