Skip to content

CSTC1 for Diabetic Foot Ulcers Phase II Study

A Randomized,Double-Blind,Vehicle-controlled,Parallel,Phase II Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of CSTC1 in Patient With Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01813305
Enrollment
124
Registered
2013-03-18
Start date
2014-07-09
Completion date
2020-01-07
Last updated
2022-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Wounds

Keywords

Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Diabetes Mellitus, Debridement, Standard of Care, wounds

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CSTC1 in patient with diabetic foot ulcers.

Detailed description

This study was designed as a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, multiple-center, and parallel trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CSTC1 in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU). In each study site, eligible patients were randomized in a 4:1 ratio to receive either one of the topical applications of CSTC1 or CSTC1 matched vehicle, topical application on target diabetic foot ulcer (DFU), 2 times daily. The treatment duration for each subject was 12 weeks or up to confirmed complete ulcer closure, whichever comes first. That was, subjects would receive treatment for at most 12 weeks, which consists of 8 visits located at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. Subjects who achieved confirmed complete ulcer closure during the treatment period would be arranged for a 12 week post-treatment follow-up. Subjects failed to achieve complete ulcer closure at week-12 visit would be arranged for 4 weeks of safety follow-up. If confirmation of complete ulcer closure was reached at a week-14 visit, the subject would continue the post-treatment follow-up visit until week-24 visit. Otherwise, the subject would be arranged for safety follow-up until week-16 visit.

Interventions

DRUGCSTC1

vapor fraction from seeds of Glycine max (L.) Merr. and composition thereof

DRUGCSTC1 Matched vehicle

Sponsors

ASKLEP Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Charsire Biotechnology Corp.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* With either gender aged at least 20 years old; * With a diabetic ulcer (which is defined as the target ulcer) on the foot and not healing for at least 2 weeks; * The target ulcer is classified as grade 1 or 2 ulcer according to modified Wagner system; * The target ulcer should show infection control at investigator's discretion; * Subject should be free of any necrosis or infection in soft and bone tissue; * Subject has signed the written informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* With active osteomyelitis; * With target ulcer size decreased by at least 50% after at least 2 weeks of standard-of-care-only period or any other recorded regular therapy before Randomization visit; * With poor nutritional status (albumin \< 3g/dl), poor diabetic control (HbA1c \> 12%), anemia (hemoglobin\<10 g/dL), a leukocyte counts \< 1,000/mm3, abnormal liver function (AST, ALT\>3 x upper limit of normal range); * Requiring treatment with corticosteroids, immunosuppressive or chemotherapeutic agents; * Presence of necrosis, purulence or sinus tracts that cannot be removed by debridement; * Receiving revascularization surgery performed \<8 weeks before entry in the study; * With known or suspected hypersensitivity to any ingredients of study product and vehicle; * With coronary heart disease with myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) within 3 months prior to study; * Pregnant or lactating or premenopausal with childbearing potential but not taking reliable contraceptive method(s) during the study period; * Enrollment in any investigational drug trial within 4 weeks before entering this study; * With any uncontrolled illness judged by the investigator that entering the trial may be detrimental to the subject.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Complete Ulcer Closure During the Treatment PeriodBaseline to 14 weeksComplete ulcer closure is defined as 100% skin re-epithelialization without drainage or dressing requirements confirmed at the coming visits 2 weeks apart. The treatment period is until 12 weeks or up to confirmation of complete ulcer closure. Subjects with complete ulcer closure at Week 12 and confirmed at Week 14 were considered as success.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Ulcer Closure Time24 weeksDefined as the time to complete ulcer closure.
The Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer Closure24 weeksComplete ulcer closure is defined as 100% skin re-epithelialization without drainage or dressing requirements observed for at the last two consecutive study visits 2 weeks apart. The count of participants with complete ulcer closure at each post-treatment visit is provided.
Percentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment Visitbaseline and 24 weeksThe proportion of ulcer closure is calculated as (Ulcer size at post-treatment visit - Ulcer size at baseline)/(Ulcer size at baseline). This proportion was then multiplied by 100 to calculate the percentage change in ulcer size for each post-treatment visit. The percentage change in ulcer size for each post-treatment visit are presented.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pulse Rate Change From Baseline to Week 24baseline and 24 weeksVital signs measurement consisted of blood pressures, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature. Among them, pulse rates were obtained after the subject has been at rest for at least 5 minutes in a sitting position. The vital sign data was collected from Screening visit to Final visit (up to 24 weeks). The mean changes of Final visit to baseline in vital signs were presented (value at 24 weeks minus value at baseline).
Number of Participants With Adverse Events24 weeksAn AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a study medication and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not related to the study medication. AE data was collected from Screening visit to Final visit (up to 24 weeks).
Respiratory Rate Change From Baseline to Week 24baseline and 24 weeksVital signs measurement consisted of blood pressures, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature. Among them, respiratory rate were obtained after the subject has been at rest for at least 5 minutes in a sitting position. The vital sign data was collected from Screening visit to Final visit (up to 24 weeks). The mean changes of Final visit to baseline in vital signs were presented (value at 24 weeks minus value at baseline).
Body Temperature Change From Baseline to Week 24baseline and 24 weeksVital signs measurement consisted of blood pressures, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature. Among them, body temperature were obtained after the subject has been at rest for at least 5 minutes in a sitting position. The vital sign data was collected from Screening visit to Final visit (up to 24 weeks). The mean changes of Final visit to baseline in vital signs were presented (value at 24 weeks minus value at baseline).
Number of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the Visits24 weeksPhysical examinations in this study included the following items: general appearance, skin, eyes, ears, nose, throat, head and neck, heart, joints, chest and lungs, abdomen, lymph nodes, musculoskeletal, nervous system, and others. Physical examinations were conducted from Screening visit to Final visit (up to 24 weeks). If at least one of physical examinations was identified in the subject, the subject was included in physical abnormalities calculation.
Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to Baselinebaseline and 12 weeksLaboratory examination to be measured in this study consisted of hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, RBC, platelet, WBC with differential counts) and biochemistry (Aspartate Transaminase (AST), Alanine Transaminase (ALT), fasting glucose, HbA1c, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), albumin). The laboratory examinations were conducted at the Screening visit, baseline, and Week 12. Patients' laboratory change from baseline to Week 12 was documented as relieved, unchanged, worsened (MH), or worsened (AE). The worsened means that the laboratory values were normal or non clinically significant (NCS) at baseline but change to clinically significant at Week 12. If the worsen situation was found, the clinically significant worsening changes were classified as related to medical history (MH) or adverse events (AE).
Blood Pressure Change From Baseline to Week 24baseline and 24 weeksVital signs measurement consisted of blood pressures, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature. Among them, blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) were obtained after the subject has been at rest for at least 5 minutes in a sitting position. The vital sign data was collected from Screening visit to Final visit (up to 24 weeks). The mean changes of Final visit to baseline in vital signs were presented (value at 24 weeks minus value at baseline).

Countries

Taiwan

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The planned sample size was determined to be 80 versus 20 subjects (4:1 ratio) for treatment versus vehicle groups, 100 subjects in total. To ensure the completion of 100 evaluable subjects, around 125 subjects were planned to be recruited. In the actual trial, a total of 137 subjects were screened, with 124 meeting the criteria followed by randomization to CSTC1 group (n = 98) or Vehicle group (n = 26).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CSTC1
CSTC1 (vapor fraction from seeds of Glycine max (L.) Merr. and composition thereof), topical, two times daily
98
CSTC1 Matched Vehicle
Matched vehicle, topical, two times daily
26
Total124

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up31
Overall StudyPhysician Decision40
Overall StudyProhibited Medication Administration or Condition Worsening72
Overall StudyProtocol Violation10
Overall StudySafety Concern40
Overall StudyUlcer became worse40
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject125

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCSTC1CSTC1 Matched VehicleTotal
Age, Continuous58.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.79
58.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.84
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.36
Baseline Diabetic Foot Target Ulcer Size
> 10 ~ 15 cm^2
4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Baseline Diabetic Foot Target Ulcer Size
> 1 ~ 1.5 cm^2
27 Participants5 Participants32 Participants
Baseline Diabetic Foot Target Ulcer Size
> 15 ~ 20 cm^2
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Baseline Diabetic Foot Target Ulcer Size
> 1.5 ~ 2 cm^2
11 Participants4 Participants15 Participants
Baseline Diabetic Foot Target Ulcer Size
> 20 cm^2
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Baseline Diabetic Foot Target Ulcer Size
> 2 ~ 3 cm^2
15 Participants4 Participants19 Participants
Baseline Diabetic Foot Target Ulcer Size
> 3 ~ 4 cm^2
14 Participants2 Participants16 Participants
Baseline Diabetic Foot Target Ulcer Size
> 4 ~ 5 cm^2
8 Participants4 Participants12 Participants
Baseline Diabetic Foot Target Ulcer Size
> 5 ~ 10 cm^2
15 Participants4 Participants19 Participants
Baseline Target Ulcer Size4.37 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.471
5.15 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.531
4.53 cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.47
Maximum Grade of Foot Ulcers
Grade 1
15 Participants4 Participants19 Participants
Maximum Grade of Foot Ulcers
Grade 2
83 Participants22 Participants105 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
98 Participants26 Participants124 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
67 Participants17 Participants84 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants9 Participants40 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 981 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
44 / 9813 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
20 / 983 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Complete Ulcer Closure During the Treatment Period

Complete ulcer closure is defined as 100% skin re-epithelialization without drainage or dressing requirements confirmed at the coming visits 2 weeks apart. The treatment period is until 12 weeks or up to confirmation of complete ulcer closure. Subjects with complete ulcer closure at Week 12 and confirmed at Week 14 were considered as success.

Time frame: Baseline to 14 weeks

Population: All randomized subjects who have received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSTC1Number of Participants With Complete Ulcer Closure During the Treatment Period32 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Complete Ulcer Closure During the Treatment Period4 Participants
Secondary

Percentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment Visit

The proportion of ulcer closure is calculated as (Ulcer size at post-treatment visit - Ulcer size at baseline)/(Ulcer size at baseline). This proportion was then multiplied by 100 to calculate the percentage change in ulcer size for each post-treatment visit. The percentage change in ulcer size for each post-treatment visit are presented.

Time frame: baseline and 24 weeks

Population: All randomized patients who have received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CSTC1Percentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 1-15.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 28.31
CSTC1Percentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 2-28.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 30.32
CSTC1Percentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 3-36.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 34.93
CSTC1Percentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 4-46.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 35.15
CSTC1Percentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 6-53.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 40.13
CSTC1Percentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 8-56.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 49.96
CSTC1Percentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 10-61.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 47.01
CSTC1Percentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 20-70.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 38.6
CSTC1Percentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 12-66.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 41.91
CSTC1Percentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 14-69.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 39.09
CSTC1Percentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 16-69.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 38.4
CSTC1Percentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 24-70.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 38.52
CSTC1 Matched VehiclePercentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 20-59.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 60.05
CSTC1 Matched VehiclePercentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 1-16.3 percent changeStandard Deviation 25.09
CSTC1 Matched VehiclePercentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 16-59.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 60.05
CSTC1 Matched VehiclePercentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 2-21.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 32.82
CSTC1 Matched VehiclePercentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 14-57.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 57.54
CSTC1 Matched VehiclePercentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 3-29.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 41
CSTC1 Matched VehiclePercentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 10-51.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 44.85
CSTC1 Matched VehiclePercentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 4-32.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 36.9
CSTC1 Matched VehiclePercentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 24-59.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 59.95
CSTC1 Matched VehiclePercentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 6-44.8 percent changeStandard Deviation 41.11
CSTC1 Matched VehiclePercentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 12-54.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 56.52
CSTC1 Matched VehiclePercentage Change in Ulcer Size for Each Post-treatment VisitWeek 8-47.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 46.67
Secondary

The Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer Closure

Complete ulcer closure is defined as 100% skin re-epithelialization without drainage or dressing requirements observed for at the last two consecutive study visits 2 weeks apart. The count of participants with complete ulcer closure at each post-treatment visit is provided.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: All randomized patients who have received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSTC1The Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 10 Participants
CSTC1The Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 20 Participants
CSTC1The Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 30 Participants
CSTC1The Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 40 Participants
CSTC1The Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 62 Participants
CSTC1The Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 89 Participants
CSTC1The Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 1013 Participants
CSTC1The Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 1222 Participants
CSTC1The Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 1432 Participants
CSTC1The Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 1635 Participants
CSTC1The Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 2035 Participants
CSTC1The Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 2436 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 207 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 10 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 101 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 20 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 167 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 30 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 122 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 40 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 246 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 61 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 144 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Accumulated Participant Counts With Complete Ulcer ClosureWeek 81 Participants
Secondary

The Ulcer Closure Time

Defined as the time to complete ulcer closure.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: All randomized subjects who have received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CSTC1The Ulcer Closure Time87 DaysStandard Error 2.2
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Ulcer Closure Time92 DaysStandard Error 3.2
Other Pre-specified

Blood Pressure Change From Baseline to Week 24

Vital signs measurement consisted of blood pressures, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature. Among them, blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) were obtained after the subject has been at rest for at least 5 minutes in a sitting position. The vital sign data was collected from Screening visit to Final visit (up to 24 weeks). The mean changes of Final visit to baseline in vital signs were presented (value at 24 weeks minus value at baseline).

Time frame: baseline and 24 weeks

Population: All randomized patients who have received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CSTC1Blood Pressure Change From Baseline to Week 24Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]-3.67 mmHgStandard Deviation 27.088
CSTC1Blood Pressure Change From Baseline to Week 24Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]1.41 mmHgStandard Deviation 13.882
CSTC1 Matched VehicleBlood Pressure Change From Baseline to Week 24Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]-20.00 mmHgStandard Deviation 34.137
CSTC1 Matched VehicleBlood Pressure Change From Baseline to Week 24Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg]-6.25 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.646
Other Pre-specified

Body Temperature Change From Baseline to Week 24

Vital signs measurement consisted of blood pressures, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature. Among them, body temperature were obtained after the subject has been at rest for at least 5 minutes in a sitting position. The vital sign data was collected from Screening visit to Final visit (up to 24 weeks). The mean changes of Final visit to baseline in vital signs were presented (value at 24 weeks minus value at baseline).

Time frame: baseline and 24 weeks

Population: All randomized patients who have received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CSTC1Body Temperature Change From Baseline to Week 240.08 degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.468
CSTC1 Matched VehicleBody Temperature Change From Baseline to Week 240.33 degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.377
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Adverse Events

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a study medication and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not related to the study medication. AE data was collected from Screening visit to Final visit (up to 24 weeks).

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: All randomized patients who have received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSTC1Number of Participants With Adverse Events80 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Adverse Events22 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the Visits

Physical examinations in this study included the following items: general appearance, skin, eyes, ears, nose, throat, head and neck, heart, joints, chest and lungs, abdomen, lymph nodes, musculoskeletal, nervous system, and others. Physical examinations were conducted from Screening visit to Final visit (up to 24 weeks). If at least one of physical examinations was identified in the subject, the subject was included in physical abnormalities calculation.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: All randomized patients who have received at least one dose study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
CSTC1Number of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 457 participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 1241 participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 157 participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 1443 participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 657 participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 1642 participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 359 participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 2018 participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 852 participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 2415 participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 257 participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsBaseline (Day 1)57 participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 1045 participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsBaseline (Day 1)18 participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 218 participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 316 participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 416 participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 617 participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 816 participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 1016 participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 1216 participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 1412 participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 1612 participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 202 participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 242 participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Physical Abnormality Finding at the VisitsWeek 118 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to Baseline

Laboratory examination to be measured in this study consisted of hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, RBC, platelet, WBC with differential counts) and biochemistry (Aspartate Transaminase (AST), Alanine Transaminase (ALT), fasting glucose, HbA1c, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), albumin). The laboratory examinations were conducted at the Screening visit, baseline, and Week 12. Patients' laboratory change from baseline to Week 12 was documented as relieved, unchanged, worsened (MH), or worsened (AE). The worsened means that the laboratory values were normal or non clinically significant (NCS) at baseline but change to clinically significant at Week 12. If the worsen situation was found, the clinically significant worsening changes were classified as related to medical history (MH) or adverse events (AE).

Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks

Population: All randomized patients who have received at least one dose study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineLymphocytes (%)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineWhite blood cells (10^9/L)Unchanged81 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineWhite blood cells (10^9/L)Worsened (MH)2 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineWhite blood cells (10^9/L)Worsened (AE)5 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineNeutrophils (%)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineNeutrophils (%)Unchanged84 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineNeutrophils (%)Worsened (MH)2 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineNeutrophils (%)Worsened (AE)1 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineEosinophils (%)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineEosinophils (%)Unchanged87 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineEosinophils (%)Worsened (MH)0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineEosinophils (%)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBasophils (%)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBasophils (%)Unchanged87 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBasophils (%)Worsened (MH)0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBasophils (%)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineWhite blood cells (10^9/L)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineLymphocytes (%)Unchanged83 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineLymphocytes (%)Worsened (MH)2 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineLymphocytes (%)Worsened (AE)2 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineMonocytes (%)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineMonocytes (%)Unchanged87 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineMonocytes (%)Worsened (MH)0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineMonocytes (%)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineRed Blood Cells (^12/L)Relieved2 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineRed Blood Cells (^12/L)Unchanged81 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineRed Blood Cells (^12/L)Worsened (MH)5 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineRed Blood Cells (^12/L)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHemoglobin (g/mL)Relieved3 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHemoglobin (g/mL)Unchanged80 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHemoglobin (g/mL)Worsened (MH)5 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHemoglobin (g/mL)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHematocrit (%)Relieved2 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHematocrit (%)Unchanged82 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHematocrit (%)Worsened (MH)4 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHematocrit (%)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselinePlatelets (10^9/L)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselinePlatelets (10^9/L)Unchanged86 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselinePlatelets (10^9/L)Worsened (MH)2 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselinePlatelets (10^9/L)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHemoglobin A1C (%)Relieved5 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHemoglobin A1C (%)Unchanged79 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHemoglobin A1C (%)Worsened (MH)4 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHemoglobin A1C (%)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L)Relieved1 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L)Unchanged85 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L)Worsened (MH)1 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L)Relieved1 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L)Unchanged86 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L)Worsened (MH)1 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBlood Urea Nitrogen (U/L)Relieved6 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBlood Urea Nitrogen (U/L)Unchanged77 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBlood Urea Nitrogen (U/L)Worsened (MH)5 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBlood Urea Nitrogen (U/L)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineCreatinine (umol/L)Relieved6 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineCreatinine (umol/L)Unchanged78 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineCreatinine (umol/L)Worsened (MH)4 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineCreatinine (umol/L)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineGlucose (mg/dL)Relieved13 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineGlucose (mg/dL)Unchanged66 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineGlucose (mg/dL)Worsened (MH)9 Participants
CSTC1Number of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineGlucose (mg/dL)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineGlucose (mg/dL)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineWhite blood cells (10^9/L)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHematocrit (%)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineWhite blood cells (10^9/L)Unchanged22 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineWhite blood cells (10^9/L)Worsened (MH)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHematocrit (%)Unchanged21 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineWhite blood cells (10^9/L)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineCreatinine (umol/L)Relieved1 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineNeutrophils (%)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHematocrit (%)Worsened (MH)1 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineNeutrophils (%)Unchanged22 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L)Unchanged22 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineNeutrophils (%)Worsened (MH)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHematocrit (%)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineNeutrophils (%)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineGlucose (mg/dL)Relieved1 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineEosinophils (%)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselinePlatelets (10^9/L)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineEosinophils (%)Unchanged22 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L)Worsened (MH)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineEosinophils (%)Worsened (MH)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselinePlatelets (10^9/L)Unchanged22 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineEosinophils (%)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineCreatinine (umol/L)Unchanged21 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBasophils (%)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselinePlatelets (10^9/L)Worsened (MH)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBasophils (%)Unchanged22 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineAlanine Aminotransferase (U/L)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBasophils (%)Worsened (MH)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselinePlatelets (10^9/L)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBasophils (%)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineGlucose (mg/dL)Worsened (MH)3 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineLymphocytes (%)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHemoglobin A1C (%)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineLymphocytes (%)Unchanged22 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBlood Urea Nitrogen (U/L)Relieved2 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineLymphocytes (%)Worsened (MH)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHemoglobin A1C (%)Unchanged21 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineLymphocytes (%)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineCreatinine (umol/L)Worsened (MH)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineMonocytes (%)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHemoglobin A1C (%)Worsened (MH)1 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineMonocytes (%)Unchanged22 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBlood Urea Nitrogen (U/L)Unchanged19 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineMonocytes (%)Worsened (MH)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHemoglobin A1C (%)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineMonocytes (%)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineGlucose (mg/dL)Unchanged18 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineRed Blood Cells (^12/L)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineRed Blood Cells (^12/L)Unchanged21 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBlood Urea Nitrogen (U/L)Worsened (MH)1 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineRed Blood Cells (^12/L)Worsened (MH)1 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L)Unchanged22 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineRed Blood Cells (^12/L)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineCreatinine (umol/L)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHemoglobin (g/mL)Relieved0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L)Worsened (MH)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHemoglobin (g/mL)Unchanged21 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineBlood Urea Nitrogen (U/L)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHemoglobin (g/mL)Worsened (MH)1 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineAspartate Aminotransferase (U/L)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleNumber of Participants With Relieved, Unchanged, or Worsen Values in Laboratory Test at Week 12 Compared to BaselineHemoglobin (g/mL)Worsened (AE)0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Pulse Rate Change From Baseline to Week 24

Vital signs measurement consisted of blood pressures, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature. Among them, pulse rates were obtained after the subject has been at rest for at least 5 minutes in a sitting position. The vital sign data was collected from Screening visit to Final visit (up to 24 weeks). The mean changes of Final visit to baseline in vital signs were presented (value at 24 weeks minus value at baseline).

Time frame: baseline and 24 weeks

Population: All randomized patients who have received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CSTC1Pulse Rate Change From Baseline to Week 244.00 beats/minStandard Deviation 9.899
CSTC1 Matched VehiclePulse Rate Change From Baseline to Week 24-1.25 beats/minStandard Deviation 9.323
Other Pre-specified

Respiratory Rate Change From Baseline to Week 24

Vital signs measurement consisted of blood pressures, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature. Among them, respiratory rate were obtained after the subject has been at rest for at least 5 minutes in a sitting position. The vital sign data was collected from Screening visit to Final visit (up to 24 weeks). The mean changes of Final visit to baseline in vital signs were presented (value at 24 weeks minus value at baseline).

Time frame: baseline and 24 weeks

Population: All randomized patients who have received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CSTC1Respiratory Rate Change From Baseline to Week 24-0.11 breaths/minStandard Deviation 1.672
CSTC1 Matched VehicleRespiratory Rate Change From Baseline to Week 24-3.25 breaths/minStandard Deviation 3.862
Post Hoc

The Response Rate of the Target Ulcer Size Reduction ≥ 50%

The proportion of ulcer closure is calculated as (Ulcer size at post-treatment visit - Ulcer size at baseline)/(Ulcer size at baseline). A subject who had target ulcer closure ≥ 50% was counted as a responder. The non-responders included subjects whose target ulcer closure size less than 50% before 12 weeks.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: All randomized patients who have received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSTC1The Response Rate of the Target Ulcer Size Reduction ≥ 50%Responder77 Participants
CSTC1The Response Rate of the Target Ulcer Size Reduction ≥ 50%Non-Responder21 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Response Rate of the Target Ulcer Size Reduction ≥ 50%Responder18 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Response Rate of the Target Ulcer Size Reduction ≥ 50%Non-Responder8 Participants
Post Hoc

The Response Rate of the Target Ulcer Size Reduction ≥ 90%

Subjects with ulcer closure size ≥ 90% compared to the baseline at a Week 12 were considered as a responder. A subject whose target ulcer size reduction was less than 90% was counted as a non-responder. The percentage of repsonders and non-responders were presented.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: All randomized patients who have received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CSTC1The Response Rate of the Target Ulcer Size Reduction ≥ 90%Responder49 Participants
CSTC1The Response Rate of the Target Ulcer Size Reduction ≥ 90%Non-Responder49 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Response Rate of the Target Ulcer Size Reduction ≥ 90%Responder12 Participants
CSTC1 Matched VehicleThe Response Rate of the Target Ulcer Size Reduction ≥ 90%Non-Responder14 Participants
Post Hoc

Time to Achieve ≥ 50% Reduction in Target Ulcer Size

The proportion of ulcer closure is calculated as (Ulcer size at post-treatment visit - Ulcer size at baseline)/(Ulcer size at baseline). Time to achieve ≥ 50% reduction in target ulcer size was measured from Screening visit to Final visit (up to 24 weeks).

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: All randomized patients who have received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CSTC1Time to Achieve ≥ 50% Reduction in Target Ulcer Size42 DaysStandard Deviation 3.3
CSTC1 Matched VehicleTime to Achieve ≥ 50% Reduction in Target Ulcer Size52 DaysStandard Deviation 7.1
Post Hoc

Time to Achieve ≥90% Reduction in Target Ulcer Size

The proportion of ulcer closure is calculated as (Ulcer size at post-treatment visit - Ulcer size at baseline)/(Ulcer size at baseline). Time to achieve ≥ 90% reduction in target ulcer size was analyzed in the subjects.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: All randomized patients who have received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CSTC1Time to Achieve ≥90% Reduction in Target Ulcer Size73 DaysStandard Deviation 2.9
CSTC1 Matched VehicleTime to Achieve ≥90% Reduction in Target Ulcer Size84 DaysStandard Deviation 4.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026