Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy in Premenopausal Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding (HMB) Associated With Uterine Fibroids (UF)

A Phase 2b Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Premenopausal Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated With Uterine Fibroids

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01817530
Enrollment
571
Registered
2013-03-25
Start date
2013-04-08
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2020-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heavy Uterine Bleeding, Uterine Fibroids

Keywords

Uterine Fibroids, Leiomyomata, Elagolix, Menorrhagia, Elagolix sodium, Heavy Uterine Bleeding, ABT-620

Brief summary

This is a Phase 2b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the safety and efficacy of elagolix alone and in combination with add-back therapy versus placebo on heavy menstrual bleeding in premenopausal women 18 to 51 years of age with uterine fibroids.

Interventions

oral coated tablet

DRUGElagolix

oral coated tablet

DRUG0.5 mg estradiol / 0.1 mg norethindrone acetate

oral hard capsule

DRUG1 mg estradiol / 0.5 mg norethindrone acetate

oral hard capsule

oral hard capsule

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 51 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is pre-menopausal female 18 to 51 years of age at Screening. * Subject has diagnosis of uterine fibroids documented by a Pelvic Ultrasound. * Subject has heavy uterine bleeding associated with uterine fibroids.

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has had a myomectomy, uterine artery embolization or high intensity focused ultrasound for fibroid destruction within 6 months prior to Screening or endometrial ablation within 5 years prior to Screening. * Subject has a history of osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease. * Subject shows evidence of clinically significant hematological, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, psychiatric (including depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder), or neurologic diseases or any uncontrolled medical illness such as uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Subject has any history of attempted suicide. * Subject has a history of clinically significant condition(s) including but not limited to: \* Symptomatic Endometriosis \* Epilepsy or seizures \* Type 1 diabetes \* Chronic kidney disease \* Any cancer (except treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin), including breast or ovarian cancer or subject has taken any systemic cancer chemotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final MonthBaseline, Final Month (last 28 days of treatment)The percentage of participants meeting a composite endpoint consisting of these 2 bleeding assessments: a MBL Volume of \< 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥50% Reduction in MBL Volume from Baseline to the Final Month (last 28 days of treatment). Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 84 to 57 Days of TreatmentBaseline, third last 28 days of treatment (last 84 to 57 days of treatment)The percentage of participants meeting a composite endpoint consisting of these 2 bleeding assessments: a MBL volume \< 80 mL and a ≥ 50% reduction in MBL volume from baseline during the last 84 to 57 days of last treatment. Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an MBL Volume of < 80 mL at the Final MonthFinal Month (last 28 days of treatment)Percentage of participants who achieved an MBL volume of \< 80 mL at the Final Month (last 28 days of treatment). Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period.
Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final MonthBaseline, Final Month (last 28 days of treatment)Percentage of participants with a \>= 50% reduction from baseline in MBL to the Final Month (last 28 days of treatment). Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Amenorrhea During the Last 56 Days of TreatmentLast 56 days of treatment (after 10 days from first dose date)Amenorrhea is defined as having 0 days of bleeding or spotting based on observed validated and nonvalidated alkaline hematin data and having 0 days of bleeding or spotting, based on imputed electronic diary data during the last 56 days of treatment. Participants needed to have at least 66 days on treatment.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Suppression of Bleeding During the Last 56 Days of TreatmentLast 56 days of treatment (after 10 days from first dose date)Suppression of bleeding is defined as having 0 days of bleeding based on observed validated and nonvalidated alkaline hematin data and having 0 days of bleeding (spotting is allowed) based on imputed electronic diary data during the last 56 days of treatment.
Mean Change in the Number of Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6Baseline, Month 6The number of days with any bleeding including spotting was calculated using data collected on daily bleeding diary. Baseline is defined as the last 28 days prior to the first dose day of study drug.
Mean Change in the Number of Heavy Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6Baseline, Month 6The number of days with heavy bleeding (either heavy or very heavy/gushing bleeding) was calculated using data collected on daily bleeding diary. Baseline is defined as the last 28 days prior to the first dose day of study drug.
Change in Bleeding Severity Scores From Baseline at the Final MonthBaseline, Final Month (last 28 days of treatment)The average bleeding score was calculated for each 28-day interval starting on Day 29 using data collected on daily bleeding diary using the Mansfield-Voda-Jorgenson (MVJ) Menstrual Bleeding Scale (1=spotting, 2 = very light bleeding, 3 = light bleeding, 4 = moderate bleeding, 5 = heavy bleeding, 6 = very heavy/gushing bleeding). Baseline is defined as the last 28 days prior to the first day of study drug.
Percentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 56 to 29 Days of TreatmentBaseline, second last 28 days of treatment (last 56 to 29 days of treatment)The percentage of participants meeting a composite endpoint consisting of these 2 bleeding assessments: a MBL volume \< 80 mL and a ≥ 50% reduction in MBL volume from baseline during the last 56 to 29 days of last treatment. Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period.
Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitBaseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)Volume of the total fibroid volume (3 largest fibroids), as measured by transvaginal ultrasound, or transabdominal ultrasound.
Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitBaseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)Volume of the largest fibroid (primary fibroid), as measured by transvaginal ultrasound, or transabdominal ultrasound.
Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitBaseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)Uterine volume, as measured by transvaginal ultrasound or transabdominal ultrasound.
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitBaseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)Total fibroid volume (3 largest fibroids) was measured by transvaginal ultrasound, or transabdominal ultrasound.
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitBaseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)Volume of the largest fibroid (primary fibroid) was measured by transvaginal ultrasound or transabdominal ultrasound.
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitBaseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)Uterine volume was measured by transvaginal ultrasound or transabdominal ultrasound.
Change From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireBaseline, Days 1-28, Days 29-56, Days 57-84, Days 85-112, Days 113-140, Days 141-168, Final Month of treatment, Post-treatment (PT) Days 1-28, PT Days 29-56, PT Days 57-84, PT Days 85-112, PT Days 113-140, PT Days 141-168The NBUFSQ (8 items) is a brief patient-reported daily diary that assesses non-bleeding symptoms experienced by women with uterine fibroids. It includes 6 items, asking women to rate their symptoms (abdominal/pelvic pain, pressure, and cramping, back pain, bloating, and urinary problems) in the past 24 hours using an 11-point numeric response scale that ranges from 0 (i.e., no symptom) to 10 (i.e., worst possible symptom) and 2 items to address urinary frequency during the daytime and at night. Data presented in the sum of scores to the 6 symptom questions, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (worst possible symptoms). Baseline is defined as the last 28 days prior to the first day of study drug. Final Month is defined as the last 28 days prior to and including the last dose date of study drug.
Percentage of Participants Who Successfully Avoided Surgical or Invasive Procedures for Uterine FibroidsMonth 6The percentage of participants who successfully avoided surgical or invasive procedures for Uterine Fibroids was assessed.
Mean Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Final VisitBaseline, Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Overall, 571 female participants were enrolled into the study across 86 sites (5 sites in the UK, 4 in Chile, 2 in Canada, 4 in Puerto Rico, and 71 in the US).

Pre-assignment details

Four participants were randomized in error; they were not dosed and were excluded from all analyses including demographic summaries.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cohort 1: Placebo
Placebo for elagolix BID and placebo for E2/NETA QD
65
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID
Elagolix 300 mg BID and placebo for E2/NETA QD
65
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QD
Elagolix 300 mg BID plus LD E2/NETA QD
64
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QD
Elagolix 300 mg BID plus SD E2/NETA QD
65
Cohort 2: Placebo
Placebo for elagolix QD and placebo for E2/NETA QD
78
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD
Elagolix 600 mg QD and placebo for E2/NETA QD
77
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QD
Elagolix 600 mg QD plus LD E2/NETA QD
76
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QD
Elagolix 600 mg QD plus SD E2/NETA QD
77
Total567

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007
Overall StudyAdverse Event632501058
Overall StudyConsent Withdrawn by Subject347353310
Overall StudyExclusionary Medication Received00001000
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy10000101
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up14213284
Overall StudyOther01001050
Overall StudyPregnancy00000100
Overall StudySubject Noncompliant31040111
Overall StudySurgery or Invasive Intervention10001110

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCohort 1: PlaceboCohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDCohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDCohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDCohort 2: PlaceboCohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDCohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDCohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDTotal
Age, Continuous42.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.14
42.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.76
43.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.02
43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.66
42.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.78
42.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.93
41.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.74
42.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
42.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.22
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants65 Participants64 Participants65 Participants78 Participants77 Participants76 Participants77 Participants567 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 650 / 650 / 640 / 650 / 780 / 770 / 760 / 77
other
Total, other adverse events
33 / 6545 / 6537 / 6444 / 6542 / 7859 / 7743 / 7651 / 77
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 653 / 653 / 641 / 651 / 785 / 773 / 764 / 77

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With a Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month

The percentage of participants meeting a composite endpoint consisting of these 2 bleeding assessments: a MBL Volume of \< 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥50% Reduction in MBL Volume from Baseline to the Final Month (last 28 days of treatment). Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period.

Time frame: Baseline, Final Month (last 28 days of treatment)

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (ITT): randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Excludes participants with \< 28 days of treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month26.56 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month91.94 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With a Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month85.25 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With a Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month79.03 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month31.58 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month90.14 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With a Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month72.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With a Menstrual Blood Loss (MBL) Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month81.58 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [11.12, 95.05]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [6.72, 41.3]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [4.79, 25.84]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [7.81, 49.27]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.95, 12.3]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [4.79, 22.34]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) Questionnaire

The NBUFSQ (8 items) is a brief patient-reported daily diary that assesses non-bleeding symptoms experienced by women with uterine fibroids. It includes 6 items, asking women to rate their symptoms (abdominal/pelvic pain, pressure, and cramping, back pain, bloating, and urinary problems) in the past 24 hours using an 11-point numeric response scale that ranges from 0 (i.e., no symptom) to 10 (i.e., worst possible symptom) and 2 items to address urinary frequency during the daytime and at night. Data presented in the sum of scores to the 6 symptom questions, ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (worst possible symptoms). Baseline is defined as the last 28 days prior to the first day of study drug. Final Month is defined as the last 28 days prior to and including the last dose date of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Days 1-28, Days 29-56, Days 57-84, Days 85-112, Days 113-140, Days 141-168, Final Month of treatment, Post-treatment (PT) Days 1-28, PT Days 29-56, PT Days 57-84, PT Days 85-112, PT Days 113-140, PT Days 141-168

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 85-112-7.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 10.74
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 1-28-5.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 13.39
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 57-84-5.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 17.08
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 29-56-5.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 15.83
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 141-1687.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 27.75
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireFinal Month-5.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 13.19
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 141-168-6.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 14.28
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 1-28-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 10.11
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 113-140-4.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 13.16
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 57-84-5.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 10.94
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 85-112-4.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 17.82
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 29-56-4.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 13.12
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 113-1403.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 27.8
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 1-28-5.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 12.13
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 1-28-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.21
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 141-168-8.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.42
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 85-112-6.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 12.99
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 85-112-7.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 11.75
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 29-56-4.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 13.1
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireFinal Month-6.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 11.94
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 57-84-7.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 11.04
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 113-140-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.15
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 57-84-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 14.11
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 141-168-8.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 12.65
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 113-140-7.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 12.03
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 29-56-5.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.78
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 1-28-3.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.88
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 57-84-4.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.4
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireFinal Month-4.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 10.15
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 57-84-2.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 10.91
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 141-1684.1 units on a scale
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 29-56-4.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.59
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 85-112-5.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 9.05
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 113-140-5.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 9.43
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 141-168-5.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 9.94
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 1-28-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 10.37
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 29-56-1.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 11.57
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 85-112-4.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 10.33
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 113-1401.3 units on a scale
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 141-168-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 13.01
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 141-168-3.3 units on a scale
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 1-28-1.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.42
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 57-84-1.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 10.5
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 1-28-3.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 10.69
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 85-112-3.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 10.76
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 29-560.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 9.89
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 113-1401.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.75
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 57-84-3.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 11.26
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireFinal Month-3.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 12.59
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 85-1120.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.59
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 29-56-2.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 9.44
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 113-140-3.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 12.1
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 141-168-10.5 units on a scale
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 113-1400.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 11.92
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 57-84-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 13.08
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 29-56-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 12.49
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 141-168-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 10.46
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 29-56-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.13
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 1-280.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.71
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 113-140-6.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 85-112-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.15
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 57-840.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.34
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 1-28-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 12.46
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 85-112-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.47
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireFinal Month-0.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 11.34
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 57-84-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 9.79
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 1-28-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.27
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 29-56-4.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.72
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 57-84-4.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.55
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 85-112-5.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 9.4
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 113-140-17.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 26.2
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 113-140-5.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.44
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 85-112-2.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 14.37
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireFinal Month-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 9.4
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 1-28-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 10.53
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 141-168-5.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 9.45
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 29-56-2.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 11.85
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 141-168-3.1 units on a scale
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 1-28-2.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.44
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 29-56-2.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.58
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 85-112-3.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.35
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 57-84-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.22
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 141-168-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.42
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 1-28-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.23
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 141-168-4.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.21
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 29-56-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.54
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 85-112-3.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.48
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 113-140-5.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.45
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 57-84-1.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.35
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 113-140-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.13
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireFinal Month-3.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.09
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 113-140-5.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.99
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireFinal Month-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 10.56
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 141-168-4.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 9.3
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 29-56-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.54
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 57-84-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.92
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 85-112-4.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 8.96
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 113-140-7.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.12
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 57-84-3.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.87
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 1-28-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 7.82
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 85-112-5.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.12
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnairePT Days 141-168-6.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.94
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 29-56-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 9.31
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange From Baseline to Each Month in Non-Bleeding Uterine Fibroids Symptom (NBUFSQ) QuestionnaireDays 1-280.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 6.26
Comparison: Final Monthp-value: 0.55695% CI: [-6.65, 3.59]ANCOVA
Comparison: Final Monthp-value: 0.67295% CI: [-6.33, 4.09]ANCOVA
Comparison: Final Monthp-value: 0.27495% CI: [-2.39, 8.36]ANCOVA
Comparison: Final Monthp-value: 0.22395% CI: [-5.26, 1.23]ANCOVA
Comparison: Final Monthp-value: 0.21595% CI: [-5.38, 1.22]ANCOVA
Comparison: Final Monthp-value: 0.39295% CI: [-4.75, 1.87]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Bleeding Severity Scores From Baseline at the Final Month

The average bleeding score was calculated for each 28-day interval starting on Day 29 using data collected on daily bleeding diary using the Mansfield-Voda-Jorgenson (MVJ) Menstrual Bleeding Scale (1=spotting, 2 = very light bleeding, 3 = light bleeding, 4 = moderate bleeding, 5 = heavy bleeding, 6 = very heavy/gushing bleeding). Baseline is defined as the last 28 days prior to the first day of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Final Month (last 28 days of treatment)

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Participants with an assessment at baseline and final month.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PlaceboChange in Bleeding Severity Scores From Baseline at the Final Month-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDChange in Bleeding Severity Scores From Baseline at the Final Month-0.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange in Bleeding Severity Scores From Baseline at the Final Month-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange in Bleeding Severity Scores From Baseline at the Final Month-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Cohort 2: PlaceboChange in Bleeding Severity Scores From Baseline at the Final Month-0.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDChange in Bleeding Severity Scores From Baseline at the Final Month-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.14
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDChange in Bleeding Severity Scores From Baseline at the Final Month-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDChange in Bleeding Severity Scores From Baseline at the Final Month-0.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-0.79, -0.15]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.31495% CI: [-0.4, 0.13]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.30795% CI: [-0.12, 0.39]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.10695% CI: [-0.58, 0.06]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.42495% CI: [-0.36, 0.15]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.52895% CI: [-0.18, 0.35]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Final Visit

Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to the first dose of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Participants with an assessment at baseline and final month.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PlaceboMean Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Final Visit0.6 g/dLStandard Error 0.17
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDMean Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Final Visit1.9 g/dLStandard Error 0.17
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Final Visit1.9 g/dLStandard Error 0.17
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Final Visit1.4 g/dLStandard Error 0.17
Cohort 2: PlaceboMean Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Final Visit0.3 g/dLStandard Error 0.15
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDMean Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Final Visit1.4 g/dLStandard Error 0.16
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Final Visit1.1 g/dLStandard Error 0.16
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Change in Hemoglobin Concentration From Baseline to Final Visit1.2 g/dLStandard Error 0.16
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.8, 1.74]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.78, 1.72]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.33, 1.27]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.65, 1.52]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.29, 1.16]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.4, 1.26]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change in the Number of Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6

The number of days with any bleeding including spotting was calculated using data collected on daily bleeding diary. Baseline is defined as the last 28 days prior to the first dose day of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Participants with an assessment at baseline and Month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PlaceboMean Change in the Number of Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6-1.2 daysStandard Error 0.63
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDMean Change in the Number of Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6-4.9 daysStandard Error 1.15
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Change in the Number of Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6-2.7 daysStandard Error 0.75
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Change in the Number of Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6-1.1 daysStandard Error 0.69
Cohort 2: PlaceboMean Change in the Number of Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6-1.4 daysStandard Error 0.49
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDMean Change in the Number of Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6-3.3 daysStandard Error 0.87
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Change in the Number of Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6-1.3 daysStandard Error 0.66
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Change in the Number of Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6-1.8 daysStandard Error 0.64
p-value: 0.00795% CI: [-6.28, -1.03]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.13295% CI: [-3.44, 0.46]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.87695% CI: [-1.71, 2]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.05595% CI: [-3.92, 0.04]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.89895% CI: [-1.52, 1.74]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.5995% CI: [-2.05, 1.17]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Change in the Number of Heavy Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6

The number of days with heavy bleeding (either heavy or very heavy/gushing bleeding) was calculated using data collected on daily bleeding diary. Baseline is defined as the last 28 days prior to the first dose day of study drug.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Participants with an assessment at baseline and Month 6.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PlaceboMean Change in the Number of Heavy Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6-1.0 daysStandard Error 0.15
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDMean Change in the Number of Heavy Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6-2.0 daysStandard Error 0.27
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Change in the Number of Heavy Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6-1.9 daysStandard Error 0.18
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Change in the Number of Heavy Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6-1.7 daysStandard Error 0.16
Cohort 2: PlaceboMean Change in the Number of Heavy Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6-0.7 daysStandard Error 0.14
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDMean Change in the Number of Heavy Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6-1.2 daysStandard Error 0.25
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Change in the Number of Heavy Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6-1.4 daysStandard Error 0.19
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Change in the Number of Heavy Bleeding Days From Baseline to Month 6-1.8 daysStandard Error 0.18
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [-1.64, -0.42]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.42, -0.48]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-1.12, -0.25]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.11895% CI: [-1.04, 0.12]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-1.16, -0.22]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-1.51, -0.59]ANCOVA
Secondary

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Volume of the largest fibroid (primary fibroid), as measured by transvaginal ultrasound, or transabdominal ultrasound.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit9.0 percentage changeStandard Deviation 46.63
Cohort 1: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 36.9 percentage changeStandard Deviation 35.31
Cohort 1: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 613.2 percentage changeStandard Deviation 48.65
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-35.5 percentage changeStandard Deviation 26.32
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit-35.6 percentage changeStandard Deviation 30.81
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-36.1 percentage changeStandard Deviation 30.59
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-19.6 percentage changeStandard Deviation 32.1
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-20.3 percentage changeStandard Deviation 33.54
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit20.0 percentage changeStandard Deviation 31.73
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 60.0 percentage changeStandard Deviation 47.07
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-3.7 percentage changeStandard Deviation 39.13
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit-2.7 percentage changeStandard Deviation 46.63
Cohort 2: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 36.7 percentage changeStandard Deviation 27.66
Cohort 2: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 61.4 percentage changeStandard Deviation 30.03
Cohort 2: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit3.0 percentage changeStandard Deviation 28.7
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit-34.8 percentage changeStandard Deviation 30.36
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-33.5 percentage changeStandard Deviation 31.89
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-33.6 percentage changeStandard Deviation 23.74
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit-12.8 percentage changeStandard Deviation 39.65
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-12.2 percentage changeStandard Deviation 40.59
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-17.2 percentage changeStandard Deviation 27.39
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-0.7 percentage changeStandard Deviation 42.98
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-1.9 percentage changeStandard Deviation 39.22
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit0.0 percentage changeStandard Deviation 40.17
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 3p-value: 0.036Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
p-value: 0.04Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.098Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.014Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.409Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: 0.094Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: 0.002Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: 0.393Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Volume of the total fibroid volume (3 largest fibroids), as measured by transvaginal ultrasound, or transabdominal ultrasound.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Participants with an assessment at baseline and final month.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 68.3 percentage changeStandard Deviation 50.97
Cohort 1: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit4.6 percentage changeStandard Deviation 48.59
Cohort 1: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 31.7 percentage changeStandard Deviation 33.61
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-41.9 percentage changeStandard Deviation 24.87
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-40.2 percentage changeStandard Deviation 27.6
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit-39.6 percentage changeStandard Deviation 28.66
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-23.3 percentage changeStandard Deviation 30.34
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit-24.0 percentage changeStandard Deviation 29.93
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-24.6 percentage changeStandard Deviation 27.58
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit-12.9 percentage changeStandard Deviation 46.2
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-9.8 percentage changeStandard Deviation 40.31
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-8.8 percentage changeStandard Deviation 47.81
Cohort 2: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-1.8 percentage changeStandard Deviation 30.1
Cohort 2: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 35.4 percentage changeStandard Deviation 27.18
Cohort 2: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit0.1 percentage changeStandard Deviation 28.82
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-34.4 percentage changeStandard Deviation 25.56
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-34.2 percentage changeStandard Deviation 31.14
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit-36.4 percentage changeStandard Deviation 30.07
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-17.8 percentage changeStandard Deviation 30.49
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-17.5 percentage changeStandard Deviation 27.76
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit-16.6 percentage changeStandard Deviation 32.65
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-1.1 percentage changeStandard Deviation 46.66
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit-1.6 percentage changeStandard Deviation 42.75
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-4.6 percentage changeStandard Deviation 39.97
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 3p-value: 0.018Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 3p-value: 0.021Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.032Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.007Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.495Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: 0.015Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: 0.002Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: 0.329Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Mean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Uterine volume, as measured by transvaginal ultrasound or transabdominal ultrasound.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 617.5 percentage changeStandard Deviation 40.25
Cohort 1: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit15.9 percentage changeStandard Deviation 38.06
Cohort 1: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 37.3 percentage changeStandard Deviation 25.12
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-35.6 percentage changeStandard Deviation 25.74
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-30.9 percentage changeStandard Deviation 28.87
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit-31.5 percentage changeStandard Deviation 31.44
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-21.9 percentage changeStandard Deviation 27.64
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-19.4 percentage changeStandard Deviation 22.48
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit-22.0 percentage changeStandard Deviation 28.52
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-13.2 percentage changeStandard Deviation 23.86
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-7.3 percentage changeStandard Deviation 20.7
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit-11.8 percentage changeStandard Deviation 22.56
Cohort 2: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 610.7 percentage changeStandard Deviation 20.73
Cohort 2: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 38.4 percentage changeStandard Deviation 24.26
Cohort 2: PlaceboMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit11.6 percentage changeStandard Deviation 25.38
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-24.7 percentage changeStandard Deviation 21.98
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-26.00 percentage changeStandard Deviation 29.51
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit-26.6 percentage changeStandard Deviation 28.26
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-13.5 percentage changeStandard Deviation 25.09
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-15.7 percentage changeStandard Deviation 21.84
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit-11.5 percentage changeStandard Deviation 25.33
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit-6.7 percentage changeStandard Deviation 21.8
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 3-6.1 percentage changeStandard Deviation 18.81
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDMean Percentage Change From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 6-9.0 percentage changeStandard Deviation 22.12
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Kruskal-Wallis
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Amenorrhea During the Last 56 Days of Treatment

Amenorrhea is defined as having 0 days of bleeding or spotting based on observed validated and nonvalidated alkaline hematin data and having 0 days of bleeding or spotting, based on imputed electronic diary data during the last 56 days of treatment. Participants needed to have at least 66 days on treatment.

Time frame: Last 56 days of treatment (after 10 days from first dose date)

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Excludes participants with \< 66 days of treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Amenorrhea During the Last 56 Days of Treatment1.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Amenorrhea During the Last 56 Days of Treatment56.1 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Amenorrhea During the Last 56 Days of Treatment33.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Amenorrhea During the Last 56 Days of Treatment28.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Amenorrhea During the Last 56 Days of Treatment1.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Amenorrhea During the Last 56 Days of Treatment50.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Amenorrhea During the Last 56 Days of Treatment17.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Amenorrhea During the Last 56 Days of Treatment22.7 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an MBL Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month

Percentage of participants who achieved an MBL volume of \< 80 mL at the Final Month (last 28 days of treatment). Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period.

Time frame: Final Month (last 28 days of treatment)

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Excludes participants with \< 28 days of treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an MBL Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month32.81 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an MBL Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month91.94 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an MBL Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month88.52 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an MBL Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month79.03 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an MBL Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month36.84 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an MBL Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month91.55 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an MBL Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month72.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved an MBL Volume of < 80 mL at the Final Month85.53 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [8.57, 71.32]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [6.57, 45.05]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.79, 19.92]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [7.11, 49.02]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.43, 10.04]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [5.17, 26.79]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Suppression of Bleeding During the Last 56 Days of Treatment

Suppression of bleeding is defined as having 0 days of bleeding based on observed validated and nonvalidated alkaline hematin data and having 0 days of bleeding (spotting is allowed) based on imputed electronic diary data during the last 56 days of treatment.

Time frame: Last 56 days of treatment (after 10 days from first dose date)

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Excludes participants with \< 66 days of treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Suppression of Bleeding During the Last 56 Days of Treatment1.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Suppression of Bleeding During the Last 56 Days of Treatment75.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Suppression of Bleeding During the Last 56 Days of Treatment52.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Suppression of Bleeding During the Last 56 Days of Treatment43.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Suppression of Bleeding During the Last 56 Days of Treatment2.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Suppression of Bleeding During the Last 56 Days of Treatment67.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Suppression of Bleeding During the Last 56 Days of Treatment31.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Suppression of Bleeding During the Last 56 Days of Treatment34.8 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
p-value: <0.001Fisher Exact
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Successfully Avoided Surgical or Invasive Procedures for Uterine Fibroids

The percentage of participants who successfully avoided surgical or invasive procedures for Uterine Fibroids was assessed.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: This endpoint was not completed due to lack of data collection.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Volume of the largest fibroid (primary fibroid) was measured by transvaginal ultrasound or transabdominal ultrasound.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 313.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit24.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 624.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit69.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 367.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 670.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit50.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 346.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 647.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 323.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 626.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit27.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 614.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 310.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit13.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 664.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 363.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit66.1 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 638.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 337.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit40.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 322.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 634.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Primary Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit30.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 3p-value: 0.188Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 3p-value: 0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 3p-value: 0.104Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.021Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.859Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.006Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.015Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: 0.007Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: 0.722Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: 0.032Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Total fibroid volume (3 largest fibroids) was measured by transvaginal ultrasound, or transabdominal ultrasound.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 313.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 624.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit24.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 675.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit73.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 379.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit57.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 350.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 654.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit41.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 331.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 640.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 618.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit16.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 39.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 662.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit64.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 366.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit40.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 334.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 640.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 322.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 634.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Total Fibroid Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit30.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 3p-value: 0.02Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 3p-value: 0.002Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 3p-value: 0.061Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.004Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.085Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.012Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.049Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: 0.056Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: 0.005Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: 0.088Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit

Uterine volume was measured by transvaginal ultrasound or transabdominal ultrasound.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, and Final Visit during treatment period (Month 6 or early termination)

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit3.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 62.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 35.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 678.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 373.1 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit73.2 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 658.0 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 342.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit58.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 318.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit26.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 631.9 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit1.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 31.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 61.6 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 357.1 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit63.1 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 662.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit29.3 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 632.7 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 336.8 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitFinal Visit23.4 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 317.5 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With ≥ 25% Reduction From Baseline in Uterine Volume at Month 3, Month 6, and Final VisitMonth 626.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 3p-value: 0.041Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 3p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 3p-value: 0.008Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.003Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.003Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: 0.004Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: <0.001Regression, Logistic
Comparison: Final Visitp-value: 0.002Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month

Percentage of participants with a \>= 50% reduction from baseline in MBL to the Final Month (last 28 days of treatment). Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period.

Time frame: Baseline, Final Month (last 28 days of treatment)

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Excludes participants with \< 28 days of treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month31.25 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month93.55 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month86.89 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month82.26 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month35.53 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month90.14 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month79.45 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline to the Final Month85.53 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [10.02, 98.83]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [5.77, 35.91]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [4.23, 22.8]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [6.66, 41.26]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [3.36, 14.68]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [4.85, 23.76]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 56 to 29 Days of Treatment

The percentage of participants meeting a composite endpoint consisting of these 2 bleeding assessments: a MBL volume \< 80 mL and a ≥ 50% reduction in MBL volume from baseline during the last 56 to 29 days of last treatment. Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period.

Time frame: Baseline, second last 28 days of treatment (last 56 to 29 days of treatment)

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Excludes participants with \< 56 days of treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 56 to 29 Days of Treatment11.29 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 56 to 29 Days of Treatment94.83 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 56 to 29 Days of Treatment88.14 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 56 to 29 Days of Treatment85.00 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 56 to 29 Days of Treatment18.42 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 56 to 29 Days of Treatment85.29 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 56 to 29 Days of Treatment67.19 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 56 to 29 Days of Treatment77.14 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [38.04, 641.22]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [21.1, 206.88]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [17.42, 156.09]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [10.45, 61.96]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [4.38, 21.25]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [7.13, 36.67]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 84 to 57 Days of Treatment

The percentage of participants meeting a composite endpoint consisting of these 2 bleeding assessments: a MBL volume \< 80 mL and a ≥ 50% reduction in MBL volume from baseline during the last 84 to 57 days of last treatment. Baseline is defined as the last qualified menstrual cycle during the screening period.

Time frame: Baseline, third last 28 days of treatment (last 84 to 57 days of treatment)

Population: Modified ITT: randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of randomized, double-blind study drug in this study. Excludes participants with \< 84 days of treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 84 to 57 Days of Treatment19.67 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BIDPercentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 84 to 57 Days of Treatment96.43 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 84 to 57 Days of Treatment89.47 percentage of participants
Cohort 1: Elagolix 300 mg BID Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 84 to 57 Days of Treatment79.31 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 84 to 57 Days of Treatment21.62 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QDPercentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 84 to 57 Days of Treatment86.36 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus LD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 84 to 57 Days of Treatment74.19 percentage of participants
Cohort 2: Elagolix 600 mg QD Plus SD E2/NETA QDPercentage of Participants With a MBL Volume < 80 mL and a ≥ 50% Reduction in MBL Volume From Baseline During the Last 84 to 57 Days of Treatment72.31 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [25.93, 584.85]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [13.59, 121.03]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [7.44, 48.58]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [9.29, 55.77]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [4.88, 24.27]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [4.46, 21.22]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026