Skip to content

Efficiency of a Small-peptide Enteral Feeding Formula Compared to a Whole-protein Formula

Efficiency and Tolerance of a Small-peptide Enteral Feeding Formula Compared to a Whole-protein Formula in the Critically Ill Patient : a Prospective Randomized Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01833624
Acronym
NUTRI_REA
Enrollment
206
Registered
2013-04-17
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2017-08-31
Last updated
2016-08-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critically Ill, Traumatic and/or Non-traumatic Brain Injury

Brief summary

An early and efficient enteral nutritional support could improve the clinical outcomes of brain injured critically ill patients. Gastrointestinal feeding intolerance defined as an increased gastric residual volume frequently occurs in these patients. Previous experimental studies have suggested that a small-peptide enteral feeding formula could promote the gastric emptying compared to a whole-protein formula. An improved gastrointestinal tolerance of enteral nutrition should allow a rapid increase in the daily caloric intake and enhance nutritional support of brain injured critically ill patients.

Detailed description

This open-labelled prospective randomized trial aims to compare 2 groups of patients: the Study Group and the Control Group. The randomization process will concern the allocation of the type of enteral feeding formula administered for nutritional support: Peptamen® AF in the Study Group, and Sondalis® HP in the Control Group. 2 centers are involved in this study. Each patient admitted in the critical care unit will be assessed for eligibility. After written informed consent is obtained from relatives, patient without any exclusion criteria will be included in the study. The allocation of the type of enteral nutritional feeding formula will be randomized after inclusion. Enteral nutrition according to the randomization group will start within the 48 hours of admission and up to 10 days, if requested. Beyond the 10th day, all patients will receive standard enteral nutrition formula. After inclusion, data regarding efficacy and tolerance will be assessed daily up to day 10. Mortality and outcome will be assessed at day 28 and at day 60.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPeptamen® AF

Comparison of two types of enteral nutrition feeding: Peptamen® AF and Sondalis® HP

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTSondalis® HP

Sponsors

Nestlé Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Admission in our surgical critical care unit. * Traumatic brain injury. * Non-traumatic brain injury: stroke, intracranial and/or subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural and/or extradural hematoma. * Expected duration of mechanical ventilation \> 48 hours.

Exclusion criteria

* Abdominal surgery in the previous 30 days. * Pregnancy. * Breast-feeding. * Hemodynamic instability defined as infusion of norepinephrine \> 3 mg/h, or epinephrine \> 1 mg/h, or as increasing needs in vasopressive or inotropic drugs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the nutritional efficacy of a small-peptide (Peptamen AF®) to that of a whole-protein (Sondalis HP®) enteral feeding formula in traumatic and non-traumatic brain injured critically ill patientsDay3 to Day5To compare the nutritional efficacy of a small-peptide (Peptamen AF®) to that of a whole-protein (Sondalis HP®) enteral feeding formula in traumatic and non-traumatic brain injured critically ill patients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
impact on morbidity and mortality of a small-peptide (Peptamen AF®) to that of a whole-protein (Sondalis HP®) enteral feeding formula.Day 10

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactAnne-Sophie BALON
annesophie.balon@gmail.com+3381668675

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026