Skip to content

IVIg Efficacy Study to Treat Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

Proof-of-Concept Study of IVIg Efficacy in Patients With Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01841619
Enrollment
16
Registered
2013-04-26
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2015-08-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

Keywords

skin, lupus, intravenous immunoglobulin, ivig

Brief summary

The purpose of this research study is to show that non-steroidal treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) can replace current systemic immunosuppressive therapy in cutaneous lupus erythematosis (CLE) patients.

Detailed description

The ultimate goal of this pilot project is to generate proof-of-concept data showing that treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) can replace current systemic immunosuppressive therapy in cutaneous lupus erythematosis (CLE) patients. This project has relevant clinical implications due to the severe side effects of and lack of response to current therapies. From the review of literature, it can be postulated that: 1. the beneficial effects of IVIg for patients with CLE should be prompt, with marked improvement within a few weeks; 2. clinical improvement should last several weeks after the last infusion; and 3. remission may be prolonged by maintenance IVIg therapy. Although this is only a non-controlled study, the investigator expects that IVIg will improve CLE, including those resistant to standard treatments. It is anticipated that treatment with IVIg will facilitate healing of extensive cutaneous lesions and achieve rapid remission. Maintenance therapy with repeated monthly pulses of IVIg is expected to keep the disease in remission during the treatment-free follow up observational period. The results will provide the basis a multicenter randomized controlled study to identify which CLE subsets will benefit the most and which protocol will provide the optimal clinical outcome.

Interventions

DRUGIVIg

All enrolled subjects will receive IVIg treatment following the protocol that proved to be efficacious in the treatment of patients with autoimmune blistering diseases as well as some patients with CLE. The drug will be administered at 500 mg/kg/day on consecutive days up to a total of 2 g/kg/month for 3 months in the Institute for Clinical and Translational Science (ICTS) at University of California, Irvine. After 3 months of treatment, IVIg will be discontinued and the subjects will be monitored for additional 6 months for a possible relapse. In the case of relapse, which is expected to occur in \<25% subjects, the subjects will be re-treated by the standard protocol.

Sponsors

Grifols Therapeutics LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of California, Irvine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the subject has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the trial. * Subjects who are willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, and other study procedures. * Be at least 18 years of age at time of informed consent. * Have had a diagnosis of CLE * Currently has active CLE (any subtype) established by standard clinical and histo- and immunopathologic criteria * Falls into one of the two following cohorts: * Cohort 1 - Has received a standard systemic therapy without a therapeutic response for a minimum of one month * Cohort 2 - Has not received any systemic treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Subject is not over 18 years of age. * Subject cannot understand or follow directions. * Subject is a female of child-bearing potential and unwilling to use a form of highly effective birth control. * Subject is pregnant, planning to get pregnant, or breast feeding. * Subject has a known history of immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Activity Score (CLASI - TAS)Initial, 1st Visit - 9th VisitDisease activity will be measured using the CLASI activity score that describes the activity of the disease. This score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease. This clinical assessment tool enables standardized assessments of response to therapy. Results expressed relative to the mean initial value of all patients, taken as 100%. Each proceeding visit will be relative to the initial visit. A decrease in percentage represents improvement while an increase in percentage indicates worsening of CLE. Visits occur on a month-to-month basis.
Skindex 29Initial, 1st Visit - 9th VisitThe subjects also evaluated their skin-specific quality of life with the Skindex-29 - the questionnaire consisting of 29 items used to calculate three subscales: symptoms (pain, itch, burning, sensitivity), emotions (depression, anxiety, embarrassment, anger) and functioning (sleep, relationships with others). All assessments were repeated at all study visits. Results expressed relative to the mean initial value of all patients, taken as 100%. Each proceeding visit will be relative to the initial visit. A decrease in percentage represents improvement while an increase in percentage indicates worsening of CLE. Visits occur on a month-to-month basis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Improvement (PSAI)Initial, 1st Visit - 9th VisitAt clinic visits, the investigator will categorize the change in disease activity in each patient as improved, unchanged, or worse since the last visit. Estimated change in disease activity will be based on the investigator's subjective assessment of the patient's skin disease. Results expressed relative to the mean initial value of all patients, taken as 100%. Each proceeding visit will be relative to the initial visit. A decrease in percentage represents improvement while an increase in percentage indicates worsening of CLE. Visits occur on a month-to-month basis.
Mean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Severity (PSAS)Initial, 1st Visit - 9th VisitAt clinic visits, the investigator will categorize the change in disease activity in each patient as improved, unchanged, or worse since the last visit. Estimated change in disease activity will be based on the investigator's subjective assessment of the patient's skin disease. Results expressed relative to the mean initial value of all patients, taken as 100%. Each proceeding visit will be relative to the initial visit. A decrease in percentage represents improvement while an increase in percentage indicates worsening of CLE. Visits occur on a month-to-month basis.
Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Damage Score (CLASI - TDS)Initial, 1st Visit - 9th VisitDisease activity will be measured using the CLASI activity score that describes the damage of the disease. This score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease. This clinical assessment tool enables standardized assessments of response to therapy. Results expressed relative to the mean initial value of all patients, taken as 100%. Each proceeding visit will be relative to the initial visit. A decrease in percentage represents improvement while an increase in percentage indicates worsening of CLE. Visits occur on a month-to-month basis. All patients were measured identically in all visits.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IVIg as a Monotherapy
IVIg will be used as a first line treatment. Topical treatment will be stopped at the beginning of IVIg therapy. IVIg: All enrolled subjects will receive IVIg treatment following the protocol that proved to be efficacious in the treatment of patients with autoimmune blistering diseases as well as some patients with CLE. The drug will be administered at 500 mg/kg/day on consecutive days up to a total of 2 g/kg/month for 3 months in the Institute for Clinical and Translational Science (ICTS) at University of California, Irvine. After 3 months of treatment, IVIg will be discontinued and the subjects will be monitored for additional 6 months for a possible relapse. In the case of relapse, which is expected to occur in \<25% subjects, the subjects will be re-treated by the standard protocol.
16
Total16

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIVIg as a Monotherapy
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 16
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 16

Outcome results

Primary

Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Activity Score (CLASI - TAS)

Disease activity will be measured using the CLASI activity score that describes the activity of the disease. This score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease. This clinical assessment tool enables standardized assessments of response to therapy. Results expressed relative to the mean initial value of all patients, taken as 100%. Each proceeding visit will be relative to the initial visit. A decrease in percentage represents improvement while an increase in percentage indicates worsening of CLE. Visits occur on a month-to-month basis.

Time frame: Initial, 1st Visit - 9th Visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Activity Score (CLASI - TAS)Initial100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Activity Score (CLASI - TAS)1st Visit94 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 30
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Activity Score (CLASI - TAS)2nd Visit84 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 29
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Activity Score (CLASI - TAS)3rd Visit94 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 52
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Activity Score (CLASI - TAS)4th Visit86 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 19
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Activity Score (CLASI - TAS)5th Visit85 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 14
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Activity Score (CLASI - TAS)6th Visit72 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 37
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Activity Score (CLASI - TAS)7th Visit68 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 33
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Activity Score (CLASI - TAS)8th Visit81 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 17
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Activity Score (CLASI - TAS)9th Visit71 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 13
Primary

Skindex 29

The subjects also evaluated their skin-specific quality of life with the Skindex-29 - the questionnaire consisting of 29 items used to calculate three subscales: symptoms (pain, itch, burning, sensitivity), emotions (depression, anxiety, embarrassment, anger) and functioning (sleep, relationships with others). All assessments were repeated at all study visits. Results expressed relative to the mean initial value of all patients, taken as 100%. Each proceeding visit will be relative to the initial visit. A decrease in percentage represents improvement while an increase in percentage indicates worsening of CLE. Visits occur on a month-to-month basis.

Time frame: Initial, 1st Visit - 9th Visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IVIg as a MonotherapySkindex 293rd Visit92 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 12
IVIg as a MonotherapySkindex 294th Visit90 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 15
IVIg as a MonotherapySkindex 295th Visit81 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 21
IVIg as a MonotherapySkindex 296th Visit79 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 23
IVIg as a MonotherapySkindex 297th Visit83 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 30
IVIg as a MonotherapySkindex 298th Visit99 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 11
IVIg as a MonotherapySkindex 29Initial100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
IVIg as a MonotherapySkindex 291st Visit97 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 3
IVIg as a MonotherapySkindex 292nd Visit94 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 9
IVIg as a MonotherapySkindex 299th Visit82 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 21
Secondary

Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Damage Score (CLASI - TDS)

Disease activity will be measured using the CLASI activity score that describes the damage of the disease. This score ranges from 0-70, with higher scores indicating more severe skin disease. This clinical assessment tool enables standardized assessments of response to therapy. Results expressed relative to the mean initial value of all patients, taken as 100%. Each proceeding visit will be relative to the initial visit. A decrease in percentage represents improvement while an increase in percentage indicates worsening of CLE. Visits occur on a month-to-month basis. All patients were measured identically in all visits.

Time frame: Initial, 1st Visit - 9th Visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Damage Score (CLASI - TDS)Initial100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Damage Score (CLASI - TDS)1st Visit100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Damage Score (CLASI - TDS)2nd Visit100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Damage Score (CLASI - TDS)3rd Visit100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Damage Score (CLASI - TDS)4th Visit100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Damage Score (CLASI - TDS)5th Visit100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Damage Score (CLASI - TDS)6th Visit100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Damage Score (CLASI - TDS)7th Visit100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Damage Score (CLASI - TDS)8th Visit100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
IVIg as a MonotherapyCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index - Total Damage Score (CLASI - TDS)9th Visit100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Mean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Improvement (PSAI)

At clinic visits, the investigator will categorize the change in disease activity in each patient as improved, unchanged, or worse since the last visit. Estimated change in disease activity will be based on the investigator's subjective assessment of the patient's skin disease. Results expressed relative to the mean initial value of all patients, taken as 100%. Each proceeding visit will be relative to the initial visit. A decrease in percentage represents improvement while an increase in percentage indicates worsening of CLE. Visits occur on a month-to-month basis.

Time frame: Initial, 1st Visit - 9th Visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Improvement (PSAI)8th Visit150 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 77
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Improvement (PSAI)Intial100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Improvement (PSAI)1st Visit100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Improvement (PSAI)2nd Visit100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Improvement (PSAI)3rd Visit136 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 79
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Improvement (PSAI)4th Visit104 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 48
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Improvement (PSAI)5th Visit105 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 52
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Improvement (PSAI)6th Visit117 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 37
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Improvement (PSAI)7th Visit133 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 47
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Improvement (PSAI)9th Visit100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 29
Secondary

Mean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Severity (PSAS)

At clinic visits, the investigator will categorize the change in disease activity in each patient as improved, unchanged, or worse since the last visit. Estimated change in disease activity will be based on the investigator's subjective assessment of the patient's skin disease. Results expressed relative to the mean initial value of all patients, taken as 100%. Each proceeding visit will be relative to the initial visit. A decrease in percentage represents improvement while an increase in percentage indicates worsening of CLE. Visits occur on a month-to-month basis.

Time frame: Initial, 1st Visit - 9th Visit

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Severity (PSAS)Initial100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Severity (PSAS)1st Visit100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 0
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Severity (PSAS)2nd Visit98 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 8
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Severity (PSAS)3rd Visit100 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 10
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Severity (PSAS)4th Visit97 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 18
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Severity (PSAS)5th Visit92 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 19
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Severity (PSAS)6th Visit92 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 18
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Severity (PSAS)7th Visit92 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 20
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Severity (PSAS)8th Visit90 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 18
IVIg as a MonotherapyMean Percent Change in Physician's Subjective Assessment of Severity (PSAS)9th Visit90 Percent of BaselineStandard Deviation 17

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026