Skip to content

The Role of Concurrent Chemotherapy for Lower Risk Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma(NPC) in the Era of IMRT

Multicenter Phase III Study of Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Alone Compared to Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Combined Chemotherapy for Lower Risk Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01817023
Enrollment
590
Registered
2013-03-22
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2021-03-30
Last updated
2021-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Keywords

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, current chemotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, low-risk

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to verify that simultaneous integrated boost IMRT (SIB-IMRT) alone is non-inferior to SIB-IMRT combined with concurrent chemotherapy for low-risk locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Detailed description

* There were several randomized clinical trials confirmed that concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is superior to radiotherapy (RT)alone for locally advanced NPC, most of the patients in the trials were treated with conventional radiotherapy technique. * As the new technique of IMRT used more and more in the clinical practice, the role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) seems blurred, in two of Hongkong phaseIII studies(NPC9901/9902), half of the patients were treated by 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT)/IMRT,the results showed that there were no significant different in terms of overall survival between RT alone and CCRT groups. Furthermore, several large sample size retrospective studies from China, showed that there were no advantage of CCRT over RT alone when treated by SIB-IMRT. * In an analysis of who will benefit from CCRT,( Lin, et.al, IJROBP,2004; 60:156-164), the author divided the locally advanced NPC patients into two groups, with the high-risk group defined as patients met at least one of following criteria: nodal size \>6 cm, (2) supraclavicular node metastasesN3, T4N2 and multiple neck node metastases with 1 node \>4cm. * Based on these information, we hypothesize that, for low-risk locally advanced NPC patients, there may no need CCRT under SIB-IMRT treatment.

Interventions

RADIATIONSIB-IMRT

SIB-IMRT was given to the patients with regimen of 69.96Gy-73.92Gy to the gross target volume, 60Gy to the high risk clinical target volume, 50Gy to the low risk clinical target volume

DRUGCisplatin

Cisplatin 100mg/m2 was delivered at d1,d22 and d43 to the CCRT group patients during radiotherapy.

Sponsors

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

central investigator organization digital randomize

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histopathological proven non-keratin nasopharyngeal carcinoma * AJCC 7th edition stage III/IVM0, without any one of following factors: node size \>6cm;supraclavicular metastasis node; T4N2; multiple neck node metastases with 1 node \>4 cm * Life expectancy≥6 months * Adequate renal function, defined as follows: Serum creatinine \< 2 x institutional upper limit of normal(ULN) within 2 weeks prior to registration or creatinine clearance rate (CCr) ≥ 50 ml/min within 2 weeks prior to registration determined by 24- hour collection or estimated by Cockcroft-Gault formula: CCr male = \[(140 - age) x (wt in kg)\] \[(Serum Cr mg/dl) x (72)\] CCr female = 0.85 x (CCrmale) * The following assessments are required within 2 weeks prior to the start of registration: Na, K, Cl, glucose, Ca, Mg, and albumin

Exclusion criteria

* Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease free for a minimum of 3 years; noninvasive cancers (For example, carcinoma in situ of the breast, oral cavity, or cervix are all permissible) are permitted even if diagnosed and treated \< 3 years ago * Prior radiotherapy to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields * Severe, active co-morbidity * Treatment planning does not meet the requirement of prescription dose.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
overall survival5 yearsaccording to the recruitment, a interrim analysis will done in July, 2019, if there is inferior finding of RT alone group, the study will premature terminate

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute and late toxicities5years* compare the acute radiation and chemotherapy-related toxicities during treatment course * compare late toxicities after treatment
3 year Progression-free survival (PFS)5yearto compare the 3years PFS between the IMRT alone and IMRT with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJunlin YI, MD
yijunlin1969@163.com861087788504
Backup ContactKai Wang, MD
kaiwang2007@163.com8613910741366

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026