Skip to content

Brain Imaging of rTMS Treatment for Depression

A Causal Neural Network-level Understanding of Depression and Its Treatment Through Concurrent TMS and fMRI

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01829165
Enrollment
85
Registered
2013-04-11
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2017-01-20
Last updated
2018-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression, Major Depressive Disorder

Brief summary

The overarching goal of this research program is to elucidate causal and directional neural network- level abnormalities in depression, and how they are modulated by an individually-tailored, circuit-directed intervention. By using concurrent TMS and fMRI, the investigators can overcome a major limitation of neuroimaging - the inability to demonstrate causality. The investigators' findings will serve as a platform for future studies wherein TMS treatment can be directly guided by the investigators' ability to image and causally manipulate specific neural networks. Aim 1: To examine causal interactions between two major brain networks in depression. Aim 2: To examine the impact of antidepressant TMS on causal network abnormalities in depression. Hypothesis 1: Depressed subjects will show blunted responses, compared to healthy controls, in two targeted and interacting networks, using concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Hypothesis 2: Treatment of patients with high-frequency repetitive TMS (rTMS) will result in normalization of baseline network-level deficits, and be predicted by degree of baseline network abnormalities.

Detailed description

This study has a single primary outcome measure and other measures are exploratory. Previous versions of this study record incorrectly listed some exploratory outcome measures as secondary.

Interventions

MRI-compatible TMS stimulator

Sponsors

The Dana Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
CollaboratorNIH
Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women, ages 18 to 50 * Depression assessed through phone screen * Must comprehend English well to ensure adequate comprehension of the fMRI and TMS instructions, and of clinical scales * Has failed \>1 previous adequate antidepressant medication trials * Right-handed * No current or history of neurological disorders * No seizure disorder or risk of seizures

Exclusion criteria

* Any contraindication to being scanned in the 3T scanners at the Lucas Center or CNI such as having a pacemaker or implanted device that has not been cleared for scanning at the Lucas Center or CNI * Any unstable medical condition, any significant CNS neurological condition such as stroke, seizure, tumor, hemorrhage, multiple sclerosis, etc * Current rTMS treatment or prior treatment failure with rTMS * Current electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or prior treatment failure with ECT * Currently pregnant or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinician Administered HAM-DBaseline; Day 10; Day 20The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) is a 24-item clinician-administered assessment utilized as a way of determining a patient's level of depression before, during, and after treatment. It takes approximately 15-20 minutes to complete the interview and score the results. Subscale scores are 0-2 (10 questions), 0-3 (2 questions), and 0-4 (12 questions). Subscales are totaled for an overall score (range 0 -76). For the overall score and all subscales, lower scores correspond to fewer symptoms, and higher scores correspond more symptoms.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
fMRI/TMS Assessed Neural Network ConnectivityUp to 3 months.From pre- to post-treatment, improvement will be based on enhanced functional connectivity.
Implicit Emotion RegulationUp to 3 monthsImplicit emotion regulation assessed through emotion conflict task performed during functional imaging. Performance based on reaction time and recruitment of emotion regulation regions during the task.
fMRI-assessed Resting ConnectivityUp to 3 months.From pre- to post-treatment of patients with high-frequency repetitive TMS (rTMS) improvement shall be measured by normalization of baseline network-level deficits.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

85 participants were enrolled and 33 were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
rTMS Treatment
rTMS was to be delivered for 20 sessions over 4 weeks. Active 10 Hz rTMS was delivered using neuro-navigation based on participants' own fMRI images. Daily treatment regiments were to last 36.5 minutes and rTMS was delivered at 120% of the participant's motor threshold. Participants were monitored during the rTMS sessions for adverse events and/or side effects. rTMS Treatment: MRI-compatible TMS stimulator
20
Sham Treatment
Sham rTMS was to be delivered for 20 sessions over 4 weeks. Placebo 10Hz rTMS was delivered through sham stimulation electrodes. The rTMS coil was positioned using neuro-navigation based on participants' own fMRI images, mimicking active rTMS treatment. Daily treatment regiments were to 36.5minutes and sham rTMS was delivered at 120% of the participant's motor threshold. Participants were monitored during the rTMS sham sessions for adverse events and/or side effects. Upon completing the sham 20 sessions participants are unblinded and offered 20 further treatments of guaranteed open-label treatment. The open-label treatment would follow the active rTMS treatment protocol. rTMS Treatment: MRI-compatible TMS stimulator
13
Total33

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDid not complete intervention20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicrTMS TreatmentSham TreatmentTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants13 Participants33 Participants
Age, Continuous37.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
35.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
36.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D 24)27.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
26.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
26.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
14 Participants9 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants9 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants4 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 201 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Clinician Administered HAM-D

The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) is a 24-item clinician-administered assessment utilized as a way of determining a patient's level of depression before, during, and after treatment. It takes approximately 15-20 minutes to complete the interview and score the results. Subscale scores are 0-2 (10 questions), 0-3 (2 questions), and 0-4 (12 questions). Subscales are totaled for an overall score (range 0 -76). For the overall score and all subscales, lower scores correspond to fewer symptoms, and higher scores correspond more symptoms.

Time frame: Baseline; Day 10; Day 20

Population: Randomized and treated

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
rTMS TreatmentClinician Administered HAM-DBaseline27.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
rTMS TreatmentClinician Administered HAM-DDay 1022.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
rTMS TreatmentClinician Administered HAM-DDay 2017.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.9
Sham TreatmentClinician Administered HAM-DBaseline26.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
Sham TreatmentClinician Administered HAM-DDay 1022.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Sham TreatmentClinician Administered HAM-DDay 2017.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Other Pre-specified

fMRI-assessed Resting Connectivity

From pre- to post-treatment of patients with high-frequency repetitive TMS (rTMS) improvement shall be measured by normalization of baseline network-level deficits.

Time frame: Up to 3 months.

Other Pre-specified

fMRI/TMS Assessed Neural Network Connectivity

From pre- to post-treatment, improvement will be based on enhanced functional connectivity.

Time frame: Up to 3 months.

Other Pre-specified

Implicit Emotion Regulation

Implicit emotion regulation assessed through emotion conflict task performed during functional imaging. Performance based on reaction time and recruitment of emotion regulation regions during the task.

Time frame: Up to 3 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026