Skip to content

Subjective Comparison of Pre-Lens Tear Film Stability With Daily Disposable Contact Lenses

Subjective Comparison of Pre-Lens Tear Film Stability With Daily Disposable Contact Lenses Using Ring Mire Projection

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01839318
Enrollment
30
Registered
2013-04-24
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2014-06-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia, Hyperopia, Refractive Error

Keywords

Soft contact lenses, Daily disposable contact lenses, Tear Film Break Up Time, Contact lens wettability

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to compare three CE-marked daily disposable contact lenses for tear film stability as measured by pre-lens non-invasive keratograph break up time (PL NIK-BUT). Secondarily, contact lens surface wettability was assessed.

Detailed description

Each participant wore 3 brands of contact lenses in a randomized, cross-over fashion, with a washout phase of at least 1 night between brands.

Interventions

DEVICEOmafilcon A contact lenses

Sponsors

Alcon Research
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 44 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Sign Informed Consent. * Adapted soft contact lens wearer. * Willing to wear contact lenses up to 12 hours and attend all study visits. * Vision correctable to 0.1 (logMAR) or better in each eye at distance with pre-study lenses at Visit 1. * Contact lens prescription within the power range specified in the protocol. * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

* Any ocular infection, inflammation, abnormality, or active disease that would contraindicate contact lens wear. * Any use of systemic or ocular medications that would contraindicate contact lens wear. * Any ocular finding observed during the Visit 1 examination that would contraindicate contact lens wear. * Monocular (only 1 eye with functional vision) or fit with only 1 lens. * History of herpetic keratitis, ocular surgery, or irregular cornea. * Known pregnancy. * Unstable tear film with a NIK-BUT value below 13 seconds in either eye without lenses. * Participation in any clinical study within 30 days of Visit 1. * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pre-Lens Non-Invasive Keratograph Break Up Time (PL NIK-BUT) at 8 HoursHour 8The pre-lens tear film is the layer of tears located on top of the contact lens (i.e., between the eye lid and the contact lens). The time required for a dry spot to appear on the corneal surface after blinking is referred to as the tear film break-up time. Circular images were projected onto the contact lens using an Oculus Keratograph 5 and the tear film reflection was observed. PL NIK-BUT was recorded at the first sign of distortion. A longer tear film break-up time indicates a more stable tear film. One eye (right eye) contributed to the mean.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Wettability ScoreHour 8The investigator graded lens wettability by corneal region using a scale from 0 (fully wettable) to 3 (clearly visible ring distortions in more than 1/3 of ring reflection zone). The total wettability score per eye was calculated by averaging the grade of each of the 5 corneal regions (central, superior, nasal, inferior, and temporal). One eye (right eye) contributed to the mean.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from 1 study center located in Germany.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 30 enrolled, 2 participants discontinued before product was dispensed. This reporting group includes all participants exposed to the study product (28). In this 3-treatment, 6-sequence crossover study, each participant received all 3 products in randomized order and used 1 product at a time for a duration of 12 hours.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall
Nelfilcon A contact lenses, etafilcon A contact lenses, and omafilcon A contact lenses worn in a cross-over assignment.
28
Total28

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall
Age, Continuous24.96 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.54
Sex: Female, Male
Female
22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Pre-Lens Non-Invasive Keratograph Break Up Time (PL NIK-BUT) at 8 Hours

The pre-lens tear film is the layer of tears located on top of the contact lens (i.e., between the eye lid and the contact lens). The time required for a dry spot to appear on the corneal surface after blinking is referred to as the tear film break-up time. Circular images were projected onto the contact lens using an Oculus Keratograph 5 and the tear film reflection was observed. PL NIK-BUT was recorded at the first sign of distortion. A longer tear film break-up time indicates a more stable tear film. One eye (right eye) contributed to the mean.

Time frame: Hour 8

Population: This analysis population includes all participants exposed to the study product with reportable values.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DAILIES AquaComfort PlusPre-Lens Non-Invasive Keratograph Break Up Time (PL NIK-BUT) at 8 Hours5.28 secondsStandard Deviation 5.71
1-DAY ACUVUE MOISTPre-Lens Non-Invasive Keratograph Break Up Time (PL NIK-BUT) at 8 Hours3.46 secondsStandard Deviation 4.52
Proclear 1 DayPre-Lens Non-Invasive Keratograph Break Up Time (PL NIK-BUT) at 8 Hours4.93 secondsStandard Deviation 6.34
Secondary

Total Wettability Score

The investigator graded lens wettability by corneal region using a scale from 0 (fully wettable) to 3 (clearly visible ring distortions in more than 1/3 of ring reflection zone). The total wettability score per eye was calculated by averaging the grade of each of the 5 corneal regions (central, superior, nasal, inferior, and temporal). One eye (right eye) contributed to the mean.

Time frame: Hour 8

Population: This analysis population includes all participants exposed to the study product with reportable values.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DAILIES AquaComfort PlusTotal Wettability Score20 seconds post blink1.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
DAILIES AquaComfort PlusTotal Wettability Score10 seconds post blink1.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
DAILIES AquaComfort PlusTotal Wettability Score25 seconds post blink1.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
DAILIES AquaComfort PlusTotal Wettability Score15 seconds post blink1.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
DAILIES AquaComfort PlusTotal Wettability Score5 seconds post blink0.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.93
1-DAY ACUVUE MOISTTotal Wettability Score10 seconds post blink1.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.14
1-DAY ACUVUE MOISTTotal Wettability Score20 seconds post blink1.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
1-DAY ACUVUE MOISTTotal Wettability Score5 seconds post blink0.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
1-DAY ACUVUE MOISTTotal Wettability Score25 seconds post blink1.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
1-DAY ACUVUE MOISTTotal Wettability Score15 seconds post blink1.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
Proclear 1 DayTotal Wettability Score25 seconds post blink2.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
Proclear 1 DayTotal Wettability Score10 seconds post blink1.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Proclear 1 DayTotal Wettability Score15 seconds post blink1.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.19
Proclear 1 DayTotal Wettability Score20 seconds post blink1.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.18
Proclear 1 DayTotal Wettability Score5 seconds post blink0.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.96

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026