Skip to content

Transcorneal Electrostimulation for Therapy of Retinitis Pigmentosa

Transkorneale Elektrostimulation Zur Therapie Bei Retinitis Pigmentosa - Eine Prospektive, Randomisierte, Einfach Blinde Folgestudie

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01837901
Enrollment
88
Registered
2013-04-23
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2021-03-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Retinitis Pigmentosa

Keywords

Transcorneal electrostimulation, TcES, TES

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the long-term effects of transcorneal electrostimulation (TcES) in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP). In a prior study (NCT00804102) the results of short-term stimulation showed a positive effect on the visual field and other parameters. In this study, the patients will be stimulated with either 0%, 150% or 200% of the individually determined phosphene threshold.

Detailed description

The study was performed at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Germany. The protocol was approved by the local ethics committee. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. The study was conducted according to the standards of GCP, the European Union Directive for Medical Devices, and the German Medical Product Law. Patients were seen at 14 visits over a period of 78 weeks: one baseline visit (screening), followed by 12 visits (in week 1-4 weekly, then in weeks 10, 16, 22, 28, 34, 40, 46 and 52; dates varied a maximum of ± 1 week) including application of TcES for 52 weeks and one follow-up visit (in week 78, dates varied a maximum of ± 1 week). After inclusion patients were randomly assigned to TcES with 0 mA (sham), 150% or 200% of their individual electrical phosphene threshold (EPT) current at 20 Hz. Patients and technicians who performed kinetic perimetry, as well as full-field electrophysiology (ERG), multifocal ERG (mfERG) and dark adaptation, were blinded to the treatment group for the entire study period. The physicians who performed all other examinations and TcES were not blinded to study treatment because they were responsible for setting the stimulation parameters.

Interventions

Sponsors

Okuvision GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult subject with RP (rod-cone dystrophy) * BCVA 0.02 to 0.9 * Reliable visual field measurements * Reliable ERG measurements * Skillful enough to use the device at home * Able to give consent and take part during the whole study

Exclusion criteria

* Diabetic retinopathy * Neovascularisation of any origin * After arterial or venous occlusion * After retinal detachment * Silicone oil tamponade * Dry or exudative age-related macular degeneration * Macular edema * All forms of glaucoma * Any form of corneal degeneration that reduces visual acuity * Systemic diseases that are difficult to control or manage, that could endanger the normal study schedule * Patients in a permanently poor general condition, which could hinder the regular attendance at control examinations in the clinic * Forms of mental illness related to the bipolar affective and schizoid-affective disorders, and all forms of dementia * Simultaneous participation in another interventional study or history of interventions whose effect may still persist

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Field, III4eone yearChange in the area measured by kinetic visual field measurement
Visual Field, V4eone yearChange in the area measured by kinetic visual field measurement

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
BCVAone yearBest corrected visual acuity
ERG B-waveone year
Dark Adaptationone yearAdaptation time, changes in pupil diameter, threshold to fullfield blue and red light is measured with a fullfield stimulus threshold test (FST) on the ESPION ERG machine (Diagnosys).
VFQ-25one yearVisual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25)
ERG A-waveone year

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited from the hospital's hereditary retinal degeneration clinic (Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany). Of 88 enrolled participants, 63 met the inclusion criteria and were randomized to treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sham
Device was turned on but no stimulation was performed.
20
150%
Transcorneal electrostimulation with 150% of phosphene threshold.
15
200%
Transcorneal electrostimulation with 200% of phosphene threshold.
17
Total52

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham150%200%Total
Age, Continuous48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
Region of Enrollment
Germany
20 participants15 participants17 participants52 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants7 Participants7 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants8 Participants10 Participants27 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 220 / 210 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 2218 / 2120 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 210 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Visual Field, III4e

Change in the area measured by kinetic visual field measurement

Time frame: one year

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
ShamVisual Field, III4eBaseline4835.29 deg2
ShamVisual Field, III4e1 year4488.39 deg2
150%Visual Field, III4eBaseline4988.43 deg2
150%Visual Field, III4e1 year4962.76 deg2
200%Visual Field, III4eBaseline6234.59 deg2
200%Visual Field, III4e1 year5878.75 deg2
Primary

Visual Field, V4e

Change in the area measured by kinetic visual field measurement

Time frame: one year

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
ShamVisual Field, V4eBaseline7135.77 deg2
ShamVisual Field, V4e1 year6730.20 deg2
150%Visual Field, V4eBaseline7599.65 deg2
150%Visual Field, V4e1 year7641.55 deg2
200%Visual Field, V4eBaseline8303.59 deg2
200%Visual Field, V4e1 year8112.18 deg2
Secondary

BCVA

Best corrected visual acuity

Time frame: one year

Secondary

Dark Adaptation

Adaptation time, changes in pupil diameter, threshold to fullfield blue and red light is measured with a fullfield stimulus threshold test (FST) on the ESPION ERG machine (Diagnosys).

Time frame: one year

Secondary

ERG A-wave

Time frame: one year

Secondary

ERG B-wave

Time frame: one year

Secondary

VFQ-25

Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25)

Time frame: one year

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026