Skip to content

A Study to Compare the Effect of Transipeg 2.95 g or Forlax Junior 4 g in Children With Constipation

A Double-blind, Randomized, Uninational, Multicenter, Two Parallel Groups, Active Controlled Study to Compare the Effect of the Treatment With Transipeg 2.95 g or Forlax Junior 4 g in Children With Constipation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01810653
Enrollment
97
Registered
2013-03-13
Start date
2006-04-30
Completion date
2008-12-31
Last updated
2015-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Constipation

Keywords

Macrogol

Brief summary

The study design combines a long-term safety and a dose range determination objective. The first 8 weeks of the study were primarily intended for the dose range determination, while the later visits were used for the comparison of long-term safety between the groups.

Interventions

DRUGMacrogol (Transipeg, BAY81-8430)

Up to 4 sachets per day based on individual titration

DRUGMacrogol (Forlax)

Up to 4 sachets per day based on individual titration

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Childhood functional constipation * 6 months to \<16 years of age * Male or female * For females of childbearing potential (after menarche): negative pregnancy test * Moderately severe to severe constipation, defined as stool frequency \<3 stools/week * Informed consent signed by parent(s) or legal acceptable representative(s), after sufficient oral and written information before entering the study, to be documented by the investigators in the Case Report Form

Exclusion criteria

* Functional non-retentive fecal incontinence * Known metabolic or endocrine disorders (s.a. hypothyroidism) * Neurologic disorders (s.a. spina bifida or spinal cord anomaly) * Hirschsprung's disease (congenital megacolon) * Anal anomaly * Gastrointestinal surgery * Drug induced constipation * Mental retardation * Cerebral palsy * Treatment with other laxatives * Drugs influencing gastrointestinal function (e.g., cisapride, erythromicin, imodium) * Prior bowel surgery, except appendectomy * Earlier participation in this trial * Concurrent participation in any other clinical trial * Participation in any other clinical study 6 months prior to inclusion * Any use of a Macrogol within 2 months prior to inclusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Dose Range Determination: Mean Dose per Kilogram Body Weight Based on Sachets UsedUp to 52 weeks
Overall Change of Total Sum Score (TSS): Average of all Diaries Obtained Minus BaselineAverage up to 52 weeks
Dose Range Determination: Mean Dose Based on Sachets UsedUp to 52 weeks.
Symptom Based Weekly Total Sum Score (TSS) Over 52 WeeksBaseline (Week 0), Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Change From Baseline in Total Sum Score (TSS) at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
Short Term Change of Total Sum Score (TSS): Average of Weeks 1 to 8 Minus BaselineAverage of Weeks 1 to 8
Long Term Change of Total Sum Score (TSS): Average of Weeks 26 and 52 Minus BaselineAverage of Weeks 26 and 52

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Individual Symptoms: Strains During DefecationWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Quantity of StoolsWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Relation of Abdominal Pain With DefecationWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Frequency of Pain (Times per Week)Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Percentage of Subjects with Fecal Incontinence at Specified Time pointsWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Percentage of Subjects With Urgency for DefecationWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Frequency of Urgency for Defecation (Times per Week)Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Percentage of Subjects With Urine Incontinence (UI) During Day and NightWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Frequency of Urine Incontinence During Day and Night (Times per Week)Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Percentage of Subjects With Good, Moderate or Bad AppetiteWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Average Score for Diary Reported DiarrhoeaWeek 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Average Score for Diary Reported FlatulenceWeek 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Average Score for Diary Reported NauseaWeek 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Fecal Incontinence (Times per Week) and Fecal Incontinence (Times per Week) at NightWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Percentage of Subjects With Abdominal PainWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Frequency of Abdominal Pain (Times per Week)Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Percentage of Subjects With Pain During DefecationWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Percentage of Treatment SuccessWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Defecation FrequencyWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52
Individual Symptoms: Consistency of the FecesWeek 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 26, 52

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026