Skip to content

Effect of Botox and Vibration on Bone in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Effect of Botox and Vibration on Bone in Children With Cerebral Palsy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01803464
Enrollment
29
Registered
2013-03-04
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2018-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy, Muscle Spasticity

Keywords

Botox, Muscle strength

Brief summary

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a neuromuscular disorder that affects approximately 800,000 individuals in the U.S. An estimated 70-80% of these individuals have spasticity which affects ambulation and requires management. Therefore, the treatment of spasticity is a primary goal of interventions for children with CP. One treatment widely used to reduce spasticity is Botox because of its ability to temporarily paralyze a muscle. However, no studies have determined the effect of Botox treatment on bone in humans. Also, a low magnitude vibration treatment has been shown to improve bone structure in the lower extremity bones of children with CP. The aims of this study are: 1) to determine the effect of Botox treatment in conjunction with a daily vibration treatment on bone mass and bone structure in children with spastic CP, and 2) to identify the mechanism that underlies the effect of Botox and vibration on bone.

Detailed description

The investigators have been working with children diagnosed with cerebral palsy (CP) for the past 10 years. The investigators have found that bone structure is markedly underdeveloped and bone strength is severely compromised in children with CP. Also, an increased fracture rate has been observed in the lower extremity bones of children with CP. There is evidence that Botox, which is used to treat spasticity in CP, can improve motor function; however the effect of Botox on human bone is unknown. There is also evidence that low magnitude vibration treatment can improve bone mass and bone structure. The overall goal of this current research study is to investigate the effect and mechanism of action of Botox and vibration on bone in children with CP. The investigators will also examine the effect of Botox on muscle volume. A total of 36 participants will participate in this study. The investigators will assess bone structure and muscle volume using MRI. The investigators will assess bone mass using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Interventions

DEVICELow-magnitude vibration

Children will receive a daily low-magnitude vibration treatment.

DRUGBotox

Children who are candidates to receive Botox as part of their standard of care.

Sponsors

Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children
CollaboratorOTHER
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Delaware
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
2 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion (Children with CP): 1. Have spastic CP 2. Between 2-12 years of age 3. Recommended for Botox treatment by their physician as part of their clinical care. Those who accept Botox treatment and those who do not accept Botox treatment are both eligible for the study. 4. A score of 1-4 on the gross motor function classification scale (GMFCS) Exclusion (Children with CP): 1. Botox treatment in the lower extremities within the last year 2. Metal rods in both legs Inclusion (Typically developing children): 1. Between 2 and 12 years of age. 2. Match a child with CP for sex, age and race. Exclusion(Typically developing children): 1. Neurological disorder 2. Surgery in the lower extremities within the last year. 3. Chronic medication use

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bone Structurebaseline to 6 monthsChange in cortical bone volume of the middle third of the tibia from baseline to 6 months, as measured by MRI.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Muscle Volumebaseline to 6 monthsChange in muscle volume of the midleg from baseline to 6 months, as measured by MRI
Bone Massbaseline to 6 monthsChange in bone mineral content in the distal femur from baseline to 6 months, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

62 children with spastic cerebral palsy eligible for botulinum toxin treatment and typically developing children were screened. 5 children did not meet the study criteria and 57 children were invited to participate in the study, of which 29 participated in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Botox Plus Low-magnitude Vibration
Children with cerebral palsy who are recommended for and scheduled to receive Botox treatment will randomized to also receive vibration treatment. Children will be asked to stand on a vibration plate 10 minutes per day for 6 months. Botox plus low-magnitude vibration: Half of the children who receive Botox treatment will be randomly assigned to receive a high-frequency, low magnitude vibration treatment. The other half of the children who receive Botox treatment and are randomly assigned to the Botox-only group will be offered the vibration treatment at the end of the study.
5
Botox
Children with cerebral palsy who are recommended for and scheduled to receive Botox treatment will randomized to serve as a Botox-only group. Botox: Children will not receive vibration treatment. Children in the Botox-only group will be offered vibration treatment at the end of the study.
4
Cerebral Palsy Control
Children with cerebral palsy who are recommended for but decline Botox treatment will serve as controls.
10
Typically Developing Control
Typically developing children without cerebral palsy will serve as controls.
10
Total29

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyIncomplete data0040
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBotox Plus Low-magnitude VibrationBotoxCerebral Palsy ControlTypically Developing ControlTotal
Age, Continuous7.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.85
8.50 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.65
7.61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.22
8.71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.68
8.13 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.16
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants4 participants10 participants10 participants29 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants3 Participants6 Participants7 Participants20 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 50 / 40 / 103 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 40 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Bone Structure

Change in cortical bone volume of the middle third of the tibia from baseline to 6 months, as measured by MRI.

Time frame: baseline to 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Botox Plus Low-magnitude VibrationBone Structure10.4 percent changeStandard Deviation 8.6
BotoxBone Structure7.6 percent changeStandard Deviation 10.2
Cerebral Palsy ControlBone Structure6.7 percent changeStandard Deviation 4.7
Typically Developing ControlBone Structure9.0 percent changeStandard Deviation 4.4
Secondary

Bone Mass

Change in bone mineral content in the distal femur from baseline to 6 months, as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

Time frame: baseline to 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Botox Plus Low-magnitude VibrationBone Mass8.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 4.3
BotoxBone Mass3.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 3.9
Cerebral Palsy ControlBone Mass4.2 percent changeStandard Deviation 2.5
Typically Developing ControlBone Mass3.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 3.9
Secondary

Muscle Volume

Change in muscle volume of the midleg from baseline to 6 months, as measured by MRI

Time frame: baseline to 6 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Botox Plus Low-magnitude VibrationMuscle Volume9.5 percent changeStandard Deviation 13.5
BotoxMuscle Volume10.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 14.2
Cerebral Palsy ControlMuscle Volume5.1 percent changeStandard Deviation 7.4
Typically Developing ControlMuscle Volume3.9 percent changeStandard Deviation 10.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026