Skip to content

Pharmacokinetics of CLG561 in Patients With Advanced Age-Related Macular Degeneration

A Multi-Center, Open-Label, Single Ascending Dose Study To Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Serum Pharmacokinetics of Intravitreal CLG561 in Subjects With Advanced Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01835015
Enrollment
50
Registered
2013-04-18
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2016-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Age-related Macular Degeneration

Keywords

First in human, Safety, Tolerability, Serum PK, Intravitreal (IVT), Age-related macular degeneration, AMD, Geographic Atrophy, Choroidal neovascularization

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and serum pharmacokinetics of CLG561 in subjects with advanced age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Detailed description

Subjects were divided into 5 cohorts, with the subjects in each cohort being administered a single IVT dose of CLG561 in 1 of 5 concentration levels A-E, where A=lowest and E=highest. All subjects received active CLG561. Progress from one cohort to the next was time-lagged to allow for safety review. Dosing was also time-lagged within each cohort. Only one eye (designated as the study eye) was dosed per subject. Post-dose safety assessments and ocular examination occurred immediately after the IVT injection and continued throughout the outpatient visits at pre-determined timepoints. Collection of post-injection blood samples began after the IVT injection at pre-determined timepoints. Subjects were followed for up to 84 days.

Interventions

DRUGCLG561

Administered by intravitreal injection, Day 1

Sponsors

Alcon Research
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration in study eye, as specified in protocol. * Poor visual acuity in study eye, as specified in protocol. * Willing to receive meningitis and pneumonia vaccinations at least 2 weeks prior to study treatment. * Females must be post-menopausal and/or surgically sterile. * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

* Treatments to the study eye within 28 days prior to study treatment, as specified in protocol. * Any disease or medication expected to cause systemic or ocular immunosuppression. * Participation in another interventional clinical study or use of any experimental treatment for AMD within 12 weeks prior to study treatment. * Other protocol-defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeBaseline, Day 2, Day 4, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85BCVA (with spectacles or other visual corrective devices) using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) testing was reported in letters read correctly. Improvement of BCVA was defined as an increase (gain) in letters read from the baseline assessment. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Mean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeBaseline, Day 1, Day 2, Day 4, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry or tonopen, at the discretion of the Investigator, and reported in mmHg (millimeters of mercury). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
Number of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentBaseline, Day 2, Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85A dilated fundus examination was performed to evaluate the health of the retina, macula, choroid, and optic nerve. Subjects having a normal baseline evaluation were examined at subsequent visits, and any change from normal to abnormal was recorded. Criteria for reclassifying from normal to abnormal were left to the opinion of the investigators. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. None of the abnormalities were deemed related to the study medication.
Number of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentBaseline, Day 2, Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85A slit-lamp biomicroscopy examination was performed to evaluate the anterior segment of the eye. Subjects having a normal baseline evaluation were examined at subsequent visits, and any change from normal to abnormal was recorded. Criteria for reclassifying from normal to abnormal were left to the opinion of the investigators. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. None of the abnormalities were deemed related to the study medication.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dose-normalized Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-last)/D]Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method. These data were analyzed using a noncompartmental PK method.
Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time t Where t is a Defined Time Point After Administration [AUC(0-t)]Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method.
Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to All [AUC(0-all)]Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method. These data were analyzed using a noncompartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) method.
The Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Elimination Phase Following Extravascular Administration (Vz/F)Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method.
Apparent Systemic (or Total Body) Clearance From Serum Following Extravascular Administration (CL/F)Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method.
Terminal Elimination Half-life (T½)Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method.
Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-last)]Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method. These data were analyzed using a noncompartmental PK method.
Time to Reach the Maximum Serum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax)Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method. These data were analyzed using a noncompartmental PK method.
Dose Normalized Observed Maximum Serum Concentration Following Drug Administration (Cmax/D)Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method. These data were analyzed using a noncompartmental PK method.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited from 4 investigational centers located in the US.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 50 enrolled,19 subjects were exited as screen failures prior to randomization. This reporting group includes all assigned subjects (31).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CLG561, Level A
Single 50 μL intravitreal injection of CLG561, Dose Level A
6
CLG561, Level B
Single 50 μL intravitreal injection of CLG561, Dose Level B
6
CLG561, Level C
Single 50 μL intravitreal injection of CLG561, Dose Level C
7
CLG561, Level D
Single 50 μL intravitreal injection of CLG561, Dose Level D
6
CLG561, Level E
Single 100 μL intravitreal injection of CLG561, Dose Level E
6
Total31

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event00100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCLG561, Level ACLG561, Level BCLG561, Level CCLG561, Level DCLG561, Level ETotal
Age, Continuous74.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.82
76.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
76.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.69
73.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.52
76.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.86
75.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.12
Primary Diagnosis
Exudative macular degeneration
6 participants4 participants5 participants5 participants4 participants24 participants
Primary Diagnosis
Geographic atrophy
0 participants2 participants2 participants1 participants2 participants7 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants3 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants5 Participants3 Participants1 Participants3 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 63 / 66 / 72 / 63 / 60 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 60 / 61 / 70 / 60 / 60 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study Eye

BCVA (with spectacles or other visual corrective devices) using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) testing was reported in letters read correctly. Improvement of BCVA was defined as an increase (gain) in letters read from the baseline assessment. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 2, Day 4, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85

Population: This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects who received investigational product. Here, n is the number of subjects with non-missing values at the specific time point for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CLG561, Level AMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 29, n=6,5,6,6,62.2 lettersStandard Deviation 5.85
CLG561, Level AMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 15, n=6,6,6,6,62.7 lettersStandard Deviation 7.99
CLG561, Level AMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 2, n=6,6,7,6,60.7 lettersStandard Deviation 8.24
CLG561, Level AMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 57, n=6,5,6,6,64.7 lettersStandard Deviation 11.09
CLG561, Level AMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 4, n=6,6,7,6,63.5 lettersStandard Deviation 8.53
CLG561, Level AMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 85, n=6,6,6,6,63.8 lettersStandard Deviation 9.43
CLG561, Level AMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeBaseline, n=6,6,7,6,623.7 lettersStandard Deviation 16.55
CLG561, Level BMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 2, n=6,6,7,6,62.5 lettersStandard Deviation 5.24
CLG561, Level BMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 29, n=6,5,6,6,64.8 lettersStandard Deviation 5.02
CLG561, Level BMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 57, n=6,5,6,6,62.0 lettersStandard Deviation 3.24
CLG561, Level BMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeBaseline, n=6,6,7,6,625.7 lettersStandard Deviation 15.2
CLG561, Level BMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 15, n=6,6,6,6,63.7 lettersStandard Deviation 4.5
CLG561, Level BMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 85, n=6,6,6,6,63.0 lettersStandard Deviation 4.86
CLG561, Level BMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 4, n=6,6,7,6,64.8 lettersStandard Deviation 4.67
CLG561, Level CMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 2, n=6,6,7,6,61.1 lettersStandard Deviation 3.02
CLG561, Level CMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 15, n=6,6,6,6,62.0 lettersStandard Deviation 4.73
CLG561, Level CMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 4, n=6,6,7,6,61.7 lettersStandard Deviation 3.04
CLG561, Level CMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeBaseline, n=6,6,7,6,627.6 lettersStandard Deviation 17.67
CLG561, Level CMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 57, n=6,5,6,6,62.5 lettersStandard Deviation 5.75
CLG561, Level CMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 29, n=6,5,6,6,61.3 lettersStandard Deviation 5.28
CLG561, Level CMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 85, n=6,6,6,6,62.2 lettersStandard Deviation 5.12
CLG561, Level DMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 4, n=6,6,7,6,61.8 lettersStandard Deviation 5.19
CLG561, Level DMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeBaseline, n=6,6,7,6,641.5 lettersStandard Deviation 20.42
CLG561, Level DMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 2, n=6,6,7,6,60.0 lettersStandard Deviation 5.73
CLG561, Level DMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 15, n=6,6,6,6,63.5 lettersStandard Deviation 8.26
CLG561, Level DMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 29, n=6,5,6,6,62.0 lettersStandard Deviation 6.84
CLG561, Level DMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 57, n=6,5,6,6,64.2 lettersStandard Deviation 11.09
CLG561, Level DMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 85, n=6,6,6,6,62.2 lettersStandard Deviation 5.12
CLG561, Level EMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 85, n=6,6,6,6,63.2 lettersStandard Deviation 5.12
CLG561, Level EMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 57, n=6,5,6,6,62.3 lettersStandard Deviation 2.94
CLG561, Level EMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 2, n=6,6,7,6,6-1.0 lettersStandard Deviation 10.02
CLG561, Level EMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeBaseline, n=6,6,7,6,638.0 lettersStandard Deviation 11.75
CLG561, Level EMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 15, n=6,6,6,6,65.2 lettersStandard Deviation 8.06
CLG561, Level EMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 29, n=6,5,6,6,61.5 lettersStandard Deviation 4.51
CLG561, Level EMean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) by Visit - Study EyeChange from Baseline, Day 4, n=6,6,7,6,63.3 lettersStandard Deviation 7.87
Primary

Mean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study Eye

IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry or tonopen, at the discretion of the Investigator, and reported in mmHg (millimeters of mercury). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 1, Day 2, Day 4, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85

Population: This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects who received investigational product. Here, n is the number of subjects with non-missing values at the specific time point for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CLG561, Level AMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 1, n=6,6,7,6,616.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.72
CLG561, Level AMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 2, n=6,6,7,6,616.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.79
CLG561, Level AMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 57, n=6,5,6,6,617.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.94
CLG561, Level AMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 15, n=6,6,6,6,614.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.67
CLG561, Level AMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 85, n=6,6,6,6,616.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.07
CLG561, Level AMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 29, n=6,5,6,6,616.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.19
CLG561, Level AMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeBaseline, n=6,6,7,6,614.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.16
CLG561, Level AMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 4, n=6,6,7,6,616.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.32
CLG561, Level BMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 15, n=6,6,6,6,615.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.81
CLG561, Level BMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 1, n=6,6,7,6,620.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 8.01
CLG561, Level BMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 4, n=6,6,7,6,614.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.99
CLG561, Level BMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 2, n=6,6,7,6,614.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.05
CLG561, Level BMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 85, n=6,6,6,6,615.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 5.24
CLG561, Level BMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 57, n=6,5,6,6,615.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 5.32
CLG561, Level BMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 29, n=6,5,6,6,616.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.6
CLG561, Level BMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeBaseline, n=6,6,7,6,614.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.42
CLG561, Level CMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 57, n=6,5,6,6,616.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.27
CLG561, Level CMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 85, n=6,6,6,6,616.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.27
CLG561, Level CMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeBaseline, n=6,6,7,6,615.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.86
CLG561, Level CMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 15, n=6,6,6,6,616.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.21
CLG561, Level CMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 1, n=6,6,7,6,616.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 6.24
CLG561, Level CMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 4, n=6,6,7,6,615.1 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.74
CLG561, Level CMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 29, n=6,5,6,6,616.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.94
CLG561, Level CMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 2, n=6,6,7,6,614.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.15
CLG561, Level DMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 4, n=6,6,7,6,614.7 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.23
CLG561, Level DMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 15, n=6,6,6,6,616.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.76
CLG561, Level DMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 85, n=6,6,6,6,616.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.07
CLG561, Level DMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 2, n=6,6,7,6,614.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 4
CLG561, Level DMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 29, n=6,5,6,6,616.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.26
CLG561, Level DMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 1, n=6,6,7,6,622.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.5
CLG561, Level DMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeBaseline, n=6,6,7,6,615.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.06
CLG561, Level DMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 57, n=6,5,6,6,616.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.25
CLG561, Level EMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 85, n=6,6,6,6,616.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.26
CLG561, Level EMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 4, n=6,6,7,6,615.3 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.93
CLG561, Level EMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 15, n=6,6,6,6,616.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.09
CLG561, Level EMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeBaseline, n=6,6,7,6,616.5 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.67
CLG561, Level EMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 1, n=6,6,7,6,620.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.97
CLG561, Level EMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 2, n=6,6,7,6,615.0 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.1
CLG561, Level EMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 29, n=6,5,6,6,616.2 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.67
CLG561, Level EMean Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) by Visit - Study EyeDay 57, n=6,5,6,6,615.8 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.13
Primary

Number of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline Assessment

A slit-lamp biomicroscopy examination was performed to evaluate the anterior segment of the eye. Subjects having a normal baseline evaluation were examined at subsequent visits, and any change from normal to abnormal was recorded. Criteria for reclassifying from normal to abnormal were left to the opinion of the investigators. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. None of the abnormalities were deemed related to the study medication.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 2, Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85

Population: This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects who received investigational product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CLG561, Level ANumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentIris: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level ANumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentConjunctiva: Baseline Normal5 participants
CLG561, Level ANumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentConjunctiva: Change from Normal to Abnormal2 participants
CLG561, Level ANumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentCornea: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level ANumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentIris: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level ANumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentLids/Lashes: Baseline Normal5 participants
CLG561, Level ANumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentLids/Lashes: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level ANumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentCornea: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level BNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentIris: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level BNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentConjunctiva: Baseline Normal4 participants
CLG561, Level BNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentCornea: Baseline Normal5 participants
CLG561, Level BNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentLids/Lashes: Baseline Normal4 participants
CLG561, Level BNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentIris: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level BNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentCornea: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level BNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentConjunctiva: Change from Normal to Abnormal1 participants
CLG561, Level BNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentLids/Lashes: Change from Normal to Abnormal1 participants
CLG561, Level CNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentCornea: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level CNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentConjunctiva: Change from Normal to Abnormal4 participants
CLG561, Level CNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentConjunctiva: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level CNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentIris: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level CNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentCornea: Change from Normal to Abnormal2 participants
CLG561, Level CNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentLids/Lashes: Change from Normal to Abnormal1 participants
CLG561, Level CNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentLids/Lashes: Baseline Normal5 participants
CLG561, Level CNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentIris: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level DNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentConjunctiva: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level DNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentCornea: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level DNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentIris: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level DNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentIris: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level DNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentLids/Lashes: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level DNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentConjunctiva: Baseline Normal5 participants
CLG561, Level DNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentCornea: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level DNumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentLids/Lashes: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level ENumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentLids/Lashes: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level ENumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentIris: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level ENumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentIris: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level ENumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentCornea: Baseline Normal5 participants
CLG561, Level ENumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentConjunctiva: Baseline Normal5 participants
CLG561, Level ENumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentCornea: Change from Normal to Abnormal1 participants
CLG561, Level ENumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentConjunctiva: Change from Normal to Abnormal2 participants
CLG561, Level ENumber of Subjects With a Change From Normal to Abnormal in Ocular Signs at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentLids/Lashes: Change from Normal to Abnormal1 participants
Primary

Number of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline Assessment

A dilated fundus examination was performed to evaluate the health of the retina, macula, choroid, and optic nerve. Subjects having a normal baseline evaluation were examined at subsequent visits, and any change from normal to abnormal was recorded. Criteria for reclassifying from normal to abnormal were left to the opinion of the investigators. One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis. None of the abnormalities were deemed related to the study medication.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 2, Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85

Population: This analysis population includes all enrolled subjects who received investigational product.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CLG561, Level ANumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentChoroid: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level ANumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentRetina: Baseline Normal5 participants
CLG561, Level ANumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentRetina: Change from Normal to Abnormal1 participants
CLG561, Level ANumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentOptic Nerve: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level ANumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentMacula: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level ANumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentOptic Nerve: Change from Normal to Abnormal1 participants
CLG561, Level ANumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentMacula: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level ANumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentChoroid: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level BNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentRetina: Baseline Normal4 participants
CLG561, Level BNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentChoroid: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level BNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentOptic Nerve: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level BNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentChoroid: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level BNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentMacula: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level BNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentOptic Nerve: Baseline Normal3 participants
CLG561, Level BNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentMacula: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level BNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentRetina: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level CNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentRetina: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level CNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentOptic Nerve: Baseline Normal5 participants
CLG561, Level CNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentMacula: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level CNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentRetina: Baseline Normal4 participants
CLG561, Level CNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentMacula: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level CNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentChoroid: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level CNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentChoroid: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level CNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentOptic Nerve: Change from Normal to Abnormal2 participants
CLG561, Level DNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentRetina: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level DNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentRetina: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level DNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentMacula: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level DNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentMacula: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level DNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentChoroid: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level DNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentOptic Nerve: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level DNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentOptic Nerve: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level DNumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentChoroid: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level ENumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentRetina: Baseline Normal5 participants
CLG561, Level ENumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentChoroid: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level ENumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentMacula: Change from Normal to Abnormal1 participants
CLG561, Level ENumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentMacula: Baseline Normal6 participants
CLG561, Level ENumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentRetina: Change from Normal to Abnormal1 participants
CLG561, Level ENumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentOptic Nerve: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
CLG561, Level ENumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentOptic Nerve: Baseline Normal5 participants
CLG561, Level ENumber of Subjects With Change From Normal to Abnormal in Fundus Examination at Any Post-Therapy Visit as Compared to Baseline AssessmentChoroid: Change from Normal to Abnormal0 participants
Secondary

Apparent Systemic (or Total Body) Clearance From Serum Following Extravascular Administration (CL/F)

Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method.

Time frame: Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85

Population: This parameter was not calculated as AUClast and AUCall were considered sufficient to characterize the systemic exposure to CLG561.

Secondary

Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to All [AUC(0-all)]

Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method. These data were analyzed using a noncompartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) method.

Time frame: Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85

Population: This analysis population includes all subjects who received investigational product, completed at least 1 post-injection study visit and for whom serum concentration-time data is available, provided no collection or analytical deviations which would affect the integrity of the data occurred.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CLG561, Level AArea Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to All [AUC(0-all)]NA hr*ng/mL
CLG561, Level BArea Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to All [AUC(0-all)]NA hr*ng/mL
CLG561, Level CArea Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to All [AUC(0-all)]NA hr*ng/mL
CLG561, Level DArea Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to All [AUC(0-all)]238000 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 81800
CLG561, Level EArea Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to All [AUC(0-all)]373000 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 160000
Secondary

Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-last)]

Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method. These data were analyzed using a noncompartmental PK method.

Time frame: Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85

Population: This analysis population includes all subjects who received investigational product, completed at least 1 post-injection study visit and for whom serum concentration-time data is available, provided no collection or analytical deviations which would affect the integrity of the data occurred.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CLG561, Level AArea Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-last)]NA hr*ng/mL
CLG561, Level BArea Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-last)]NA hr*ng/mL
CLG561, Level CArea Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-last)]NA hr*ng/mL
CLG561, Level DArea Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-last)]195000 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 78300
CLG561, Level EArea Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-last)]304000 hr*ng/mLStandard Deviation 148000
Secondary

Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Time t Where t is a Defined Time Point After Administration [AUC(0-t)]

Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method.

Time frame: Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85

Population: This parameter was not calculated as AUClast and AUCall were considered sufficient to characterize the systemic exposure to CLG561.

Secondary

Dose-normalized Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-last)/D]

Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method. These data were analyzed using a noncompartmental PK method.

Time frame: Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85

Population: This analysis population includes all subjects who received investigational product, completed at least 1 post-injection study visit and for whom serum concentration-time data is available, provided no collection or analytical deviations which would affect the integrity of the data occurred.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CLG561, Level ADose-normalized Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-last)/D]NA hr*ng/mL/mg
CLG561, Level BDose-normalized Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-last)/D]NA hr*ng/mL/mg
CLG561, Level CDose-normalized Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-last)/D]NA hr*ng/mL/mg
CLG561, Level DDose-normalized Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-last)/D]38900 hr*ng/mL/mgStandard Deviation 15700
CLG561, Level EDose-normalized Area Under the Serum Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration [AUC(0-last)/D]30400 hr*ng/mL/mgStandard Deviation 14800
Secondary

Dose Normalized Observed Maximum Serum Concentration Following Drug Administration (Cmax/D)

Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method. These data were analyzed using a noncompartmental PK method.

Time frame: Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85

Population: This analysis population includes all subjects who received investigational product, completed at least 1 post-injection study visit and for whom serum concentration-time data is available, provided no collection or analytical deviations which would affect the integrity of the data occurred.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CLG561, Level ADose Normalized Observed Maximum Serum Concentration Following Drug Administration (Cmax/D)NA ng/mL/mg
CLG561, Level BDose Normalized Observed Maximum Serum Concentration Following Drug Administration (Cmax/D)NA ng/mL/mg
CLG561, Level CDose Normalized Observed Maximum Serum Concentration Following Drug Administration (Cmax/D)NA ng/mL/mg
CLG561, Level DDose Normalized Observed Maximum Serum Concentration Following Drug Administration (Cmax/D)102 ng/mL/mgStandard Deviation 30
CLG561, Level EDose Normalized Observed Maximum Serum Concentration Following Drug Administration (Cmax/D)75.8 ng/mL/mgStandard Deviation 30.9
Secondary

Terminal Elimination Half-life (T½)

Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method.

Time frame: Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85

Population: This parameter was not calculated as AUClast and AUCall were considered sufficient to characterize the systemic exposure to CLG561.

Secondary

The Apparent Volume of Distribution During the Terminal Elimination Phase Following Extravascular Administration (Vz/F)

Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method.

Time frame: Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85

Population: This parameter was not calculated as AUClast and AUCall were considered sufficient to characterize the systemic exposure to CLG561.

Secondary

Time to Reach the Maximum Serum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax)

Serum concentrations at each collection time point were quantitated, where possible, using a validated immunoassay method. These data were analyzed using a noncompartmental PK method.

Time frame: Day 1 pre-injection, 2h, 6h, Day 2, Day 4, Day 6, Day 8, Day 11, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85

Population: This analysis population includes all subjects who received investigational product, completed at least 1 post-injection study visit and for whom serum concentration-time data is available, provided no collection or analytical deviations which would affect the integrity of the data occurred.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CLG561, Level ATime to Reach the Maximum Serum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax)NA hours
CLG561, Level BTime to Reach the Maximum Serum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax)NA hours
CLG561, Level CTime to Reach the Maximum Serum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax)NA hours
CLG561, Level DTime to Reach the Maximum Serum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax)144 hoursStandard Deviation 62.7
CLG561, Level ETime to Reach the Maximum Serum Concentration After Drug Administration (Tmax)187 hoursStandard Deviation 79.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026