Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Trial of Elobixibat in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation

A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Trial in Patients With Chronic Idiopathic Constipation to Demonstrate the Efficacy and Safety of Elobixibat 5 mg and 10 mg for 12 Weeks Followed by a 4-week Withdrawal Period

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01833065
Enrollment
314
Registered
2013-04-16
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2014-04-30
Last updated
2015-10-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Idiopathic Constipation

Brief summary

12 Week Efficacy and Safety Trial Followed by a 4 Week Withdrawal Period for Patients with Chronic Idiopathic Constipation.

Detailed description

The present trial was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of elobixibat treatment (at both doses of 5 mg and 10 mg/day) compared to placebo treatment for 12-week Treatment Period followed by a 4-week Withdrawal Period in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation. During Withdrawal Period a sub-group of patients in elobixibat 5 mg and 10 mg treatment arms respectively received placebo treatment, while rest of the patients continued with 5 mg and 10 mg treatment in respective groups. In placebo groups, patients received elobixibat 10 mg treatment during Withdrawal Period. Patients were followed-up for 2 weeks after end of the Withdrawal Period. The assessment of primary and key secondary end points was done for patients who completed the first 12 weeks of treatment period. Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) were reported till 2 weeks after end of the Withdrawal Period. The trial was early terminated due to a distribution issue with the trial medication.

Interventions

DRUGElobixibat 10 mg/day

Elobixibat 10 mg/day

DRUGElobixibat 5 mg/day

Elobixibat 5 mg/day

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo

Sponsors

Ferring Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Body mass index (BMI) ≥18.5 but \<35.0 kg/m\^2 * Male or female ≥18 years of age * Reports \<3 spontaneous Bowel Movements (BM) per week and reports one or more of the following symptoms for the last 3 months with symptom onset at least 6 months before the Screening Visit or before starting chronic therapy with any laxative: 1. Straining during at least 25% of defecations 2. Lumpy or hard stools during at least 25% of defecations 3. Sensation of incomplete evacuation during at least 25% of defecations * Is ambulatory and community dwelling * An initial colonoscopy is required if recommended by national guidelines

Exclusion criteria

* Reports loose (mushy) or watery stools in the absence of any laxative intake in the form of a tablet, a suppository or an enema, or prohibited medicine for \>25% of BMs * The patient reports a BSFS of 6 or 7 during the Pretreatment Period * Has irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with pain/discomfort as predominant symptoms * Has a structural abnormality of the Gastrointestinal (GI) tract or a disease or condition that can affect GI motility * Has a history of diverticulitis, chronic pancreatitis, active peptic ulcer disease (PUD) not adequately treated, ischaemic colitis, inflammatory bowel disease, laxative abuse, faecal impaction that required hospitalization or emergency treatment, pseudo-obstruction, megacolon, megarectum, bowel obstruction, descending perineum syndrome, ovarian cysts, endometriosis, solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, systemic sclerosis, pre-malignant colonic disease (e.g., familial adenomatous polyposis or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer) or other forms of familial colorectal cancer * Has unexplained and clinically significant GI alarm signals (e.g., lower GI bleeding or heme-positive stool in the absence of known internal or external haemorrhoids, iron-deficiency anaemia, unexplained weight loss) or systemic signs of infection or colitis * Has a potential central nervous system (CNS) cause of constipation (e.g., Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis) * Has intestinal/rectal prolapse or other known pelvic floor dysfunction * Commonly uses digital maneuvers (perianal pressure or digital disimpaction) or vaginal splinting to facilitate the passage of a bowel movement * Has a history of diabetic neuropathy * Has a history of bariatric surgery for treatment of obesity; surgery to remove a segment of the GI tract; or surgery of the abdomen, pelvic or retroperitoneal area during the 6 months prior to Screening; or appendectomy or cholecystectomy 3 months prior to screening; or other major surgery 1 month prior to Screening * Has a history of cancer with last date of proven disease activity/presence of malignancy within 5 years, except for adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin, cervical dysplasia, or carcinoma in situ of the skin or the cervix * Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or Hepatitis B/C (HBV/HCV) infection * Has a history of hospitalization for any psychiatric disorder, or any suicide attempt in the 2 years prior to Screening * Is actively abusing alcohol or drugs or has a history of alcohol or drug abuse during the 6 months prior to Screening * Is being treated for hypothyroidism, but the dose of medication has not been stable for at least 3 months at the time of Screening * Is a pregnant, breast-feeding, or lactating woman

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) ResponseDuring the first 12 weeksThis outcome measured the percentage of patients who were CSBM responders. A CSBM responder was defined as a patient with ≥3 CSBMs per week and an increase of ≥1 CSBM per week from Baseline, for at least 9 of the 12 weeks in the 12-week Treatment Period, including at least 3 weeks during Weeks 9-12.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Weekly Frequency of Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBMs)From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment PeriodThe change from Baseline for the continuous variable was estimated using a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model.
Change From Baseline in Weekly Stool Consistency of SBMsFrom Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment PeriodThe stool consistency is measured using the seven-point ordinal Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) score. The BSFS classifies human stool into seven types and points them accordingly. Type 1: Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass) Type 2: Sausage-shaped, but lumpy Type 3: Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface Type 4: Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft Type 5: Soft blobs with clear cut edges (passed easily) Type 6: Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool Type 7: Watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid Types 1 and 2 indicate constipation, with 3 and 4 represents the ideal stool form (especially the latter), and 5, 6 and 7 tends towards diarrhoea . For a given assessment week, the weekly stool consistency was defined as the sum of non-missing stool consistency score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing stool consistency score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model.
Total Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Score ResponderAt Week 12This outcome measured the percentage of patients who were PAC-QOL score responder at 12-week Treatment Period. A PAC-QOL score responder was defined as a patient with ≥50% reduction in total PAC-QOL score from Baseline at Week 12. PAC-QOL is a 28-item questionnaire for psychometric assessment of disease-specific quality of life. The questionnaire is based on 5-point Likert scale; ranging from 0 \[none of the time or not at all\] to 4 \[all of the time or extremely\]). A lower score indicates a better Quality of Life. The PAC-QOL questionnaire is developed specifically for patients with constipation. Total PAC-QOL score was averaged from the individual item score.
Occurrence of CSBM ResponseWithin first 24 hours of treatment initiationThis outcome measured the percentage of patients who had a CSBM within 24 hours after the first dose of treatment. A CSBM was defined as a spontaneous (occurring without laxative within the preceding 24 hours, including no rescue medication within the preceding 24 hours) bowel movement (as interpreted by the patient, with a beginning and an end, including single or multiple stools), accompanied by a patient reported sense of complete evacuation ('complete').
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Bloating ScoreFrom Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment PeriodThe abdominal pain score was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, and 5=Very severe). For a given assessment week, the weekly abdominal bloating score was defined as the sum of non-missing abdominal bloating score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing abdominal bloating score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model.
Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Discomfort ScoreFrom Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment PeriodThe abdominal discomfort score was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, and 5=Very severe). For a given assessment week, the weekly abdominal discomfort score was defined as the sum of non-missing abdominal discomfort score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing abdominal discomfort score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model.
Change From Baseline in Weekly Degree of Straining of SBMsFrom Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment PeriodThe degree of straining was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=A moderate amount, 4=A great deal, and 5=An extreme amount). For a given assessment week, the weekly degree of straining was defined as the sum of non-missing straining score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing straining score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model.

Countries

Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Germany, Hungary, Mexico, Poland, Slovakia, South Africa, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Trial included 4-week Screening and 2-week Pretreatment Period before patient randomization to treatment sequences i.e. EBX 10/EBX 10, EBX 10/PLCBO, EBX 5/EBX 5, EBX 5/PLCBO and PLCBO/EBX 10. The total study duration was of 16 weeks: the efficacy assessments focused on the first 12 weeks, while safety assessments focused on whole 16 weeks

Participants by arm

ArmCount
EBX 10
Elobixibat 10 mg/day was administered orally in a tablet form.
103
EBX 5
Elobixibat 5 mg/day was administered orally in a tablet form.
100
PLCBO
Placebo was administered orally in a tablet form.
111
Total314

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event61023
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10003
Overall StudyOthers21114
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10002
Overall StudySubject's substantial non-compliance01000
Overall StudyTrial terminated by sponsor887313
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject624311

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEBX 10TotalPLCBOEBX 5
Age, Continuous49.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
49.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
48.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1
49.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants29 Participants11 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
94 Participants285 Participants100 Participants91 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants5 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
16 Participants45 Participants16 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
85 Participants264 Participants93 Participants86 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
1 participants4 participants1 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
2 participants4 participants0 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
4 participants13 participants5 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
15 participants42 participants14 participants13 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
3 participants10 participants3 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
5 participants13 participants5 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
12 participants32 participants13 participants7 participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
1 participants6 participants3 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
11 participants32 participants12 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
49 participants158 participants55 participants54 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
84 Participants266 Participants97 Participants85 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants48 Participants14 Participants15 Participants
Weekly number of CSBM0.33 CSBM per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.62
0.36 CSBM per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.64
0.43 CSBM per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.68
0.32 CSBM per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.62
Weekly number of SBM2.31 SBM per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.27
2.32 SBM per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.26
2.45 SBM per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.35
2.19 SBM per week
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.13

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
25 / 6511 / 5313 / 3520 / 5024 / 110
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 650 / 530 / 351 / 503 / 110

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Response

This outcome measured the percentage of patients who were CSBM responders. A CSBM responder was defined as a patient with ≥3 CSBMs per week and an increase of ≥1 CSBM per week from Baseline, for at least 9 of the 12 weeks in the 12-week Treatment Period, including at least 3 weeks during Weeks 9-12.

Time frame: During the first 12 weeks

Population: The ITT analysis set consisting of all randomized (as planned) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EBX 10Overall Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Response12.6 Percentage of patients
EBX 5Overall Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Response15.0 Percentage of patients
PLCBOOverall Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Response8.1 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Bloating Score

The abdominal pain score was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, and 5=Very severe). For a given assessment week, the weekly abdominal bloating score was defined as the sum of non-missing abdominal bloating score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing abdominal bloating score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model.

Time frame: From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period

Population: The ITT analysis set consisting of all randomized (as planned) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
EBX 10Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Bloating Score-0.46 Units on a scale
EBX 5Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Bloating Score-0.35 Units on a scale
PLCBOChange From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Bloating Score-0.30 Units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Discomfort Score

The abdominal discomfort score was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=None, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe, and 5=Very severe). For a given assessment week, the weekly abdominal discomfort score was defined as the sum of non-missing abdominal discomfort score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing abdominal discomfort score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model.

Time frame: From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period

Population: The ITT analysis set consisting of all randomized (as planned) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
EBX 10Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Discomfort Score-0.37 Units on a scale
EBX 5Change From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Discomfort Score-0.32 Units on a scale
PLCBOChange From Baseline in Weekly Abdominal Discomfort Score-0.25 Units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Weekly Degree of Straining of SBMs

The degree of straining was measured using the five-point ordinal scale (1=Not at all, 2=A little bit, 3=A moderate amount, 4=A great deal, and 5=An extreme amount). For a given assessment week, the weekly degree of straining was defined as the sum of non-missing straining score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing straining score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model.

Time frame: From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period

Population: The ITT analysis set consisting of all randomized (as planned) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
EBX 10Change From Baseline in Weekly Degree of Straining of SBMs-0.90 Units on a scale
EBX 5Change From Baseline in Weekly Degree of Straining of SBMs-0.84 Units on a scale
PLCBOChange From Baseline in Weekly Degree of Straining of SBMs-0.63 Units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Weekly Frequency of Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBMs)

The change from Baseline for the continuous variable was estimated using a repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model.

Time frame: From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period

Population: The ITT analysis set consisting of all randomized (as planned) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
EBX 10Change From Baseline in Weekly Frequency of Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBMs)2.25 SBM per week
EBX 5Change From Baseline in Weekly Frequency of Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBMs)2.40 SBM per week
PLCBOChange From Baseline in Weekly Frequency of Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBMs)1.20 SBM per week
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Weekly Stool Consistency of SBMs

The stool consistency is measured using the seven-point ordinal Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) score. The BSFS classifies human stool into seven types and points them accordingly. Type 1: Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass) Type 2: Sausage-shaped, but lumpy Type 3: Like a sausage but with cracks on its surface Type 4: Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft Type 5: Soft blobs with clear cut edges (passed easily) Type 6: Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool Type 7: Watery, no solid pieces, entirely liquid Types 1 and 2 indicate constipation, with 3 and 4 represents the ideal stool form (especially the latter), and 5, 6 and 7 tends towards diarrhoea . For a given assessment week, the weekly stool consistency was defined as the sum of non-missing stool consistency score for SBMs during that week divided by the number of non-missing stool consistency score for SBMs during that week. The parameter was analysed using repeated measures ANCOVA model.

Time frame: From Baseline (2-week Pretreatment Period) to overall first 12-weeks of Treatment Period

Population: The ITT analysis set consisting of all randomized (as planned) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
EBX 10Change From Baseline in Weekly Stool Consistency of SBMs1.56 Units on BSFS
EBX 5Change From Baseline in Weekly Stool Consistency of SBMs1.45 Units on BSFS
PLCBOChange From Baseline in Weekly Stool Consistency of SBMs0.80 Units on BSFS
Secondary

Occurrence of CSBM Response

This outcome measured the percentage of patients who had a CSBM within 24 hours after the first dose of treatment. A CSBM was defined as a spontaneous (occurring without laxative within the preceding 24 hours, including no rescue medication within the preceding 24 hours) bowel movement (as interpreted by the patient, with a beginning and an end, including single or multiple stools), accompanied by a patient reported sense of complete evacuation ('complete').

Time frame: Within first 24 hours of treatment initiation

Population: The ITT analysis set consisting of all randomized (as planned) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EBX 10Occurrence of CSBM Response21.4 Percentage of patients
EBX 5Occurrence of CSBM Response13.0 Percentage of patients
PLCBOOccurrence of CSBM Response13.5 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Total Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Score Responder

This outcome measured the percentage of patients who were PAC-QOL score responder at 12-week Treatment Period. A PAC-QOL score responder was defined as a patient with ≥50% reduction in total PAC-QOL score from Baseline at Week 12. PAC-QOL is a 28-item questionnaire for psychometric assessment of disease-specific quality of life. The questionnaire is based on 5-point Likert scale; ranging from 0 \[none of the time or not at all\] to 4 \[all of the time or extremely\]). A lower score indicates a better Quality of Life. The PAC-QOL questionnaire is developed specifically for patients with constipation. Total PAC-QOL score was averaged from the individual item score.

Time frame: At Week 12

Population: The ITT analysis set consisting of all randomized (as planned) patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EBX 10Total Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Score Responder33.0 Percentage of patients
EBX 5Total Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Score Responder31.0 Percentage of patients
PLCBOTotal Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Score Responder18.9 Percentage of patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026