Skip to content

Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Occlusion Based Dentifrice in Relief of Dentinal Hypersensitivity

A Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Occlusion Based Dentifrice in the Relief of Dentinal Hypersensitivity

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01831817
Enrollment
140
Registered
2013-04-15
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2015-03-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dentinal Hypersensitivity

Brief summary

The purpose of this exploratory study is to compare the treatment effect on dentinal hypersensitivity of a tubule occluding dentifrice as measured by Schiff and Tactile sensitivity. This proof of concept study will compare the test dentifrice with three other treatment groups.

Detailed description

This will be a single center, eight week, randomized, controlled, examiner blind, four treatment arms, parallel design study in participants with at least two sensitive teeth that meet all the criteria at the Screening and Baseline visit. Participants will be assessed at baseline, four and eight weeks to monitor clinical efficacy and safety.

Interventions

Calcium sodium phosphosilicate dentifrice (5% w/w) and 1500 ppm F as sodium monofluorophosphate

DRUG0% calcium sodium phosphosilicate/ sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice

No calcium sodium phosphosilicate and 1500 ppm F as sodium monofluorophosphate

Sodium monofluorophospate dentifrice (1000 ppm F)

Dentifrice containing 1100ppm F as sodium fluoride

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants between 18 and 55 years of age, in good general health, with pre-existing self-reported and clinically diagnosed tooth sensitivity are required for entry into the study. * Participants will be required to have at least four teeth with facial/cervical erosion, abrasion and/or gingival recession which respond to qualifying evaporative (air) assessment at the Screening visit and have at least two teeth (incisors, canines or pre-molars) demonstrating signs of sensitivity, measured by qualifying tactile threshold (Yeaple ≤ 20 gram (g)) and evaporative (air) (Schiff Sensitivity Score ≥ 2) assessments at the Baseline visit.

Exclusion criteria

* Specific Dentition Exclusions for Test teeth 1. Tooth with evidence of current or recent caries, or reported treatment of decay in 12 months of Screening. 2. Tooth with exposed dentin but with deep, defective or facial restorations, teeth used as abutments for fixed or removable partial dentures, teeth with full crowns or veneers, orthodontic bands or cracked enamel. Sensitive teeth with contributing etiologies other than erosion, abrasion or recession of exposed dentin. 3. Sensitive tooth not expected to respond to treatment with an over-the-counter dentifrice in the opinion of the investigator * Use of a sensitivity dentifrice within 8 weeks of screening * Individuals who require antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 8Baseline and 8 weeks post administration of study treatmentThe intensity of response to stimulus will be rated using a 10 point scale where 1 denotes No Pain and 10 denotes Intense Pain.
Median Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 8Baseline and 8 weeks post administration of study treatmentResponse to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the subject whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the subject gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.
Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 4Baseline and 4 weeks post administration of study treatmentThe intensity of response to stimulus will be rated using a 10 point scale where 1 denotes No Pain and 10 denotes Intense Pain.
Mean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4Baseline and 4 weeks post administration of study treatmentResponse to a constant jet of air applied to hypersensitive teeth was evaluated using a Schiff Sensitivity pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for each individual stimulated tooth ranged from 0 to 3; 0 - participant did not respond to air stimulation, 1 - participant responded to air stimulus but did not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 - participant responded to air stimulus and requested discontinuation of stimulus, 3 - participant responded to air stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful and request discontinuation of stimulus.
Mean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8Baseline and 8 weeks post administration of study treatmentResponse to a constant jet of air applied to hypersensitive teeth was evaluated using a Schiff Sensitivity pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for each individual stimulated tooth ranged from 0 to 3; 0 - participant did not respond to air stimulation, 1 - participant responded to air stimulus but did not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 - participant responded to air stimulus and requested discontinuation of stimulus, 3 - participant responded to air stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful and request discontinuation of stimulus.
Median Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 4Baseline and 4 weeks post administration of study treatmentResponse to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the subject whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the subject gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ) Total Score at Week 8Baseline and 8 weeks post administration of study treatmentDHEQ Total score is an overall summary measure for the impact of dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Total score is calculated as the sum of 34 questions (each with a possible score of 1 to 7). The scale of responses range from 34 to 238. Higher values imply a worse outcome i.e. an increase in impact on dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Lower values imply a better outcome i.e. a decrease in impact on dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life.
Mean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire Total Score at Week 4Baseline and 4 weeks post administration of study treatmentDHEQ Total score is an overall summary measure for the impact of dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Total score is calculated as the sum of 34 questions (each with a possible score of 1 to 7). The scale of responses range from 34 to 238. Higher values imply a worse outcome i.e. an increase in impact on dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Lower values imply a better outcome i.e. a decrease in impact on dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited at the clinical site

Pre-assignment details

Participants aged 18 and 55 years of age (inclusive), in good general health, with preexisting self-reported and clinically diagnosed tooth sensitivity were enrolled in this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate
Dentifrice containing 5.0% w/w calcium sodium phosphosilicate and 1500ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate
32
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium Monofluorophosphate
Dentifrice containing 0% w/w calcium sodium phosphosilicate and 1500ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate
34
Sodium Monofluorophosphate
Dentifrice containing 1000 ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate
35
Sodium Fluoride
Dentifrice containing 1100 ppm fluoride as sodium fluoride
36
Total137

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1000
Overall StudyWithdrawl of Consent3000

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium Monofluorophosphate0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateSodium MonofluorophosphateSodium FluorideTotal
Age, Continuous36.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.08
39.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.72
38.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.73
42.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1
39.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.55
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants32 Participants28 Participants30 Participants118 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants2 Participants7 Participants6 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 353 / 342 / 352 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 350 / 340 / 350 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4

Response to a constant jet of air applied to hypersensitive teeth was evaluated using a Schiff Sensitivity pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for each individual stimulated tooth ranged from 0 to 3; 0 - participant did not respond to air stimulation, 1 - participant responded to air stimulus but did not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 - participant responded to air stimulus and requested discontinuation of stimulus, 3 - participant responded to air stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful and request discontinuation of stimulus.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks post administration of study treatment

Population: The ITT population was defined as all participants who were randomized, administered at least one study treatment during the study and had at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4Baseline2.39 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.396
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4Mean change from baseline at Week 4-0.56 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.759
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4Week 41.83 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.779
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4Baseline2.41 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.435
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4Mean change from baseline at Week 4-0.47 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.563
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4Week 41.94 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.547
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4Week 42.31 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.516
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4Baseline2.40 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.417
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4Mean change from baseline at Week 4-0.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.445
Sodium FluorideMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4Baseline2.38 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.403
Sodium FluorideMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4Mean change from baseline at Week 4-0.07 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.341
Sodium FluorideMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 4Week 42.31 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.401
Comparison: Principal null hypothesis to be tested was- H0: The change from baseline was the same for both treatments in all pairwise comparisonsp-value: 0.432195% CI: [-0.35, 0.15]ANCOVA
Comparison: Principal null hypothesis to be tested was- H0: The change from baseline was the same for both treatments in all pairwise comparisonsp-value: 0.000295% CI: [-0.73, -0.23]ANCOVA
Comparison: Principal null hypothesis to be tested was- H0: The change from baseline was the same for both treatments in all pairwise comparisonsp-value: 0.000295% CI: [-0.74, -0.24]ANCOVA
Comparison: Principal null hypothesis to be tested was- H0: The change from baseline was the same for both treatments in all pairwise comparisonsp-value: 0.002895% CI: [0.13, 0.63]ANCOVA
Comparison: Principal null hypothesis to be tested was- H0: The change from baseline waas the same for both treatments in all pairwise comparisonsp-value: 0.002295% CI: [0.14, 0.63]ANCOVA
Comparison: Principal null hypothesis to be tested was- H0: The change from baseline was the same for both treatments in all pairwise comparisonsp-value: 0.960695% CI: [-0.25, 0.24]ANCOVA
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8

Response to a constant jet of air applied to hypersensitive teeth was evaluated using a Schiff Sensitivity pain response scale. According to this analog scale, pain response for each individual stimulated tooth ranged from 0 to 3; 0 - participant did not respond to air stimulation, 1 - participant responded to air stimulus but did not request discontinuation of stimulus, 2 - participant responded to air stimulus and requested discontinuation of stimulus, 3 - participant responded to air stimulus, considered stimulus to be painful and request discontinuation of stimulus.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks post administration of study treatment

Population: The ITT population was defined as all participants who were randomized, administered at least one study treatment during the study and had at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8Mean change from baseline at Week 8-0.81 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.972
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8Baseline2.40 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.396
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8Week 81.60 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.987
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8Week 81.56 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.894
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8Baseline2.41 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.435
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8Mean change from baseline at Week 8-0.85 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.901
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8Mean change from baseline at Week 80.01 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.353
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8Baseline2.40 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.417
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8Week 82.41 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.462
Sodium FluorideMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8Week 82.44 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.427
Sodium FluorideMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8Baseline2.38 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.403
Sodium FluorideMean Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score at Week 8Mean change from baseline at Week 80.07 Score on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.45
Comparison: Principal null hypothesis to be tested was- H0: The change from baseline was the same for both treatments in all pairwise comparisonsp-value: 0.80395% CI: [-0.3, 0.38]ANCOVA
Comparison: Principal null hypothesis to be tested was- H0: The change from baseline was the same for both treatments in all pairwise comparisonsp-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.16, -0.48]ANCOVA
Comparison: Principal null hypothesis to be tested was- H0: The change from baseline was the same for both treatments in all pairwise comparisonsp-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.2, -0.53]ANCOVA
Comparison: Principal null hypothesis to be tested was- H0: The change from baseline was the same for both treatments in all pairwise comparisonsp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.53, 1.19]ANCOVA
Comparison: Principal null hypothesis to be tested was- H0: The change from baseline was the same for both treatments in all pairwise comparisonsp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.58, 1.23]ANCOVA
Comparison: Principal null hypothesis to be tested was- H0: The change from baseline was the same for both treatments in all pairwise comparisonsp-value: 0.787295% CI: [-0.37, 0.28]ANCOVA
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 4

The intensity of response to stimulus will be rated using a 10 point scale where 1 denotes No Pain and 10 denotes Intense Pain.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks post administration of study treatment

Population: The ITT population was defined as all participants who were randomized, administered at least one study treatment during the study and had at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 4Week 45.45 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.212
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 4Mean change from baseline at Week 4-1.20 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.727
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 4Baseline6.66 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.886
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 4Baseline6.69 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.723
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 4Mean change from baseline at Week 4-0.97 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.371
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 4Week 45.72 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.776
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 4Week 45.39 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.702
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 4Baseline6.41 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.776
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 4Mean change from baseline at Week 4-1.03 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.356
Sodium FluorideMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 4Baseline6.92 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.783
Sodium FluorideMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 4Mean change from baseline at Week 4-0.54 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.742
Sodium FluorideMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 4Week 46.38 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.814
p-value: 0.555595% CI: [-1.03, 0.56]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.876995% CI: [-0.86, 0.73]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.056295% CI: [-1.55, 0.02]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.656295% CI: [-0.95, 0.6]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.178895% CI: [-0.24, 1.3]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.073495% CI: [-1.47, 0.07]ANCOVA
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 8

The intensity of response to stimulus will be rated using a 10 point scale where 1 denotes No Pain and 10 denotes Intense Pain.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks post administration of study treatment

Population: The ITT population was defined as all participants who were randomized, administered at least one study treatment during the study and had at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 8Baseline6.71 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.892
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 8Mean change from baseline at Week 8-2.06 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.205
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 8Week 84.65 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.55
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 8Baseline6.69 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.723
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 8Mean change from baseline at Week 8-2.24 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.287
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 8Week 84.46 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.076
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 8Week 85.70 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.914
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 8Baseline6.41 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.776
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 8Mean change from baseline at Week 8-0.71 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.559
Sodium FluorideMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 8Baseline6.92 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.783
Sodium FluorideMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 8Mean change from baseline at Week 8-0.86 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.673
Sodium FluorideMean Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale Score at Week 8Week 86.07 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.046
p-value: 0.672795% CI: [-0.71, 1.1]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.007295% CI: [-2.14, -0.34]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.005695% CI: [-2.16, -0.38]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.001695% CI: [0.56, 2.31]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.001195% CI: [0.59, 2.33]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.941395% CI: [-0.9, 0.84]ANCOVA
Primary

Median Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 4

Response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the subject whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the subject gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks post administration of study treatment

Population: The ITT population was defined as all participants who were randomized, administered at least one study treatment during the study and had at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 4Baseline10.00 grams
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 4Median change from baseline at Week 40.00 grams
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 4Week 410.00 grams
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 4Baseline10.00 grams
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 4Median change from baseline at Week 40.00 grams
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 4Week 410.00 grams
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 4Week 410.00 grams
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 4Baseline10.00 grams
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 4Median change from baseline at Week 40.00 grams
Sodium FluorideMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 4Baseline10.00 grams
Sodium FluorideMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 4Median change from baseline at Week 40.00 grams
Sodium FluorideMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 4Week 410.00 grams
p-value: 0.964295% CI: [0, 0]Hodges-Lehmann Wilcoxon non-parametric
p-value: 0.001695% CI: [0, 5]Hodges-Lehmann Wilcoxon non-parametric
p-value: 0.0195% CI: [0, 5]Hodges-Lehmann Wilcoxon non-parametric
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [0, 0]Hodges-Lehmann Wilcoxon non-parametric
p-value: 0.012295% CI: [0, 0]Hodges-Lehmann Wilcoxon non-parametric
p-value: 0.713895% CI: [0, 0]Hodges-Lehmann Wilcoxon non-parametric
Primary

Median Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 8

Response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force was reached. The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the subject whether the sensation caused discomfort. The pressure setting at which the subject gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold. The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth. At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks post administration of study treatment

Population: The ITT population was defined as all participants who were randomized, administered at least one study treatment during the study and had at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 8Baseline10.00 grams
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 8Week 815.00 grams
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 8Median change from baseline at Week 85.00 grams
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 8Week 815.00 grams
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 8Baseline10.00 grams
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 8Median change from baseline at Week 85.00 grams
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 8Week 810.00 grams
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 8Baseline10.00 grams
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 8Median change from baseline at Week 80.00 grams
Sodium FluorideMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 8Baseline10.00 grams
Sodium FluorideMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 8Median change from baseline at Week 80.00 grams
Sodium FluorideMedian Change From Baseline in Tactile Sensitivity at Week 8Week 810.00 grams
p-value: 0.000195% CI: [0, 15]Hodges-Lehmann Wilcoxon non-parametric
p-value: 0.000395% CI: [0, 15]Hodges-Lehmann Wilcoxon non-parametric
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-10, 0]Hodges-Lehmann Wilcoxon non-parametric
p-value: 0.983495% CI: [-5, 5]Hodges-Lehmann Wilcoxon non-parametric
p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-10, 0]Hodges-Lehmann Wilcoxon non-parametric
p-value: 0.289495% CI: [0, 0]Hodges-Lehmann Wilcoxon non-parametric
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ) Total Score at Week 8

DHEQ Total score is an overall summary measure for the impact of dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Total score is calculated as the sum of 34 questions (each with a possible score of 1 to 7). The scale of responses range from 34 to 238. Higher values imply a worse outcome i.e. an increase in impact on dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Lower values imply a better outcome i.e. a decrease in impact on dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life.

Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks post administration of study treatment

Population: The ITT population was defined as all participants who were randomized, administered at least one study treatment during the study and had at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ) Total Score at Week 8Baseline134.33 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.778
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ) Total Score at Week 8Change from baseline at Week 8-6.43 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.693
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ) Total Score at Week 8Change from baseline at Week 8-7.97 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.324
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ) Total Score at Week 8Baseline132.55 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.646
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ) Total Score at Week 8Baseline120.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 44.614
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ) Total Score at Week 8Change from baseline at Week 8-3.88 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.222
Sodium FluorideMean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ) Total Score at Week 8Baseline133.89 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.638
Sodium FluorideMean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire (DHEQ) Total Score at Week 8Change from baseline at Week 8-10.86 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.669
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire Total Score at Week 4

DHEQ Total score is an overall summary measure for the impact of dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Total score is calculated as the sum of 34 questions (each with a possible score of 1 to 7). The scale of responses range from 34 to 238. Higher values imply a worse outcome i.e. an increase in impact on dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life. Lower values imply a better outcome i.e. a decrease in impact on dentine hypersensitivity on everyday life.

Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks post administration of study treatment

Population: The ITT population was defined as all participants who were randomized, administered at least one study treatment during the study and had at least one post baseline assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire Total Score at Week 4Baseline136.53 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.194
5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/ Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire Total Score at Week 4Mean change from baseline at Week 4-3.91 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.85
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire Total Score at Week 4Mean change from baseline at Week 4-4.39 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.155
0% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate/Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire Total Score at Week 4Baseline132.55 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.646
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire Total Score at Week 4Baseline121.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 44.467
Sodium MonofluorophosphateMean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire Total Score at Week 4Mean change from baseline at Week 4-3.80 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.874
Sodium FluorideMean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire Total Score at Week 4Baseline133.89 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.638
Sodium FluorideMean Change From Baseline in Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire Total Score at Week 4Mean change from baseline at Week 4-7.50 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.905

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026