Skip to content

Phase 3b Study of Metvix NDL-PDT Versus Metvix c-PDT in Subjects With Actinic Keratoses

Multi-centre, Randomized, Investigator-blind, Intra-individual Active and Vehicle-controlled Study, Comparing Metvix Natural Daylight Photodynamic Therapy Versus Metvix Conventional Photodynamic Therapy in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01821391
Acronym
COMET2
Enrollment
131
Registered
2013-04-01
Start date
2013-07-31
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2021-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Actinic Keratoses

Keywords

actinic keratoses, photodynamic therapy, natural daylight

Brief summary

This study was to be conducted as a multi-centre, randomized, investigator-blinded, active and vehicle-controlled, intra-individual (split-face/scalp) non-inferiority (regarding efficacy) and superiority (regarding pain) study. The primary purpose of this study is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of NDL-PDT compared to c-PDT in terms of lesion complete response rate.

Interventions

DRUGNDL-PDT

Metvix natural daylight photodynamic therapy

DRUGc-PDT

Metvix conventional photodynamic therapy

DRUGplacebo c-PDT

Metvix placebo conventional photodynamic therapy

Sponsors

Galderma R&D
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Intervention model description

2 intra-individual groups: * Metvix NDL-PDT / Metvix c-PDT * Metvix NDL-PDT / Placebo c-PDT

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of mild (Grade 1) and/or moderate (Grade 2) AKs on the face or the scalp on treated areas * Subject with two symmetrical treated areas half scalps or two half faces excluding ears, chin, bridge of the nose, eyelids and lips inside the vermillion border): no more than a twofold difference in terms of total number of lesions between the two TAs

Exclusion criteria

* Subject with clinical diagnosis of at least one severe (Grade 3) AK on treated areas * Subject with pigmented AK on the treated areas * Immuno-compromised Subject for idiopathic, disease specific or therapeutic reasons * Subject with porphyria,

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage (%) Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Complete Response at Week 12 in Group 1Baseline, Week 12The lesion complete response rate was defined as the percentage of pre-existing and treated lesions at Baseline that were assessed as clear (complete disappearance of the lesion, visually and by palpation) at Week 12. New lesions or the lesions in non-complete response were not not considered in the lesion response assessment. This outcome measure was analyzed as an intra-individual comparison between Metvix NDL-PDT on one side of the face/scalp and Metvix vehicle cream (placebo) c-PDT on the contralateral side (Group I).

Countries

France, Germany, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1
Participants applied single dose of Metvix cream topically followed by NDL-PDT (test treatment) on one half-face/scalp and on the contra-lateral side of face/scalp applied Metvix cream topically followed by c- PDT (active comparator) on Day 0 (Baseline).
108
Group 2
Participants applied a single dose of Metvix cream topically followed by NDL-PDT (test treatment) on one half-face/scalp and on the contra-lateral side of face/scalp applied Metvix vehicle cream (placebo) followed by c-PDT on Day 0 (Baseline).
23
Total131

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalGroup 2Group 1
Age, Categorical
Age
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Age
>=65 years
110 Participants21 Participants89 Participants
Age, Categorical
Age
Between 18 and 65 years
21 Participants2 Participants19 Participants
Duration of AK (years)9.15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.78
6.79 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.81
9.66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.07
Phototype
Phototype I
11 Participants1 Participants10 Participants
Phototype
Phototype II
86 Participants17 Participants69 Participants
Phototype
Phototype III
27 Participants3 Participants24 Participants
Phototype
Phototype IV
7 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Race
Other
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race
White
130 Participants22 Participants108 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants1 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
121 Participants22 Participants99 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1310 / 1080 / 231 / 131
other
Total, other adverse events
65 / 13166 / 1087 / 233 / 131
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1310 / 1080 / 236 / 131

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage (%) Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Complete Response at Week 12 in Group 1

The lesion complete response rate was defined as the percentage of pre-existing and treated lesions at Baseline that were assessed as clear (complete disappearance of the lesion, visually and by palpation) at Week 12. New lesions or the lesions in non-complete response were not not considered in the lesion response assessment. This outcome measure was analyzed as an intra-individual comparison between Metvix NDL-PDT on one side of the face/scalp and Metvix vehicle cream (placebo) c-PDT on the contralateral side (Group I).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included entire population enrolled and randomized. ITT analysis imputed missing data using a worst case approach and considered the lesions with missed lesion response assessment as not responded (ITT/Worst-case) lesions.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group I: Metvix NDL-PDTPercentage (%) Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Complete Response at Week 12 in Group 168.4 percentage change from baselineStandard Deviation 27.7
Group I: Metvix c-PDTPercentage (%) Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Complete Response at Week 12 in Group 171.5 percentage change from baselineStandard Deviation 27.6
p-value: =0.2665Paired Student's t test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026