Brain Tumor
Conditions
Keywords
core body temperature, humidity, circuit temperature
Brief summary
To evaluate differences in intraoperative body temperature between heated huimid breathing circuit and conventional breathing circuit
Interventions
DEVICEGroup C
non-heated, non-humidified conventional breathing circuit was used in group C patient
DEVICEGroup E
breathing tube which apply humidity and heat (Evaqua™ Breathing Circuits manufactured by Fischer & Paykel)was used in group E patient
DEVICEGroup M
Heated humid tube with a warming device (Mega Acer kit manufactured by Acemedical,Seoul Korea)was used in group M patient
Sponsors
Seoul National University Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* aged 18-70 years, * ASA I or II * patients scheduled for craniotomy under general anesthesia
Exclusion criteria
* ASA III or IV * Duration of anesthesia time less than 4 hours * emergency operation
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| trend of changes on body temperature | from the point of postintubation up to 5 hours | Investigate differences on core body temperature among different kinds of circuit (heated-humid circuit, humid circuit, conventional circuit) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| total duration of airwarmer(Bair-Hurgger warming unit) using time | from the point of postintubation up to 5hours | investigate the total duration of airwarmer using time |
Countries
South Korea
Outcome results
None listed