Skip to content

Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope

Measurement of Forces Applied Using a Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope Compared to GlideScope Video Laryngoscope in Patients With at Least One Difficult Intubation Risk Factor

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01814176
Enrollment
44
Registered
2013-03-19
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2016-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Moderately Difficult to Intubate

Brief summary

During Anesthesia many patients require that a breathing be inserted into their windpipe. This is usually achieved using a direct laryngoscope, consisting of a retraction blade with a light near its end. When achieving a direct line-of-sight to the windpipe is difficult, more force is often applied, resulting in greater patient stress. A GlideScope video laryngoscope uses a camera and light source to see the windpipe. This enables the user to see objects that may not be in the direct line-of-sight. This likely results in less force being required, reducing patient stress. Because such stresses are often confounded by patient variables, we are comparing the forces required by the direct and video laryngoscopes on patients with at least one risk factor for difficulty, by directly measuring these with special sensors attached to the laryngoscope blades.

Interventions

DEVICEIntubation with GlideScope Video Laryngoscope or Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope

Sponsors

University Health Network, Toronto
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age \> 18years * elective surgery * single lumen endotracheal intubation required * signed informed consent * one risk factor for a difficult laryngoscopy ( Mallampati score \>3, inter-incisor gap \< 3.5cm, thyromental distance \< 6.5cm, sternomental distance \< 12.5cm, reduced neck extension and flexion)

Exclusion criteria

* lack of patient consent * anesthesiologist declines to consent * contraindication to neuromuscular blockade * ASA 4 * rapid sequence intubation * previous failed intubation * other method of intubation indicated eg fiberoptic intubation, awake tracheostomy * symptomatic gastro-esophageal reflux * cervical spine instability * unstable hypertension and symptomatic coronary artery disease * cerebrovascular disease or raised intracranial pressure * oral/pharyngeal/laryngeal carcinoma * loose teeth/poor dentition

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Peak forces during intubationIntraoperativelyPeak forces generated during the laryngoscopy and intubation process using both laryngoscopes.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026