Skip to content

A Two-Part, Single-Blind, Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Patiromer for the Treatment of Hyperkalemia (OPAL)

A Two-Part, Single-Blind, Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Patiromer for the Treatment of Hyperkalemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01810939
Acronym
OPAL
Enrollment
243
Registered
2013-03-14
Start date
2013-02-28
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2021-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Hyperkalemia (HK)

Keywords

Chronic Kidney Disease, Treatment of Hyperkalemia, Hyperkalemia

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of patiromer (investigational drug) in the treatment of hyperkalemia (high serum potassium). The study also evaluated the effect of withdrawing patiromer treatment and assessed whether chronic treatment with patiromer prevented the recurrence of hyperkalemia. The safety of patiromer treatment was also evaluated.

Detailed description

There were two parts in the study, Part A and Part B. Part A was an assessment of 4 weeks of dosing with patiromer in the treatment of hyperkalemia; Part B was a randomized, placebo-controlled, 8-week assessment of the withdrawal of patiromer in participants with a baseline serum potassium at the beginning of Part A ≥ 5.5 mEq/L who responded to the 4 weeks of treatment with patiromer during Part A. All participants received patiromer during Part A; Part B participants were randomized to continue patiromer or switch to placebo. Total study participation was up to 14 weeks (including up to 2 weeks of follow up). The dose of patiromer could be titrated based on participant's serum potassium response.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Sponsors

Relypsa, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males and females ages 18 - 80 * Chronic kidney disease (CKD) - eGFR 15 to \< 60 mL/min/1.73m2 at screening * Hyperkalemia, defined as a serum potassium value of 5.1 to \< 6.5 mEq/L at screening * Taking either an Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor, an Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), or an aldosterone antagonist (AA) medication * Informed consent given

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with auto-immune related chronic kidney disease such as lupus nephritis or renal scleroderma/scleroderma renal crisis, or mixed connective tissue disease with renal involvement * Participants with uncontrolled Type 1 diabetes, defined as or a HbA1c \> 10.0 %, or hospitalization to treat hyper- or hypo-glycemia in the past 3 months within the previous 6 months in participants with Type 2 diabetes * Participants with severe heart failure, defined as NYHA (New York Heart Association) class IV * Participants with major surgery including thoracic and cardiac, in the past 3 months, or participants with heart or kidney transplant * Participants with significant cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events in the past 2 months, such as cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, or stroke * Participants with BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Serum Potassium From Part A Baseline to Part A Week 4Part A Baseline to Part A Week 4The primary analysis endpoint is the change from Baseline at Week 4. The estimate of the change at Week 4 is from a repeated measures model, which includes data from Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4. The analysis includes all intent to treat participants who had a serum potassium result at baseline and at least one weekly post-baseline visit (i.e. Part A Week 1 or later) and excludes six participants who had no result collected after Day 3).
Change in Serum Potassium From Part B BaselinePart B Baseline to Part B Week 4 or first local laboratory serum potassium < 3.8 mEq/L or ≥ 5.5 mEq/LChange in Serum Potassium from Part B Baseline to either: Part B Week 4 visit, if the participant's serum potassium remained ≥ 3.8 mEq/L and \< 5.5 mEq/L up to the Part B Week 4 visit or the earliest Part B visit at which the participant's serum potassium was \< 3.8 mEq/L or ≥ 5.5 mEq/L.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of Participants With Serum Potassium Levels in the Target Range of 3.8 to < 5.1 mEq/L at Part A Week 4Week 4
Proportion of Participants With Serum Potassium That Was ≥ 5.5 mEq/L in Part BPart B Baseline to Part B Week 8
Proportion of Participants With Serum Potassium ≥ 5.1 mEq/L in Part BPart B Baseline to Part B Week 8

Countries

Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Georgia, Hungary, Italy, Serbia, Slovenia, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part A Patiromer
Participants were administered patiromer starting dose of 8.4 g or 16.8 g daily as a divided dose twice a day, orally, for 4 weeks.
243
Total243

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Part A Treatment PeriodAdverse Event1000
Part A Treatment PeriodNon-compliance with Study Drug100
Part A Treatment PeriodProtocol-specified (eGFR)200
Part A Treatment PeriodProtocol-specified (High K+)300
Part A Treatment PeriodProtocol-specified (Low K+)100
Part A Treatment PeriodProtocol Violation200
Part A Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject500
Part B Placebo-Controlled WithdrawalAdverse Event011
Part B Placebo-Controlled WithdrawalDeath001
Part B Placebo-Controlled WithdrawalLost to Follow-up010
Part B Placebo-Controlled WithdrawalNon-compliance with Study Drug010
Part B Placebo-Controlled WithdrawalPhysician Decision011
Part B Placebo-Controlled WithdrawalProtocol-specified (eGFR)011
Part B Placebo-Controlled WithdrawalProtocol-specified (High K+)0214
Part B Placebo-Controlled WithdrawalProtocol-specified (K+ result)012
Part B Placebo-Controlled WithdrawalProtocol-specified (Low K+)021
Part B Placebo-Controlled WithdrawalWithdrawal by Subject001

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart A Patiromer
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
131 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
112 Participants
Age, Continuous64.2 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
103 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
140 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
33 / 2435 / 558 / 52
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 2430 / 551 / 52

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Serum Potassium From Part A Baseline to Part A Week 4

The primary analysis endpoint is the change from Baseline at Week 4. The estimate of the change at Week 4 is from a repeated measures model, which includes data from Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4. The analysis includes all intent to treat participants who had a serum potassium result at baseline and at least one weekly post-baseline visit (i.e. Part A Week 1 or later) and excludes six participants who had no result collected after Day 3).

Time frame: Part A Baseline to Part A Week 4

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part A PatiromerChange in Serum Potassium From Part A Baseline to Part A Week 4-1.01 mEq/LStandard Error 0.031
Comparison: Estimation of mean change in serum potassium from Part A Baseline to Part A Week 4 and test mean change different from zero.p-value: <0.001Longitudinal mixed models
Primary

Change in Serum Potassium From Part B Baseline

Change in Serum Potassium from Part B Baseline to either: Part B Week 4 visit, if the participant's serum potassium remained ≥ 3.8 mEq/L and \< 5.5 mEq/L up to the Part B Week 4 visit or the earliest Part B visit at which the participant's serum potassium was \< 3.8 mEq/L or ≥ 5.5 mEq/L.

Time frame: Part B Baseline to Part B Week 4 or first local laboratory serum potassium < 3.8 mEq/L or ≥ 5.5 mEq/L

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Part A PatiromerChange in Serum Potassium From Part B Baseline0.72 mEq/L
Part B PatiromerChange in Serum Potassium From Part B Baseline0 mEq/L
Comparison: Test for difference between treatment groups in serum potassium change in Part Bp-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Serum Potassium ≥ 5.1 mEq/L in Part B

Time frame: Part B Baseline to Part B Week 8

Population: Percentages were estimated not as simple ratios, but by using a stratified method, in order to account for differences between the patiromer and placebo groups in terms of whether participants had type 2 diabetes mellitus and whether they entered the study with serum potassium \< 5.8 mEq/L or serum potassium ≥ 5.8 mEq/L.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part A PatiromerProportion of Participants With Serum Potassium ≥ 5.1 mEq/L in Part B91 percentage of participants
Part B PatiromerProportion of Participants With Serum Potassium ≥ 5.1 mEq/L in Part B43 percentage of participants
Comparison: Test for difference between treatment groups in proportion with serum potassium ≥ 5.1 mEq/Lp-value: <0.001Mantel Haenszel
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Serum Potassium Levels in the Target Range of 3.8 to < 5.1 mEq/L at Part A Week 4

Time frame: Week 4

Population: Proportion of participants with serum potassium level in the target range at Part A Week 4

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part A PatiromerProportion of Participants With Serum Potassium Levels in the Target Range of 3.8 to < 5.1 mEq/L at Part A Week 476 percentage of participants
95% CI: [0.7, 0.81]
Secondary

Proportion of Participants With Serum Potassium That Was ≥ 5.5 mEq/L in Part B

Time frame: Part B Baseline to Part B Week 8

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Part A PatiromerProportion of Participants With Serum Potassium That Was ≥ 5.5 mEq/L in Part B60 percentage of participants
Part B PatiromerProportion of Participants With Serum Potassium That Was ≥ 5.5 mEq/L in Part B15 percentage of participants
Comparison: Test for difference between treatment groups in proportion with serum potassium ≥ 5.5 mEq/Lp-value: <0.001Mantel Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026