Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of HET Bipolar System for Treatment of Stage I and Stage II Hemorrhoids

Multi-Center, Prospective Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the HET Bipolar System for Treatment of Stage I and Stage II Hemorrhoids

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01841970
Enrollment
20
Registered
2013-04-29
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2015-01-31
Last updated
2017-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemorrhoids, Internal

Brief summary

Hemorrhoids are vascular cushions in the anal canal. People are normally born with hemorrhoids, and the presence of hemorrhoids does not imply disease. However, hemorrhoids typically cause symptoms when they enlarge over time. There are two types of hemorrhoids- External Hemorrhoids and Internal Hemorrhoids. Current minimally invasive technologies for the treatment of internal hemorrhoids are associated with several drawbacks that include high rate of recurrence and a need for repetitive procedures, frequent post-procedural pain or significant discomfort, intra-operative pain and technically demanding. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the HET Bipolar System is safe and effective in the treatment of Stage I and Stage II hemorrhoids (internal hemorrhoids). The HET Bipolar System is a new alternative device for the minimally invasive treatment of Stage I and Stage II hemorrhoids that incorporate design features with the intent of resolving each of the major limitations of currently available technology.

Detailed description

In this study, the investigators will use the HET Bipolar System for the treatment of Stage I and Stage II hemorrhoids, where significant tissue prolapse is not present. The hemorrhoids are treated by bipolar ligation of the superior hemorrhoidal blood supply. Each prospective subject will be screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria at least one week prior to treatment. All patients undergoing treatment will review and sign the study Informed Consent prior to their procedure. One to three internal hemorrhoids will be treated in one therapeutic session. The number will be based on the investigator's judgment of which quadrants are symptomatic. Evaluations will be recorded for all treated subjects immediately following treatment. Subjects will be followed at 1, 3, and 6 months post procedure unless complications are reported between scheduled follow-up dates. At each post treatment follow-up, a report will be made of pain/discomfort, bleeding, medication use, itching, presence of adverse events or complications and need for supplemental treatment. Face-to-face follow-up evaluations will include anoscopic evaluation and assessment of hemorrhoid and other relevant symptoms.

Interventions

DEVICEHET Bipolar System

The HET Bipolar System is used to treat hemorrhoids by bipolar ligation of the superior hemorrhoidal blood supply.

Sponsors

Medtronic - MITG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject over 21 years of age * General good health * Subject undergoing elective treatment for Stage I or Stage II internal hemorrhoids * Chronic bleeding from Stage I or Stage II internal hemorrhoids (at least weekly occurrence * Failure of prior medical management

Exclusion criteria

* Under 21 years of age. * Gastrointestinal bleeding from source other than their internal hemorrhoids * Active proctitis * Inflammatory bowel disease * HIV positive or immunocompromised * Rectal wall prolapse * Stage III and Stage IV hemorrhoids * Medical conditions requiring anticoagulants and/or subject to receive anticoagulants within 7 days of initial examination * Pregnancy * Rectal malignancy * Hepatitis C * Liver cirrhosis * End stage renal disease * Receiving chemotherapy * Advanced malignancy * Documented bleeding diathesis * Treatment with an investigational drug or medical device in the past 30 days

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Resolution of SymptomsPost treatment at Month1, Month 3, Month 6The primary endpoint analysis was the resolution of symptoms, including resolution of bleeding and prolapse, if present prior to treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Recorded Yes or No on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Post treatment at Month 1, Month 3, Month 6Patient reported pain on 10 point scale where 0 =No Pain and \> 0 = Pain with 10 being the worst.
Mean Pain Score Based on the Visual Analog Pain ScalePost treatment at Month 1, Month 3, Month 6Mean pain score based on the Visual Analog pain scale. Patient reported pain on 10 point scale where 0 =No Pain and \> 0 = Pain with 10 being the worst.
Incidence of Recurrence of Pre-procedure SymptomsPost treatment at Month 1, Month 3, and Month 6Recurrence of pre-procedure symptoms after initial improvement
Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentPost treatment at Month 1, Month 3, Month 6Number of patients with recurrence of symptoms defined as external thrombosed hemorrhoids, infection, mucous discharge, new fissure, stenosis and delayed healing.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
HET Arm
Active arm. A single procedure with HET was used to treat Grade I and Grade II hemorrhoids HET Bipolar System: The HET Bipolar System is used to treat hemorrhoids by bipolar ligation of the superior hemorrhoidal blood supply.
20
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up8
Overall StudyPhysician Decision2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHET Arm
Age, Continuous56.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.1
Bleeding (Y/N)
Bleeding No
0 participants
Bleeding (Y/N)
Bleeding Yes
20 participants
Gender
Female
11 Participants
Gender
Male
9 Participants
Hemorrhoid grade
Grade I
7 participants
Hemorrhoid grade
Grade II
13 participants
Pain (Y/N)
Pain No
7 participants
Pain (Y/N)
Pain Yes
13 participants
Previous Treatment Received (Y/N)
Previous Treatment No
0 participants
Previous Treatment Received (Y/N)
Previous Treatment Yes
20 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
20 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Resolution of Symptoms

The primary endpoint analysis was the resolution of symptoms, including resolution of bleeding and prolapse, if present prior to treatment

Time frame: Post treatment at Month1, Month 3, Month 6

Population: 18 participants included. 2 participants were lost to follow up.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
HET ArmNumber of Participants With Resolution of Symptoms18 participants
Secondary

Incidence of Recurrence of Pre-procedure Symptoms

Recurrence of pre-procedure symptoms after initial improvement

Time frame: Post treatment at Month 1, Month 3, and Month 6

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HET ArmIncidence of Recurrence of Pre-procedure SymptomsRecurrence Yes0 participants
HET ArmIncidence of Recurrence of Pre-procedure SymptomsRecurrence No18 participants
Month 3Incidence of Recurrence of Pre-procedure SymptomsRecurrence Yes3 participants
Month 3Incidence of Recurrence of Pre-procedure SymptomsRecurrence No8 participants
Month 6Incidence of Recurrence of Pre-procedure SymptomsRecurrence Yes4 participants
Month 6Incidence of Recurrence of Pre-procedure SymptomsRecurrence No5 participants
Secondary

Mean Pain Score Based on the Visual Analog Pain Scale

Mean pain score based on the Visual Analog pain scale. Patient reported pain on 10 point scale where 0 =No Pain and \> 0 = Pain with 10 being the worst.

Time frame: Post treatment at Month 1, Month 3, Month 6

Population: At Month 1, 3 and 6 the number of participants include patients followed through that time period. The remaining patients were lost to follow up.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
HET ArmMean Pain Score Based on the Visual Analog Pain Scale0.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.57
Month 3Mean Pain Score Based on the Visual Analog Pain Scale0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
Month 6Mean Pain Score Based on the Visual Analog Pain Scale0.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Secondary

Pain Recorded Yes or No on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Patient reported pain on 10 point scale where 0 =No Pain and \> 0 = Pain with 10 being the worst.

Time frame: Post treatment at Month 1, Month 3, Month 6

Population: At Month 1, 3 and 6 the number of participants include patients followed through that time period. The remaining patients were lost to follow up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
HET ArmPain Recorded Yes or No on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Pain YES4 participants
HET ArmPain Recorded Yes or No on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Pain NO14 participants
Month 3Pain Recorded Yes or No on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Pain YES1 participants
Month 3Pain Recorded Yes or No on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Pain NO10 participants
Month 6Pain Recorded Yes or No on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Pain YES1 participants
Month 6Pain Recorded Yes or No on Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Pain NO8 participants
Secondary

Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With Treatment

Number of patients with recurrence of symptoms defined as external thrombosed hemorrhoids, infection, mucous discharge, new fissure, stenosis and delayed healing.

Time frame: Post treatment at Month 1, Month 3, Month 6

Population: At Month 1, 3 and 6 the number of participants include patients followed through that time period. The remaining patients were lost to follow up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
HET ArmRecurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentStenosis YES0 Participants
HET ArmRecurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentMucous Discharge NO18 Participants
HET ArmRecurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentSigns of Infection YES0 Participants
HET ArmRecurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentDelayed Healing NO18 Participants
HET ArmRecurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentNew Fissure YES2 Participants
HET ArmRecurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentExternal Thrombosed Hemorrhoids - YES0 Participants
HET ArmRecurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentDelayed Healing YES0 Participants
HET ArmRecurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentNew Fissure NO16 Participants
HET ArmRecurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentStenosis NO18 Participants
HET ArmRecurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentSigns of Infection NO18 Participants
HET ArmRecurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentOther Conditions No15 Participants
HET ArmRecurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentExternal Thrombosed Hemorrhoids - NO18 Participants
HET ArmRecurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentMucous Discharge YES0 Participants
HET ArmRecurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentOther Conditions YES2 Participants
Month 3Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentStenosis YES0 Participants
Month 3Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentExternal Thrombosed Hemorrhoids - NO11 Participants
Month 3Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentExternal Thrombosed Hemorrhoids - YES0 Participants
Month 3Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentSigns of Infection YES0 Participants
Month 3Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentSigns of Infection NO11 Participants
Month 3Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentMucous Discharge YES0 Participants
Month 3Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentMucous Discharge NO11 Participants
Month 3Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentNew Fissure YES0 Participants
Month 3Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentNew Fissure NO11 Participants
Month 3Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentDelayed Healing YES0 Participants
Month 3Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentDelayed Healing NO11 Participants
Month 3Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentStenosis NO11 Participants
Month 3Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentOther Conditions YES2 Participants
Month 3Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentOther Conditions No9 Participants
Month 6Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentOther Conditions YES1 Participants
Month 6Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentDelayed Healing NO9 Participants
Month 6Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentMucous Discharge YES0 Participants
Month 6Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentSigns of Infection NO9 Participants
Month 6Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentStenosis YES0 Participants
Month 6Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentSigns of Infection YES0 Participants
Month 6Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentExternal Thrombosed Hemorrhoids - NO9 Participants
Month 6Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentStenosis NO9 Participants
Month 6Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentExternal Thrombosed Hemorrhoids - YES0 Participants
Month 6Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentNew Fissure NO9 Participants
Month 6Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentNew Fissure YES0 Participants
Month 6Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentOther Conditions No8 Participants
Month 6Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentDelayed Healing YES0 Participants
Month 6Recurrence of Symptoms That Had Resolved With TreatmentMucous Discharge NO9 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026