Skip to content

A Study of Two Vismodegib Regimens in Participants With Multiple Basal Cell Carcinomas

A Randomized, Double-blinded, Regimen-controlled, Phase II, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Vismodegib Regimens in Patients With Multiple Basal Cell Carcinomas

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01815840
Enrollment
229
Registered
2013-03-21
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2017-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Basal Cell Carcinoma

Brief summary

This randomized, double-blind, regimen-controlled, phase II, multicenter study will assess the efficacy and safety of two different vismodegib regimens in participants with multiple basal cell carcinoma. Participants will receive vismodegib 150 mg orally once daily either in an intermittent schedule of 12 weeks vismodegib followed by 8 weeks placebo (Arm A) or as 24 weeks induction followed by an intermittent schedule of 8 weeks placebo followed by 8 weeks vismodegib (Arm B). Anticipated time on study treatment is 72 weeks.

Interventions

DRUGVismodegib

Vismodegib 150 mg hard gelatin capsule orally once daily

DRUGPlacebo

Vismodegib placebo orally once daily

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult participants, \>/= 18 years of age * Participants with multiple basal cell carcinomas, including participants with Gorlin syndrome, with at least 6 clinically evident basal cell carcinomas at the time of randomization, of which 3 measure 5 mm or more in diameter and are considered target lesions. All other lesions are considered to be non-target lesions * Histopathologic confirmation that at least one of the three target lesions is basal cell carcinoma * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2 * Adequate renal and hepatic function and hematopoietic capacity * Women of childbearing potential must agree to use contraception as defined by protocol during treatment and for at least 9 months after completion of study treatment * Male participants with female partners of childbearing potential must agree to use contraception as defined by protocol during treatment and for 2 months after completion of study treatment

Exclusion criteria

* Inability or unwillingness to swallow capsules * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Any metastatic basal cell carcinoma * Locally advanced basal cell carcinoma lesion that is considered to be inoperable or to have medical contraindications to surgery * Recent (i.e., within the past 28 days prior to randomization) or current participation in another experimental drug study * Known or suspected alcohol abuse * One of the following known rare hereditary conditions: galactose intolerance, primary hypolactasia or glucose-galactose malabsorption

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of Clinically Evident Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73 (After 72 Weeks of Treatment)Baseline; Week 73The total number of clinically evident basal cell carcinomas = the total number of target and/or non-target lesions present in individual participants.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Size of Three Target Basal Cell Carcinoma Lesions in Individual Participants at Week 73Baseline; Week 73The three target basal cell carcinoma lesions = the three largest visible lesions, at least 5 mm in the longest diameter, in individual participants.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction in the Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73Baseline; Week 73
Percentage of Participants With New Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73Baseline; Week 73
Percent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 85 (12 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)Baseline; Week 85
Percent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 97 (24 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)Baseline; Week 97
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesBaseline to Week 73The percentage of participants who discontinued study treatment (due either to adverse event, refusal of treatment, or withdrawal of consent) was summarized by treatment group.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Any Adverse EventUp to 125 weeks
Percent Change From Baseline in the Skindex-16 Symptom Domain Score at Week 73Baseline; Week 73The Skindex-16 is a patient-reported outcome health questionnaire. Participants were asked about their symptoms, and their answers were combined into a composite Symptom Domain Score. Scores range from 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered).
Percent Change From Baseline in the Skindex-16 Emotion Domain Score at Week 73Baseline; Week 73The Skindex-16 is a patient-reported outcome health questionnaire. Participants were asked about their emotional state, and their answers were combined into a composite Emotion Domain Score. Scores range from 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered).
Percent Change From Baseline in the Skindex-16 Function Domain Score at Week 73Baseline; Week 73The Skindex-16 is a patient-reported outcome health questionnaire. Participants were asked about their ability to function, and answers were combined into a composite Function Domain Score. Scores range from 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered).
Percent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 125 (52 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)Baseline; Week 125

Countries

Austria, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Russia, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

229 participants were enrolled in 10 countries.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Vismodegib Intermittent Schedule
Vismodegib intermittent schedule of 12 weeks vismodegib followed by 8 weeks placebo, repeated 3 times with a final course of vismodegib (total 72 weeks), followed by 52 weeks treatment-free follow up
116
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent Schedule
Vismodegib beginning with 24 weeks induction followed by intermittent schedule 8 weeks placebo, 8 weeks vismodegib (total 72 weeks), followed by 52 weeks treatment-free follow up
113
Total229

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative/Other13
Overall StudyAdverse Event1016
Overall StudyDeath22
Overall StudyDisease progression32
Overall StudyInvestigators Decision23
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up36
Overall StudyMissing10
Overall StudyRefused Treatment51
Overall StudySponsor Termination Treatment10
Overall StudyWithdrew Consent3130

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVismodegib Intermittent ScheduleVismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent ScheduleTotal
Age, Continuous61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.94
59.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.35
60.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.63
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants25 Participants60 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
81 Participants88 Participants169 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
107 / 114108 / 113
serious
Total, serious adverse events
24 / 11423 / 113

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of Clinically Evident Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73 (After 72 Weeks of Treatment)

The total number of clinically evident basal cell carcinomas = the total number of target and/or non-target lesions present in individual participants.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 73

Population: Participants in the Intent-to-Treat analysis population (defined as all randomized participants) with available data were included in the analysis. The last observation carried forward method was used.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Vismodegib Intermittent ScheduleMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of Clinically Evident Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73 (After 72 Weeks of Treatment)62.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 52.01
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent ScheduleMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Number of Clinically Evident Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73 (After 72 Weeks of Treatment)54.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 54.85
Comparison: The mean difference in the mean relative reduction between treatment arms, along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval, was estimated by fitting an ANCOVA model with treatment as main effect and the following covariates: number of basal cell carcinomas at baseline, geographical region, immunosuppression status, confirmed basal cell carcinoma nevus syndrome.95% CI: [-22.2, 5.7]
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Size of Three Target Basal Cell Carcinoma Lesions in Individual Participants at Week 73

The three target basal cell carcinoma lesions = the three largest visible lesions, at least 5 mm in the longest diameter, in individual participants.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 73

Population: Participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population (defined as all randomized participants) with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Vismodegib Intermittent ScheduleMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Size of Three Target Basal Cell Carcinoma Lesions in Individual Participants at Week 7382.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 27.01
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent ScheduleMean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Size of Three Target Basal Cell Carcinoma Lesions in Individual Participants at Week 7368.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 53.02
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Any Adverse Event

Time frame: Up to 125 weeks

Population: Safety Analysis Population: participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population (defined as all randomized participants) who received at least one dose of study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants Experiencing Any Adverse Event99.1 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants Experiencing Any Adverse Event97.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability Issues

The percentage of participants who discontinued study treatment (due either to adverse event, refusal of treatment, or withdrawal of consent) was summarized by treatment group.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 73

Population: Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population, defined as all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesOverall37.1 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesAdverse Events20.7 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesRefused Treatment6.0 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesWithdrew Consent10.3 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesWithdrew Consent11.5 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesOverall41.6 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesRefused Treatment2.7 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to Tolerability IssuesAdverse Events27.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction in the Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73

Time frame: Baseline; Week 73

Population: Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population, defined as all randomized participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction in the Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 7365.5 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction in the Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 7350.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With New Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73

Time frame: Baseline; Week 73

Population: Participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population (defined as all randomized participants) with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants With New Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 731 new lesion10.6 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants With New Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 733 new lesions5.3 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants With New Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 732 new lesions5.3 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants With New Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73>3 new lesions2.1 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants With New Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73No new lesions76.6 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants With New Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73>3 new lesions5.8 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants With New Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 73No new lesions74.4 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants With New Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 731 new lesion11.6 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants With New Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 732 new lesions5.8 percentage of participants
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercentage of Participants With New Basal Cell Carcinomas at Week 733 new lesions2.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in the Skindex-16 Emotion Domain Score at Week 73

The Skindex-16 is a patient-reported outcome health questionnaire. Participants were asked about their emotional state, and their answers were combined into a composite Emotion Domain Score. Scores range from 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 73

Population: Participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population (defined as all randomized participants) with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercent Change From Baseline in the Skindex-16 Emotion Domain Score at Week 73-27.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 27.71
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercent Change From Baseline in the Skindex-16 Emotion Domain Score at Week 73-28.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 28.16
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in the Skindex-16 Function Domain Score at Week 73

The Skindex-16 is a patient-reported outcome health questionnaire. Participants were asked about their ability to function, and answers were combined into a composite Function Domain Score. Scores range from 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 73

Population: Participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population (defined as all randomized participants) with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercent Change From Baseline in the Skindex-16 Function Domain Score at Week 73-9.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 20.59
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercent Change From Baseline in the Skindex-16 Function Domain Score at Week 73-10.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 26.03
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in the Skindex-16 Symptom Domain Score at Week 73

The Skindex-16 is a patient-reported outcome health questionnaire. Participants were asked about their symptoms, and their answers were combined into a composite Symptom Domain Score. Scores range from 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered).

Time frame: Baseline; Week 73

Population: Participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population (defined as all randomized participants) with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercent Change From Baseline in the Skindex-16 Symptom Domain Score at Week 73-14.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 25.75
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercent Change From Baseline in the Skindex-16 Symptom Domain Score at Week 73-12.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 23.98
Secondary

Percent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 125 (52 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)

Time frame: Baseline; Week 125

Population: Participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population (defined as all randomized participants) with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 125 (52 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)41.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 45.23
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 125 (52 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)44.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 42.87
Secondary

Percent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 85 (12 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)

Time frame: Baseline; Week 85

Population: Participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population (defined as all randomized participants) with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 85 (12 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)35.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 50.25
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 85 (12 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)38.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 55.22
Secondary

Percent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 97 (24 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)

Time frame: Baseline; Week 97

Population: Participants in the Intent-to-Treat Analysis Population (defined as all randomized participants) with available data were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Vismodegib Intermittent SchedulePercent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 97 (24 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)36.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 49.48
Vismodegib Induction Followed by Intermittent SchedulePercent Change in Total Number of Basal Cell Carcinomas Relative to Baseline at Week 97 (24 Weeks Following End of Treatment) (Recurrence Rate)42.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 57.83

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026