Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Alirocumab (SAR236553/REGN727) in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia on Stable Atorvastatin Therapy in Japan

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Three Doses of SAR236553 (REGN727) Over 12 Weeks in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia and LDL-cholesterol ≥100 mg/dL (≥2.59 mmol/L) on Ongoing Stable Atorvastatin Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01812707
Enrollment
100
Registered
2013-03-18
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2016-10-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypercholesterolemia

Brief summary

Alirocumab (SAR236553/REGN727) is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). Primary Objective of the study: To evaluate the effect of alirocumab on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels after 12 weeks of treatment in comparison with placebo in participants with LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL (≥2.59 mmol/L) on ongoing stable atorvastatin therapy. Secondary Objectives: * To evaluate the effects of alirocumab on other lipid levels after 12 weeks of treatment in comparison with placebo * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of alirocumab * To evaluate the development of anti-alirocumab antibodies * To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of alirocumab

Detailed description

The duration of study participation depended on the status of the participant at screening: 21 to 27 weeks including a screening/run-in period of 1 to 7 weeks, a double-blind treatment period of 12 weeks, followed by an 8-week follow-up period.

Interventions

DRUGAlirocumab

Two SC injections in the abdomen only

Two subcutaneous (SC) injections in the abdomen only Route of administration: subcutaneous injection (1 mL) in the abdomen

DRUGAtorvastatin

Orally once daily at a stable dose of 5 to 20 mg as background therapy Route of administration: oral administration in the evening

Sponsors

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: \- Participants with primary hypercholesterolemia treated with atorvastatin at stable dose of 5-20 mg for at least 6 weeks prior to screening and likely to have LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL (≥2.59 mmol/L) at the screening visit. OR \- Participants with primary hypercholesterolemia who were receiving a lipid-lowering treatment other than atorvastatin, or who were not at stable dose of atorvastatin 5-20 mg for at least 6 weeks prior to screening if they were likely to have LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL (≥2.59 mmol/L) after a 6-week run-in treatment period on atorvastatin therapy.

Exclusion criteria

1. LDL-C \<100 mg/dL (\<2.59 mmol/L) * at screening visit for participants who were being treated with stable dose of atorvastatin 5-20 mg for at least 6 weeks prior to screening OR * at the end of the 6-week run-in period on atorvastatin for participants receiving a lipid lowering treatment other than atorvastatin, or not at stable dose of atorvastatin 5-20 mg for at least 6 weeks prior to screening 2. Participants with type 1 diabetes 3. Participants with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin, or without, and considered poorly controlled at screening. The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisBaseline to Week 12 (LOCF)Calculated LDL-C values were obtained using the Friedewald formula. Baseline adjusted least squares (LS) means and standard errors were estimated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model including available post-baseline data on treatment from first investigational product (IP) injection up to 21 days after last IP injection (on-treatment analysis). Missing Week 12 data were imputed by last observation carried forward \[LOCF\] method.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisBaseline to Week 12 (LOCF)Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisWeek 12 (LOCF)
Absolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisBaseline to Week 12 (LOCF)Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisBaseline to Week 12 (LOCF)Since the assumptions of normal distribution and equality of variances were not verified for the lipid parameters, percent changes were expressed as median (inter-quartile range).
Absolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) Ratio at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisFrom Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)Adjusted LS mean and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA as for primary endpoint.
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisBaseline to Week 12 (LOCF)Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.

Countries

Japan

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 4 centers in Japan. Overall, 162 participants were screened between March 2013 and August 2013, 62 of whom were run-in/screen failures, mainly due to exclusion criteria met.

Pre-assignment details

Randomization was stratified according to atorvastatin dose. Assignment to treatment arms was done centrally using an Interactive Voice/Web Response System in a 1:1:1:1 ratio after confirmation of selection criteria. 100 participants were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Placebo (for alirocumab) Q2W for 12-weeks in combination with atorvastatin stable dose.
25
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W for 12-weeks in combination with atorvastatin stable dose.
25
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W for 12-weeks in combination with atorvastatin stable dose.
25
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2W
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2W for 12-weeks in combination with atorvastatin stable dose.
25
Total100

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0002
Overall StudyConsent withdrawn by participant1000
Overall StudyPoor compliance to protocol1000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboAlirocumab 50 mg Q2WAlirocumab 75 mg Q2WAlirocumab 150 mg Q2WTotal
Age, Continuous58.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
57.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
LDL-C in mg/dL121.0 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.1
122.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.6
120.9 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.7
120.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2
121.2 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.5
Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) in mmol/L3.13 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.55
3.16 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.43
3.13 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.43
3.12 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.42
3.14 mmol/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.45
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants16 Participants12 Participants16 Participants55 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants9 Participants13 Participants9 Participants45 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 2511 / 258 / 259 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 250 / 250 / 251 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis

Calculated LDL-C values were obtained using the Friedewald formula. Baseline adjusted least squares (LS) means and standard errors were estimated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model including available post-baseline data on treatment from first investigational product (IP) injection up to 21 days after last IP injection (on-treatment analysis). Missing Week 12 data were imputed by last observation carried forward \[LOCF\] method.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)

Population: Modified Intent-To-Treat (mITT) population included all randomized participants with one baseline and at least one post-baseline calculated LDL-C value on-treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-2.7 percent changeStandard Error 3.1
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-54.8 percent changeStandard Error 3.1
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-62.3 percent changeStandard Error 3.1
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-71.7 percent changeStandard Error 3.1
Comparison: Each treatment group was compared to placebo using ANCOVA-derived contrasts.~A hierarchical testing procedure was applied to ensure strong control of overall Type-I error rate at 0.05 level. Order was following:~1. Alirocumab 150 mg Q2W versus placebo~2. Alirocumab 75 mg Q2W versus placebo~3. Alirocumab 50 mg Q2W versus placebo~Testing continued only when high-order test was statistically significant at 5% level.p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) Ratio at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS mean and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA as for primary endpoint.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)

Population: Participants of the mITT population with one baseline and at least one post baseline on-treatment value of ApoB/ApoA-1 ratio analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) Ratio at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis0.02 ratioStandard Error 0.02
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) Ratio at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-0.30 ratioStandard Error 0.02
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) Ratio at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-0.32 ratioStandard Error 0.02
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B/Apolipoprotein A-1 (ApoB/ApoA-1) Ratio at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-0.38 ratioStandard Error 0.02
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)

Population: mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-5.0 mg/dLStandard Error 3.6
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-67.1 mg/dLStandard Error 3.6
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-74.6 mg/dLStandard Error 3.6
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mg/dL) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-85.8 mg/dLStandard Error 3.6
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)

Population: mITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-0.1 mmol/LStandard Error 0.1
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-1.7 mmol/LStandard Error 0.1
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-1.9 mmol/LStandard Error 0.1
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WAbsolute Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C (mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis-2.2 mmol/LStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis

Time frame: Week 12 (LOCF)

Population: mITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L)8.0 percentage of participants
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L)100.0 percentage of participants
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)84.0 percentage of participants
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L)100.0 percentage of participants
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)84.0 percentage of participants
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L)88.0 percentage of participants
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and < 70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis

Since the assumptions of normal distribution and equality of variances were not verified for the lipid parameters, percent changes were expressed as median (inter-quartile range).

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)

Population: Participants of the mITT population with one baseline and at least one post baseline on-treatment value of Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein (a) analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisFasting Triglycerides1.3 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLipoprotein (a)-3.7 percent change
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLipoprotein (a)-35.6 percent change
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisFasting Triglycerides-21.1 percent change
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisFasting Triglycerides-10.7 percent change
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLipoprotein (a)-40.2 percent change
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisFasting Triglycerides-15.0 percent change
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides and Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisLipoprotein (a)-43.3 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment Analysis

Adjusted LS means and standard errors were estimated using the same ANCOVA model as for primary endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 12 (LOCF)

Population: Participants of the mITT population with one baseline and at least one post baseline on-treatment value of lipid parameters analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisTotal Cholesterol-1.2 percent changeStandard Error 2.1
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisHDL-C-0.2 percent changeStandard Error 2
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisNon-HDL-C-0.9 percent changeStandard Error 2.9
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisApo-B-2.3 percent changeStandard Error 3.3
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisApo-B-43.5 percent changeStandard Error 3.3
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisNon-HDL-C-46.3 percent changeStandard Error 2.9
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisHDL-C5.1 percent changeStandard Error 2
Alirocumab 50 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisTotal Cholesterol-31.9 percent changeStandard Error 2.1
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisNon-HDL-C-53.1 percent changeStandard Error 2.9
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisApo-B-48.6 percent changeStandard Error 3.3
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisHDL-C5.0 percent changeStandard Error 2
Alirocumab 75 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisTotal Cholesterol-36.3 percent changeStandard Error 2.1
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisHDL-C3.2 percent changeStandard Error 2.1
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisTotal Cholesterol-41.4 percent changeStandard Error 2.1
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisApo-B-60.0 percent changeStandard Error 3.3
Alirocumab 150 mg Q2WPercent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol, High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C), Non-HDL-C, and Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12 - On-Treatment AnalysisNon-HDL-C-62.2 percent changeStandard Error 2.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026