Skip to content

Phase 3 Study of Ataluren in Participants With Nonsense Mutation Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (nmDMD)

A Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety Study of Ataluren in Patients With Nonsense Mutation Dystrophinopathy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01826487
Acronym
ACT DMD
Enrollment
230
Registered
2013-04-08
Start date
2013-03-26
Completion date
2015-08-20
Last updated
2020-08-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Genetic Diseases, X-Linked, Muscular Diseases, Muscular Disorders, Atrophic, Muscular Dystrophies, Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Nervous System Diseases, Neuromuscular Diseases

Keywords

Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Dystrophinopathy, Nonsense mutation, Premature stop codon, Becker muscular dystrophy, DMD/BMD, PTC124, Ataluren

Brief summary

Dystrophinopathy is a disease continuum that includes Duchenne muscular dystrophy, which develops in boys. It is caused by a mutation in the gene for dystrophin, a protein that is important for maintaining normal muscle structure and function. Loss of dystrophin causes muscle fragility that leads to weakness and loss of walking ability. A specific type of mutation, called a nonsense (premature stop codon) mutation is the cause of dystrophinopathy in approximately 10-15 percent (%) of boys with the disease. Ataluren is an orally delivered, investigational drug that has the potential to overcome the effects of the nonsense mutation. The main goal of this Phase 3 study is to evaluate the effect of ataluren on walking ability. The effect of ataluren on physical function, quality of life, and activities of daily living will be evaluated. This study will also provide additional information on the long-term safety of ataluren.

Detailed description

This is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to determine the efficacy and safety of ataluren in participants with nmDMD.

Interventions

DRUGAtaluren

Ataluren will be administered as per the dose and schedule specified in the arm.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo will be administered as per the schedule specified in the arm.

Sponsors

PTC Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
7 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ability to provide written informed consent (parental/guardian consent if applicable)/assent per local requirements. * Phenotypic evidence of dystrophinopathy based on the onset of characteristic clinical symptoms or signs (for example; proximal muscle weakness, waddling gait, and Gowers' maneuver) by 6 years of age, an elevated serum creatinine kinase level, and ongoing difficulty with walking. * Documentation of the presence of a nonsense point mutation in the dystrophin gene as determined by gene sequencing from a laboratory certified by the College of American Pathologists (CAP), the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act/Amendment (CLIA) or an equivalent organization. * Documentation that a blood sample has been drawn for confirmation of the presence of a nonsense mutation in the dystrophin gene. * Use of systemic corticosteroids (prednisone, prednisolone, or deflazacort) for a minimum of 6 months immediately prior to start of study treatment, with no significant change in dosage or dosing regimen (not related to body weight change) for a minimum of 3 months immediately prior to start of study treatment and a reasonable expectation that dosage and dosing regimen will not change significantly for the duration of the study. * Valid Screening 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) greater than or equal to (≥) 150 meters. Valid Screening 6MWD must have been less than or equal to (≤) 80% of predicted for age and height. * Results of the 2 Baseline 6MWD results must be determined as valid and results of the Day 2 Baseline 6MWD must be within 20% of the Day 1 Baseline 6MWD. * Baseline 6MWD (mean of valid Day 1 and Day 2 values) must be no more than a 20% change from the valid Screening 6MWD. * Confirmed screening laboratory values within the central laboratory ranges (hepatic, renal, and serum electrolyte parameters). * Willingness to abstain from sexual intercourse or employ an approved method of contraception during the period of study drug administration and 6-week follow-up period. * Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, drug administration plan, study procedures, laboratory tests, and study restrictions.

Exclusion criteria

* Treatment with systemic aminoglycoside antibiotics within 3 months prior to start of study treatment. * Initiation of systemic corticosteroids therapy within 6 months prior to start of study treatment. * Change in systemic corticosteroid therapy (for example; change in type of drug, dose modification not related to body weight change, schedule modification, interruption, or reinitiation) within 3 months prior to start of study treatment. * Any change (initiation, change in type of drug, dose modification, schedule modification,interruption, discontinuation, or reinitiation) in prophylaxis/treatment for congestive heart failure (CHF) within 3 months prior to start of study treatment. * Ongoing use of coumarin-based anticoagulants (for example; warfarin), phenytoin, tolbutamide, or paclitaxel. * Prior therapy with ataluren. * Known hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients or excipients of the study drug. * Exposure to another investigational drug within 3 months prior to start of study treatment. * History of major surgical procedure within 6 weeks prior to start of study treatment. * Ongoing immunosuppressive therapy (other than corticosteroids). * Ongoing participation in any clinical trial (except for studies specifically approved by PTC Therapeutics). * Expectation of major surgical procedure (for example; scoliosis surgery) during the 12-month treatment period of the study. * Requirement for daytime ventilator assistance. * Uncontrolled clinical symptoms and signs of CHF (American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Stage C or Stage D). * Prior or ongoing medical condition (for example; concomitant illness, psychiatric condition, behavioral disorder, alcoholism, drug abuse), medical history, physical findings (for example; lower limb injury that may affect 6MWT performance), electrocardiogram (ECG) findings, or laboratory abnormality that, in the investigator's opinion, could adversely affect the safety of the participant, makes it unlikely that the course of treatment or follow-up would be completed, or could impair the assessment of study results.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 48Baseline, Week 48The 6MWD test is a non-encouraged test performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant is instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed. Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures by measuring the 6MWD in meters. Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test. Participants with confirmed loss of ambulation at a particular visit were assigned a 6MWD result of 0. Baseline and Week 48 6MWD values are each the average of two valid 6MWD values, or a single available value if one was missing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to 10 Percent (%) Persistent Worsening in 6MWDBaseline to Week 48The 6MWD test is a non-encouraged test performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant is instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed. Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures by measuring the 6MWD in meters. Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test. Time to 10% persistent worsening in 6MWD was defined as the last time that 6MWD was not 10% worse compared with baseline. Time to 10% persistent worsening in 6MWD \<300 meters, \>=300 to 400 meters, and \>=400 meters was evaluated. For participants who did not have 10% 6MWD worsening or who were removed from study, time to 10% 6MWD worsening was censored at the time of the last 6MWD test. Participants who became non-ambulatory were considered to have 10% worsening.
Change From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 48Baseline, Week 48During the test for walking/running 10 meters, the method of walk/run used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1. Unable to walk independently; 2. Unable to walk independently but can walk with support from a person or with assistive device (full leg calipers \[knee-ankle-foot orthoses \] or walker); 3. Highly adapted gait, wide-based lordotic gait, cannot increase walking speed; 4. Moderately adapted gait, can pick up speed but cannot run; 5. Able to pick up speed but runs with a double stance phase (that is, cannot achieve both feet off the ground); 6. Runs and gets both feet off the ground (with no double stance phase). If the time taken to perform a test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform the test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. A cumulative change from baseline data has been reported.
Change From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 48Baseline, Week 48During the test for stair-climbing, the method of climbing used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1. Unable to up climb 4 standard stairs; 2. Climbs 4 standard stairs marking time (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on one or both handrails; 3. Climbs 4 standard stairs marking time (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using one arm on one handrail; 4. Climbs 4 standard stairs marking time (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), not needing handrail; 5. Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, needs handrail for support; 6. Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support. A cumulative change from baseline data has been reported.
Change From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 48Baseline, Week 48During the test for stair-descending, the method of descending used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1. Unable to descend 4 standard stairs; 2. Descends 4 standard stairs marking time (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on one or both handrails; 3. Descends 4 standard stairs marking time (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using one arm on one handrail; 4. Descends 4 standard stairs marking time (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), not needing handrail; 5. Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet, needs handrail for support; 6. Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support. A cumulative change from baseline data has been reported.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)Baseline up to Week 54An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event that occurred or worsened in the period extending from first dose of study drug to 6 weeks after the last dose of study drug. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelBaseline, Week 48Changes in activities of daily living and disease symptoms were captured via a DMD-specific survey administered by Site personnel. At screening or baseline, the participant and/or parent/caregiver were asked to identify any activities of daily living (for example, ambulation, balance, personal hygiene/grooming, dressing and undressing, self-feeding, using the bathroom, handwriting, school performance, behavior or energy level) or symptoms that were affected by the participant's DMD. At post-baseline visit (Week 48), the same participant and/or parent/caregiver was asked to describe any changes from baseline in those activities of daily living/symptoms, within the following categories: physical functioning; general energy level; cognition/school function; emotional/social functioning; and sleep. Changes from baseline were reported on a 5-point Likert scale: 1 (much worse), 2 (slightly worse), 3 (unchanged), 4 (slightly better), or 5 (much better).
Change From Baseline in PODCI Transfers/Basic Mobility and Sports/Physical Functioning Scores at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQL) were measured via the PODCI questionnaire that has been shown to correlate with disease progression and clinical outcome measures in DMD. PODCI includes a Global Functioning Scale and 5 core scales: Upper Extremity and Physical Function,Transfer/Basic Mobility, Sports/Physical Functioning, Pain/Comfort,and Happiness. The following PODCI domains were prespecified in the protocol for analysis:Transfers/Basic Mobility domain assesses difficulty experienced in performing routine motor activities in daily life. Sports/Physical Functioning domain assesses difficulty encountered in participating in more active recreational activities. Each domain was scored from 0 to 100, with 0 representing a poor outcome/worse health, while 100 representing the highest level of functioning and least pain.
Ataluren Plasma ConcentrationWeeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48Plasma samples for the determination of ataluren concentrations were analyzed using a validated high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS-MS) method with a lower limit of quantitation of 0.5 micrograms/milliliter (mcg/mL).
Study Drug ComplianceBaseline to Week 48Study drug compliance was assessed by quantification of used and unused study drug. Compliance was assessed in terms of the percentage of drug actually taken relative to the amount that should have been taken during the study.
Change From Baseline in Physical Function Total Score as Measured by NSAA at Week 48Baseline, Week 48Physical function was assessed via the NSAA, a functional scale specifically designed for ambulant Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) participants. The assessment comprised tests for 17 abilities of a participant, such as ability to stand, rise from the floor, get from lying to sitting, get from sitting to standing, raise one's head, stand on one's heels, hop, jump, and run. For each activity, a score of 0, 1, or 2 was recorded, with 0 = unable to achieve independently, 1 = modified method but achieves goal independent of physical assistance from another, or 2 = normal- achieves goal without any assistance. The sum of these scores (except for 'raise one's head' activity score) was reported as the ordinal total score, which was transformed to a linear total score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Participants with confirmed loss of ambulation at a particular visit were assigned a score of 0.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Czechia, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 291 participants were screened for eligibility, of which 61 participants did not meet entry criteria.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 230 eligible participants were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive either placebo or ataluren. 2 participants, 1 in each treatment arm, were excluded from intent-to-treat (ITT) population; as they did not have at least 1 valid post-baseline 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) value, a requirement for inclusion in ITT population.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to ataluren orally TID at morning, midday, and evening for 48 weeks.
115
Ataluren
Participants received ataluren suspension orally TID, 10 mg/kg at morning, 10 mg/kg at midday, and 20 mg/kg at evening (total daily dose 40 mg/kg) for 48 weeks.
115
Total230

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10
Overall StudyProtocol Violation11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalAtaluren
6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD)362.69 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 81.424
363.36 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 77.322
364.04 meters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 73.342
Age, Continuous9.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.65
8.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.72
8.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.79
Baseline 6MWT
<300 meters
22 Participants47 Participants25 Participants
Baseline 6MWT
>=300 to <400 meters
52 Participants99 Participants47 Participants
Baseline 6MWT
>=400 meters
41 Participants84 Participants43 Participants
Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) Scores
Sports/Physical Functioning Score
56.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.94
56.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.92
56.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.94
Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI) Scores
Transfers/Basic Mobility Score
81.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.79
82.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.53
83.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
Physical Function Total Score as Measured by North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA)60.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.37
60.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.14
60.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.97
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
115 Participants230 Participants115 Participants
Time to Climb 4 Stairs6.76 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.287
6.38 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.389
5.99 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.347
Time to Descend 4 Stairs5.05 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.362
5.06 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.247
5.07 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.157
Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters6.83 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.924
6.75 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.996
6.66 seconds
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.078

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
99 / 115103 / 115
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 1154 / 115

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 48

The 6MWD test is a non-encouraged test performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant is instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed. Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures by measuring the 6MWD in meters. Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test. Participants with confirmed loss of ambulation at a particular visit were assigned a 6MWD result of 0. Baseline and Week 48 6MWD values are each the average of two valid 6MWD values, or a single available value if one was missing.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Multiple imputation was applied to impute missing values within the treatment groups.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 48-60.67 metersStandard Error 9.323
AtalurenChange From Baseline in 6MWD at Week 48-47.69 metersStandard Error 9.247
Comparison: Analysis was performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) method including stratification factors for age (less than \[\<\] 9 years versus \[vs.\] greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 9 years), duration of use of corticosteroids at baseline (approx. \>=6 to \<12 months vs. \>=12 months), and baseline 6MWD category (\>=350 meters vs \<350 meters), as well as baseline 6MWD as covariate.p-value: 0.21395% CI: [-7.44, 33.39]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 48

During the test for stair-climbing, the method of climbing used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1. Unable to up climb 4 standard stairs; 2. Climbs 4 standard stairs marking time (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on one or both handrails; 3. Climbs 4 standard stairs marking time (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using one arm on one handrail; 4. Climbs 4 standard stairs marking time (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), not needing handrail; 5. Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, needs handrail for support; 6. Climbs 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support. A cumulative change from baseline data has been reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 484.46 secondsStandard Deviation 7.31
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Climb 4 Stairs at Week 482.65 secondsStandard Deviation 5.297
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 48

During the test for stair-descending, the method of descending used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1. Unable to descend 4 standard stairs; 2. Descends 4 standard stairs marking time (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using both arms on one or both handrails; 3. Descends 4 standard stairs marking time (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), using one arm on one handrail; 4. Descends 4 standard stairs marking time (climbs one foot at a time, with both feet on a step before moving to next step), not needing handrail; 5. Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet, needs handrail for support; 6. Descends 4 standard stairs alternating feet, not needing handrail support. A cumulative change from baseline data has been reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 483.97 secondsStandard Deviation 7.854
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Descend 4 Stairs at Week 482.15 secondsStandard Deviation 5.306
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 48

During the test for walking/running 10 meters, the method of walk/run used by the participant was categorized as follows: 1. Unable to walk independently; 2. Unable to walk independently but can walk with support from a person or with assistive device (full leg calipers \[knee-ankle-foot orthoses \] or walker); 3. Highly adapted gait, wide-based lordotic gait, cannot increase walking speed; 4. Moderately adapted gait, can pick up speed but cannot run; 5. Able to pick up speed but runs with a double stance phase (that is, cannot achieve both feet off the ground); 6. Runs and gets both feet off the ground (with no double stance phase). If the time taken to perform a test exceeded 30 seconds or if a participant could not perform the test due to disease progression, a value of 30 seconds was used. A cumulative change from baseline data has been reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 483.47 secondsStandard Deviation 6.393
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Time to Walk/Run 10 Meters at Week 482.27 secondsStandard Deviation 5.216
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event that occurred or worsened in the period extending from first dose of study drug to 6 weeks after the last dose of study drug. A summary of other non-serious AEs and all SAEs, regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported AE section'.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 54

Population: As-treated population included all randomized participants who actually received any study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)87.8 percentage of participants
AtalurenPercentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs)89.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to 10 Percent (%) Persistent Worsening in 6MWD

The 6MWD test is a non-encouraged test performed in a 30 meters long flat corridor, where the participant is instructed to walk as far as possible, back and forth around two cones, with the permission to slow down, rest, or stop if needed. Ambulation was assessed via the 6MWD test following standardized procedures by measuring the 6MWD in meters. Participants were not permitted to use assistive devices (walker, long leg braces, or short leg braces) during the 6MWD test. Time to 10% persistent worsening in 6MWD was defined as the last time that 6MWD was not 10% worse compared with baseline. Time to 10% persistent worsening in 6MWD \<300 meters, \>=300 to 400 meters, and \>=400 meters was evaluated. For participants who did not have 10% 6MWD worsening or who were removed from study, time to 10% 6MWD worsening was censored at the time of the last 6MWD test. Participants who became non-ambulatory were considered to have 10% worsening.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Multiple imputation was applied to impute missing values within treatment groups. Here, 'Number analyzed 'signifies participants evaluable for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboTime to 10 Percent (%) Persistent Worsening in 6MWD<300 meters56 days
PlaceboTime to 10 Percent (%) Persistent Worsening in 6MWD>=300 to <400 meters280 days
PlaceboTime to 10 Percent (%) Persistent Worsening in 6MWD>=400 metersNA days
AtalurenTime to 10 Percent (%) Persistent Worsening in 6MWD<300 meters164 days
AtalurenTime to 10 Percent (%) Persistent Worsening in 6MWD>=300 to <400 metersNA days
AtalurenTime to 10 Percent (%) Persistent Worsening in 6MWD>=400 metersNA days
Other Pre-specified

Ataluren Plasma Concentration

Plasma samples for the determination of ataluren concentrations were analyzed using a validated high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS-MS) method with a lower limit of quantitation of 0.5 micrograms/milliliter (mcg/mL).

Time frame: Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48

Population: As-treated population included all randomized participants who actually received any study treatment. Here, 'Number analyzed 'signifies participants evaluable at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAtaluren Plasma ConcentrationWeek 163.429 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 3.9275
PlaceboAtaluren Plasma ConcentrationWeek 243.323 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 3.6135
PlaceboAtaluren Plasma ConcentrationWeek 084.230 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 5.3913
PlaceboAtaluren Plasma ConcentrationWeek 323.480 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 3.1053
PlaceboAtaluren Plasma ConcentrationWeek 403.997 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 4.7615
PlaceboAtaluren Plasma ConcentrationWeek 483.544 mcg/mLStandard Deviation 3.8082
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in Physical Function Total Score as Measured by NSAA at Week 48

Physical function was assessed via the NSAA, a functional scale specifically designed for ambulant Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) participants. The assessment comprised tests for 17 abilities of a participant, such as ability to stand, rise from the floor, get from lying to sitting, get from sitting to standing, raise one's head, stand on one's heels, hop, jump, and run. For each activity, a score of 0, 1, or 2 was recorded, with 0 = unable to achieve independently, 1 = modified method but achieves goal independent of physical assistance from another, or 2 = normal- achieves goal without any assistance. The sum of these scores (except for 'raise one's head' activity score) was reported as the ordinal total score, which was transformed to a linear total score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Participants with confirmed loss of ambulation at a particular visit were assigned a score of 0.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Physical Function Total Score as Measured by NSAA at Week 48-8.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.65
AtalurenChange From Baseline in Physical Function Total Score as Measured by NSAA at Week 48-6.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.64
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in PODCI Transfers/Basic Mobility and Sports/Physical Functioning Scores at Week 48

Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQL) were measured via the PODCI questionnaire that has been shown to correlate with disease progression and clinical outcome measures in DMD. PODCI includes a Global Functioning Scale and 5 core scales: Upper Extremity and Physical Function,Transfer/Basic Mobility, Sports/Physical Functioning, Pain/Comfort,and Happiness. The following PODCI domains were prespecified in the protocol for analysis:Transfers/Basic Mobility domain assesses difficulty experienced in performing routine motor activities in daily life. Sports/Physical Functioning domain assesses difficulty encountered in participating in more active recreational activities. Each domain was scored from 0 to 100, with 0 representing a poor outcome/worse health, while 100 representing the highest level of functioning and least pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PODCI Transfers/Basic Mobility and Sports/Physical Functioning Scores at Week 48Transfers/Basic Mobility Score-8.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in PODCI Transfers/Basic Mobility and Sports/Physical Functioning Scores at Week 48Sports/Physical Functioning Score-7.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.87
AtalurenChange From Baseline in PODCI Transfers/Basic Mobility and Sports/Physical Functioning Scores at Week 48Transfers/Basic Mobility Score-6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.76
AtalurenChange From Baseline in PODCI Transfers/Basic Mobility and Sports/Physical Functioning Scores at Week 48Sports/Physical Functioning Score-5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.91
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site Personnel

Changes in activities of daily living and disease symptoms were captured via a DMD-specific survey administered by Site personnel. At screening or baseline, the participant and/or parent/caregiver were asked to identify any activities of daily living (for example, ambulation, balance, personal hygiene/grooming, dressing and undressing, self-feeding, using the bathroom, handwriting, school performance, behavior or energy level) or symptoms that were affected by the participant's DMD. At post-baseline visit (Week 48), the same participant and/or parent/caregiver was asked to describe any changes from baseline in those activities of daily living/symptoms, within the following categories: physical functioning; general energy level; cognition/school function; emotional/social functioning; and sleep. Changes from baseline were reported on a 5-point Likert scale: 1 (much worse), 2 (slightly worse), 3 (unchanged), 4 (slightly better), or 5 (much better).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized and received any study treatment; and had a valid baseline, and at least one valid post-baseline 6MWD value. Here, 'Number analyzed 'signifies participants evaluable for specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelSleepSlightly better4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelCognition/Social FunctioningUnchanged71 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelCognition/Social FunctioningSlightly worse3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelEmotional/Social FunctioningMuch better3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelGeneral Energy LevelSlightly better12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: OtherMuch better4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: OtherSlightly worse7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: OtherMuch worse7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelCognition/Social FunctioningMuch better6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelCognition/Social FunctioningSlightly better12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Upper Extremity ActivityMuch better1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Upper Extremity ActivitySlightly better7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Upper Extremity ActivityUnchanged67 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Upper Extremity ActivitySlightly worse6 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Upper Extremity ActivityMuch worse1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: WalkingMuch better5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: WalkingSlightly better13 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: WalkingUnchanged57 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: WalkingSlightly worse19 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: WalkingMuch worse18 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Climbing StairsMuch better4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Climbing StairsSlightly better8 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Climbing StairsUnchanged61 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Climbing StairsSlightly worse17 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: OtherSlightly better9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: OtherUnchanged38 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Climbing StairsMuch worse15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelGeneral Energy LevelUnchanged54 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelGeneral Energy LevelSlightly worse11 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelGeneral Energy LevelMuch worse3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelCognition/Social FunctioningMuch worse0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelEmotional/Social FunctioningSlightly better9 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelEmotional/Social FunctioningUnchanged75 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelSleepMuch better3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelSleepUnchanged73 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelEmotional/Social FunctioningSlightly worse5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelEmotional/Social FunctioningMuch worse2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelGeneral Energy LevelMuch better3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelSleepSlightly worse5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelSleepMuch worse0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelOtherMuch better0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelOtherSlightly better5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelOtherUnchanged15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelOtherSlightly worse2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelOtherMuch worse1 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: OtherMuch better5 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelCognition/Social FunctioningSlightly better20 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelSleepMuch worse2 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelCognition/Social FunctioningUnchanged74 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: OtherSlightly better10 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelCognition/Social FunctioningSlightly worse3 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelCognition/Social FunctioningMuch worse2 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelOtherUnchanged13 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelEmotional/Social FunctioningSlightly better21 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelEmotional/Social FunctioningUnchanged68 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Climbing StairsSlightly worse15 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelEmotional/Social FunctioningSlightly worse6 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Climbing StairsMuch worse13 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: OtherSlightly worse8 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelGeneral Energy LevelMuch better8 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelGeneral Energy LevelSlightly better12 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelCognition/Social FunctioningMuch better5 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelOtherMuch better1 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelGeneral Energy LevelUnchanged63 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Upper Extremity ActivityMuch better4 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelEmotional/Social FunctioningMuch worse2 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Upper Extremity ActivitySlightly better7 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelGeneral Energy LevelSlightly worse5 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Upper Extremity ActivityUnchanged73 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelOtherMuch worse0 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Upper Extremity ActivitySlightly worse2 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelSleepUnchanged76 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Upper Extremity ActivityMuch worse2 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelEmotional/Social FunctioningMuch better8 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: WalkingMuch better8 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelOtherSlightly better6 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: WalkingSlightly better16 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelSleepSlightly worse2 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: WalkingUnchanged60 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: OtherUnchanged44 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: WalkingSlightly worse21 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelSleepMuch better3 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: WalkingMuch worse3 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelGeneral Energy LevelMuch worse1 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Climbing StairsMuch better4 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelOtherSlightly worse3 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Climbing StairsSlightly better13 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: OtherMuch worse1 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelPhysical Functioning: Climbing StairsUnchanged65 Participants
AtalurenNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living and Disease Status at Week 48, as Assessed by a Standardized Survey Administered by Site PersonnelSleepSlightly better8 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Study Drug Compliance

Study drug compliance was assessed by quantification of used and unused study drug. Compliance was assessed in terms of the percentage of drug actually taken relative to the amount that should have been taken during the study.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 48

Population: As-treated population included all randomized participants who actually received any study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboStudy Drug Compliance95.1 percentage of drugStandard Deviation 9.43
AtalurenStudy Drug Compliance95.7 percentage of drugStandard Deviation 7.57

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 22, 2026