Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of a Transvaginal Suture Capturing Mesh Device

Safety and Efficacy of a Transvaginal Suture Capturing Mesh Device: The Nordic Uphold LITE Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01823055
Enrollment
214
Registered
2013-04-04
Start date
2012-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2013-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical Repair of Middle Compartment Prolapse (Vaginal Vault or Uterine Prolapse) With or Without Cystocele

Brief summary

To perform a clinical safety and efficacy assessment of the Uphold LITE system for pelvic organ prolapse in a prospective multicenter, single cohort study.

Interventions

PROCEDURETransvaginal suture capturing mesh device

The Uphold™ LITE vaginal support system is an intra-vaginal approach to apical and anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair that utilizes a suture capturing device to place the mesh. After primary dissection the suturing device is used to pull the mesh through the sacrospinous ligament, medial to the ischial spine. An anterior colporraphy was allowed following the Uphold™ LITE procedure at the discretion of the surgeon if deemed necessary.

Sponsors

Stockholm County Council, Karolinska Institutet research foundations, Swedish Society of Medicine, Boston Scientific
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Karolinska Institutet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older and present with primary or recurrent prolapse of the middle vaginal compartment corresponding to stage 2 or higher (according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification \[POP-Q\] system)9, * with or without anterior vaginal wall prolapse, and * experiences symptoms of vaginal bulging with or without a previous hysterectomy * being able to provide oral and written informed consent before entering the study.

Exclusion criteria

* previous cancer of any pelvic organ, * systemic glucocorticoid treatment, * insulin-treated diabetes, * an inability to participate in study follow-up or to provide informed consent, or * the need for any concomitant pelvic surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Immediate and delayed complications related to the surgical procedure1 yearSerious surgical complications are categorised as any surgical event which is potentially life-threatening, internal organ perforation (or other injury), bleeding in excess of 1000 mL or adverse events, related to the surgical procedure, during follow-up which requires re-hospitalisation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system1 yearThe secondary efficacy outcome is a composite of objective and subjective measures including POP-Q stage 0 or 1 of the upper vaginal segment (i.e., point C/D, which represents the most distal point of the vaginal apex in relation to the total vaginal length) and a negative response to the question, Do you experience a feeling of bulging or protrusion in the vaginal area? (question 16 on the UDI). The secondary outcome measures further include the individual components of the composite end point, other POP-Q measurements and patient-reported urogenital distress.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026