Comparison of Two Insertion Technique of I-gel

Comparison of Two Insertion Technique of I-gel: Standard Versus 90-degree Rotation

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT01826565

Acronym

I-gel90

Enrollment

100

Registered

2013-04-08

Start date

2013-05-31

Completion date

2014-07-31

Last updated

2013-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bladder Cancer, Bladder Tumor, Prostate Cancer, Prostate Tumor

Keywords

success

Brief summary

To evaluate the efficacy of rotational technique in the insertion of i-gel

Detailed description

The i-gel is one of the 2nd generation supraglottic airways. The rotational technique is known to increase the success rate of insertion of other supraglottic airways. The investigators try to evaluate the efficacy of rotational technique in the insertion of i-gel.

Interventions

PROCEDURERotational technique

90 degree rotation

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

FEMALE

Age

18 Years to 80 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

\- Patients scheduled for general anesthesia(transurethral resection of bladder tumor or transurethral resection of the prostate) using i-gelTM

Exclusion criteria

* History of recent postoperative sore throat * History of difficult airway * Mouth opening \< 2.5 cm * Emergency operation

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
The success rate of insertion	up to 30 min.	check oropharyngeal leakage at pressure 12 cmH2O

Secondary

Measure	Time frame	Description
postoperative sore throat	up to 2 days	severe/moderate/minimal/none

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026