Skip to content

Transcranial Brain Stimulation in Vegetative State Patients

Study on the Use of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Promote Diagnosis, Prognosis and Innovative Rehabilitation in Patients in Vegetative and Minimally Conscious State.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01820923
Enrollment
40
Registered
2013-03-29
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2015-03-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vegetative State, Minimally Conscious State

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to determine whether transcranial brain stimulations, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), are effective in terms of EEG coherence and clinical changes in patients in vegetative and minimally conscious state.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

2 mA of intensity, 20 minutes of stimulation over the left fronto-temporal prefrontal cortex.

DEVICERepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)

Frequency of stimulation: 10Hz. Interstimulus interval: 1 min. Number of stimuli per session: 300. Number of sessions per week: 4 Total number of stimuli: 1.200

The electrodes of stimulation will be applied in the left fronto-temporal prefrontal cortex, but the device will be turned off.

The coil will be applied on the left fronto-temporal prefrontal cortex, but the device will be turned off.

Sponsors

IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of vegetative state od minimally conscious state defined by the Disability Rating Scale with a score between 17 and 29. * Age between 18 and 65 years. * Time from the lesion: more than 4 months. * Stable clinical condition. * written consent fron the legal administrator of the patient.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of epileptiform activity on EEG. * Previous history of epilepsy. * Extensive hemorrhage or ischemia. * Metallic clips or intracranial implants. * Pacemaker e Baclofen infusion. * Presence of drugs influencing arousal or awareness.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EEG coherence analysisChange from baseline EEG coherence at the end of brain stimulation (two weeks)EEG will be filtered between 0.5 and 30Hz by elliptic filters. Fast Fourier Transformation will be performed on 2 sec-epochs. For each stimulation site, coherence values will be estimated within four frequency bands: Delta (0.5-3.5 Hz), Theta (4-7.5 Hz), Alpha (8-12.5 Hz), and Beta (13-30 Hz). Each coherence map will be proportionally thresholded, preserving 50% of the strongest coherence values, to produce a weighted adjacency matrix. The estimated functional connectivity patterns will be characterized by means of two global network metrics derived from graph theory: modularity and global efficiency. Modularity measures how the network is organized into modules with high level clustering. Global efficiency measures how efficient the network is in exchanging information at the global level.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Disability Rating ScaleChange from baseline DRS scale at the end of brain stimulation (two weeks)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Western Neuro Sensory Stimulation Profile (WNSSP)Change from baseline WNSSP scale at the end of brain stimulation (two weeks)This scale is developed to assess cognitive function in severely impaired head-injured adults and to monitor and predict change in slow-to-recover patients.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026