Skip to content

Subcutaneous Nerve Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) Patients

SubQStim Pivotal Study: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Nerve Stimulation. Protocol 1666

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01818297
Acronym
SubQStim
Enrollment
137
Registered
2013-03-26
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2017-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Failed Back Surgery Syndrome, Post-laminectomy Syndrome

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of Subcutaneous Nerve Stimulation (SQS) (also known as Peripheral Nerve Stimulation \[PNS\]) in the reduction of chronic, intractable post-surgical back pain in adults.

Detailed description

This study is a multi-center, prospective, randomized (1:1) parallel-group design.

Interventions

DEVICEPrimeAdvanced® neurostimulator system

Neurostimulator and associated components

Sponsors

MedtronicNeuro
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Have persistent back pain for at least 6 months * Had back surgery at least 6 months ago * Have tried pain medications and physical therapy * Read and understand written English or Spanish * Male or non-pregnant female. If female of child-bearing potential, and if sexually active, must be using a medically-acceptable method of birth control during study participation * Willing and able to undergo surgical implant procedure, attend visits as scheduled, and comply with the study requirements * Have an expected lifespan greater than 12 months Key

Exclusion criteria

* Have leg pain in addition to back pain. * Currently enrolled in or plan to enroll in another drug and/or device study * Have peripheral vascular disease, peripheral neuropathy, small-fiber neuropathy, or fibromyalgia * Have an active systemic infection or are immunocompromised * Will be exposed to diathermy or anticipate needing a full-body MRI scan * Currently have an implantable cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, or neurostimulator * Treated with spinal cord stimulation, peripheral nerve stimulation, an intrathecal drug delivery system or requires additional back surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Back Pain Responders (Subjects Who Achieve at Least a 50% Reduction in Average Back Pain With no Increase in Prescription Pain Medications) From Baseline to Month 3 Post-device Activation.Baseline to 3 monthsNumber of responders in Treatment and Control groups. Subjects reported typical back pain (0=no pain, 10=worst pain) during the Baseline (BL) and Blinded Phase (M3) periods. Percentage reduction in average back pain was calculated as (BL-M3)/BL. Subjects with at least a 50% reduction in average back pain between Baseline and Month 3, with no increase in prescribed pain medications, were considered responders.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional DisabilityBaseline to 3 monthsCompare the difference in average improvement in disability (as measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)) from Baseline to Month 3 between the Treatment and Control groups. ODI ranges from 0% (no disability) -100% (greatest disability). Change is calculated as Baseline - Month 3 with a positive change indicating improvement in disability. Subjects with missing Baseline and/or Month 3 ODI assessments were counted as no change (Baseline - Month 3 = 0).
Subject Satisfaction3 monthsCompare difference in number of subjects satisfied with therapy between the Treatment and Control groups at Month 3. Subjects who reported they were very or somewhat satisfied with the therapy were counted as satisfied. Subjects with no satisfaction response were excluded from the analysis.
Quality of Life: PhysicalBaseline to 3 monthsCompare the average change in quality of life (as measured by Short Form Health Survey (SF36 v2): Physical component score (PCS)) from Baseline to Month 3 between subjects in the Treatment and Control groups. The PCS ranges from 0 (worst possible physicial quality of life) to 100 (best possible physical quality of life). Change was calculated as Month 3 - Baseline, with a positive difference indicating improvement in physical quality of life. Subjects with missing Baseline and/or Month 3 SF-36: PCS assessments were counted as no change (Month 3 - Baseline = 0).
Quality of Life: MentalBaseline to 3 monthsCompare the average change in quality of life (as measured by Short Form Health Survey (SF36 v2): Mental component score (MCS)) from Baseline to Month 3 between subjects in the Treatment and Control groups. The MCS ranges from 0 (worst possible mental quality of life) to 100 (best possible mental quality of life). Change was calculated as Month 3 - Baseline, with a positive difference indicating improvement in mental quality of life. Subjects with missing Baseline and/or Month 3 SF-36: MCS assessments were counted as no change (Month 3 - Baseline = 0).
Worst Back PainBaseline to 3 monthsCompare the average improvement in worst back pain from Baseline to Month 3 between the Treatment and Control groups. Subjects reported worst back pain (0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) during the Baseline and Blinded Phase (Month 3) periods. Change was calculated as Baseline - Month 3, with a positive change indicating improvement in worst back pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study enrolled adult patients with chronic, intractable post-surgical back pain. First enrollment was in April 2013. Enrollment was suspended in September 2014 due to slow enrollment. The last subject visit was in March 2016. The planned enrollment was 323 subjects, with 218 randomized. Actual enrollment was 137 subjects with 62 randomized.

Pre-assignment details

Of the 137 enrolled subjects, 62 were implanted and randomized. Of the 75 subjects who discontinued from the study prior to randomization, 54 did not meet inclusion/exclusion criteria, 12 withdrew consent or declined device implant, 3 discontinued due to study suspension, and 6 discontinued for other reasons.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment
Treatment settings of Medtronic PrimeAdvanced® neurostimulator system implant PrimeAdvanced® neurostimulator system: Neurostimulator and associated components
32
Control
Control settings of Medtronic PrimeAdvanced® neurostimulator system implant PrimeAdvanced® neurostimulator system: Neurostimulator and associated components
30
Total62

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Blinded Phase (Randomization - 3 Months)Adverse Event01
Open Label Phase (3-12 Months)Early study closure1710
Open Label Phase (3-12 Months)Physician Decision10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatmentControlTotal
Age, Continuous60.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
60.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
Back pain6.77 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.25
6.66 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.88
6.71 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.08
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
32 Participants29 Participants61 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
30 Participants28 Participants58 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
32 participants30 participants62 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants16 Participants34 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants14 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 320 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 328 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 320 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Back Pain Responders (Subjects Who Achieve at Least a 50% Reduction in Average Back Pain With no Increase in Prescription Pain Medications) From Baseline to Month 3 Post-device Activation.

Number of responders in Treatment and Control groups. Subjects reported typical back pain (0=no pain, 10=worst pain) during the Baseline (BL) and Blinded Phase (M3) periods. Percentage reduction in average back pain was calculated as (BL-M3)/BL. Subjects with at least a 50% reduction in average back pain between Baseline and Month 3, with no increase in prescribed pain medications, were considered responders.

Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TreatmentNumber of Back Pain Responders (Subjects Who Achieve at Least a 50% Reduction in Average Back Pain With no Increase in Prescription Pain Medications) From Baseline to Month 3 Post-device Activation.9 Participants
ControlNumber of Back Pain Responders (Subjects Who Achieve at Least a 50% Reduction in Average Back Pain With no Increase in Prescription Pain Medications) From Baseline to Month 3 Post-device Activation.5 Participants
Comparison: The original sample size estimate for the primary objective was based on the following assumptions: 109 subjects in each arm with a responder rate of 22% in the Control group and 40% in the Treatment group, and a one-sided α= 0.05 using a Z test with unpooled variance, would result in 90% power. Because the study terminated early, the actual sample size (32 in Treatment, 30 in Control) resulted in 47% power under the same assumptions.p-value: 0.14Z-test
Secondary

Functional Disability

Compare the difference in average improvement in disability (as measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)) from Baseline to Month 3 between the Treatment and Control groups. ODI ranges from 0% (no disability) -100% (greatest disability). Change is calculated as Baseline - Month 3 with a positive change indicating improvement in disability. Subjects with missing Baseline and/or Month 3 ODI assessments were counted as no change (Baseline - Month 3 = 0).

Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentFunctional Disability9.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.3
ControlFunctional Disability10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.1
Secondary

Quality of Life: Mental

Compare the average change in quality of life (as measured by Short Form Health Survey (SF36 v2): Mental component score (MCS)) from Baseline to Month 3 between subjects in the Treatment and Control groups. The MCS ranges from 0 (worst possible mental quality of life) to 100 (best possible mental quality of life). Change was calculated as Month 3 - Baseline, with a positive difference indicating improvement in mental quality of life. Subjects with missing Baseline and/or Month 3 SF-36: MCS assessments were counted as no change (Month 3 - Baseline = 0).

Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentQuality of Life: Mental1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10
ControlQuality of Life: Mental1.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
Secondary

Quality of Life: Physical

Compare the average change in quality of life (as measured by Short Form Health Survey (SF36 v2): Physical component score (PCS)) from Baseline to Month 3 between subjects in the Treatment and Control groups. The PCS ranges from 0 (worst possible physicial quality of life) to 100 (best possible physical quality of life). Change was calculated as Month 3 - Baseline, with a positive difference indicating improvement in physical quality of life. Subjects with missing Baseline and/or Month 3 SF-36: PCS assessments were counted as no change (Month 3 - Baseline = 0).

Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentQuality of Life: Physical3.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.6
ControlQuality of Life: Physical3.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.1
Secondary

Subject Satisfaction

Compare difference in number of subjects satisfied with therapy between the Treatment and Control groups at Month 3. Subjects who reported they were very or somewhat satisfied with the therapy were counted as satisfied. Subjects with no satisfaction response were excluded from the analysis.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: The analysis population includes all randomized subjects, with the exception of one subject in the Control group who did not have a satisfaction value. This subject was excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TreatmentSubject Satisfaction25 Participants
ControlSubject Satisfaction22 Participants
Secondary

Worst Back Pain

Compare the average improvement in worst back pain from Baseline to Month 3 between the Treatment and Control groups. Subjects reported worst back pain (0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) during the Baseline and Blinded Phase (Month 3) periods. Change was calculated as Baseline - Month 3, with a positive change indicating improvement in worst back pain.

Time frame: Baseline to 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentWorst Back Pain2.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
ControlWorst Back Pain1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026