Skip to content

Evaluate the Safety and Diagnostic Advantages of Tilt Down Verses Standard Horizontal Colonoscopy Positioning

The Effect of Body Positioning for Colonoscopy in Women: Randomized, Study of Left Lateral Tilt Down Versus Left Lateral Horizontal Positioning

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01815671
Acronym
CTDTTIE
Enrollment
173
Registered
2013-03-21
Start date
2012-05-31
Completion date
2012-09-30
Last updated
2014-02-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diverticulosis

Keywords

colonoscopy, technique, tilt, insertion, safety, efficacy

Brief summary

A tortuous sigmoid colon makes colonoscopy difficult. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the diagnostic utility and incidence of adverse events in women using standard horizontal compared to lateral tilt down positioning for colonoscopy.

Detailed description

This was a prospective, randomized study. Subjects who provide informed consent and present to the offices of Specialists in Gastroenterology for colonoscopy will be randomized in a 1:1 distribution to either left lateral tilt down versus left lateral horizontal positioning to initiate colonoscopy. Demographic data as well as routine information regarding the colonoscopy was filled out during or at the end of each procedure. In addition, the following parameters were assessed, and compared between groups: 1. Occurrence of complications related or possibly related to the colonoscopy procedure 2. Scope insertion time 3. Pain during and after the procedure The subjects' participation was limited to the duration of the colonoscopy, which is typically less than 60 min and a follow up by telephone 24 hours later to assess the occurrence of complications.

Interventions

PROCEDUREcolonoscopy in the lateral horizontal position

colonoscopy in the lateral horizontal position with tilt down

Sponsors

Specialists in Gastroenterology, LLC
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ability to understand and sign consent * women and men with a BMI (body mass index) \<35 kg/m2 * age 18 - 90 years * no liquids by mouth for ≥2 hours * no solid food for ≥8 hours

Exclusion criteria

* inability to provide informed consent * morbid obesity (BMI ≥35) * pregnancy * uncontrolled gastroesophageal reflux disease * gastroparesis * scleroderma * achalasia * Crohn's disease * ulcerative colitis * history of a colon resection * Parkinson's disease * brain tumor * multiple sclerosis * ischemic optic neuropathy * glaucoma * active pulmonary infection * liquid intake \<2 hours * solid food intake \<8 hours prior to the procedure * intra-procedure findings of a stricture resulting in an incomplete colonoscopy or Boston bowel preparation scores of \<6

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Experience Adverse Events Which Are Related or Possibly Related to the Colonoscopy Procedure24 hoursThe number of participants who experience adverse events which are related or possibly related to the colonoscopy procedure will be tallied in each treatment arm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Full Colonoscope Insertion30 minutes
Pain Related or Possibly Related to Colonoscopy Procedure24 hoursVisual Analogue Scale measured 0-4 with zero being no pain and 4 being most severe pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Consecutive women presenting to a private endoscopy center for colonoscopy (with or without a preceding upper endoscopy) were offered participation. A computer generated randomization code was used to assign subjects to either TD or LL group. Subjects were blinded to which group they were assigned.

Pre-assignment details

morbid obesity, pregnancy, uncontrolled gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastroparesis, scleroderma, achalasia, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, history of a colon resection, Parkinson's disease, brain tumor, multiple sclerosis, ischemic optic neuropathy, glaucoma, active pulmonary infection

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lateral Horizontal
Subjects randomized to receive colonoscopy in the lateral horizontal position
88
Lateral Tilt Down
Subjects randomized to receive colonoscopy in the lateral tilt down position
85
Total173

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLateral Tilt DownLateral HorizontalTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
4 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
31 Participants45 Participants76 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
50 Participants40 Participants90 Participants
Age, Continuous56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
Region of Enrollment
United States
85 participants88 participants173 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
85 Participants88 Participants173 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 889 / 85
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 880 / 85

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Experience Adverse Events Which Are Related or Possibly Related to the Colonoscopy Procedure

The number of participants who experience adverse events which are related or possibly related to the colonoscopy procedure will be tallied in each treatment arm.

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Lateral HorizontalNumber of Participants Who Experience Adverse Events Which Are Related or Possibly Related to the Colonoscopy Procedure2 participants
Lateral Tilt DownNumber of Participants Who Experience Adverse Events Which Are Related or Possibly Related to the Colonoscopy Procedure9 participants
Secondary

Pain Related or Possibly Related to Colonoscopy Procedure

Visual Analogue Scale measured 0-4 with zero being no pain and 4 being most severe pain.

Time frame: 24 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lateral HorizontalPain Related or Possibly Related to Colonoscopy Procedure0.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.03
Lateral Tilt DownPain Related or Possibly Related to Colonoscopy Procedure0.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.02
Secondary

Time to Full Colonoscope Insertion

Time frame: 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Lateral HorizontalTime to Full Colonoscope Insertion5.5 minutesStandard Deviation 1.2
Lateral Tilt DownTime to Full Colonoscope Insertion5.2 minutesStandard Deviation 1.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026