Skip to content

Cholesterol-lowering Effects of nutraceuticaLs Versus Ezetimibe in Statin-intolerant Patients

Randomized Comparison of the CHOlesterol-lowering Effects of nutraceuticaLs Versus Ezetimibe in Statin-intolerant patientS - The CHOLESS Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01807078
Acronym
CHOLESS
Enrollment
200
Registered
2013-03-08
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2013-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Coronary artery disease

Brief summary

Treatment with statins has a class I indication after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but is often discontinued by patients due to side effects. Pharmacologic alternatives shown to be useful after PCI include ezetimibe and nutraceuticals (i.e. compounds derived from foods with cholesterol lowering actions). It remains unknown, however, which of these two therapeutic approaches is more effective after PCI. The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of ezetimibe vs. a nutraceutical-based protocol in statin-intolerant patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

Detailed description

Background Treatment with statins has a class I indication after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but is often discontinued by patients due to side effects. Pharmacologic alternatives shown to be useful after PCI include ezetimibe and nutraceuticals (i.e. compounds derived from foods with cholesterol lowering actions). It remains unknown, however, which of these two therapeutic approaches is more effective after PCI. Purpose The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and tolerability of ezetimibe vs. a nutraceutical-based protocol in statin-intolerant patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. Study Population Patients with coronary artery disease in stable conditions treated with percutaneous coronary intervention who have withdrawn statin treatment due to side effects Randomization Patients will be randomized to receive for 6 months either ezetimibe (10 mg/day) or a commercially available nutraceutical combined pill (1 capsule/day containing monacolin K 10 mg, policosanol 10 mg, and phytosterols 300 mg).

Interventions

DRUGEzetimibe

10 mg p.d. of ezetimibe

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTNutraceuticals

1 capsule/day containing monacolin K 10 mg, policosanol 10 mg, and phytosterols 300 mg

Sponsors

University of Roma La Sapienza
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Angiographically-proven coronary artery disease * Recent (\<12 months) percutaneous coronary intervention * Class I indication to receive statin treatment * Previous (\<12 months) withdrawn of a statin due to side effects * Unwilling to receive treatment with an alternative statin * Able to understand and willing to sign the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

• Women of child bearing potential patients must demonstrate a negative pregnancy test performed within 24 hours before CT

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reasons for treatment discontinuation6 monthsReasons for treatment discontinuation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effects on lipid profile6 monthsEffects on cholesterol plasmatic levels

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026