Skip to content

Smoking, Sex Hormones, and Pregnancy

Smoking, Sex Hormones, and Pregnancy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01811225
Enrollment
95
Registered
2013-03-14
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2020-11-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Contraception, Nicotine Dependence

Brief summary

The investigators aim to (1) examine the association between levels of progesterone (Prog), allopregnanolone (Allo), and the estradiol/progesterone (E2/P) ratios with smoking-related symptomatology during ad libitum smoking and (2) determine the association between Prog, Allo, and E2/P with the changes in smoking-related symptomatology and response to nicotine following overnight abstinence

Detailed description

The sample population will consist of oral contraceptive users, both low and high dose levels of exogenous progesterone with a consistent dose of exogenous estrogen. Participants will complete data collection procedures including providing saliva (cortisol to measure stress), urine (cotinine and 3-Hydroxycotinine to measure nicotine exposure), and blood (progesterone, allopregnanolone, and estradiol) samples, as well as ecological momentary assessments (EMA) daily for seven-days. Participants will also complete a 3-hour smoking topography lab session after overnight abstinence and a 4.5-hour nicotine nasal spray lab session after a 14-hour abstinence. These sessions will contain a nicotine challenge via smoking a cigarette or nasal spray with timed-series physiological, subjective, and behavioral responses.

Interventions

DRUGLow-dose Progesterone

The low progesterone dose is seven days of placebo Tri-sprintec + placebo generic Prometrium twice a day (7AM and 7PM).

DRUGHigh-dose Progesterone

The high progesterone dose is seven days of placebo Tri-Sprintec + 200mg of generic Prometrium twice a day (7AM and 7PM).

Sponsors

University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* currently taking oral contraceptives * English fluency * Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* use of progestin only contraceptive * pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Smoking Urgesafter overnight abstinence on day 8Questionnaire on Smoking Urges-Brief (QSU-Brief): This ten-item version of the original form (QSU) was developed by Tiffany and Drobes and has an excellent level of reliability (α = .97). Total QSU-Brief. Scores can average between 1-7. A higher scores means more urges.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Positive and Negative Affect Scale Following Overnight Abstinenceafter overnight abstinence on day 8Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS): Participants rate 20 words associated with positive or negative affect using a five-point Likert-type scale. This scale has been shown to have high internal consistency. Positive PANAS scores can range from 10-50. A higher score means greater positive affect. Negative PANAS score can range from 10-50. A higher score means greater negative affect.
Change in Cohen Perceived Stress Scaleafter overnight abstinence on day 8Cohen Perceived Stress Scale (PSS): This ten-item questionnaire has been validated in a variety of populations including pregnant and postpartum women. It uses five-items to assess ten questions resulting in two factors negative feelings and inability to handle stress. It has high internal reliability (alpha = 0.75). Score range from 0-56. A higher score means more perceived stress.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
All participants at baseline
70
Total70

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Treatment Period 1Adverse Event23
Treatment Period 1Lost to Follow-up128
Treatment Period 1transporation10
Treatment Period 1unable to remain smoke free overnight106
Treatment Period 2Lost to Follow-up12
Treatment Period 2unable to remain smoke free overnight34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
70 Participants
Age, Continuous25 years
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed Race
9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American
5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
41 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
70 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
70 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 340 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 3417 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 340 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Smoking Urges

Questionnaire on Smoking Urges-Brief (QSU-Brief): This ten-item version of the original form (QSU) was developed by Tiffany and Drobes and has an excellent level of reliability (α = .97). Total QSU-Brief. Scores can average between 1-7. A higher scores means more urges.

Time frame: after overnight abstinence on day 8

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Low-Dose ContraceptiveChange in Smoking Urges5.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
High-Dose ContraceptiveChange in Smoking Urges5.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Secondary

Change in Cohen Perceived Stress Scale

Cohen Perceived Stress Scale (PSS): This ten-item questionnaire has been validated in a variety of populations including pregnant and postpartum women. It uses five-items to assess ten questions resulting in two factors negative feelings and inability to handle stress. It has high internal reliability (alpha = 0.75). Score range from 0-56. A higher score means more perceived stress.

Time frame: after overnight abstinence on day 8

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Low-Dose ContraceptiveChange in Cohen Perceived Stress Scale14 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
High-Dose ContraceptiveChange in Cohen Perceived Stress Scale15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
Secondary

Change in Positive and Negative Affect Scale Following Overnight Abstinence

Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS): Participants rate 20 words associated with positive or negative affect using a five-point Likert-type scale. This scale has been shown to have high internal consistency. Positive PANAS scores can range from 10-50. A higher score means greater positive affect. Negative PANAS score can range from 10-50. A higher score means greater negative affect.

Time frame: after overnight abstinence on day 8

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Low-Dose ContraceptiveChange in Positive and Negative Affect Scale Following Overnight AbstinencePositive Affect26.21 score on a scale
Low-Dose ContraceptiveChange in Positive and Negative Affect Scale Following Overnight AbstinenceNegative Affect17.01 score on a scale
High-Dose ContraceptiveChange in Positive and Negative Affect Scale Following Overnight AbstinencePositive Affect24.09 score on a scale
High-Dose ContraceptiveChange in Positive and Negative Affect Scale Following Overnight AbstinenceNegative Affect15.41 score on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026