Skip to content

Feasibility Study of Meso BioMatrix Device for Breast Reconstruction

Meso BioMatrix Acellular Peritoneum Matrix Breast Reconstruction Feasibility Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01823107
Enrollment
25
Registered
2013-04-04
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2017-06-29
Last updated
2019-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Meso BioMatrix, Breast, Breast Cancer, Mastectomy, Biologic Mesh, Breast Reconstruction

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the use of Meso BioMatrix Acellular Peritoneum Matrix for the reinforcement of weakened soft tissue during 2-stage, tissue expander assisted breast reconstruction.

Detailed description

Following mastectomy, women may elect to have breast reconstruction with autologous tissue or breast implants. Two-stage, tissue expander assisted breast reconstruction is one of the common surgical methods that could be selected to reconstruct the breast. This method either begins immediately after mastectomy (known as immediate breast reconstruction) or at some time afterward (known as delayed breast reconstruction). Historically, surgeons placed a tissue expander followed by the breast implant either completely or partially under the pectoralis muscle. However, this method of breast reconstruction has been associated with less favorable aesthetic outcomes. Recently, surgeons started adding a surgical mesh derived from human cadaver skin during breast reconstruction procedures. In summary, during the first stage of the breast reconstruction, the plastic surgeon releases the pectoralis muscle from the chest wall. The surgeon then attaches the surgical mesh to the pectoralis muscle and to the chest wall just below the breast. This is done to create a pocket for the tissue expander. The tissue expander is implanted in the pocket and partially inflated. The tissue expander is gradually filled with saline over several weeks or months. Once the desired breast volume has been achieved, the second stage of the reconstruction takes place. In the second stage, the tissue expander is removed and replaced with a permanent saline or silicone gel breast implant. Use of the human cadaver skin surgical mesh during breast reconstruction has been associated with less pain, fewer tissue expansion visits and improved aesthetic outcomes. However, the human cadaver skin surgical mesh adds significant cost to the procedure and some surgeons have reported an increased rate of post-operative complications. Over the last 10 years, a number of surgical mesh devices have been cleared by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) for the reinforcement and repair weak soft tissue or became available as tissue grafts from human donors. Some surgeons have published their experience with a number of these surgical mesh devices for breast reconstruction. However, at present, no surgical mesh device is approved or cleared by the FDA for use in breast reconstruction. The Meso BioMatrix device was recently cleared by the FDA for reinforcement and repair of weak soft tissue. It is a surgical mesh device that is made from pig peritoneum, the tissue that lines the abdominal cavity. The tissue is thoroughly cleaned and sterilized before use. When implanted, the Meso BioMatrix device provides structural and mechanical support to weak soft tissue during the healing process. This clinical trial is a feasibility trial. A feasibility trial is a clinical trial in which a device is being studied in a small group of people for a new use. Since the Meso BioMatrix device is not cleared specifically for use in breast reconstruction, it is considered investigational and must be studied in a controlled, step-wise series of clinical trials. Therefore, the results of this trial, if successful, may be used to design a larger clinical trial in the future.

Interventions

DEVICEMeso BioMatrix Device

Sponsors

Kensey Nash Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Non-smoker * Undergoing unilateral or bilateral, two-stage, tissue expander-assisted breast reconstruction * Life expectancy greater than 18 months * Agreement to return for the trial required follow-up visits

Exclusion criteria

* Body mass index ≥ 35 * Prior reconstructive breast surgery, breast augmentation, mastopexy or reduction mammoplasty * History of chronic corticosteroid use * Type I Diabetes * History of radiation therapy to the chest * Pre-operative treatment with induction chemotherapy for breast cancer * Pregnancy * Participating in another investigational drug or device trial that has not completed the follow-up period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Breast Related Adverse Events18 monthsInvestigators evaluated each subject and each reconstructed breast for the occurrence of an adverse event from the first stage of reconstruction through the final follow-up visit. A breast related adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence related to a reconstructed breast.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of Aesthetic Satisfaction With the Use of the Breast-Q Survey18 months (12 months after second stage reconstruction)Subjects completed the reconstructive module of the BREAST-Q, a standardized instrument measuring patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life on a scale of 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction. Completed Breast-Q questionnaires were scored according to the author's instructions. Aesthetic satisfaction was measured using the Breast-Q Satisfaction with Breasts subscale score.
Rate of Reconstruction Failure18 monthsReconstruction failure was defined as a serious adverse event in a reconstructed breast resulting in unplanned removal of the prosthesis and/or Meso BioMatrix Acellular Peritoneum Matrix.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Meso BioMatrix Acellular Peritoneum Matrix
All subjects had the Meso BioMatrix Acellular Peritoneum Matrix implanted along with a tissue expander during the first stage of breast reconstruction. After tissue expansion, the tissue expander was replaced with a breast implant during the second stage of reconstruction.
25
Total25

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMeso BioMatrix Acellular Peritoneum Matrix
Age, Continuous49.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
Body Mass Index25.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Rate of Breast Related Adverse Events

Investigators evaluated each subject and each reconstructed breast for the occurrence of an adverse event from the first stage of reconstruction through the final follow-up visit. A breast related adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence related to a reconstructed breast.

Time frame: 18 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Meso BioMatrix Acellular Peritoneum MatrixRate of Breast Related Adverse Events12 Reconstructed breasts affected
Secondary

Measurement of Aesthetic Satisfaction With the Use of the Breast-Q Survey

Subjects completed the reconstructive module of the BREAST-Q, a standardized instrument measuring patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life on a scale of 1 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction. Completed Breast-Q questionnaires were scored according to the author's instructions. Aesthetic satisfaction was measured using the Breast-Q Satisfaction with Breasts subscale score.

Time frame: 18 months (12 months after second stage reconstruction)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Meso BioMatrix Acellular Peritoneum MatrixMeasurement of Aesthetic Satisfaction With the Use of the Breast-Q Survey71.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
Secondary

Rate of Reconstruction Failure

Reconstruction failure was defined as a serious adverse event in a reconstructed breast resulting in unplanned removal of the prosthesis and/or Meso BioMatrix Acellular Peritoneum Matrix.

Time frame: 18 months

Population: Forty-four (44) breasts were reconstructed among the 25 enrolled subjects. Reconstruction failure was evaluated on a per reconstructed breast basis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Meso BioMatrix Acellular Peritoneum MatrixRate of Reconstruction Failure3 Reconstructed breasts affected

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026