Skip to content

Single Centre Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of Two Pelvic Support Garments

Management of Antenatal Pelvic Girdle Pain Study (MAPS): a Single Centre Blinded Randomized Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of Two Pelvic Support Garments

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01820013
Acronym
MAPS
Enrollment
72
Registered
2013-03-28
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2015-12-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Pain, Symphysis Pubis Dysfunction

Keywords

Pelvic Girdle pain, Symphysis Pubis Dysfunction, Sacroiliac Joint, Sacroiliitis, Physiotherapy, Physical Therapy, Orthotic Devices

Brief summary

This blinded randomized comparative trial aims to determine the effectiveness of a customized Dynamic Elastomeric Fabric Orthoses (DEFO) compared to a standard pelvic belt in: a) reducing pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PGP), b) optimizing activity levels in pregnant women with PGP, c) improving quality of life for pregnant women with PGP d) cost effectiveness.

Detailed description

Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) occurs in an estimated 70% of pregnant women, of whom 25% have severe pain and 8% significant disability. Current methods of management, such as the use of rigid pelvic belts, are limited in their effectiveness. The Dynamic Elastomeric Fabric Orthoses (DEFO) has recently proven beneficial in managing PGP in athletes. There is a need to explore the potential use of DEFO for managing PGP during pregnancy. The primary aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of a DEFO to a rigid 'off the shelf' pelvic support belt in terms of its effectiveness in reducing PGP during pregnancy. The secondary aims of the study are to compare the effectiveness of the DEFO to the rigid 'off the shelf' pelvic support belt in (a) optimizing activity levels in pregnant women with PGP, (b)improving quality of life for pregnant women with PGP. The relative cost effectiveness of these two interventions will also be compared.

Interventions

DEVICECustomised Dynamic Elastomeric fabric Orthoses

Eligible participants will be measured and fitted with a customised Dynamic Elastomeric Fabric Orthoses. The participant may require a re-fitting of the garment as they progress through their pregnancy. Participants will also be issued with standardised advice on PGP management via an information leaflet from Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Women's health website.

DEVICESerola Sacroiliac Belt

Eligible participants will be measured and fitted with a Serola sacroiliac belt. Participants will also be issued with standardised advice on PGP management via an information leaflet from Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Women's health website.

Sponsors

University of Plymouth
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

women 20-36 weeks pregnant, who: * report intermittent PGP (commenced or aggravated during pregnancy) which causes walking and/or stair climbing to be bothersome and * are positive on at least 3 out of 7 pain provocation tests

Exclusion criteria

* recent history/signs or symptoms indicative of serious causes of pain that might be inflammatory, infective, traumatic, neoplastic, degenerative or metabolic, i.e. trauma, unexplained weight loss, history of cancer, steroid use, drug abuse, HIV infection, immunosuppressed state, neurological symptoms/signs such as: bowel, bladder, sensory, motor, reflex involvement (cauda equina, lumbar disk lesion, spinal stenosis,) * fever * systemically unwell * obstetric complications * pain that does not improve with rest/severe disabling pain * history of chronic back or pelvic pain requiring surgery * focal inflammatory signs/tenderness of spine (spondylolisthesis) * known skin allergy to lycra * \>36 weeks pregnant (production of customized DEFO will take approximately 1 week)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain LevelsBaseline (pre intervention), 2 weekly intervals for potential of 20 weeks(pre-partum), 2 weekly intervals for 6 weeks (post-partum)Change in pain levels at 2 weekly intervals will be measured by a self report numerical rating scale.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Activity LevelsBaseline (pre intervention), 2 weekly intervals for potential of 20 weeks(pre-partum), 2 weekly intervals for 6 weeks (post-partum)Change in activity levels at 2 weekly intervals will be measured by a self report questionnaire.
Change in Quality of LifeBaseline (pre intervention), 2 weekly intervals for potential of 20 weeks(pre-partum), 2 weekly intervals for 6 weeks (post-partum)Change in Quality of life at two weekly intervals will be measured by two self report questionnaires: (i) Short Form 36 - Item Health Survey (Version 2) (ii) Euroqol (EQ-5D) Health Questionnaire

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026