Skip to content

Clinical Trial Nuedexta in Subjects With ALS

The Experimental Treatment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01806857
Enrollment
90
Registered
2013-03-07
Start date
2013-04-30
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2017-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Keywords

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, ALS, Nuedexta, Bulbar function, motor neurons

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Nuedexta is effective in the treatment of symptoms (impaired speech, swallowing, and saliva control)associated with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).

Detailed description

Muscle weakness, the cardinal feature of ALS, leads to progressive loss of motor function affecting the limbs, tongue, respiratory and pharyngeal muscles. Symptomatic treatments such as the placement of a feeding tube, can compensate for the inability to swallow. Riluzole, the only approved treatment for ALS, may slow disease progression but no treatment is curative and none have improved function. Unexpectedly, Nuedexta®, approved for the treatment of labile emotionality that occurs in association with ALS and other neurological disorders, has been observed to improve bulbar function, primarily speech and swallowing, in a number of neurological disorders, including ALS. The basis for this is conjectural but likely due to a direct effect of the drug on motor neurons in the part of the brain that controls speech and swallowing. The same part of the brain appears to modulate the expression of emotions and interestingly the site of action of the drug is the same as a site that has been implicated in a juvenile form of ALS. This is a multicenter, randomized double-blind, placebo controlled, cross over study evaluating the palliative effect of Nuedexta® on bulbar dysfunction. It is expected that approximately 60 ALS patients from 7 clinical centers in the US will be enrolled.

Interventions

Nuedexta PO (by mouth) for 28 ± 3 days

DRUGMatching Placebo

matching placebo PO (by mouth) for 28 ± 3 days

Sponsors

ALS Association
CollaboratorOTHER
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Center for Neurologic Study, La Jolla, California,
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ALS diagnosed as possible, laboratory-supported probable, probable, or definite as defined by revised El Escorial criteria * Age 18 years or older * Exhibits bulbar dysfunction manifested by dysarthria and/or dysphagia, according to PI judgment, exhibits a score of 55 or above on the CNS-Bulbar Function Scale * Capable of providing informed consent and following trial procedures * Geographic accessibility to the site * Women must not be able to become pregnant for the duration of the study and must be willing to be on two contraceptive therapies * Slow vital capacity (SVC) measure ≥50% of predicted for gender, height, and age at the screening visit * Must be able to swallow capsules throughout the course of the study, according to PI judgment * Subjects must not have taken riluzole for at least 30 days or be on a 50mg BID dose of riluzole for at least 30 days prior to randomization (subjects how have never taken riluzole are permitted in the study) * Subjects taking anti-sialorrhea medication(s) must be on a stable dose for at least 30 days prior to randomization (anti-sialorrhea naïve subjects are permitted in the study) * Must be able to safely swallow at least 30 milliliters (mLs) of water for the water swallowing test

Exclusion criteria

* Prior use of Nuedexta® * Current use of dextromethorphan, quinidine, quinine, mefloquine or opioids * History of quinidine, quinine, or mefloquine-induced thrombocytopenia, hepatitis, or other hypersensitivity reactions * History of known sensitivity or intolerability to dextromethorphan * Use of an mono amine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) or within 14 days of stopping an MAOI * Prolonged QT interval, congenital long QT syndrome, history suggestive of torsades de pointes, or heart failure * Complete atrioventricular (AV) block without implanted pacemaker, or subjects at high risk of complete AV block * Concomitant use with drugs that both prolong QT interval and are metabolized by cytochrome P 2D6 (CYP2D6) (i.e., thioridazine or pimozide) * Exposure to any other experimental agent (off-label use or investigational) within 30 days prior to Baseline Visit * Invasive ventilator dependence, such as tracheostomy * Any history of either substance abuse within the past year, unstable psychiatric disease, cognitive impairment, or dementia, according to PI judgment * Placement and/or usage of feeding tube * Pregnant women or women currently breastfeeding * Unable to turn diaphragm pacing device off during swallowing tests * Salivatory Botox within 90 days (3 months) of screening * Salivatory radiation within 180 days (6 months) of screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Total ScoreAverage between Screening Visit to Visit 3The Center for Neurologic Study-Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) is a 21-item self report scale that assesses three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation. Scores for each question range from 1 (does not apply) to 5 (applies most of the time). The higher the score, the worse the speech, swallowing and salivation (sialorrhea). \[Range of score: 21-105\] The scale was modeled on the Center for Neurologic Study Emotional Lability Scale (CNS-LS) that has been a robust endpoint in four clinical trials. The scale was validated in a large population of ALS patients (n=122) and detects impaired bulbar function at a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 0.97%. Test re-test correlation was 0.92% at six-months (n=53).
Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Sialorrhea ScoreAverage between Screening Visit to Visit 3The Center for Neurologic Study-Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) is a 21-item self report scale that assesses three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation. Scores for each question range from 1 (does not apply) to 5 (applies most of the time). The higher the score, the worse the salivation (sialorrhea). There are 7 salivation (sialorrhea) questions, with a score range of 7 to 35.
Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Speech ScoreAverage between Screening Visit to Visit 3The Center for Neurologic Study-Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) is a 21-item self report scale that assesses three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation. Scores for each question range from 1 (does not apply) to 5 (applies most of the time). The higher the score, the worse the speech. There are 7 speech questions, with a score range of 7 to 35.
Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Swallowing ScoreAverage between Screening Visit to Visit 3The Center for Neurologic Study-Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) is a 21-item self report scale that assesses three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation. Scores for each question range from 1 (does not apply) to 5 (applies most of the time). The higher the score, the worse the swallowing. There are 7 swallowing questions, with a score range of 7 to 35.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Timed Reading of Test Paragraph ResultAverage between Baseline Visit to Visit 3Subjects will be asked to read 'The Rainbow Passage' a commonly used test paragraph utilized by speech pathologists to assess speech rate (words/minute). Study staff will time the subject to determine how many words the subject reads per minute. It is used primarily because it contains every sound in the English language. Subjects will also be observed for loudness, nasality, and intelligibility.
Average Water Swallowing Test (WST)Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3The Water Swallowing Test (WST) estimates swallowing speed, a useful and reproducible measure. While sitting, subjects are asked to drink 30 milliliters (mL) of liquid. The time for subjects to complete this task is a sensitive measure for the detection of swallowing dysfunction and is a simple measure for serial assessment of subjects. The test will be completed three times, with the best two scores recorded to obtain an average score. Following completion of the WST, the subject's swallowing abilities (choking, spillage, and effort) will be observed.
Visual Analog Scale - Swallowing ScoreAverage between Baseline Visit to Visit 3Visual analog scales are useful for measuring complex clinical events and offer the advantage of self-administration and responsiveness to change over time. The scales designed for this study inventory three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation (sialorrhea). For each of these, subjects score themselves by indicating their level of function on a scale of 1 (severe impairment) to 10 (normal). Scores range from 1 to 10; the higher the score, the more normal the function.
Visual Analog Scale - Salivation (Sialorrhea) ScoreAverage between Baseline Visit to Visit 3Visual analog scales are useful for measuring complex clinical events and offer the advantage of self-administration and responsiveness to change over time. The scales designed for this study inventory three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation (sialorrhea). For each of these, subjects score themselves by indicating their level of function on a scale of 1 (severe impairment) to 10 (normal). Scores range from 1 to 10; the higher the score, the more normal the function.
Center for Neurologic Study - Lability Scale (CNS-LS) Total ScoreAverage between Screening Visit to Visit 3The Center for Neurologic Study-Lability Scale (CNS-LS) is a 7-item self report scale that assesses pseudobulbar affect (PBA) by measuring the perceived frequency of PBA episodes (laughing or crying). Each item is scored using a 5-point Likert scale, from 1 (applies never) to 5 (applies most of the time). Scores range from 5-35. The higher the score, the worse the PBA.
Ashworth Spasticity Scale Score - Left ArmAverage between Baseline Visit to Visit 3This is a standard measure for spasticity that has been used in numerous ALS clinical trials to assess spasticity due to upper motor neuron dysfunction in ALS. Data is generated from the clinical exam and scored from 1-5, the lowest score indicating normal tone and the highest muscle rigidity.
Ashworth Spasticity Scale Score - Right LegAverage between Baseline Visit to Visit 3This is a standard measure for spasticity that has been used in numerous ALS clinical trials to assess spasticity due to upper motor neuron dysfunction in ALS. Data is generated from the clinical exam and scored from 1-5, the lowest score indicating normal tone and the highest muscle rigidity.
Ashworth Spasticity Scale Score - Left LegAverage between Baseline Visit to Visit 3This is a standard measure for spasticity that has been used in numerous ALS clinical trials to assess spasticity due to upper motor neuron dysfunction in ALS. Data is generated from the clinical exam and scored from 1-5, the lowest score indicating normal tone and the highest muscle rigidity.
Average Solids Swallowing TestAverage between Baseline Visit to Visit 3The Time Swallowing Test assesses the subject's ability to swallow solids. For this test, the subject will be asked to consume a tablespoon of cereal containing 5 cheerios. The subject will be instructed to close their mouth, chew and subsequently swallow the bolus. The time to complete this task will be recorded. The test will be completed three times to obtain an average score.
ALS Functional Rating Scale- Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total ScoreAverage between Screening Visit to Visit 3The ALSFRS-R is a quickly administered (5 min) ordinal rating scale used to determine a subject's assessment of their capability and independence in 12 functional activities. There are 12 questions, graded by the subject 0-4 (4 is normal). Score of 0 (worst) to 48 (best). Reflects speech and swallowing, fine motor skills, large motor skills, and breathing.
Visual Analog Scale - Speech ScoresAverage between Baseline Visit to Visit 3Visual analog scales are useful for measuring complex clinical events and offer the advantage of self-administration and responsiveness to change over time. The scales designed for this study inventory three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation (sialorrhea). For each of these, subjects score themselves by indicating their level of function on a scale of 1 (severe impairment) to 10 (normal). Scores range from 1 to 10; the higher the score, the more normal the function.
Ashworth Spasticity Scale Score - Right ArmAverage between Baseline Visit to Visit 3This is a standard measure for spasticity that has been used in numerous ALS clinical trials to assess spasticity due to upper motor neuron dysfunction in ALS. Data is generated from the clinical exam and scored from 1-5, the lowest score indicating normal tone and the highest muscle rigidity.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

90 subjects were consented for this trial, however, of the 90 that consented, 30 subjects were found to not meet eligibility criteria, and therefore were not treated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants60
Total60

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Continuous58 years
Baseline ALSFRS-R Total Score34.58 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.95
Baseline CNS-BFS Total Score58.15 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.37
Baseline CNS Lability Scale Total Score13.67 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.55
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian/White
57 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
0 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
60 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
21 / 584 / 57
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 580 / 57

Outcome results

Primary

Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Sialorrhea Score

The Center for Neurologic Study-Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) is a 21-item self report scale that assesses three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation. Scores for each question range from 1 (does not apply) to 5 (applies most of the time). The higher the score, the worse the salivation (sialorrhea). There are 7 salivation (sialorrhea) questions, with a score range of 7 to 35.

Time frame: Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3

Population: Includes all participants that received at least one dose of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active Drug (Neudexta)Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Sialorrhea Score14.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Matching PlaceboBulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Sialorrhea Score15.81 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Primary

Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Speech Score

The Center for Neurologic Study-Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) is a 21-item self report scale that assesses three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation. Scores for each question range from 1 (does not apply) to 5 (applies most of the time). The higher the score, the worse the speech. There are 7 speech questions, with a score range of 7 to 35.

Time frame: Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3

Population: Includes all participants that received at least one dose of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active Drug (Neudexta)Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Speech Score22.22 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.56
Matching PlaceboBulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Speech Score24.57 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
Primary

Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Swallowing Score

The Center for Neurologic Study-Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) is a 21-item self report scale that assesses three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation. Scores for each question range from 1 (does not apply) to 5 (applies most of the time). The higher the score, the worse the swallowing. There are 7 swallowing questions, with a score range of 7 to 35.

Time frame: Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3

Population: Includes all participants that received at least one dose of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active Drug (Neudexta)Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Swallowing Score17.14 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.46
Matching PlaceboBulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Swallowing Score18.92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
Primary

Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Total Score

The Center for Neurologic Study-Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) is a 21-item self report scale that assesses three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation. Scores for each question range from 1 (does not apply) to 5 (applies most of the time). The higher the score, the worse the speech, swallowing and salivation (sialorrhea). \[Range of score: 21-105\] The scale was modeled on the Center for Neurologic Study Emotional Lability Scale (CNS-LS) that has been a robust endpoint in four clinical trials. The scale was validated in a large population of ALS patients (n=122) and detects impaired bulbar function at a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 0.97%. Test re-test correlation was 0.92% at six-months (n=53).

Time frame: Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3

Population: Includes all participants that received at least one dose of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active Drug (Neudexta)Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Total Score53.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.07
Matching PlaceboBulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) Total Score59.31 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
p-value: 0.0003Random Effects Model
Secondary

ALS Functional Rating Scale- Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score

The ALSFRS-R is a quickly administered (5 min) ordinal rating scale used to determine a subject's assessment of their capability and independence in 12 functional activities. There are 12 questions, graded by the subject 0-4 (4 is normal). Score of 0 (worst) to 48 (best). Reflects speech and swallowing, fine motor skills, large motor skills, and breathing.

Time frame: Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3

Population: Includes all participants that received at least one dose of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active Drug (Neudexta)ALS Functional Rating Scale- Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score34.15 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Matching PlaceboALS Functional Rating Scale- Revised (ALSFRS-R) Total Score33.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Secondary

Ashworth Spasticity Scale Score - Left Arm

This is a standard measure for spasticity that has been used in numerous ALS clinical trials to assess spasticity due to upper motor neuron dysfunction in ALS. Data is generated from the clinical exam and scored from 1-5, the lowest score indicating normal tone and the highest muscle rigidity.

Time frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3

Population: Includes all participants that received at least one dose of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active Drug (Neudexta)Ashworth Spasticity Scale Score - Left Arm1.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.06
Matching PlaceboAshworth Spasticity Scale Score - Left Arm1.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.07
Secondary

Ashworth Spasticity Scale Score - Left Leg

This is a standard measure for spasticity that has been used in numerous ALS clinical trials to assess spasticity due to upper motor neuron dysfunction in ALS. Data is generated from the clinical exam and scored from 1-5, the lowest score indicating normal tone and the highest muscle rigidity.

Time frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3

Population: Includes all participants that received at least one dose of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active Drug (Neudexta)Ashworth Spasticity Scale Score - Left Leg1.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
Matching PlaceboAshworth Spasticity Scale Score - Left Leg1.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
Secondary

Ashworth Spasticity Scale Score - Right Arm

This is a standard measure for spasticity that has been used in numerous ALS clinical trials to assess spasticity due to upper motor neuron dysfunction in ALS. Data is generated from the clinical exam and scored from 1-5, the lowest score indicating normal tone and the highest muscle rigidity.

Time frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3

Population: Includes all participants that received at least one dose of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active Drug (Neudexta)Ashworth Spasticity Scale Score - Right Arm1.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.06
Matching PlaceboAshworth Spasticity Scale Score - Right Arm1.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.06
Secondary

Ashworth Spasticity Scale Score - Right Leg

This is a standard measure for spasticity that has been used in numerous ALS clinical trials to assess spasticity due to upper motor neuron dysfunction in ALS. Data is generated from the clinical exam and scored from 1-5, the lowest score indicating normal tone and the highest muscle rigidity.

Time frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3

Population: Includes all participants that received at least one dose of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active Drug (Neudexta)Ashworth Spasticity Scale Score - Right Leg1.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1
Matching PlaceboAshworth Spasticity Scale Score - Right Leg1.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.1
Secondary

Average Solids Swallowing Test

The Time Swallowing Test assesses the subject's ability to swallow solids. For this test, the subject will be asked to consume a tablespoon of cereal containing 5 cheerios. The subject will be instructed to close their mouth, chew and subsequently swallow the bolus. The time to complete this task will be recorded. The test will be completed three times to obtain an average score.

Time frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3

Population: Includes all participants that received at least one dose of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active Drug (Neudexta)Average Solids Swallowing Test18.53 secondsStandard Error 1.16
Matching PlaceboAverage Solids Swallowing Test19.45 secondsStandard Error 1.19
Secondary

Average Water Swallowing Test (WST)

The Water Swallowing Test (WST) estimates swallowing speed, a useful and reproducible measure. While sitting, subjects are asked to drink 30 milliliters (mL) of liquid. The time for subjects to complete this task is a sensitive measure for the detection of swallowing dysfunction and is a simple measure for serial assessment of subjects. The test will be completed three times, with the best two scores recorded to obtain an average score. Following completion of the WST, the subject's swallowing abilities (choking, spillage, and effort) will be observed.

Time frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3

Population: Includes all participants that received at least one dose of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active Drug (Neudexta)Average Water Swallowing Test (WST)12.16 secondsStandard Error 0.71
Matching PlaceboAverage Water Swallowing Test (WST)13.11 secondsStandard Error 0.72
Secondary

Center for Neurologic Study - Lability Scale (CNS-LS) Total Score

The Center for Neurologic Study-Lability Scale (CNS-LS) is a 7-item self report scale that assesses pseudobulbar affect (PBA) by measuring the perceived frequency of PBA episodes (laughing or crying). Each item is scored using a 5-point Likert scale, from 1 (applies never) to 5 (applies most of the time). Scores range from 5-35. The higher the score, the worse the PBA.

Time frame: Average between Screening Visit to Visit 3

Population: Includes all participants that received at least one dose of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active Drug (Neudexta)Center for Neurologic Study - Lability Scale (CNS-LS) Total Score10.79 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
Matching PlaceboCenter for Neurologic Study - Lability Scale (CNS-LS) Total Score13.72 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.49
p-value: 0.0001Random Effects Model
Secondary

Timed Reading of Test Paragraph Result

Subjects will be asked to read 'The Rainbow Passage' a commonly used test paragraph utilized by speech pathologists to assess speech rate (words/minute). Study staff will time the subject to determine how many words the subject reads per minute. It is used primarily because it contains every sound in the English language. Subjects will also be observed for loudness, nasality, and intelligibility.

Time frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3

Population: Includes all participants that received at least one dose of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active Drug (Neudexta)Timed Reading of Test Paragraph Result107.12 words per minuteStandard Error 1.79
Matching PlaceboTimed Reading of Test Paragraph Result103.37 words per minuteStandard Error 1.83
Secondary

Visual Analog Scale - Salivation (Sialorrhea) Score

Visual analog scales are useful for measuring complex clinical events and offer the advantage of self-administration and responsiveness to change over time. The scales designed for this study inventory three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation (sialorrhea). For each of these, subjects score themselves by indicating their level of function on a scale of 1 (severe impairment) to 10 (normal). Scores range from 1 to 10; the higher the score, the more normal the function.

Time frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3

Population: Includes all participants that received at least one dose of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active Drug (Neudexta)Visual Analog Scale - Salivation (Sialorrhea) Score6.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Matching PlaceboVisual Analog Scale - Salivation (Sialorrhea) Score6.78 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Secondary

Visual Analog Scale - Speech Scores

Visual analog scales are useful for measuring complex clinical events and offer the advantage of self-administration and responsiveness to change over time. The scales designed for this study inventory three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation (sialorrhea). For each of these, subjects score themselves by indicating their level of function on a scale of 1 (severe impairment) to 10 (normal). Scores range from 1 to 10; the higher the score, the more normal the function.

Time frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3

Population: Includes all participants that received at least one dose of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active Drug (Neudexta)Visual Analog Scale - Speech Scores4.97 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Matching PlaceboVisual Analog Scale - Speech Scores4.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.21
Secondary

Visual Analog Scale - Swallowing Score

Visual analog scales are useful for measuring complex clinical events and offer the advantage of self-administration and responsiveness to change over time. The scales designed for this study inventory three domains of bulbar function: speech, swallowing and salivation (sialorrhea). For each of these, subjects score themselves by indicating their level of function on a scale of 1 (severe impairment) to 10 (normal). Scores range from 1 to 10; the higher the score, the more normal the function.

Time frame: Average between Baseline Visit to Visit 3

Population: Includes all participants that received at least one dose of intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Active Drug (Neudexta)Visual Analog Scale - Swallowing Score7.23 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Matching PlaceboVisual Analog Scale - Swallowing Score6.93 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.3

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026