Skip to content

Phase 3 Study of Carfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone vs Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

A Randomized, Open-label Phase 3 Study of Carfilzomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan, and Prednisone in Transplant-ineligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01818752
Acronym
CLARION
Enrollment
955
Registered
2013-03-26
Start date
2013-07-08
Completion date
2016-11-04
Last updated
2019-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Brief summary

The primary objective was to compare the progression-free survival of transplant ineligible patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma who were treated with carfilzomib, melphalan and prednisone (CMP) or with Velcade® (bortezomib), melphalan and prednisone (VMP).

Interventions

DRUGCarfilzomib

Carfilzomib was administered over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 22, 23, 29, and 30 for nine 42-day cycles. Carfilzomib 20 mg/m² IV was administered on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1, followed by escalation to 36 mg/m² IV starting on day 8 of cycle 1.

DRUGBortezomib

Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² was administered as a bolus IV injection or as a subcutaneous injection (per investigator's choice, dose modification, or regulatory approval) on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, and 32 of cycles 1 to 4, and on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 of cycles 5 to 9.

DRUGMelphalan

Melphalan 9 mg/m² was taken orally on days 1 to 4 of all cycles.

DRUGPrednisone

Prednisone 60 mg/m² was taken orally on days 1 to 4 of all cycles.

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma (per International Myeloma Working Group \[IMWG\] diagnostic criteria) 2. Transplant ineligibility 3. Measurable disease, as defined by 1 or more of the following (assessed within 21 days prior to randomization): * Serum M-protein ≥ 0.5 g/dL, or * Urine M-protein ≥ 200 mg/24 hours, or * In subjects without detectable serum or urine M-protein, serum free light chain (SFLC) \> 100 mg/L (involved light chain) and an abnormal kappa lambda ratio (SFLC kappa lambda ratio \< 0.26 or \> 1.65) 4. No prior treatment for multiple myeloma 5. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2

Exclusion criteria

1. Multiple myeloma of IgM (immunoglobulin M) subtype 2. Glucocorticoid therapy within 14 days prior to randomization that equals or exceeds a cumulative dose of 160 mg of dexamethasone 3. POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein, and skin changes) 4. Plasma cell leukemia (\> 2.0 × 10\^9/L circulating plasma cells by standard differential) 5. Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) 6. Known amyloidosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)From randomization until the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time for PFS was 21.6.and 22.2 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the earlier of documented disease progression or death due to any cause. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. The duration of PFS was censored for participants with no baseline and/or post-baseline disease assessments, who started a new anti-cancer therapy before documentation of disease progression or death, death or disease progression after missed disease assessment of 100 consecutive days or longer, or who were alive without documentation of disease progression before the data cutoff date, including lost to follow-up prior to disease progression. Participants were evaluated for disease response and progression according to the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC), determined centrally using a validated computer algorithm in a blinded manner.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Response RateDisease response was assessed every 3 weeks during the first 54 weeks and every 6 weeks thereafter until PD or the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time was 21.6.and 22.2 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.Disease response was evaluated according to the IMWG-URC using a validated computer algorithm. Overall response was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR). sCR: As for CR, normal serum free light chain (SFLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow (BM). CR: No immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \< 5% plasma cells in BM biopsy; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not electrophoresis or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein with urine M-protein \<100 mg/24 hours. A ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas if present at baseline. PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in urine M-protein by ≥ 90% or to \< 200 mg/24 hours. A ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas if present at baseline.
Overall Survival (OS)From randomization until the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time for OS was 22.2 and 22.5 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death (whatever the cause). Participants who were alive or lost to follow-up as of the data analysis cut-off date were censored on the date the patient was last known to be alive. Median overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants With ≥ Grade 2 Peripheral NeuropathyFrom the first dose of any study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of any study drug as of the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median duration of treatment was 52 weeks in both treatment groups.Neuropathy events were defined as Grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy as specified by peripheral neuropathy Standardised Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Query, narrow (scope) (SMQN) terms. Peripheral neuropathy was assessed by neurologic exam and graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03: Grade 1: Asymptomatic; Grade 2: Moderate symptoms, limiting instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) Grade 3: Severe symptoms; limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: Death.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresBaseline, weeks 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a validated self-rating questionnaire including 30 items used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL scale was scored between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better Global Health Status/QOL.
Number of Participants With Adverse EventsFrom the first dose of any study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of any study drug as of the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median duration of treatment was 52 weeks in both treatment groups.Adverse events (AEs)were graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), version 4.03, where GRADE 1 = Mild; GRADE 2 = Moderate; GRADE 3 = Severe; GRADE 4 = Life-threatening; GRADE 5 = Fatal. A serious adverse event is an adverse event that met 1 or more of the following criteria: * Death * Life-threatening * Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization * Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Congenital anomaly/birth defect * Important medical event that jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-related adverse events are adverse events considered related to at least 1 investigational product by the investigator, including those with unknown relationship.
Complete Response RateDisease response was assessed every 3 weeks during the first 54 weeks and every 6 weeks thereafter until PD or the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time was 21.6.and 22.2 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.Complete response rate was defined as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who achieved a sCR or CR per the IMWG-URC as their best response. sCR: As for CR, normal serum free light chain (SFLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow (BM). CR: No immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \< 5% plasma cells in BM biopsy.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study was conducted at 183 centers in Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Russia, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and United States.

Pre-assignment details

Eligible participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization was stratified by International Staging System (ISS) stage (stage 1 versus stages 2 or 3), choice of route of bortezomib administration (intravenous \[IV\] versus subcutaneous \[SC\]), region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, or other), and age (\< 75 years versus ≥ 75 years).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone
Participants received bortezomib in combination with melphalan and prednisone for nine 42-day cycles. Bortezomib was administered either IV or subcutaneously at 1.3 mg/m² during cycles 1 to 4 on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, and 32 followed by 1.3 mg/m² during cycles 5 to 9 on days 1, 8, 22, and 29. On days 1 to 4 of each cycle, melphalan was administered at 9 mg/m² and prednisone was administered at 60 mg/m².
477
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, Prednisone
Participants received carfilzomib administered in combination with melphalan and prednisone for nine 42-day cycles. Carfilzomib was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 22, 23, 29, and 30 of each 42-day cycle. The carfilzomib dose was at 20 mg/m² on cycle 1, days 1 and 2 followed by 36 mg/m² thereafter. On days 1 to 4, melphalan was administered at 9 mg/m² and prednisone was administered at 60 mg/m².
478
Total955

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event6474
Overall StudyContinuing Treatment14
Overall StudyDeath1418
Overall StudyDisease Progression5448
Overall StudyNon-compliance1620
Overall StudyOther78
Overall StudyPhysician Decision98
Overall StudyRandomized but not Dosed74
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1514

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCarfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneTotalBortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone
Age, Continuous72.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7
71.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1
71.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
0 (Fully active)
129 participants254 participants125 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
1 (Restrictive but ambulatory)
260 participants510 participants250 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
2 (Ambulatory but unable to work)
89 participants190 participants101 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Missing
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants33 Participants15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
427 Participants870 Participants443 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
33 Participants52 Participants19 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 participants3 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
123 participants244 participants121 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
3 participants3 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
2 participants2 participants0 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Reported
19 participants31 participants12 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 participants4 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
329 participants668 participants339 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
235 Participants473 Participants238 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
243 Participants482 Participants239 Participants
Stratification Factor: Age
< 75 years
327 participants656 participants329 participants
Stratification Factor: Age
≥ 75 years
151 participants299 participants148 participants
Stratification Factor: International Staging System (ISS) Stage
Stage I
95 participants194 participants99 participants
Stratification Factor: International Staging System (ISS) Stage
Stage II or III
383 participants761 participants378 participants
Stratification Factor: Region of Enrollment
Asia Pacific
140 participants281 participants141 participants
Stratification Factor: Region of Enrollment
Europe
320 participants637 participants317 participants
Stratification Factor: Region of Enrollment
North America
8 participants20 participants12 participants
Stratification Factor: Region of Enrollment
Other
10 participants17 participants7 participants
Stratification Factor: Route of Bortezomib Administration
Intravenous
123 participants246 participants123 participants
Stratification Factor: Route of Bortezomib Administration
Subcutaneous
355 participants709 participants354 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
437 / 470437 / 474
serious
Total, serious adverse events
198 / 470235 / 474

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the earlier of documented disease progression or death due to any cause. PFS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. The duration of PFS was censored for participants with no baseline and/or post-baseline disease assessments, who started a new anti-cancer therapy before documentation of disease progression or death, death or disease progression after missed disease assessment of 100 consecutive days or longer, or who were alive without documentation of disease progression before the data cutoff date, including lost to follow-up prior to disease progression. Participants were evaluated for disease response and progression according to the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria (IMWG-URC), determined centrally using a validated computer algorithm in a blinded manner.

Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time for PFS was 21.6.and 22.2 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.

Population: The intent-to-treat population included all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneProgression-Free Survival (PFS)22.1 months
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneProgression-Free Survival (PFS)22.3 months
Comparison: The inferential test associated with the primary analysis of PFS was assessed against an overall 1-sided significance level of α=0.025.p-value: 0.15995% CI: [0.746, 1.101]Log Rank
Secondary

Complete Response Rate

Complete response rate was defined as the percentage of participants in each treatment group who achieved a sCR or CR per the IMWG-URC as their best response. sCR: As for CR, normal serum free light chain (SFLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow (BM). CR: No immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \< 5% plasma cells in BM biopsy.

Time frame: Disease response was assessed every 3 weeks during the first 54 weeks and every 6 weeks thereafter until PD or the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time was 21.6.and 22.2 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.

Population: Intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneComplete Response Rate23.1 percentage of participants
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneComplete Response Rate25.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.138895% CI: [0.875, 1.589]Stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) Scores

The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a validated self-rating questionnaire including 30 items used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL scale was scored between 0 and 100, with higher scores indicating better Global Health Status/QOL.

Time frame: Baseline, weeks 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42 and 48

Population: Intent-to treat population with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresWeek 6 (n = 412, 407)56.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.5
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresWeek 24 (n = 320, 345)57.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.6
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresWeek 42 (n = 275, 288)63.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresWeek 30 (n = 298, 317)61.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresWeek 12 (n = 376, 389)55.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.8
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresWeek 36 (n = 285, 308)61.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.5
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresBaseline (n = 425, 425)53.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.9
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresWeek 18 (n = 341, 369)55.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.8
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresWeek 48 (n = 261, 265)62.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.4
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresWeek 18 (n = 341, 369)63.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.4
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresWeek 48 (n = 261, 265)65.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresWeek 6 (n = 412, 407)61.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.6
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresWeek 12 (n = 376, 389)62.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresBaseline (n = 425, 425)53.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresWeek 24 (n = 320, 345)63.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.1
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresWeek 30 (n = 298, 317)63.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresWeek 36 (n = 285, 308)64.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneEuropean Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Module (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (QOL) ScoresWeek 42 (n = 275, 288)65.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.1
Comparison: Treatment groups were compared using a linear mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The model included the fixed, categorical effects of treatment (all baseline responses were modeled with a dummy treatment), the randomization stratification factors - ISS stage, choice of route of bortezomib administration, region, age, and random effects of subject intercept and coefficient on time.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.48, 6.51]Mixed Effects Model for Repeated Measure
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

Adverse events (AEs)were graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), version 4.03, where GRADE 1 = Mild; GRADE 2 = Moderate; GRADE 3 = Severe; GRADE 4 = Life-threatening; GRADE 5 = Fatal. A serious adverse event is an adverse event that met 1 or more of the following criteria: * Death * Life-threatening * Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization * Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity * Congenital anomaly/birth defect * Important medical event that jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-related adverse events are adverse events considered related to at least 1 investigational product by the investigator, including those with unknown relationship.

Time frame: From the first dose of any study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of any study drug as of the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median duration of treatment was 52 weeks in both treatment groups.

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious adverse events198 participants
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsFatal adverse events20 participants
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAll adverse events454 participants
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs ≥ grade 3358 participants
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsLeading to discontinuation of study drug73 participants
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related adverse events (TRAEs)431 participants
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTRAEs ≥ grade 3285 participants
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related serious adverse events102 participants
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTRAE leading to discontinuation of study drug51 participants
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related fatal adverse events5 participants
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related serious adverse events136 participants
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related adverse events (TRAEs)408 participants
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTreatment-related fatal adverse events10 participants
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAll adverse events460 participants
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTRAEs ≥ grade 3268 participants
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsAEs ≥ grade 3354 participants
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsSerious adverse events235 participants
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsTRAE leading to discontinuation of study drug54 participants
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsLeading to discontinuation of study drug83 participants
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneNumber of Participants With Adverse EventsFatal adverse events31 participants
Secondary

Overall Response Rate

Disease response was evaluated according to the IMWG-URC using a validated computer algorithm. Overall response was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR). sCR: As for CR, normal serum free light chain (SFLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow (BM). CR: No immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and \< 5% plasma cells in BM biopsy; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not electrophoresis or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein with urine M-protein \<100 mg/24 hours. A ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas if present at baseline. PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in urine M-protein by ≥ 90% or to \< 200 mg/24 hours. A ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas if present at baseline.

Time frame: Disease response was assessed every 3 weeks during the first 54 weeks and every 6 weeks thereafter until PD or the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time was 21.6.and 22.2 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.

Population: Intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneOverall Response Rate78.8 percentage of participants
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneOverall Response Rate84.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.021895% CI: [1.01, 1.973]Stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death (whatever the cause). Participants who were alive or lost to follow-up as of the data analysis cut-off date were censored on the date the patient was last known to be alive. Median overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median follow-up time for OS was 22.2 and 22.5 months in the bortezomib and carfilzomib arms respectively.

Population: Intent-to-treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneOverall Survival (OS)NA months
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisoneOverall Survival (OS)NA months
p-value: 0.893495% CI: [0.896, 1.637]Log Rank
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥ Grade 2 Peripheral Neuropathy

Neuropathy events were defined as Grade 2 or higher peripheral neuropathy as specified by peripheral neuropathy Standardised Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Query, narrow (scope) (SMQN) terms. Peripheral neuropathy was assessed by neurologic exam and graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03: Grade 1: Asymptomatic; Grade 2: Moderate symptoms, limiting instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) Grade 3: Severe symptoms; limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: Death.

Time frame: From the first dose of any study drug up to 30 days after the last dose of any study drug as of the data cut-off date of 15 July 2016; median duration of treatment was 52 weeks in both treatment groups.

Population: The safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study treatment (i.e., carfilzomib, bortezomib, melphalan, or prednisone).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bortezomib, Melphalan, PrednisonePercentage of Participants With ≥ Grade 2 Peripheral Neuropathy35.1 percentage of participants
Carfilzomib, Melphalan, PrednisonePercentage of Participants With ≥ Grade 2 Peripheral Neuropathy2.5 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.026, 0.088]Pearson Chi-Square test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026