Skip to content

Phase II Clinical Trial of Intraoral Grafting of Human Tissue Engineered Oral Mucosa

A Randomized, Parallel-group Autogenous ex Vivo Produced Oral Mucosa Equivalent vs. Palatal Oral Mucosa Safety and Efficacy Study in Subjects Requiring Additional Keratinized Oral Mucosa for Dental Implants

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01834326
Enrollment
18
Registered
2013-04-17
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2019-01-15
Last updated
2021-09-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Disorder of Oral Mucous Membrane

Keywords

dental implants, deficient keratinized oral mucosa

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to improve the current standard of care of repairing mouth soft tissue defects.

Detailed description

This study will test a tissue equivalent ex vivo produced oral mucosa equivalent(EVPOME), which is a subject's own cells grown on top of a piece of AlloDerm (a commercially available freeze dried human cadaver tissue that is routinely used in present day surgical reconstructive procedures) to create a new piece of soft tissue for use only in that subject's body. The tissue equivalent product will be tested against a non-experimental method of grafts, the gold standard a piece of palatal oral mucosa (POM) to see which works best. Each subject will be randomly assigned to receive either the EVPOME or POM to cover the defect in their mouth. The objective of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy for the use of human EVPOME for soft tissue intraoral grafting procedures compared to the gold standard palatal oral mucosa (POM) graft.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALEVPOME (autogenous ex vivo produced oral mucosa equivalent)

EVPOME is manufactured from the subjects own oral cells and is implanted back in the subjects mouth after an approximately 30 day manufacturing process.

BIOLOGICALPOM (Palatal oral mucosa)

POM is a tissue graft harvested from the palate and surgically placed into the defect area

Sponsors

Stephen E. Feinberg
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Deficient band (\<3mm) of keratinized mucosa prior to or following dental implant placement * Surgery to increase width of keratinized mucosa is clinically indicated or requested by the patient to facilitate oral hygiene procedures or to improve esthetics * Patients in need of a graft of approximately 15 x 10 x 20 mm in dimension

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with potential medical complications such as evidence of clinically significant (as described by investigators) renal, hepatic, cardiac, endocrine, hematologic, autoimmune, or any systemic disease which may complication execution of the protocol and/or interpretation of results * Current radiation therapy or history of radiation therapy treatment to the intraoral donor biopsy site or recipient site for graft placement * Documented history of syphilis, HIV, Hepatitis B or C virus * Pregnant women or women planning to become pregnant or unwilling to abstain or use double barrier contraceptives during the course of the study * Smoking or use of tobacco products within 6 months prior to screening * History of either alcohol or drug abuse * Subjects taking medications that can result in gingival enlargement/overgrowth (Cyclosporine, Dilantin, calcium channel blockers) * Current use of intravenous bisphosphonate or current oral bisphosphate use or a history of bisphosphonate use for over 5 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Increase in Zone (Width) of Keratinized Mucosa at Grafted Site2 and 4 weeks post surgical graftThe keratinized mucosa (KM) width will be measured by determining the distance from the crest of the edentulous ridge to the mucogingival line to the nearest millimeter with a Castroviejo caliper. The keratinized mucosa width of study subjects was measured prior to graft placement and then after two weeks, and after 4 weeks. The data provided shows the difference in keratinized mucosa width between the pre surgery measure and the post surgery measure. More mucosa width (positive numbers in mm) is an improvement, negative numbers (a decrease) would be less good.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Graft Contracture2, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after surgeryGraft measurements collected at each time point post graft surgery, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 24 weeks. Measurements collected, Horizontal Coronal (mm), Horizontal Apical (mm), Vertical between coronal and apical (mm), were used to determine the area of the graft as a trapezoid like shape. The area of the graft at each time point was compared to the area of the graft at the time of implantation (graft surgery) to determine the % of graft contracture from implantation thru each follow-up time point. Less graft contracture is considered a better outcome.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Graft Blood Flow2 and 4 weeks after surgeryGraft blood flow measured using Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) of the graft at 2 and 4 weeks after surgery. LDF measurements (perfusion units) are taken at the site of the graft and compared to LDF readings at a contralateral site on the same subject. The comparison is reported as a percent. The percent is derived by dividing the LDF perfusion units at the graft site by the LDF perfusion units at the contralateral site in the same subject. It is not known how many perfusion units are necessary to adequately supply blood to a graft. By comparing the graft site to the contralateral site in the same patient at 2 and 4 weeks post surgery this data may provide more understanding of graft incorporation.
Immunohistochemistry Using Anti-CD31 (Cluster of Differentiation 31) to Detect Blood Vessel Growth Into the Graft.4 weeks after graft surgeryA biopsy of the graft is taken at 4 weeks after engraftment. The biopsy is stained for CD31 (cluster of differentiation 31) which is a marker for blood vessels. The number of blood vessels are counted in a standardized size of field. The number of blood vessels within the standardized field is reported. It is not known how much blood vessel development is necessary for graft success, but this study may provide insight into blood vessel development within EVPOME grafts over time.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Palatal Oral Mucosa (POM) Graft
Standard of care palatal oral mucosa (POM) graft will be taken from the palate and then surgically placed onto the defect area POM (Palatal oral mucosa): POM is a tissue graft harvested from the palate and surgically placed into the defect area
10
Ex Vivo Produced Oral Mucosa Equivalent
Palatal biopsy will be harvested for fabrication of autogenous ex vivo produced oral mucosa equivalent (EVPOME) and then surgically placed onto the defect area EVPOME (autogenous ex vivo produced oral mucosa equivalent): EVPOME is manufactured from the subjects own oral cells and is implanted back in the subjects mouth after an approximately 30 day manufacturing process.
8
Total18

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPalatal Oral Mucosa (POM) GraftEx Vivo Produced Oral Mucosa EquivalentTotal
Age, Customized
Age 18 to 80 Years
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Deficient band of keratinized mucosa10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants8 Participants14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
6 participants7 participants13 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
4 participants1 participants5 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 101 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Clinical Increase in Zone (Width) of Keratinized Mucosa at Grafted Site

The keratinized mucosa (KM) width will be measured by determining the distance from the crest of the edentulous ridge to the mucogingival line to the nearest millimeter with a Castroviejo caliper. The keratinized mucosa width of study subjects was measured prior to graft placement and then after two weeks, and after 4 weeks. The data provided shows the difference in keratinized mucosa width between the pre surgery measure and the post surgery measure. More mucosa width (positive numbers in mm) is an improvement, negative numbers (a decrease) would be less good.

Time frame: 2 and 4 weeks post surgical graft

Population: Pregraft data for this outcome was not collected for the first subject, the protocol was written to collect the pregraft measurement after the first subject completed POM graft. For this reason there are only 7 data points in the POM arm of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Palatal Oral Mucosa (POM) GraftClinical Increase in Zone (Width) of Keratinized Mucosa at Grafted Site2 Week increase in keratinized mucosa6.1 millimetersStandard Deviation 1.9
Palatal Oral Mucosa (POM) GraftClinical Increase in Zone (Width) of Keratinized Mucosa at Grafted Site4 week increase in keratinized mucosa5.1 millimetersStandard Deviation 1.4
Ex Vivo Produced Oral Mucosa EquivalentClinical Increase in Zone (Width) of Keratinized Mucosa at Grafted Site2 Week increase in keratinized mucosa6.5 millimetersStandard Deviation 2.1
Ex Vivo Produced Oral Mucosa EquivalentClinical Increase in Zone (Width) of Keratinized Mucosa at Grafted Site4 week increase in keratinized mucosa4.5 millimetersStandard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

Graft Contracture

Graft measurements collected at each time point post graft surgery, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 24 weeks. Measurements collected, Horizontal Coronal (mm), Horizontal Apical (mm), Vertical between coronal and apical (mm), were used to determine the area of the graft as a trapezoid like shape. The area of the graft at each time point was compared to the area of the graft at the time of implantation (graft surgery) to determine the % of graft contracture from implantation thru each follow-up time point. Less graft contracture is considered a better outcome.

Time frame: 2, 4, 8 and 24 weeks after surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Palatal Oral Mucosa (POM) GraftGraft Contracture8 weeks post surgery45 Percentage of graft contractureStandard Deviation 11
Palatal Oral Mucosa (POM) GraftGraft Contracture2 weeks post surgery10 Percentage of graft contractureStandard Deviation 28
Palatal Oral Mucosa (POM) GraftGraft Contracture24 weeks post surgery42 Percentage of graft contractureStandard Deviation 15
Palatal Oral Mucosa (POM) GraftGraft Contracture4 weeks post surgery31 Percentage of graft contractureStandard Deviation 24
Ex Vivo Produced Oral Mucosa EquivalentGraft Contracture24 weeks post surgery71 Percentage of graft contractureStandard Deviation 6
Ex Vivo Produced Oral Mucosa EquivalentGraft Contracture2 weeks post surgery24 Percentage of graft contractureStandard Deviation 34
Ex Vivo Produced Oral Mucosa EquivalentGraft Contracture8 weeks post surgery73 Percentage of graft contractureStandard Deviation 4
Ex Vivo Produced Oral Mucosa EquivalentGraft Contracture4 weeks post surgery49 Percentage of graft contractureStandard Deviation 13
Other Pre-specified

Graft Blood Flow

Graft blood flow measured using Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) of the graft at 2 and 4 weeks after surgery. LDF measurements (perfusion units) are taken at the site of the graft and compared to LDF readings at a contralateral site on the same subject. The comparison is reported as a percent. The percent is derived by dividing the LDF perfusion units at the graft site by the LDF perfusion units at the contralateral site in the same subject. It is not known how many perfusion units are necessary to adequately supply blood to a graft. By comparing the graft site to the contralateral site in the same patient at 2 and 4 weeks post surgery this data may provide more understanding of graft incorporation.

Time frame: 2 and 4 weeks after surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Palatal Oral Mucosa (POM) GraftGraft Blood Flow2 Week post surgery percent of perfusion units at graft site vs contralateral site on same subject202 Percent perfusion units graft/contralatStandard Deviation 391
Palatal Oral Mucosa (POM) GraftGraft Blood Flow4 week post surgery percent of perfusion units at graft site vs contralateral site on same subject206 Percent perfusion units graft/contralatStandard Deviation 234
Ex Vivo Produced Oral Mucosa EquivalentGraft Blood Flow2 Week post surgery percent of perfusion units at graft site vs contralateral site on same subject30 Percent perfusion units graft/contralatStandard Deviation 4
Ex Vivo Produced Oral Mucosa EquivalentGraft Blood Flow4 week post surgery percent of perfusion units at graft site vs contralateral site on same subject222 Percent perfusion units graft/contralatStandard Deviation 210
Other Pre-specified

Immunohistochemistry Using Anti-CD31 (Cluster of Differentiation 31) to Detect Blood Vessel Growth Into the Graft.

A biopsy of the graft is taken at 4 weeks after engraftment. The biopsy is stained for CD31 (cluster of differentiation 31) which is a marker for blood vessels. The number of blood vessels are counted in a standardized size of field. The number of blood vessels within the standardized field is reported. It is not known how much blood vessel development is necessary for graft success, but this study may provide insight into blood vessel development within EVPOME grafts over time.

Time frame: 4 weeks after graft surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Palatal Oral Mucosa (POM) GraftImmunohistochemistry Using Anti-CD31 (Cluster of Differentiation 31) to Detect Blood Vessel Growth Into the Graft.15 Number of blood vesselsStandard Deviation 5
Ex Vivo Produced Oral Mucosa EquivalentImmunohistochemistry Using Anti-CD31 (Cluster of Differentiation 31) to Detect Blood Vessel Growth Into the Graft.17 Number of blood vesselsStandard Deviation 7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026