Skip to content

Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effect of Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy on Pain Threshold in Breast Cancer Patients

Prospective Pilot Study to Determine the Effect of Aromatase Inhibitor-induced Estrogen Depletion on Evoked Pain Threshold and Psychosocial Factors in Breast Cancer Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01814397
Enrollment
50
Registered
2013-03-19
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2013-02-28
Last updated
2024-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthralgia, Breast Cancer, Pain

Keywords

Aromatase inhibitor, Pain threshold

Brief summary

Postmenopausal women who have hormone receptor positive breast cancer are typically treated with aromatase inhibitor medications, which substantially decrease the amount of estrogen produced by their bodies. These medications are fairly well tolerated, but can cause aches and pains which can be quite severe in some cases. People experience pain differently. Estrogen appears to play a role in how we experience pain. Therefore, decreasing estrogen levels may lead to more pain in some women than others. The goal of this study is to evaluate perception of pain in women with breast cancer, and to determine if differences in pain perception lead to more aches and pains in some women treated with aromatase inhibitors. In this study, we plan to enroll 55 women with breast cancer who are starting treatment with an aromatase inhibitor. Participants will undergo testing to evaluate their perception of pain, and will also complete a set of questionnaires. Testing will be conducted before starting aromatase inhibitor therapy, as well as after 3 and 6 months of therapy. We will investigate whether pre-existing differences in pain perception lead to different amounts of pain during aromatase inhibitor therapy.

Interventions

DRUGAnastrozole

1 mg orally daily

DRUGexemestane

25 mg orally daily

DRUGletrozole

2.5 mg orally daily

Sponsors

Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female gender * Postmenopausal, age 21 or greater * Stage 0-III estrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor positive breast cancer who will be receiving a standard dose of letrozole, anastrozole, or exemestane * Performance status 0-2 * Willing to sign the consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Average pain \>=8/10 over the past 24 hours * Peripheral sensory neuropathy grade 2 or higher * Personal history of schizophrenia, or suicidal ideation or attempt within the past 2 years * Thumbnail abnormalities on either hand that are likely to alter pain perception during testing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Pain50 Assessed at Baseline, 3 Months and 6 MonthsBaseline, 3 months, 6 monthsPatients rated the intensity of each pressure sensation using a 0 to 100 numerical rating scale (0 = no pain, 100 = worst pain imaginable). Pain50 was defined as the amount of applied pressure in kilograms per square centimeter that evoked a pain intensity rating of 50 out of 100. Pain50 was assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Change in Pain50 with estrogen depletion was determined.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Conditioned Pain Modulation Assessed at Baseline, 3 Months, and 6 MonthsBaseline, 3 months, 6 monthsTo assess conditioned pain modulation, pressure equivalent to the patient's Pain50 was applied to the non-dominant thumbnail for 30 seconds (test stimulus), and the patient rated the intensity of the pressure on a 0-100 pain scale at 10 second intervals. Ten minutes later pressure (conditioning stimulus) was continuously applied to the dominant thumbnail for 60 seconds at the same Pain50 intensity. After 30 seconds, the test stimulus was again applied to the non-dominant thumbnail for 30 seconds and the patient rated the intensity every 10 seconds. Conditioned pain modulation magnitude was calculated as the difference (second minus first) in the mean of the 3 pain ratings to the test stimulus applied prior to and during the conditioning stimulus. Conditioned pain modulation was assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Change over that time period was assessed. Higher conditioned pain modulation values indicate less efficient conditioned pain modulation.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Baseline Patient-reported Symptom Measures for Patients Who Were Persistent and Nonpersistent With Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy During the First 6 Months of TreatmentBaseline patient-reported outcomes measures, 6 month persistence with therapyPatients completed 4 measures at baseline, before aromatase inhibitor therapy initiation. (1) Depression: Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression, scores 0-60, higher scores reflect more depression. (2) Pain: 7 day Pain Diary, scores 0-10, higher scores reflect more pain. (3) Fatigue: Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, scores 4-20, higher scores reflect more fatigue. (4) Sleep: Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep, scores 0-100, higher scores reflect worse sleep. Persistence with aromatase inhibitor therapy was assessed at the 6 month timepoint. Mean baseline values for each measure were calculated for the cohort that persisted with aromatase inhibitor therapy and the cohort that was non-persistent.
Estradiol Concentration Assessments at Baseline and After 3 Months of Aromatase Inhibitor TherapyBaseline, 3 monthsEstradiol is being assessed using an ultrasensitive gas chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy-based assay. The lower limit of detection of the assay is 0.625 pg/ml. For patients whose serum estradiol concentrations were below the lower limit of detection, the value of 0.625 pg/ml was used to calculate the mean estradiol concentration and standard deviation at both baseline and 3 months.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Women Starting Aromatase Inhibitor (AI) Therapy
There is only a single cohort. Postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer who are starting treatment with anastrozole 1 mg daily, letrozole 2.5 mg daily, or exemestane 25 mg daily. Choice of therapy is at the discretion of the treating physician.
50
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event7
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject7

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicWomen Starting Aromatase Inhibitor (AI) Therapy
Age, Continuous60 years
Aromatase inhibitor
anastrozole 1 mg daily
40 participants
Aromatase inhibitor
exemestane 25 mg daily
1 participants
Aromatase inhibitor
letrozole 2.5 mg daily
9 participants
Body mass index30.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
Mean conditioned pain modulation (CPM)7.9 units on a scale (0-100 pain scale)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.7
Mean Pain50, kg/cm^24.3 kg/cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
Mean serum estradiol, pg/ml6.0 pg/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
Prior chemotherapy
no prior chemotherapy
27 participants
Prior chemotherapy
prior chemotherapy
23 participants
Prior tamoxifen
no prior tamoxifen
36 participants
Prior tamoxifen
prior tamoxifen
14 participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
Weight, kg80.7 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.8

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Pain50 Assessed at Baseline, 3 Months and 6 Months

Patients rated the intensity of each pressure sensation using a 0 to 100 numerical rating scale (0 = no pain, 100 = worst pain imaginable). Pain50 was defined as the amount of applied pressure in kilograms per square centimeter that evoked a pain intensity rating of 50 out of 100. Pain50 was assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Change in Pain50 with estrogen depletion was determined.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Women Starting AI TherapyMean Pain50 Assessed at Baseline, 3 Months and 6 MonthsBaseline4.3 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.5
Women Starting AI TherapyMean Pain50 Assessed at Baseline, 3 Months and 6 Months3 month4.2 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.8
Women Starting AI TherapyMean Pain50 Assessed at Baseline, 3 Months and 6 Months6 month4.2 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Mean Conditioned Pain Modulation Assessed at Baseline, 3 Months, and 6 Months

To assess conditioned pain modulation, pressure equivalent to the patient's Pain50 was applied to the non-dominant thumbnail for 30 seconds (test stimulus), and the patient rated the intensity of the pressure on a 0-100 pain scale at 10 second intervals. Ten minutes later pressure (conditioning stimulus) was continuously applied to the dominant thumbnail for 60 seconds at the same Pain50 intensity. After 30 seconds, the test stimulus was again applied to the non-dominant thumbnail for 30 seconds and the patient rated the intensity every 10 seconds. Conditioned pain modulation magnitude was calculated as the difference (second minus first) in the mean of the 3 pain ratings to the test stimulus applied prior to and during the conditioning stimulus. Conditioned pain modulation was assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Change over that time period was assessed. Higher conditioned pain modulation values indicate less efficient conditioned pain modulation.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Women Starting AI TherapyMean Conditioned Pain Modulation Assessed at Baseline, 3 Months, and 6 Months6 months10.4 units on a scale (0-100 pain scale)Standard Deviation 18.9
Women Starting AI TherapyMean Conditioned Pain Modulation Assessed at Baseline, 3 Months, and 6 Monthsbaseline7.9 units on a scale (0-100 pain scale)Standard Deviation 14.7
Women Starting AI TherapyMean Conditioned Pain Modulation Assessed at Baseline, 3 Months, and 6 Months3 months6.3 units on a scale (0-100 pain scale)Standard Deviation 18.4
Other Pre-specified

Estradiol Concentration Assessments at Baseline and After 3 Months of Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy

Estradiol is being assessed using an ultrasensitive gas chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy-based assay. The lower limit of detection of the assay is 0.625 pg/ml. For patients whose serum estradiol concentrations were below the lower limit of detection, the value of 0.625 pg/ml was used to calculate the mean estradiol concentration and standard deviation at both baseline and 3 months.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Women Starting AI TherapyEstradiol Concentration Assessments at Baseline and After 3 Months of Aromatase Inhibitor TherapyBaseline6.0 pg/mlStandard Deviation 7.6
Women Starting AI TherapyEstradiol Concentration Assessments at Baseline and After 3 Months of Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy3 months0.75 pg/mlStandard Deviation 0.45
Other Pre-specified

Mean Baseline Patient-reported Symptom Measures for Patients Who Were Persistent and Nonpersistent With Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy During the First 6 Months of Treatment

Patients completed 4 measures at baseline, before aromatase inhibitor therapy initiation. (1) Depression: Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression, scores 0-60, higher scores reflect more depression. (2) Pain: 7 day Pain Diary, scores 0-10, higher scores reflect more pain. (3) Fatigue: Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, scores 4-20, higher scores reflect more fatigue. (4) Sleep: Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep, scores 0-100, higher scores reflect worse sleep. Persistence with aromatase inhibitor therapy was assessed at the 6 month timepoint. Mean baseline values for each measure were calculated for the cohort that persisted with aromatase inhibitor therapy and the cohort that was non-persistent.

Time frame: Baseline patient-reported outcomes measures, 6 month persistence with therapy

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Women Starting AI TherapyMean Baseline Patient-reported Symptom Measures for Patients Who Were Persistent and Nonpersistent With Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy During the First 6 Months of TreatmentBaseline sleep, no discontinuation by 6 mo28.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.8
Women Starting AI TherapyMean Baseline Patient-reported Symptom Measures for Patients Who Were Persistent and Nonpersistent With Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy During the First 6 Months of TreatmentBL general fatigue, no discontinuation by 6 mo10.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Women Starting AI TherapyMean Baseline Patient-reported Symptom Measures for Patients Who Were Persistent and Nonpersistent With Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy During the First 6 Months of TreatmentBaseline depression, discontinuation by 6 mo14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Women Starting AI TherapyMean Baseline Patient-reported Symptom Measures for Patients Who Were Persistent and Nonpersistent With Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy During the First 6 Months of TreatmentBaseline depression, no discontinuation by 6 mo6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
Women Starting AI TherapyMean Baseline Patient-reported Symptom Measures for Patients Who Were Persistent and Nonpersistent With Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy During the First 6 Months of TreatmentBaseline sleep, discontinuation by 6 mo47.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.9
Women Starting AI TherapyMean Baseline Patient-reported Symptom Measures for Patients Who Were Persistent and Nonpersistent With Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy During the First 6 Months of TreatmentBL general fatigue, discontinuation by 6 mo16.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Women Starting AI TherapyMean Baseline Patient-reported Symptom Measures for Patients Who Were Persistent and Nonpersistent With Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy During the First 6 Months of TreatmentBL pain, discontinuation by 6 mo1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Women Starting AI TherapyMean Baseline Patient-reported Symptom Measures for Patients Who Were Persistent and Nonpersistent With Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy During the First 6 Months of TreatmentBaseline pain, no discontinuation by 6 mo1.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026