Skip to content

Comparison of Partial Removal and Total Removal of the Corneal Epithelium on Keratoconus

Study of Surgical Methods for Keratoconus

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01809977
Enrollment
22
Registered
2013-03-13
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2012-12-31
Last updated
2013-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Keratoconus

Keywords

Keratoconus, remove, cornea, visual acuity

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine which surgical method makes less corneal haze

Detailed description

Keratoconus is an asymmetric, bilateral, progressive non-inflammatory ectasia of the cornea. The investigators evaluate whether partial removal versus total removal of the corneal epithelium can lead to less corneal haze and better visual outcomes.

Interventions

PROCEDUREcollagen cross-linking procedure (total removal)

patients underwent Corneal collagen cross-linking procedure with totally corneal epithelium removing. Total removal was performed by mechanical debridement of the corneal epithelium over the central 9 mm.

PROCEDUREcollagen cross-linking procedure (partial removal)

patients underwent Corneal collagen cross-linking procedure with partially corneal epithelium removing. Partial removal was performed by removing a 3-mm width ring and leaving the central 3 mm of the cornea intact.

Sponsors

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 16-40 years * axial topography consistent with keratoconus * minimum corneal thickness more than 400 µm and a progression of keratoconus in past 12 months

Exclusion criteria

* history of ocular herpes or non-healing corneal ulcers * subjects with current ocular infection * severe preoperative corneal haze or scar * severe ocular surface disease * autoimmune diseases * pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Best corrected visual acuityat six months after surgerydetermining corrected visual acuity in partial removal versus total removal of the corneal epithelium

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Corneal optical densityat six months after surgeryCorneal optical density was assessed by Scheimpflug densitometry

Countries

Iran

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026