Skip to content

Lotta Alla Sepsi Ospedaliera - Fighting Hospital Sepsis

Educational and Organizational Intervention's Effect on Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Out of Intensive Care Units: Medical Wards and Emergency Departments

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01804764
Enrollment
1123
Registered
2013-03-05
Start date
2011-05-31
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2023-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe Sepsis

Keywords

Severe Sepsis, Septic Shock, Sepsis Six bundle

Brief summary

Sepsis is widespread (1.8 million cases annually worldwide) and accounts for a very high mortality: 20-25% of all severe sepsis, 40-70% of all septic shock. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) recommends a first 6 hours resuscitative bundle to improve patient's outcome. Despite this, the bundle is poorly performed, because of a superficial knowledge of the guidelines and several difficulties in their clinical implementation. In recognition of this, a sepsis six bundle is designed to facilitate early intervention with just three diagnostic and three therapeutic steps to be delivered by staff within 1 h. The aim of our study is to evaluate if an Educational and Organizational Intervention (EOI) could improve septic patient's outcome in no Critical Care Units. The second endpoint is to evaluate if the compliance to the sepsis six bundle could improve after this sort of intervention.

Detailed description

Methods 39 Medical Wards and 12 Emergency Departments, belonging to 12 hospitals, were voluntarily enrolled. Through the collaboration of 12 Multidisciplinary Teams (MT), we took a Pre-EOI picture of the human resources (i.e. doctors to patients ratio) and of the organisational structures (i.e. laboratory's opening hours) of each hospital. For six months, each unit enrolled was asked to fill in a Clinical Checklist for every patient suspected for severe sepsis or septic shock; so that the Pre-EOI sepsis six bundle compliance could be evaluated. Then, we planned several pre-agreed educational meetings for all of the doctors and nurses belonging to the enrolled wards. In the meanwhile the MT worked to overcome any impediment to a better septic patient management. Finally, the educated medical staff was asked to fill in again the same Clinical Checklist used in the Pre-EOI phase; so that the Post-EOI sepsis six bundle compliance could be evaluated and a comparison with the Pre-EOI phase could be done. Hypothesis This is the first study aimed to analyze the impact of an Educational and Organizational Intervention in the outcome of septic patients managed in no Critical Care Units. We guess that the differences showed in human resources and organizational structures among the hospitals could have a role in the sepsis six bundle compliance and in the patient's outcome, but only a comparison with data collected from the clinical checklist and patient's outcome will confirm our guess. Likewise, we believe that an educational intervention could improve the septic patient's management, but we need the Post-EOI phase conclusion to demonstrate or not our hypothesis.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Milano Bicocca
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any patient having a SIRS due to Sepsis and at least on of the following criteria: Systolic Blood Pressure \< 90 mmHg and/or serum lactate \> 4 mg/dl and/or organ failure

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
An improvement in Sepsis Six Bundle implementation for Severe Sepsis and Septic Shockwithin 12 months after an Educational and Organizational Intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
All cause Mortality1 month afte diagnosis of Severe Sepsis / Septic Shock

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026