Skip to content

Supreme LMA and Proseal LMA in Prone Anesthetized Patient

Comparison of the Effectiveness Between the LMA SupremeTM and the LMA ProsealTM for Airway Management in Patient Undergoing Elective Orthopaedic Surgery in Prone Position

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01814306
Acronym
SPLMA
Enrollment
100
Registered
2013-03-19
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2013-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inadequate or Impaired Breathing Pattern or Ventilation

Keywords

LMA Supreme,LMA Proseal,airway management,prone position

Brief summary

There is no significant difference about success rate of two devices.

Detailed description

There is no significant difference about success rate of two device: efficacy and safety

Interventions

Use Supreme LMA to compare efficay with Proseal LMA in prone position insertion

Use Proseal LMA to compare efficay with Supreme LMA in prone position insertion

Sponsors

Prince of Songkla University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* American Society Anesthesiologists physical status I-III * Patient undergo elective orthopedics surgery in prone position under general anaesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* Age \<15year * Non-fast * Morbid obesity (BMI \> 35kg/m2) * Pregnancy * Known or predicted difficult airway * GERD * History of laryngeal problem (injury,subglottic stenosis) * Local pharyngeal problem (abscess,tumor) * Poor dentation * Pulmonary disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Success rate of insertion (quality of ventilation)1 year

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Ease of insertion, Complication and Glottic seal pressure1 year

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026