Skip to content

Intranasal Oxytocin and Social Cognition, Implicit Preferences and Craving in Alcohol Drinkers

The Effects of Intranasal Oxytocin on Social Cognition, Implicit Preferences and Craving in Moderate to Heavy Social Alcohol Drinkers

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01829516
Enrollment
32
Registered
2013-04-11
Start date
2013-05-31
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2016-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

AOD Use, Abuse, and Dependence

Brief summary

This is a randomized, placebo controlled, double blind crossover study of the effects of intranasal oxytocin on social cognition, implicit preferences and craving in moderate to heavy social alcohol drinkers.

Detailed description

Impaired social functioning is an important feature of substance use disorders. Social deficits are a risk factor for developing substance use disorders as well as a consequence of substance abuse. Improved social functioning is also a key goal of effective substance abuse treatments. While treatment of disrupted social networks is a mainstay of psychosocial substance abuse treatments, there are currently no pharmacological interventions aimed at improving social functioning in individuals with substance use disorders. Oxytocin administration may shift preference from substance related cues to social cues and may decrease subjective craving for alcohol. The specific aims are: 1. To examine the effects of intranasal oxytocin administration on social cognition in moderate to heavy social alcohol drinkers. 2. To examine the effects of intranasal oxytocin administration on alcohol craving. 3. To examine the effects of intranasal oxytocin administration on implicit preferences for drug-related and social stimuli in moderate to heavy social alcohol drinkers.

Interventions

DRUGOxytocin

Intranasal oxytocin

DRUGPlacebo

Intranasal placebo

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is a volunteer between 18 and 50 years of age. * If female, subject is non-lactating, not pregnant, and using a reliable contraception method (i.e. abstinence, intrauterine device \[IUD\], hormonal birth control, or barrier method). * Subject is able to read and speak English. * Subject is able and willing to provide written informed consent. * Subject is able to understand and follow the instructions of the investigator and understand all screening questionnaires. * Subject is in good health.

Exclusion criteria

* Positive urine drug screen (except marijuana). * Using cocaine, stimulants (other than nicotine and caffeine), amphetamines, hallucinogens, ecstasy, opiates, sedatives, pain pills, sleeping pills, or other psychoactive drugs within 2 weeks of the start of the study (except marijuana) OR more than 10 times in the last year (except marijuana). * Marijuana use more than 3 times/week. * Has a current dependence on, or addiction to any psychoactive drug (except nicotine or caffeine) including alcohol OR a recent history of substance abuse other than alcohol, tobacco or marijuana. * Clinically significant medical or psychiatric illness requiring treatment as determined by screening blood tests, medical history, and/or physical exam performed or reviewed by the study physician. * BAC level \> 0.05% at the beginning of screening visit (within margin of error of detection). * Has a neurological dysfunction or psychiatric disorder (confirm with study physician). * Has a history of brain trauma (confirm with study physician). * Has an allergy or intolerance to oxytocin. * Subject has received an investigational drug within 30 days of Screening Visit. * Subject is considered unsuitable for the study in the opinion of the investigator, nurse practitioner, or study physician for any other reason.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Craving on the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) After Administration of Oxytocin vs. Placebo During the 3-week Study.Measured just prior to and after each of the water and alcohol cues at visits 2 and 3.Change in craving represented by the mean difference in Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) craving scores between alcohol and water cues (e.g., a positive alcohol-water score indicates cue-induced craving) after administration of oxytocin vs. placebo during the 3-week study. Craving for alcohol was assessed prior to the water and alcohol cues and again after each stimulus presentation using the 8-item Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) (Bohn et al., 1995), in which subjects indicate how much they agree or disagree with statements regarding their alcohol craving on a 7-point Likert scale. AUQ craving scores are calculated by averaging responses to the 8 items. Each item is scored on a 1 to 7 scale (Strongly Disagree = 1 and Strongly Agree = 7). Items 2 and 7 are reverse scored. A total score is computed by averaging the item scores and ranges from 1 to 7. Higher scores reflect greater craving.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Average Percentage of Correct Responses on a Social Perception Task, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) After Administration of Oxytocin vs. Placebo During the 3-week Study.Administered at visits 2 and 3We will examine the effects of intranasal oxytocin administration on overall RMET performance in moderate to heavy social alcohol drinkers after placebo or oxytocin administration. The RMET has 28 items. Each item is an cropped photo of a person's eyes with four emotion labels around it. The subjects are asked to select which one of the four emotion words best describes the emotion that the eyes are showing. RMET is scored by adding up the total number of correct responses (range 0-28). The mean percent correct is then calculated.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Sixty-one nontreatment-seeking subjects were recruited online. Eligible subjects met DSM-IV criteria for alcohol abuse, but were excluded if physically dependent on alcohol. These subjects were screened to yield 39 eligible subjects. Of the 39 subjects deemed eligible, 7 did not return after the screening visit, resulting in 32 enrolled subjects.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
This is a crossover study of 39 moderate to heavy social alcohol users who will receive a single dose 40 IU of intranasal oxytocin followed by 40 IU of placebo or vice versa.
39
Total39

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 320 / 32
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 320 / 32

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Craving on the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) After Administration of Oxytocin vs. Placebo During the 3-week Study.

Change in craving represented by the mean difference in Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) craving scores between alcohol and water cues (e.g., a positive alcohol-water score indicates cue-induced craving) after administration of oxytocin vs. placebo during the 3-week study. Craving for alcohol was assessed prior to the water and alcohol cues and again after each stimulus presentation using the 8-item Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) (Bohn et al., 1995), in which subjects indicate how much they agree or disagree with statements regarding their alcohol craving on a 7-point Likert scale. AUQ craving scores are calculated by averaging responses to the 8 items. Each item is scored on a 1 to 7 scale (Strongly Disagree = 1 and Strongly Agree = 7). Items 2 and 7 are reverse scored. A total score is computed by averaging the item scores and ranges from 1 to 7. Higher scores reflect greater craving.

Time frame: Measured just prior to and after each of the water and alcohol cues at visits 2 and 3.

Population: In this crossover study a total of 32 participants were analyzed for each intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OxytocinChange in Craving on the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) After Administration of Oxytocin vs. Placebo During the 3-week Study.1.11 units on a 7-pt Likert ScaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboChange in Craving on the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) After Administration of Oxytocin vs. Placebo During the 3-week Study.0.69 units on a 7-pt Likert ScaleStandard Error 0.17
Secondary

Average Percentage of Correct Responses on a Social Perception Task, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) After Administration of Oxytocin vs. Placebo During the 3-week Study.

We will examine the effects of intranasal oxytocin administration on overall RMET performance in moderate to heavy social alcohol drinkers after placebo or oxytocin administration. The RMET has 28 items. Each item is an cropped photo of a person's eyes with four emotion labels around it. The subjects are asked to select which one of the four emotion words best describes the emotion that the eyes are showing. RMET is scored by adding up the total number of correct responses (range 0-28). The mean percent correct is then calculated.

Time frame: Administered at visits 2 and 3

Population: 1 subject did not complete the RMET task, so only 31 participant responses were analyzed for this task.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
OxytocinAverage Percentage of Correct Responses on a Social Perception Task, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) After Administration of Oxytocin vs. Placebo During the 3-week Study.77.2 Mean percent correct responsesStandard Error 1.7
PlaceboAverage Percentage of Correct Responses on a Social Perception Task, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) After Administration of Oxytocin vs. Placebo During the 3-week Study.76.4 Mean percent correct responsesStandard Error 1.5

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026