Skip to content

Airway Evaluation by McGrath Videolaryngoscope

Comparison of Cormack-Lehane Score in Sedation and Anesthesia Condition by McGrath Videolaryngoscope

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01824914
Enrollment
97
Registered
2013-04-05
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2014-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia

Keywords

videolaryngoscope, tracheal intubation, Cormack-Lehane grade, airway evaluation, sedation, anesthesia

Brief summary

Difficult tracheal intubation is a cause of severe patient damage and death. There is not a good method to predict it. The McGrath Series 5 video laryngoscope can improve visualization of the glottic structures one to two grades. Moreover unlike a classical laryngoscope with a Macintosh blade, the McGrath provides a view of the glottis without requiring alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and laryngeal axes. In this study, the investigators will use it to compare the Cormack-Lehane score in sedation and anesthesia condition. It helps to know the role of videolaryngoscope in predicting difficult intubation.

Detailed description

* The enrolled patients were given a bolus of sufentanil 0.3-0.5μg/kg to achieve Ramsay sedation score 2-3. The Cormack-Lehane score in sedation was evaluated by McGrath videolaryngoscope. * Then the patients were induced with propofol. A bolus of rocuronium was given to facilitate intubation. The Cormack-Lehane score in anesthesia was recorded when intubated by McGrath videolaryngoscope. * BMI, mouth opening, thyromental distance, intubation duration and ramsay sedation score were also recorded. * To compare the Cormack-Lehane score in sedate and anesthesia condition

Interventions

A kind of portable videolaryngoscopes, produced by Aircraft Medical. It has been used for difficult airway.

Sponsors

Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients scheduled for general surgery under general anesthesia * ASA classification 1-3

Exclusion criteria

* emergent operation, aspiration risk * a history of difficult airway * expected difficult airway * incooperative patients with mental diseases, hearing disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cormack-Lehane score in sedation condition5 minutes after administration of sufentanilBased on the Modified Cormack-Lehane classification. 5 degrades. 1-5
Cormack-lehane score in anesthesia condition1 minute after administration of rocuroniumBased on the Modified Cormack-Lehane classification. 5 degrades. 1-5

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of intubationAt intubationThe duration of intubation is defined as the time from inserting videolaryngoscope, intubating a tube, to withdrawing videolaryngoscope using a stopwatch.
Sedation score5 minutes after administraion of sufentanilby Ramsay sedation score 1-6. The higher score, the deeper sedation

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
BMIOne day before operation
Thyromental distanceOne day before operationmeasuring with a ruler
Mallampati classificationOne day before operation4 degrades
Mouth openingOne day before operationmeasuring with a ruler

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026