Skip to content

A Retrospective Study of Actifuse Synthetic Bone Graft Versus Other Bone Graft Substitutes in Patients Requiring Lumbar Fusion

A Retrospective Study of Actifuse Synthetic Bone Graft Versus Other Bone Graft Substitutes in Patients Requiring Lumbar Fusion

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01833962
Enrollment
100
Registered
2013-04-17
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2015-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lumbar Fusion

Keywords

Lumbar fusion rates, Actifuse synthetic bone graft, Baxter Healthcare, Other synthetic bone graft

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess fusion status in patients who underwent spinal fusion with Actifuse synthetic bone graft versus other bone graft material (including autograft) in achieving lumbar spinal fusion.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Baxter Healthcare Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
OrthoGeorgia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Any patient 18 years of age or older * Patients with a minimum follow up of 1 year * Patients who have previously undergone TLIF, PLIF,PLF, XLIF procedures

Exclusion criteria

* Patients under the age of 18 * Any patient with less than 1 year of follow up history at the time of first data analysis * Any patient that the primary investigator deems as an unfit candidate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Achievement of fusion prior to or at 12 months postoperatively6 - 12 months year

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026