Skip to content

An Observational Study of Epoetin Beta (NeoRecormon) in Participants With Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy

Non-Interventional Study to Evaluate Treatment of Symptomatic Anemia in Patients With Malignancies Receiving Chemo- and NeoRecormon-Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01809314
Enrollment
1167
Registered
2013-03-12
Start date
2008-03-31
Completion date
2009-10-31
Last updated
2016-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia

Brief summary

This observational study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of epoetin beta (NeoRecormon) in participants with symptomatic anemia and cancer receiving chemotherapy. Participants receiving NeoRecormon once weekly in accordance with the Summary of Product Characteristics will be followed for 4 months.

Interventions

DRUGEpoetin beta

Treatment will be given according to standard of care and the Summary of Product Characteristics during the study.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults greater than or equal to (≥) 18 years of age * Participants with solid tumors or lymphoproliferative disease * Participants receiving chemotherapy * Participants for whom erythropoietin is indicated for pre-study Hb level and observed anemic symptoms: Hb less than (\<) 11 g/dL or 6.83 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) * ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2

Exclusion criteria

* Resistant hypertension * Acute chronic bleeding within 3 months prior to study * Iron deficiency that is unmanageable prior to study * Hypersensitivity to the active substance or any of the excipients of the product * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Epoetin treatment within 6 months prior to study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) Level From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT)Baseline, Month 4The change in Hb level from Baseline to the EOT visit at Month 4 was averaged among all participants and expressed in grams per liter (g/L).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTBaseline, Month 4ECOG performance status was determined at Baseline and at the EOT visit at Month 4. The assessment used a 3-point scale, including scores of 0 (fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction), 1 (restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work), or 2 (ambulatory for more than 50% of waking hours and capable of all self care but unable to carry out any work activities). The traditional 6-point scale was not valid because only participants with a performance status of 0, 1, or 2 were eligible for the study. The percentage of participants by change in ECOG performance status was reported. For example, the percentage of participants with ECOG performance status of 0 at Baseline and 2 at EOT is shown in the table as Baseline 0, EOT 2. Transition to a lower performance status indicates improved/increased independence.
Percentage of Participants Who Required Blood Transfusions During the StudyBaseline to Month 1, Month 1 to 2, Month 2 to 3, Month 3 to 4The percentage of participants who required blood transfusions was reported at each assessment visit and was based on the 1-month period preceding the respective visit.

Countries

Hungary

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
NeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia
Participants with symptomatic anemia who received epoetin beta (NeoRecormon) according to standard of care and the Summary of Product Characteristics were observed for 4 months. Treatment was selected at the discretion of the prescriber prior to enrollment and not chosen by the Sponsor in this non-interventional study.
1,167
Total1,167

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event6
Overall StudyInsufficient Therapeutic Response14
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up724
Overall StudyWithdrawal Prior to Treatment1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNeoRecormon in Symptomatic Anemia
Age, Continuous60.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
709 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
398 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unknown
60 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 1,167
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 1,167

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Hemoglobin (Hb) Level From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT)

The change in Hb level from Baseline to the EOT visit at Month 4 was averaged among all participants and expressed in grams per liter (g/L).

Time frame: Baseline, Month 4

Population: All Participants Enrolled; only those who provided data at all study visits were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
NeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaChange in Hemoglobin (Hb) Level From Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT)14.58 g/L
Comparison: The difference between Baseline and Month 4 was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOT

ECOG performance status was determined at Baseline and at the EOT visit at Month 4. The assessment used a 3-point scale, including scores of 0 (fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction), 1 (restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work), or 2 (ambulatory for more than 50% of waking hours and capable of all self care but unable to carry out any work activities). The traditional 6-point scale was not valid because only participants with a performance status of 0, 1, or 2 were eligible for the study. The percentage of participants by change in ECOG performance status was reported. For example, the percentage of participants with ECOG performance status of 0 at Baseline and 2 at EOT is shown in the table as Baseline 0, EOT 2. Transition to a lower performance status indicates improved/increased independence.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 4

Population: All Participants Enrolled; only those who provided data at all study visits were included in the analysis. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the total combined number of participants who provided data for the endpoint. The number of participants used in the denominator for each calculation (n) was based on the ECOG status at Baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaPercentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTBaseline 0, EOT 0 (n=71)77.5 percentage of participants
NeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaPercentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTBaseline 0, EOT 1 (n=71)19.7 percentage of participants
NeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaPercentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTBaseline 0, EOT 2 (n=71)2.8 percentage of participants
NeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaPercentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTBaseline 1, EOT 1 (n=168)67.3 percentage of participants
NeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaPercentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTBaseline 1, EOT 2 (n=168)8.9 percentage of participants
NeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaPercentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTBaseline 2, EOT 1 (n=33)48.5 percentage of participants
NeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaPercentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTBaseline 2, EOT 2 (n=33)30.3 percentage of participants
NeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaPercentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTBaseline 1, EOT 0 (n=168)23.8 percentage of participants
NeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaPercentage of Participants by Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to EOTBaseline 2, EOT 0 (n=33)21.2 percentage of participants
Comparison: Overall (all categories combined) change from Baseline in ECOG performance status at Month 4 was analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test.p-value: 0.001Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Required Blood Transfusions During the Study

The percentage of participants who required blood transfusions was reported at each assessment visit and was based on the 1-month period preceding the respective visit.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 1, Month 1 to 2, Month 2 to 3, Month 3 to 4

Population: All Participants Enrolled. The Number of Participants Analyzed reflects the total combined number of participants who provided data for the endpoint. The number of participants who provided data for the analysis at each timepoint (n) is shown in the table.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaPercentage of Participants Who Required Blood Transfusions During the StudyBaseline to Month 1 (n=1073)4.1 percentage of participants
NeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaPercentage of Participants Who Required Blood Transfusions During the StudyMonth 1 to 2 (n=853)4.1 percentage of participants
NeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaPercentage of Participants Who Required Blood Transfusions During the StudyMonth 2 to 3 (n=650)3.8 percentage of participants
NeoRecormon in Symptomatic AnemiaPercentage of Participants Who Required Blood Transfusions During the StudyMonth 3 to 4 (n=281)3.9 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026