Skip to content

Anticoagulant Utilization Pattern

A Description of Warfarin and NOAC Utilization Patterns Including Initiation, Switching, and Discontinuation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01847560
Enrollment
333664
Registered
2013-05-07
Start date
2013-04-17
Completion date
2017-11-01
Last updated
2019-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

This study plans to describe utilization patterns for oral anticoagulants over time in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke using electronic claims data from a United States commercial insurance database.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* A recorded diagnosis of atrial fibrillation * Initiation of oral anticoagulant medication * Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, Age \> 75, Diabetes Mellitus, Prior Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack, Vascular Disease, Age 65-74, Sex Category (CHA2DS2-VASc) Score \>=1 * At least 18 years of age on the date of anticoagulant initiation

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with missing or ambiguous age or sex information * Patients with documented evidence of valvular disease * Patients with less than 12 months enrolment in the UnitedHealth Research Database preceding the first dispensing * Patients with prior use of any oral anticoagulant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Description of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsFrom January 2009 to September 2015 (The study period)The analyses described the characteristics of patients treated with various oral anticoagulants. CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Congestive heart failure/ Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, Hypertension, Age (≥ 75), Diabetes Mellitus, Stroke/ transient ischemic attack (TIA) /thromboembolism, Vascular disease, Age 65-74, female gender. HAS-BLED bleeding risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke (1 point), Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile international normalized ratio (INR), Elderly (\>65 years), Drugs and Alcohol. CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome. HAS-BLED bleeding risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome. New initiators of warfarin before Dabigatran became available were only characterized in terms of age and sex (results provided above).
Percentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantFrom January 2009 to September 2015 (The study period)Proportion of patients initiating specific anticoagulant over time per arm in source cohort is estimated and is expressed in percentage. This is related to UnitedHealth database and no treatment initiation rate was estimated in MarketScan as the study cohort was defined from a population of oral anticoagulants users. The overall number of participants analyzed 609201 reported for each of the treatment arm below corresponds to overall patients numbers in UnitedHealth for the entire study period rather than for each of the treatment arm. Likewise the number of participants for each of the treatment arm for different time period corresponds to the total number of participants for the specific study period rather than for each of the treatment arm. Incident users at given time period could also be counted in later time period if the patient discontinued the drug and had re-entry during the study period.
Percentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - DabigatranFrom January 2009 to September 2015 (The study period)Percentage of patients initiating specific anticoagulant dose of dabigatran across all time periods combined in the unmatched cohort for UnitedHealth and MarketScan cohort are presented. Proportion of patients initiating specific anticoagulant over time per arm in source cohort is estimated and is expressed in percentage.
Percentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - ApixabanFrom January 2009 to September 2015 (The study period)Percentage of patients initiating specific anticoagulant dose of apixaban across all time periods combined in the unmatched cohort for UnitedHealth and MarketScan cohort are presented. Proportion of patients initiating specific anticoagulant over time per arm in source cohort is estimated and is expressed in percentage.
Percentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - RivaroxabanFrom January 2009 to September 2015 (The study period)Percentage of patients initiating specific anticoagulant dose of rivaroxaban across all time periods combined in the unmatched cohort for UnitedHealth and MarketScan cohort are presented. Proportion of patients initiating specific anticoagulant over time per arm in source cohort is estimated and is expressed in percentage.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment Persistence Over TimeFrom January 2009 to September 2015 (The study period)Overall treatment persistence in UnitedHealth and MarketScan cohorts are presented as the percentage of patients who were persistent to treatment after 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up for all time periods combined and matched cohort. Based on two US-based longitudinal healthcare claims databases (MarketScan and unitedHealth Research Database) the three separate study cohorts warfarin vs dabigatran, warfarin vs rivaroxaban and warfarin vs apixaban cohort were formed for each database.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study used a cohort design with descriptive analyses, using data from January 2009 through September 2015. The study was conducted within two US-based longitudinal healthcare claims databases (MarketScan and UnitedHealth Research Database).

Pre-assignment details

The data source for this project was a combination of claims data from UnitedHealth, a commercial health insurer, and MarketScan, a research claims database from commercial employer-sponsored health plans both of which provide comprehensive medical coverage for members with active policies.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran Users
Patients with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) new initiators of Dabigatran who were enrolled for a minimum of 12 months in UnitedHealth cohort before treatment initiation.
13,464
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban Users
Patients with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) new initiators of Rivaroxaban who were enrolled for a minimum of 12 months in UnitedHealth cohort before treatment initiation.
19,955
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban Users
Patients with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) new initiators of Apixaban who were enrolled for a minimum of 12 months in UnitedHealth cohort before treatment initiation.
9,731
Cohort UnitedHealth WarfarinUsers (After Dabigatran Available)
Patients with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) new initiators of Warfarin after Dabigatran became available who were enrolled for a minimum of 12 months in UnitedHealth cohort before treatment initiation.
56,655
Cohort UnitedHealth WarfarinUsers(Before Dabigatran Available)
Patients with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) new initiators of Warfarin before Dabigatran became available who were enrolled for a minimum of 12 months in UnitedHealth cohort before treatment initiation.
27,731
Cohort MarketScan Dabigatran Users
Patients with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) new initiators of Dabigatran who were enrolled for a minimum of 12 months in MarketScan cohort before treatment initiation.
28,343
Cohort MarketScan Rivaroxaban Users
Patients with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) new initiators of Rivaroxaban who were enrolled for a minimum of 12 months in MarketScan cohort before treatment initiation.
40,971
Cohort MarketScan Apixaban Users
Patients with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) new initiators of Apixaban who were enrolled for a minimum of 12 months in MarketScan cohort before treatment initiation.
19,829
Cohort MarketScan WarfarinUsers (After Dabigatran Available)
Patients with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) new initiators of Warfarin after Dabigatran became available who were enrolled for a minimum of 12 months in MarketScan cohort before treatment initiation.
77,547
Cohort MarketScan WarfarinUsers(Before Dabigatran Available)
Patients with a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) new initiators of Warfarin before Dabigatran became available who were enrolled for a minimum of 12 months in MarketScan cohort before treatment initiation.
39,438
Total333,664

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort MarketScan WarfarinUsers(Before Dabigatran Available)TotalCohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersCohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersCohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersCohort UnitedHealth WarfarinUsers (After Dabigatran Available)Cohort UnitedHealth WarfarinUsers(Before Dabigatran Available)Cohort MarketScan Dabigatran UsersCohort MarketScan Rivaroxaban UsersCohort MarketScan Apixaban UsersCohort MarketScan WarfarinUsers (After Dabigatran Available)
Age, Continuous69.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4
70.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
69.07 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
70.04 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.45
72.18 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.05
73.64 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.28
71.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
67.17 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.11
67.63 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.21
69.42 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.32
71.03 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.11
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15539 Participants132509 Participants5017 Participants7939 Participants4225 Participants24620 Participants11699 Participants10096 Participants15305 Participants7776 Participants30293 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23899 Participants201155 Participants8447 Participants12016 Participants5506 Participants32035 Participants16032 Participants18247 Participants25666 Participants12053 Participants47254 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Description of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant Initiators

The analyses described the characteristics of patients treated with various oral anticoagulants. CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Congestive heart failure/ Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, Hypertension, Age (≥ 75), Diabetes Mellitus, Stroke/ transient ischemic attack (TIA) /thromboembolism, Vascular disease, Age 65-74, female gender. HAS-BLED bleeding risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke (1 point), Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile international normalized ratio (INR), Elderly (\>65 years), Drugs and Alcohol. CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome. HAS-BLED bleeding risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome. New initiators of warfarin before Dabigatran became available were only characterized in terms of age and sex (results provided above).

Time frame: From January 2009 to September 2015 (The study period)

Population: All patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at risk for stroke initiating oral anticoagulants and a description of existing utilization patterns for warfarin and for the new oral anticoagulant (NOAC) medications as they become available over time.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersDescription of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsCHA2DS2-VASc score3.41 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersDescription of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsHAS-BLED score2.52 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersDescription of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsCHA2DS2-VASc score4.30 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersDescription of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsHAS-BLED score2.91 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersDescription of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsCHA2DS2-VASc score3.59 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.75
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersDescription of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsHAS-BLED score2.63 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersDescription of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsCHA2DS2-VASc score3.82 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersDescription of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsHAS-BLED score2.76 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
Cohort MarketScan Dabigatran UsersDescription of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsCHA2DS2-VASc score2.92 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.58
Cohort MarketScan Dabigatran UsersDescription of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsHAS-BLED score2.18 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Cohort MarketScan Warfarin UsersDescription of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsCHA2DS2-VASc score3.62 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.69
Cohort MarketScan Warfarin UsersDescription of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsHAS-BLED score2.51 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
Cohort MarketScan Rivaroxaban UsersDescription of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsHAS-BLED score2.32 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Cohort MarketScan Rivaroxaban UsersDescription of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsCHA2DS2-VASc score3.12 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.68
Cohort MarketScan Apixaban UsersDescription of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsCHA2DS2-VASc score3.34 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
Cohort MarketScan Apixaban UsersDescription of the Characteristics of Anticoagulant InitiatorsHAS-BLED score2.47 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
Primary

Percentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant

Proportion of patients initiating specific anticoagulant over time per arm in source cohort is estimated and is expressed in percentage. This is related to UnitedHealth database and no treatment initiation rate was estimated in MarketScan as the study cohort was defined from a population of oral anticoagulants users. The overall number of participants analyzed 609201 reported for each of the treatment arm below corresponds to overall patients numbers in UnitedHealth for the entire study period rather than for each of the treatment arm. Likewise the number of participants for each of the treatment arm for different time period corresponds to the total number of participants for the specific study period rather than for each of the treatment arm. Incident users at given time period could also be counted in later time period if the patient discontinued the drug and had re-entry during the study period.

Time frame: From January 2009 to September 2015 (The study period)

Population: Source cohort in a calendar time window includes all patients with at least one day eligibility. A random date within the time window selected and set as the index date. Patients dispensed of an anticoagulant before assigned index date will be removed, unless they are identified as new initiators for that particular time period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary 2009 - September201015.7 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary2012-June20123.4 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary2014-June20141.7 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantOctober2010 - June20115.4 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2013-December20132.0 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2012-December20122.9 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2011 -Dec 20112.9 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2015-September20150.7 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary2015-June20151.6 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary2013-June20132.3 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2014-December20141.6 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary2013-June20130.8 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2014-December20140.4 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2013-December20130.6 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary2014-June20140.5 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2011 -Dec 20112.2 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2015-September20150.1 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary2012-June20121.9 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary2015-June20150.3 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2012-December20121.3 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantOctober2010 - June20112.1 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary 2009 - September2010NA Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary2015-June20152.0 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary 2009 - September2010NA Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantOctober2010 - June2011NA Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2011 -Dec 2011NA Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary2012-June20121.5 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2012-December20121.5 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary2013-June20131.8 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2013-December20131.9 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary2014-June20142.2 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2014-December20142.0 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2015-September20151.0 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary2013-June20130.3 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2015-September20151.0 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2014-December20141.3 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2012-December2012NA Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary2012-June2012NA Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2011 -Dec 2011NA Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary2015-June20151.7 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantOctober2010 - June2011NA Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary 2009 - September2010NA Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJanuary2014-June20141.0 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific AnticoagulantJuly2013-December20130.7 Percentage of initiators (%)
Primary

Percentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Apixaban

Percentage of patients initiating specific anticoagulant dose of apixaban across all time periods combined in the unmatched cohort for UnitedHealth and MarketScan cohort are presented. Proportion of patients initiating specific anticoagulant over time per arm in source cohort is estimated and is expressed in percentage.

Time frame: From January 2009 to September 2015 (The study period)

Population: Patients initiating treatment in source cohort.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Apixaban5 mg82.4 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Apixaban2.5 mg17.6 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Apixaban5 mg84.4 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Apixaban2.5 mg15.6 Percentage of initiators (%)
Primary

Percentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Dabigatran

Percentage of patients initiating specific anticoagulant dose of dabigatran across all time periods combined in the unmatched cohort for UnitedHealth and MarketScan cohort are presented. Proportion of patients initiating specific anticoagulant over time per arm in source cohort is estimated and is expressed in percentage.

Time frame: From January 2009 to September 2015 (The study period)

Population: Patients initiating treatment in source cohort.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Dabigatran150 milligram (mg)90.7 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Dabigatran75 mg9.3 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Dabigatran150 milligram (mg)90.7 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Dabigatran75 mg9.3 Percentage of initiators (%)
Primary

Percentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Rivaroxaban

Percentage of patients initiating specific anticoagulant dose of rivaroxaban across all time periods combined in the unmatched cohort for UnitedHealth and MarketScan cohort are presented. Proportion of patients initiating specific anticoagulant over time per arm in source cohort is estimated and is expressed in percentage.

Time frame: From January 2009 to September 2015 (The study period)

Population: Patients initiating treatment in source cohort.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Rivaroxaban20 mg74.0 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Rivaroxaban15 mg18.4 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Rivaroxaban10 mg7.6 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Rivaroxaban20 mg76.4 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Rivaroxaban15 mg16.7 Percentage of initiators (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersPercentage of Patients Initiating Specific Anticoagulant Dose - Rivaroxaban10 mg7.0 Percentage of initiators (%)
Secondary

Treatment Persistence Over Time

Overall treatment persistence in UnitedHealth and MarketScan cohorts are presented as the percentage of patients who were persistent to treatment after 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up for all time periods combined and matched cohort. Based on two US-based longitudinal healthcare claims databases (MarketScan and unitedHealth Research Database) the three separate study cohorts warfarin vs dabigatran, warfarin vs rivaroxaban and warfarin vs apixaban cohort were formed for each database.

Time frame: From January 2009 to September 2015 (The study period)

Population: Patients were matched within calendar quarters (3 months period) the various NOACs were individually matched to warfarin on an exposure propensity score (PS) in a 1:1 fixed ratio using a nearest neighbor technique and a caliper of 0.05.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 12 months of follow-up15.07 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 3 months of follow-up52.19 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Dabigatran UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 6 months of follow-up30.96 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 12 months of follow-up11.86 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 6 months of follow-up28.16 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Warfarin UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 3 months of follow-up52.86 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 12 months of follow-up13.54 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 6 months of follow-up31.53 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Rivaroxaban UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 3 months of follow-up53.17 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 12 months of follow-up9.63 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 3 months of follow-up51.58 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort UnitedHealth Apixaban UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 6 months of follow-up26.11 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Dabigatran UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 3 months of follow-up51.84 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Dabigatran UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 6 months of follow-up27.71 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Dabigatran UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 12 months of follow-up9.14 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Warfarin UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 12 months of follow-up5.56 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Warfarin UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 3 months of follow-up48.29 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Warfarin UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 6 months of follow-up21.68 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Rivaroxaban UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 6 months of follow-up33.09 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Rivaroxaban UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 3 months of follow-up57.92 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Rivaroxaban UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 12 months of follow-up15.47 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Apixaban UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 6 months of follow-up26.78 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Apixaban UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 12 months of follow-up10.18 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Apixaban UsersTreatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 3 months of follow-up53.25 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Rivaroxaban (Rivaroxabna vs Warfarin)Treatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 6 months of follow-up35.49 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Rivaroxaban (Rivaroxabna vs Warfarin)Treatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 3 months of follow-up58.33 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Rivaroxaban (Rivaroxabna vs Warfarin)Treatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 12 months of follow-up16.50 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Warfarin (Warfarin vs Rivaroxaban)Treatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 12 months of follow-up8.93 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Warfarin (Warfarin vs Rivaroxaban)Treatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 3 months of follow-up53.27 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Warfarin (Warfarin vs Rivaroxaban)Treatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 6 months of follow-up25.83 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Apixaban (Apixaban vs Warfarin)Treatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 3 months of follow-up58.24 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Apixaban (Apixaban vs Warfarin)Treatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 12 months of follow-up13.20 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Apixaban (Apixaban vs Warfarin)Treatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 6 months of follow-up33.25 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Warfarin (Warfarin vs Apixaban)Treatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 12 months of follow-up6.22 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Warfarin (Warfarin vs Apixaban)Treatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 3 months of follow-up51.17 Percentage of participants (%)
Cohort MarketScan Warfarin (Warfarin vs Apixaban)Treatment Persistence Over TimeAfter 6 months of follow-up23.11 Percentage of participants (%)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026