Skip to content

EMG Activation of Gluteal Musculature During Exercises With and Without Resistance

EMG Activation of Gluteal Musculature and Perceived Exertion During Therapeutic Exercises With and Without Thera-Band® Resistance

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01841216
Acronym
GlutEMG02
Enrollment
30
Registered
2013-04-26
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2015-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Gluteus Maximus, Gluteus Medius, TFL, EMG, Perceived Exertion, Thera-Band

Brief summary

The gluteus medius (Gmed) and gluteus maximus (Gmax) muscles are important components in the treatment of many lower limb injuries. Recent studies have evaluated a myriad of exercises which activate the Gmed and Gmax, but limited research remains on exercises involving resistance and the role of the TFL. The purpose of this study is to evaluate Gmed, Gmax, and TFL percent maximal voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC) and perceived exertion in healthy and low back pain patients while performing exercises with and without resistance. Methods: A convenience sample of healthy subjects and patients diagnosed with non-radicular low back pain will be recruited. Exclusionary criteria will include: current low back or lower extremity injury (healthy group), pregnancy, history of hip surgery, and radicular symptoms. Surface electromyography will be used to quantify the activity level of the gluteal muscles and TFL while performing a series of 8 exercises with and without Thera-Band® Resistance Tubing and Stability Trainer. The maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) will be established for each muscle group and the order of exercises performed will be randomized to minimize the effect of fatigue. Following the completion of each exercise, the patient will rate their perceived exertion level on the Thera-Band® Resistance Intensity Scale for Exercise (RISE). The EMG signals will be smoothed and rectified and analyzed using a root-mean-square algorithm. Clinical Relevance: The results of this study will allow clinicians to better prescribe exercises, proven to activate the gluteal muscles and limit the TFL involvement, in the treatment of low back pain.

Interventions

DEVICELower Body Exercises with and without resistance

lower body exercises with and without resistance designed to activate the gluteal/hip musculature

Sponsors

Sport and Spine Rehab Clinical Research Foundation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* healthy, physically active subjects * patients diagnosed with non-radicular low back pain * 18-65

Exclusion criteria

* current low back or lower extremity injury (healthy group) * pregnancy * history of hip surgery * radicular symptoms

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)One 40 minute sessionPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction was measured by placing EMG leads on selected muscles. Data was collected and analyzed with the MyoResearch XP Masters Edition (Noraxam Inc., Scottsdale, AZ). The EMG signals were smoothed and rectified and analyzed using a root-mean-square algorithm. We used visual onset and offset of the EMG signal amplitude to select the middle 3 of 5 trials. The middle three repetitions were analyzed. Average activation and peak activation were determined and then compared to the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), captured during a manual muscle test, for each muscle group, and expressed as a %MVIC. The %MVIC can be greater than 100% since the MVIC is captured in a stationary, isometric position using manual force and all other activities are performed in motion against elastic or gravity resistance.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceived Exertion16 exercises during one 40 minute sessionThera-Band(R) RISE (Resistance Intensity Scale for Exercise) Scale to measure amount of perceived exertion during resistance band exercises. This is a scale 0 to 10, 0 being extremely easy and 10 being extremely hard. The subject rated the intensity or resistance felt on each exercise on this scale. The ideal range for an exercise is in the middle of the scale (4-7) where the subject is feeling resistance but is not maximally exerted.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Low Back Pain
Lower Body Exercises with and without resistance Lower Body Exercises with and without resistance: lower body exercises with and without resistance designed to activate the gluteal/hip musculature
15
Healthy
Lower Body Exercises with and without resistance Lower Body Exercises with and without resistance: lower body exercises with and without resistance designed to activate the gluteal/hip musculature
15
Total30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLow Back PainHealthyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants14 Participants29 Participants
Age, Continuous36.2 years29 years32.6 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
11 participants11 participants22 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
1 participants3 participants4 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants11 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants4 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Percent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)

Percent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction was measured by placing EMG leads on selected muscles. Data was collected and analyzed with the MyoResearch XP Masters Edition (Noraxam Inc., Scottsdale, AZ). The EMG signals were smoothed and rectified and analyzed using a root-mean-square algorithm. We used visual onset and offset of the EMG signal amplitude to select the middle 3 of 5 trials. The middle three repetitions were analyzed. Average activation and peak activation were determined and then compared to the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), captured during a manual muscle test, for each muscle group, and expressed as a %MVIC. The %MVIC can be greater than 100% since the MVIC is captured in a stationary, isometric position using manual force and all other activities are performed in motion against elastic or gravity resistance.

Time frame: One 40 minute session

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Low Back PainPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)ClamsR73.5 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 17.8
Low Back PainPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)Clams62.7 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 12.6
Low Back PainPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)HipExt41.5 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 8.6
Low Back PainPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)STHipExtR44.1 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 12.3
Low Back PainPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)SLHipAB59.3 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 12.9
Low Back PainPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)STHipAB_R55.8 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 11.9
Low Back PainPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)QuadHipExt44.9 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 8
Low Back PainPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)QuadHipExtR54.1 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 12.2
Low Back PainPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)Bridge33.6 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 7.7
Low Back PainPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)BridgeR37.3 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 6.9
Low Back PainPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)FireHydrant86.4 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 16
Low Back PainPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)FireHydrantR93.9 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 17.3
Low Back PainPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)Lunge55.8 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 12.8
Low Back PainPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)LungeR50.9 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 11.9
Low Back PainPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)RunningMan102.5 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 23.7
Low Back PainPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)RunningManR103.4 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 21.5
HealthyPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)RunningManR56 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 21.5
HealthyPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)ClamsR57.6 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 17.8
HealthyPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)Bridge16.9 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 7.7
HealthyPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)Clams37 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 12.6
HealthyPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)Lunge25.1 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 12.8
HealthyPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)HipExt28.6 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 8.6
HealthyPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)BridgeR20.8 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 6.9
HealthyPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)STHipExtR23.8 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 12.3
HealthyPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)RunningMan56.1 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 23.7
HealthyPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)SLHipAB37.2 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 12.9
HealthyPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)FireHydrant52.5 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 16
HealthyPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)STHipAB_R37 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 11.9
HealthyPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)LungeR24.2 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 11.9
HealthyPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)QuadHipExt23.5 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 8
HealthyPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)FireHydrantR57.3 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 17.3
HealthyPercent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC)QuadHipExtR26.5 percentage of MVIC of gmaxStandard Deviation 12.2
Secondary

Perceived Exertion

Thera-Band(R) RISE (Resistance Intensity Scale for Exercise) Scale to measure amount of perceived exertion during resistance band exercises. This is a scale 0 to 10, 0 being extremely easy and 10 being extremely hard. The subject rated the intensity or resistance felt on each exercise on this scale. The ideal range for an exercise is in the middle of the scale (4-7) where the subject is feeling resistance but is not maximally exerted.

Time frame: 16 exercises during one 40 minute session

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low Back PainPerceived ExertionQHipExtR3.3 units on a scale
Low Back PainPerceived ExertionBridge1.9 units on a scale
Low Back PainPerceived ExertionBridgeR2.5 units on a scale
Low Back PainPerceived ExertionFire Hydrant2.4 units on a scale
Low Back PainPerceived ExertionFire HydrantR3.7 units on a scale
Low Back PainPerceived ExertionLunge2.9 units on a scale
Low Back PainPerceived ExertionLungeR2.9 units on a scale
Low Back PainPerceived ExertionQHipExt2.3 units on a scale
Low Back PainPerceived ExertionClams1.7 units on a scale
Low Back PainPerceived ExertionClamsR2.8 units on a scale
Low Back PainPerceived ExertionPrHipExt2.5 units on a scale
Low Back PainPerceived ExertionStHipExt3 units on a scale
Low Back PainPerceived ExertionSLAB1.5 units on a scale
Low Back PainPerceived ExertionStABR3.4 units on a scale
Low Back PainPerceived ExertionRunning Man3.4 units on a scale
Low Back PainPerceived ExertionRunningManR4.4 units on a scale
HealthyPerceived ExertionRunningManR4.3 units on a scale
HealthyPerceived ExertionQHipExtR2.3 units on a scale
HealthyPerceived ExertionClams2.1 units on a scale
HealthyPerceived ExertionBridge1.5 units on a scale
HealthyPerceived ExertionSLAB1.8 units on a scale
HealthyPerceived ExertionBridgeR2.1 units on a scale
HealthyPerceived ExertionClamsR2.9 units on a scale
HealthyPerceived ExertionFire Hydrant2.3 units on a scale
HealthyPerceived ExertionRunning Man3.2 units on a scale
HealthyPerceived ExertionFire HydrantR3.2 units on a scale
HealthyPerceived ExertionPrHipExt2.3 units on a scale
HealthyPerceived ExertionLunge2.2 units on a scale
HealthyPerceived ExertionLungeR2.7 units on a scale
HealthyPerceived ExertionStABR2.2 units on a scale
HealthyPerceived ExertionStHipExt2.7 units on a scale
HealthyPerceived ExertionQHipExt1.3 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026