Skip to content

Evaluation of Store-and-Forward Teledermatology Versus a Face-to-Face Assessment During a Skin Cancer Screening Event

Evaluation of Store-and-Forward Teledermatology Versus a Face-to-Face Assessment During a Skin Cancer Screening Event

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01820234
Enrollment
170
Registered
2013-03-28
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2011-06-30
Last updated
2017-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Screening, Skin Cancer, Telemedicine

Keywords

Skin cancer, Teledermatology, Screening, Store-and-forward

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic and management concordance of face-to-face dermatologist versus a store-and-forward teledermatologist at a skin cancer screening event. The investigators' hypotheses include the following: 1. Compared to in-person assessment, store-and-forward teledermatology assessment will result in adequate diagnostic concordance. 2. Compared to in-person assessment, store-and-forward teledermatology results in adequate management concordance. 3. The sensitivity and specificity of store-and-forward evaluation to detecting lesions that are either premalignant or malignant will be similar to that of in-person evaluation.

Interventions

OTHERIn-person dermatology evaluation

Every patient will be evaluated by an in person dermatologist present at the screening.

OTHERStore-and-forward teledermatology evaluation

Every patient will be evaluated online via a store and forward teledermatology modality.

Sponsors

University of California, Davis
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older at time of consent, may be male or female. * Able to provide a brief medical history and have/allow an examination of their skin including photographs. * Capable of giving informed consent. * Will be able to receive notification of follow-up recommendations

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who will not provide informed consent * Patient who are unable to fulfill tasks of this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Aggregated diagnostic concordanceAt the time of dermatologist evaluation (Day 1)Aggregated diagnostic concordance which is defined as the agreement of the in-person dermatologist's principle diagnosis with the teledermatologist's primary diagnosis or any of the differential diagnoses.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary diagnostic concordanceAt the time of dermatologist evaluation (Day 1)Diagnostic concordance between the in-person dermatologist and the teledermatologist for their primary diagnosis.
Categorical diagnostic concordanceAt the time of dermatologist evaluation (Day 1)Diagnostic concordance between the in-person dermatologist and teledermatologist based on standard clinical diagnostic categories for each lesion.
Management concordanceAt the time of dermatologist evaluation (Day 1)The concordance between the in-person dermatologist and teledermatologist for the chosen management plan for each lesion.
SensitivityAt the time of dermatologist evaluation (Day 1)The sensitivity of store-and-forward evaluation to detecting lesions that are either premalignant or malignant.
SpecificityAt the time of dermatologist evaluation (Day 1)The specificity of store-and-forward evaluation to detecting lesions that are either premalignant or malignant.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026